World Journal of Surgery

, 32:2724

Treatment of the Open Abdomen with the Commercially Available Vacuum-Assisted Closure System in Patients with Abdominal Sepsis

Low Primary Closure Rate
  • D. Wondberg
  • H. J. Larusson
  • U. Metzger
  • A. Platz
  • U. Zingg
Article

Abstract

Background

Abdominal Vacuum-Assisted Closure (V.A.C.) systems for treatment of open abdomens have been predominantly used for trauma patients with a high primary fascial closure rate. Use of the V.A.C. technique in abdominal sepsis is less well established.

Methods

All patients with abdominal sepsis and treatment with the abdominal V.A.C. system between 2004 and 2007 were prospectively assessed. End points were fascial closure, V.A.C.-related morbidity, and quality of life score (SF-36) at follow-up.

Results

Thirty patients with abdominal sepsis were included in the study. Primary fascial closure was feasible in 10, partial closure in 4, and no closure in 16 patients. Median number of V.A.C. changes was 3 (range, 1–10). Nine patients died. V.A.C.-related morbidity was as follows: two fistulas, three fascial edge necroses, one skin blister, and four prolapses of small bowel between the fascia and foam. Univariate analysis showed no variables influencing primary closure rate or V.A.C.-related morbidity. Mortality was significantly influenced by age (P < 0.001), respiratory failure (P = 0.01), and pneumonia (P = 0.03). At follow-up, V.A.C. patients scored lower in the physical health scores and similar in the mental health scores compared with the normal population.

Conclusions

Treatment of the open abdomen in patients with abdominal sepsis with the abdominal V.A.C. system is safe with good long-term quality of life. Primary closure rate in these patients is substantially lower than in trauma patients. Stepwise closure of the fascia during V.A.C. changes should be attempted to avoid additional lateral retraction of fascial edges. V.A.C.-related complications may be avoided with careful surgical technique.

References

  1. 1.
    Tsuei BJ, Skinner JC, Bernard AC et al (2004) The open peritoneal cavity: etiology correlates with the likelihood of fascial closure. Am Surg 70:652–656PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oetting P, Rau B, Schlag PM (2006) Abdominal vacuum device with open abdomen. Chirurg 77:586–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Adkins AL, Robbins J, Villalba M et al (2004) Open management of intra-abdominal sepsis. Am Surg 70:137–140PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miller PR, Thompson JT, Faler BJ et al (2002) Late fascial closure in lieu of ventral hernia: the next step in open abdomen management. J Trauma 53:843–849PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernandez L, Norwood S, Roettger R et al (1996) Temporary intravenous bag silo closure in severe abdominal trauma. J Trauma 40:258–260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cothren CC, Moore EE, Johnson JL et al (2006) One hundred percent fascial approximation with sequential abdominal closure of the open abdomen. Am J Surg 192:238–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Navsaria PH, Bunting M, Omoshoro-Jones J et al (2003) Temporary closure of abdominal wounds by the modified sandwich-vacuum pack technique. Br J Surg 90:718–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nagy KK, Fildes JJ, Mahr C et al (1996) Experience with three prosthetic materials in temporary abdominal wall closure. Am Surg 62:331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stone PA, Hass SM, Flaherty SK et al (2004) Vacuum-assisted fascial closure for patients with abdominal trauma. J Trauma 57:1082–1086PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barker DE, Kaufman HJ, Smith LA et al (2000) Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a 7-year experience with 112 patients. J Trauma 48:201–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Labler L, Zwingmann J, Mayer D et al (2005) V.A.C. abdominal dressing system. Eur J Trauma 5:488–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miller PR, Meredith JW, Johnson JC et al (2004) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted fascial closure after open abdomen. Ann Surg 239:608–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cipolla J, Stawicki SP, Hoff WS et al (2005) A proposed algorithm for managing the open abdomen. Am Surg 71:202–207PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rao M, Burke D, Finan PJ et al (2007) The use of vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds: a word of caution. Colorectal Dis 9:266–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Perez D, Wildi S, Demartines N et al (2007) Prospective evaluation of vacuum-assisted closure in abdominal compartment syndrome and severe abdominal sepsis. J Am Coll Surg 205:586–592PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Smith LA, Barker DE, Chase CW et al (1997) Vacuum pack technique of temporary abdominal closure: a four-year experience. Am Surg 63:1102–1108PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Olejnik J, Sedlak I, Brychta I et al (2007) Vacuum supported laparostomy: an effective treatment of intra-abdominal infection. Bratisl Lek Listy 108:320–323PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Calandra T, Cohne J (2005) The international sepsis forum consensus conference on definitions of infection in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 33:1538–1548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ivancevic N, Radenkovic D, Bumbasirevic V et al (2008) Procalcitonin in preoperative diagnosis of abdominal sepsis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:3397–3403 Epub 2007 Oct 30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Maier S, Traeger T, Westerholt A et al (2005) Special aspects of abdominal sepsis. Chirurg 76:829–836PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wacha H, Linder MM, Feldmann U et al (1987) Mannheim peritonitis index–prediction of risk of death from peritonitis: construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theo Surg 1:169–177Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Linder MM, Wacha H, Feldmann U et al (1987) The Mannheim peritonitis index. An instrument for the intraoperative prognosis of peritonitis. Chirurg 58:84–92Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bullinger M (1995) German translation and psychometric testing of the SF-36 health survey: preliminary results from the IQOLA project. Soc Sci Med 41:1359–1366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barker DE, Green JM, Maxwell RA et al (2007) Experience with vacuum-pack temporary abdominal wound closure in 258 trauma patients and general and vascular surgical patients. J A. Coll Surg 204:784–793CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Suliburk JW, Ware DN, Balogh Z et al (2003) Vacuum-assisted wound closure achieves early fascial closure of open abdomens after severe trauma. J Trauma 55:1155–1160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Petersson U, Acosta S, Bjoerck M (2007) Vacuum-assisted wound closure and mesh-mediated fascial traction – a novel technique for late closure of the open abdomen. World J Surg 31:2133–2137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stonerock CE, Bynoe RP, Yost MJ et al (2003) Use of a vacuum-assisted device to facilitate abdominal closure. Am Surg 69:1030–1034PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Starr-Marshall K (2007) Vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds and entero-cutaneous fistulae: the St Marks experience. Colorectal Dis 9:573PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. Wondberg
    • 1
  • H. J. Larusson
    • 2
  • U. Metzger
    • 1
  • A. Platz
    • 1
  • U. Zingg
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryTriemli Hospital ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryUniversity Hospital BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations