World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 807–814 | Cite as

Pasieka’s Parathyroid Symptoms Scores Correlate with SF-36 Scores in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism

  • Radu MihaiEmail author
  • Gregory P. Sadler



Parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is expected to trigger an improvement in the quality of life. This has been demonstrated previously by using the SF-36 questionnaire, whose interpretation is difficult in routine clinical practice. As an alternative, the 13-item questionnaire developed by Pasieka et al. can be used to assess the severity of symptoms on a visual analogue from which a parathyroid assessment of symptoms score (PAS) can be calculated. The purpose of this study was to correlate results of these two assessment tools.


Prospective case-series study recruiting consecutive unselected patients who underwent successful parathyroidectomy for PHPT. SF-36(v2) and Pasieka’s questionnaires were collected before parathyroidectomy and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.


Between November 2005 and December 2006, 101 patients were diagnosed with PHPT (30 men; aged 18–89 years). Preoperative PAS ranged 0–1040 and did not correlate with the severity of hypercalcemia (2.91 ± 0.25; range, 2.56–3.4 mmol/l). Scores from the SF-36 questionnaire were under the 50th percentile for the normal population in three domains (vitality, emotional role, and physical role). Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy was performed in 69 patients and bilateral cervical exploration in 32 patients. All were found to have a single parathyroid adenoma and were normocalcemic at 3–12 months after parathyroidectomy.

At follow-up, there was a significant reduction of PAS from 460 ± 257 preoperatively to 254 ± 234 at 3 months postoperatively (n = 72), to 245 ± 215 at 6 months (n = 50), and 249 ± 212 at 12 months (n = 63) (p < 0.05, Student’s t-test). There was a significant and persistent improvement in five domains of SF-36 questionnaire: bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning and mental health. Overall analysis of 244 assessments using both questionnaires demonstrated a negative correlation between increasing PAS and decreasing mental component scores and physical component scores of the SF-36 assessment (r2 = 0.372 and 0.301, respectively).


Pasieka’s parathyroid assessment of symptom scores (PAS) correlate with SF-36 questionnaire scores. Because PAS allows easier and faster analysis, we advocate that Pasieka’s questionnaire should be integrated into the assessment of patients with PHPT as a reliable tool to identify symptomatic changes that correlate with improved quality of life.


Primary Hyperparathyroidism Parathyroid Adenoma Mental Component Score Physical Component Score Postoperative Improvement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Talpos GB, Bone HG 3rd, Kleerekoper M, Phillips ER, Alam M, Honasoge M, Divine GW, Rao DS (2000) Randomized trial of parathyroidectomy in mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: patient description and effects on the SF-36 health survey. Surgery 128:1013–1020PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sheldon DG, Lee FT, Neil NJ, Ryan JA Jr (2002) Surgical treatment of hyperparathyroidism improves health-related quality of life. Arch Surg 137:1022–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caillard C, Sebag F, Mathonnet M, Gibelin H, Brunaud L, Loudot C, Kraimps JL, Hamy A, Bresler L, Charbonnel B, Leborgne J, Henry JF, Nguyen JM, Mirallie E (2007) Prospective evaluation of quality of life (SF-36v2) and nonspecific symptoms before and after cure of primary hyperparathyroidism (1-year follow-up). Surgery 141:153–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ambrogini E, Cetani F, Cianferotti L, Vignali E, Banti C, Viccica G, Oppo A, Miccoli P, Berti P, Bilezikian JP, Pinchera A, Marcocci C (2007) Surgery or surveillance for mild asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized clinical trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(8):3114–3121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bollerslev J, Jansson S, Mollerup CL, Nordenstrom J, Lundgren E, Torring O, Varhaug JE, Baranowski M, Aanderud S, Franco C, Freyschuss B, Isaksen GA, Ueland T, Rosen T (2007) Medical observation compared to parathyroidectomy for asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a prospective, randomized trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1687–1692PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pasieka JL, Parsons LL (1998) Prospective surgical outcome study of relief of symptoms following surgery in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 22:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pasieka JL, Parsons LL, Demeure MJ, Wilson S, Malycha P, Jones J, Krzywda B (2002) Patient-based surgical outcome tool demonstrating alleviation of symptoms following parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 26:942–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greutelaers B, Kullen K, Kollias J, Bochner M, Roberts A, Wittert G, Pasieka J, Malycha P (2004) Pasieka Illness Questionnaire: its value in primary hyperparathyroidism. ANZ J Surg 74:112–115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mihai R, Sadler G, Wass JAH (2008) Asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism – need for multicentre studies. Clinical Endocrinol 68:155–164Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weber T, Keller M, Hense I, Pietsch A, Hinz U, Schilling T, Nawroth P, Klar E, Buchler MW (2007) Effect of parathyroidectomy on quality of life and neuropsychological symptoms in primary hyperparathyroidism. World J Surg 31:1204–1211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burney RE, Jones KR, Peterson M, Christy B, Thompson NW (1998) Surgical correction of primary hyperparathyroidism improves quality of life. Surgery 124(6):987–991PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Coker LH, Rorie K, Cantley L, Kirkland K, Stump D, Burbank N, Tembreull T, Williamson J, Perrier N. (2005) Primary hyperparathyroidism, cognition, health-related quality of life. Ann Surg 242(5):642–650PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Quiros RM, Alef MJ, Wilhelm SM, Djuricin G, Loviscek K, Prinz RA (2003) Health-related quality of life in hyperparathyroidism measurably improves after parathyroidectomy. Surgery 134:675–681PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bilezikian JP, Potts JT Jr, Fuleihan Gel H, Kleerekoper M, Neer R, Peacock M, Rastad J, Silverberg SJ, Udelsman R, Wells SA Jr (2002) Summary statement from a workshop on asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a perspective for the 21st century. J Bone Miner Res 17(Suppl 2):N2–11PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eigelberger MS, Cheah WK, Ituarte PH, Streja L, Duh QY, Clark OH (2004) The NIH criteria for parathyroidectomy in asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: are they too limited? Ann Surg 239:528–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kebebew E, Duh QY, Clark OH (2003) Parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a plea for early surgical referral. Arch Surg 138:867–871PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Egan KR, Adler JT, Olson JE, Chen H (2007) Parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism in octogenarians and nonagenarians: a risk-benefit analysis. J Surg Res 140:194–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang T, Dolan S, Robinson B, Delbridge L (2007) Does the surgical approach affect quality of life outcomes? A comparison of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy with open parathyroidectomy. Int J Surg 5:17–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Endocrine Surgery, level 2John Radcliffe HospitalHeadington, OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations