Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 1974–1979 | Cite as

Clinical, Radiological, and Manometric Profile in 145 Patients with Untreated Achalasia

  • Piero M. Fisichella
  • Dan Raz
  • Francesco Palazzo
  • Ian Niponmick
  • Marco G. PattiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Background

Esophageal achalasia is characterized by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and by a dysfunctional lower esophageal sphincter (LES). Descriptions of clinical, radiological, and manometric findings in patients with achalasia usually have been based on small numbers of patients. This study was designed to determine in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) clinical presentation; (2) how often a diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was erroneously made based on the presence of heartburn; (3) manometric profile; (4) relationship between chest pain and the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

Methods

Between 1990 and 2004, a diagnosis of esophageal achalasia was established in 145 patients. None of them had been previously treated (no previous endoscopic or surgical treatment). We evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as the results of the endoscopy, barium swallow, esophageal manometry, and ambulatory pH monitoring. We also compared the clinical and the manometric profile of patients with classic and patients with vigorous achalasia.

Results

Most patients with untreated achalasia had dysphagia (94%). Regurgitation was present in 76% and heartburn in 52%. Chest pain (41%) and weight loss (35%) were less common. Acid-suppressing medications had been prescribed to 65 patients (45%) who complained of heartburn on the assumption that GERD was present. The LES was hypertensive in 43% of patients only. There was no significant difference in the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain in patients with classic and with vigorous achalasia.

Conclusions

These results show that in patients with untreated achalasia: (1) dysphagia was the most frequent complaint, but regurgitation and heartburn were frequently present; (2) a diagnosis of GERD based on the presence of heartburn was highly unreliable; (3) the LES was hypertensive in less than half of patients; and (4) the prevalence, severity, and duration of chest pain did not correlate with the manometric finding of vigorous achalasia.

Keywords

Achalasia Lower Esophageal Sphincter Esophageal Manometry Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Spechler SJ, Castell DO (2001) Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut 49:145–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eckardt VF, Stauf B, Bernhard G (1999) Chest pain in achalasia: patient characteristics and clinical course. Gastroenterology 116:1300–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sanderson DR, Ellis FH, Schlegel JF, Olsen AM (1967) Syndrome of vigorous achalasia: clinical and physiologic observations. Dis Chest 52:508–517PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Podas T, Eaden J, Mayberry M, Mayberry J (1998) Achalasia: a critical review of epidemiological studies. Am J Gastroenterol 93:2345–2347PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Patti MG, Feo CV, Arcerito M, De Pinto M, Tamburini A, Diener U, Gantert W, Way LW (1999) Effects of previous treatment on results of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Dig Dis Sci 11:2270–2276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patti MG, Arcerito M, Tong J, De Pinto M, de Bellis M, Wang A, Feo CV, Mulvihill SJ, Way LW (1997) Importance of preoperative and postoperative pH monitoring in patients with esophageal achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 1:505–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crookes PF, Corkill S, DeMeester TR (1997) Gastroesophageal reflux in achalasia. When is reflux really reflux? Dig Dis Sci 42:1354–1361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patti MG, Diener U, Tamburini A, Molena D, Way LW (2001) Role of esophageal function tests in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Dig Dis Sci 46:597–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Katz PO, Richter JE, Cowan R, Castell DO (1986) Apparent complete lower esophageal sphincter relaxation in achalasia. Gastroenterology 90:978–983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arain MA, Peters JH, Tamhankar AP, Portale G, Almongy G, DeMeester SR, Crookes PF, Hagen JA, Bremner CG, DeMeester TR (2004) Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure affects the outcome of laparoscopic esophageal myotomy for achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg 8:328–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gorodner MV, Galvani C, Fisichella PM, Patti MG (2004) Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter pressure has little influence on the outcome of laparoscopic Heller myotomy for achalasia. Surg Endosc 18:774–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bondi JL, Godwin DH, Garrett JM (1972) “Vigorous” achalasia. Its clinical interpretation and significance. Am J Gastroenterol 58:145–155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Perretta S, Fisichella PM, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Way LW, Patti MG (2003) Achalasia and chest pain: effect of laparoscopic Heller myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg 7:595–598PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Patti MG, Galvani C, Gorodner MV, Tedesco P (2005) Timing of surgical intervention does not influence return of esophageal peristalsis or outcome for patients with achalasia. Surg Endosc 19:1188–1192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Piero M. Fisichella
    • 1
  • Dan Raz
    • 1
  • Francesco Palazzo
    • 1
  • Ian Niponmick
    • 1
  • Marco G. Patti
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Center for Esophageal DiseasesUniversity of Chicago Pritzker School of MedicineChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations