World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 118–121 | Cite as

Preventing Parastomal Hernia with a Prosthetic Mesh: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study




Parastomal hernia is a major clinical problem. In a randomized, clinical trial, a prosthetic mesh in a sublay position at the index operation reduced the rate of parastomal hernia at 12-month follow-up, without any increase in the rate of complications. This study was designed to evaluate the rate of complications after 5 years.


Between January 2001 and April 2003, 54 patients who had a permanent ostomy were randomized to a conventional stoma or to a stoma with the addition of a mesh in a sublay position. A large-pore, lightweight mesh with a reduced polypropylene content and a high proportion of absorbable material was used.


After 5 years, 21 patients with a conventional stoma were alive and parastomal herniation was recorded in 17 patients, of whom repair had been demanded in 5. In 15 patients operated on with the addition of a mesh herniation, that did not require repair, was present in 2 (P < 0.001). No fistulas or strictures developed. No mesh infection was noted and no mesh was removed during the study period.


At stoma formation, a prophylactic low-weight mesh in a sublay position is a safe procedure that reduces the rate of parastomal hernia.


  1. 1.
    Pearl RK (1989) Parastomal hernias. World J Surg 13:569–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Birnbaum W, Ferrier P (1952) Complications of abdominal colostomy. Am J Surg 3:64–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burns FJ (1970) Complications of colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 13:448–450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abrams BL, Alsikafi FH, Waterman NG (1979) Colostomy: a new look at morbidity and mortality. Am Surg 45:462–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burgess P, Matthew VV, Devlin HB (1984) A review of terminal colostomy complications following abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. Br J Surg 71:1004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cevese PG, D’Amico DF, Biasiato R et al (1984) Peristomal hernia following end-colostomy: a conservative approach. Ital J Surg Sci 14:207–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cheung MT (1995) Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust N Z J Surg 65:808–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK (1994) Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 37:916–920PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P et al (1994) Does the frequency of paracolostomy hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int J Colorectal Dis 9:65–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP et al (1985) Early local complications from intestinal stomas. Arch Surg 120:1145–1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sjodahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T (1988) Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br J Surg 75:339–341PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baslev A (1973) Kolostomitilvaerelse. Ugeskr Laeger 135:2799–2804Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K (1999) Die versorgong der Parakolostomiehernie nach Sugarbaker. Zentralblatt für Chirurgi 124(Suppl 2):13–17Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Makela JT, Turko PH, Laitenen ST (1997) Analysis of late stomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann Chir Gynaecol 86:305–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Everingham L (1998) The parastomal hernia dilemma. World Counc Enterostomal Ther J 18:32–34Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tretbar L (1988) Kirurgi vid stomikomplikationer. Stomijournalen: nordisk tidskrift för stomi vård 2:10–11Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA (2003) Parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 90:784–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Israelsson LA (2008) Parastomal hernias. Surg Clin North Am 88:113–125PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williams JG, Etherington R, Hayward MW, Hughes LE (1990) Paraileostomy hernia: a clinical and radiological study. Br J Surg 77:1355–1357PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kronborg O, Kramhohft J, Backer O, Sprechler M (1974) Late complications following operations for cancer of the rectum and anus. Dis Colon Rectum 17:750–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Martin L, Foster G (1996) Parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 78:81–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB (1994) Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch Surg 129:413–419PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V (2000) The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am J Surg 179:186–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stephenson BM, Phillips RK (1995) Parastomal hernia: local resiting and mesh repair. Br J Surg 82:1395–1396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amin SN, Armitage NC, Abercrombie JF, Scholefield JH (2001) Lateral repair of parastomal hernia. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 83:206–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch Surg 139:1356–1358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Janes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (2004) Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg 91:280–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Berger (2007) Prevention of parastomal hernias by prophylactic use of a specially designed intraperitoneal only mesh. Hernia 12:243–246Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gögenur IM, Janni HT, Rosenberg J, Fischer A (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia by placement of a polypropylene mesh at the primary operation. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1131–1135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Marimuthu K, Vijayasekar C, Ghosh D, Mathew G (2006) Prevention of parastomal hernia using preperitoneal mesh: a prospective observational study. Colorectal Dis 8:672–675PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA (1998) Incisional hernias in midline incisions: an eight-year follow-up. Hernia 2:175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur Jänes
    • 1
  • Yucel Cengiz
    • 1
  • Leif A. Israelsson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKirurgkliniken, Sundsvalls sjukhusSundsvallSweden
  2. 2.Department of Surgery and Perioperative ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Personalised recommendations