World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 12, pp 2707–2715 | Cite as

Superselective Embolization for Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage: An Institutional Review Over 7 Years

  • Ker-Kan TanEmail author
  • Daniel Wong
  • Richard Sim



Superselective embolization of visceral arterial branches has become integral in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) hemorrhage. The present study aimed to evaluate the success of superselective embolization as a primary therapeutic modality in the control of lower GI hemorrhage and to identify factors associated with rebleeding and surgical intervention after the procedure.


We performed a retrospective review of all cases of superselective embolization for acute lower GI bleeding during a 7-year period (December 2000–October 2007) in a single 1,300-bed hospital in Singapore. Hemostasis was achieved with microcoils, polyvinyl alcohol particles, gelfoam, or by selective vasopressin infusion. Various clinical and hematologic factors were analyzed against rebleeding and surgical intervention after the procedure.


A total of 265 patients underwent mesenteric angiography for GI hemorrhage. Superselective embolization of visceral vessels for lower GI hemorrhage was performed in 32 patients (12%) whose median age was 66 years (range: 34–82 years). The group was of similar gender distribution, and the median follow-up was 8 months (range: 1–32 months). Location was the small bowel in 19% and the colon in 81%. The underlying etiologies included diverticular disease (59%), angiodysplasia (19%), ulcers (19%), and malignancy (3%). In 31 patients (97%) technical success was achieved, with immediate cessation of hemorrhage in every case. Clinical success was achieved in 20 patients (63%), all of whom were discharged well with no further intervention. Seven patients rebled, and 9 underwent surgery: 1 for incomplete hemostasis, 4 for rebleeding, 1 for infarcted bowel postembolization, and 3 on the basis of the surgeon’s decision. There were 2 anastomotic leaks; 1 after surgery for postembolization ischemia and 1 after surgery for rebleeding. Overall mortality in this series was 9%. Rebleeding was more likely to occur if the site of bleeding was located in the small bowel compared to the colon (OR: 8.33, 95% CI 1.03–66.67). It was also more likely in patients with a hematocrit level ≤20.0% (OR: 7.52, 95% CI: 1.14–50.00) and a platelets level ≤140 × 109/l (OR: 9.35, 95% CI: 1.36–62.5) just before the procedure. Surgical resection was also more likely in patients with a hematocrit level ≤20.0% just before embolization (OR: 12.66, 95% CI: 1.96–83.33), and it appeared to be more likely if the underlying cause was diverticular disease (OR 8.70, 95% CI: 0.93–83.33).


The use of superselective mesenteric embolization for the treatment of lower GI bleeding is highly successful and relatively safe—97% technical success and 3% postembolization ischemia in our series. In 63% of cases it is definitive without any further intervention. Postembolization ischemia and surgery may be associated with a higher risk of anastomotic leak. Greater vigilance must be adopted in treating patients who have active hemorrhage from the small bowel and in those with a hematocrit ≤20.0%.


Anastomotic Leak Diverticular Disease Platelet Level Specialized Care Unit Mesenteric Angiography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    McGuire HH Jr (1994) Bleeding colonic diverticuli. A reappraisal of natural history and management. Ann Surg 220:653–656PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chaudhry V, Hyser M, Gracias V et al (1998) Colonoscopy: the initial test for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am Surg 64:723–728PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peter DJ, Dougherty JM (1999) Evaluation of the patient with gastrointestinal bleeding: an evidence based approach. Emerg Med Clin North Am 17:239–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rozycki GS, Tremblay L, Feliciano DV et al (2002) Three hundred consecutive emergent celiotomies in general surgery patients. Ann Surg 235:681–689PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pennoyer WP, Vignati PV, Cohen JL (1996) Management of angiogram positive lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage: long term follow-up of non-operative treatments. Int J Colorectal Dis 11:279–282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schuetz A, Jauch KW (2001) Lower gastrointestinal bleeding: therapeutic strategies, surgical techniques and results. Langenbecks. Arch Surg 386:17–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jenson DM, Machicado GA, Jutabha R et al (2000) Urgent colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of severe diverticular hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 342:78–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zuccaro G (1998) Management of the adult patient with acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1202–1208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Angtuaco TL, Reddy SK, Drapkin S et al (2001) The utility of urgent colonoscopy in the evaluation of acute lower gastrointestinal tract bleeding: a 2-year experience from a single center. Am J Gastroenterol 96:1782–1785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bloomfield RD, Rockey DC, Shetzline MA (2001) Endoscopic therapy of acute diverticular hemorrhage. Am J Gastroenterol 96:2367–2372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eisen GM, Dominitz JA, Faigel D et al (2001) American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Standards of Practice Committee. An annotated algorithmic approach to acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc 53:859–863PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nussbaum M, Baum S, Blakemore W et al (1965) Demonstration of intra-abdominal bleeding by selective arteriography. J Am Med Assoc 191:117–118Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Luchtefeld MA, Senagore AJ, Szomstein M et al (2000) Evaluation of transarterial embolization for lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Dis Colon Rectum 43:532–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drooz AT, Lewis CA, Allen TE et al (2003) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S237–S242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bandi R, Shetty PC, Sharma RP et al (2001) Superselective arterial embolization for the treatment of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12:1399–1405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Funaki B, Kostelic JK, Lorenz J et al (2001) Superselective microcoil embolization of colonic hemorrhage. Am J Roentgenol 177:829–836Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gordon RL, Ahl KL, Kerlan RK Jr et al (1997) Selective arterial embolization for the control of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Surg 174:24–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silver A, Bendick P, Wasvary H (2005) Safety and efficacy of superselective angioembolization in control of lower gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Am J Surg 189:361–363PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nicholson AA, Ettles DF, Hartley JE et al (1998) Transcatheter coil embolotherapy: a safe and effective option for major colonic haemorrhage. Gut 43:79–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Funaki B (2002) Endovascular intervention for the treatment of acute arterial gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 31:701–713PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Danesh BJ, Spiliadis C, Williams CB et al (1987) Angiodysplasia—an uncommon cause of colonic bleeding: colonoscopic evaluation of 1, 050 patients with rectal bleeding and anaemia. Int J Colorectal Dis 2:218–222PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Foutch PG (1993) Angiodysplasia of the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Gastroenterol 88:807–818PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Foutch PG (1997) Colonic angiodysplasia. Gastroenterologist 5:148–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Witting MD, Magder L, Heins AE et al (2006) ED predictors of upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding in patients without hematemesis. Am J Emerg Med 24:280–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chalasani N, Clark WS, Wilcox CM (1997) Blood urea nitrogen to creatinine concentration in gastrointestinal bleeding: a reappraisal. Am J Gastroenterol 92:1796–1799PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Miura S, Kodaira S, Shatari T et al (2000) Recent trends in diverticulosis of the right colon in Japan: retrospective review in a regional hospital. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1383–1389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Takano M, Yamada K, Sato K (2005) An analysis of the development of colonic diverticulosis in the Japanese. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2111–2116PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lee YS (1986) Diverticular disease of the large bowel in Singapore. An autopsy survey. Dis Colon Rectum 29:330–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wong SK, Ho YH, Leong AP et al (1997) Clinical behavior of complicated right-sided and left-sided diverticulosis. Dis Colon Rectum 40:344–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    So JB, Kok K, Ngoi SS (1999) Right-sided colonic diverticular disease as a source of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Am Surg 65:299–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Law WL, Lo CY, Chu KW (2001) Emergency surgery for colonic diverticulitis: differences between right-sided and left-sided lesions. Int J Colorectal Dis 16:280–284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lipska MA, Bissett IP, Parry BR et al (2006) Anastomotic leakage after lower gastrointestinal anastomosis: men are at a higher risk. Aust N Z J Surg 76:579–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Veyrie N, Ata T, Muscari F et al (2007) Anastomotic leakage after elective right versus left colectomy for cancer: prevalence and independent risk factors. J Am Coll Surg 205:785–793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryTan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Diagnostic RadiologyTan Tock Seng HospitalSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations