World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 10, pp 2138–2144 | Cite as

Surgical Education and Training in Australia and New Zealand

  • John P. Collins
  • Ian D. Civil
  • Michael Sugrue
  • Zsolt Balogh
  • Mellick J. Chehade


Surgical education for medical students in Australia and New Zealand is provided by 19 universities in Australia and 2 in New Zealand. One surgical college is responsible for managing the education, training, assessment, and professional development programs for surgeons throughout both countries. The specialist surgical associations and societies act as agents of the college in the delivery of these programs, the extent of which varies among specialties. Historically, surgical training was divided into basic and specialist components with selection required for each part. In response to a number of factors, a new surgical education and training program has been developed. The new program incorporates a single merit-based national selection directly into the candidate’s specialty of choice. The existing curriculum for each of the nine specialties has been remodeled to a competence-based format in line with the competence required to undertake the essential roles of a surgeon. New standards and criteria have been produced for accreditation of health care facilities used for training. A new basic surgical skills education and training course has been developed, with simulation playing an increasing role in all courses. Trainees’ progress is assessed by workplace-based assessment and formal examinations, including an exit examination. The sustained production of sufficient competent surgeons to meet societal needs encompasses many challenges including the recruitment of appropriate graduates and the availability of adequate educational and clinical resources to train them. Competence-based training is an attractive educational philosophy, but its implementation has brought its own set of issues, many of which have yet to be resolved.


  1. 1.
    Ek EW, Ek ET, Mackay SD (2005) Undergraduate experience of surgical teaching and its influence on career choice. ANZ J Surg 75:713–718PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Syme GA, Russell H, Devine HB (2002) Raising the standard. In: Beasley AW (ed) The mantle of surgery. Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, Melbourne, p 18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anonymous (1995) Memorandum: articles of association and regulations. The Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Handbook. Available at: Who We Are—Heritage and Archives
  4. 4.
    Brennan MF, Debas HT (2004) Surgical education in the United States: portents for change. Ann Surg 240:565–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Debas HT, Bass BL, Brennan MF et al (2005) American Surgical Association Blue Ribbon Committee Report on Surgical Education 2004. Ann Surg 241:1–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anonymous (2005) The new intercollegiate curriculum for surgical education. Available at:
  7. 7.
    Collins JP, Gough IR, Civil ID et al (2007) A new surgical education and training programme. ANZ J Surg 77:497–501PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Beard J, Bussy M (2007) Workplace-based assessment. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 89(Suppl 2):158–160Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chikwe J, de Souza AC, Pepper JR (2004) No time to train the surgeons. BMJ 328:418–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Frank JR (ed) (2005) The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wanzel KR, Ward M, Reznick RK (2002) Teaching the surgical craft: from selection to certification. Curr Probl Surg 39:583–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Australian and New Zealand Surgical Skills Education and Training Course. Available at:
  13. 13.
    Collins JP (2008) New standards and criteria for accreditation of hospitals and posts for surgical education and training. ANZ J Surg 78:277–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Marschall JG, Karimuddin AA (2003) Decline in popularity of general surgery as a career choice in North America: review of postgraduate residency training selection in Canada, 1996–2001. World J Surg 27:249–252PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anonymous (2007) Royal Australasian College of Surgeons Activities Report. Available at:
  16. 16.
    Collins JP, Okada M, Nguyen K et al (2008) Surgical interest societies for medical students. ANZ J Surg (in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Anonymous (2008) Independent inquiry into modernising medical careers. Aspiring to Excellence. Final Report of the Independent Inquiry into Modernising Medical Careers. MMC Inquiry, London. Available at:
  18. 18.
    Dunkin B, Adrales GL, Apelgren K et al (2007) Surgical simulation: a current review. Surg Endosc 21:357–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2007) Competency-based training and practice: what does it really mean? J Am Coll Surg 205:192–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gittes GK (2006) The surgeon-scientist in a new biomedical research era. Surgery 140:123–131PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • John P. Collins
    • 1
  • Ian D. Civil
    • 1
  • Michael Sugrue
    • 2
  • Zsolt Balogh
    • 3
  • Mellick J. Chehade
    • 4
  1. 1.Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, College of Surgeons GardensMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Trauma DepartmentLiverpool HospitalSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Department of TraumatologyUniversity of NewcastleCallaghanAustralia
  4. 4.Discipline of Orthopedics & TraumaUniversity of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations