Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 8, pp 1605–1612 | Cite as

Acute Care Surgery: The European Model

  • Selman UranuesEmail author
  • Eugenia Lamont
Article

Abstract

Background

This study was designed to determine whether there is in fact a European model of acute care surgery and to describe the different care systems in the individual European countries.

Methods

Questionnaires were sent to experts on emergency surgery in 27 European countries. The assessment of attitudes toward the emerging discipline of acute care surgery was the main outcome measure.

Results

Replies were received from at least one respondent from each of 18 countries. They indicated a high awareness of the new field of acute care surgery, although this has not yet become a recognized (sub-)specialty in any of the countries polled. In addition, several interesting new trends were identified: for example, different approaches depending on individual political influences.

Conclusions

There is no European consensus on acute care surgery. In some central European countries, specialists qualify in general and orthopedic trauma surgery; these allrounders also perform life-saving thoracic and neurosurgical procedures, such as emergency thoracotomies and craniotomies. The European model is not a uniform system for acute surgical care.

Keywords

Czech Republic Acute Care Emergency Service Common Trunk European Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Uranüs S, Lennquist S (2002) Trauma management and education in Europe: a survey of twelve geographic and socioeconomically diverse European countries. Eur J Surg 168:730–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cherr GS (2006) Acute care surgery: enhancing outcomes or fragmenting care? Bull Am Surg 91:40–43Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Trunkey DD (2005) Trauma in modern society: major challenges and solutions. Surgeon 3:165–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Moore EE, Maier RV, Hoyt DB, Jurkovich GJ et al (2006) Acute care surgery: Eraritjaritjaka. J Am Coll Surg 202:698–701PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catena F, Moore E (2007) WJES, WSES and the role of emergency surgery in the world. World J Emerg Surg 2:3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Waele JJ, Hoste EA (2007) The future of surgical critical care: a European perspective. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 35:984–985Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pascual J, Sarani B, Schwab CW (2007) American College of Surgeons criteria for surgeon presence at initial trauma resuscitations: superfluous or necessary? Ann Emerg Med 50:15–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Esposito TJ, Rotondo M et al (2006) Making the case for a paradigm shift in trauma surgery. J Am Coll Surg 202:655–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nathens AB, Maier RV, Jurkovich GJ et al (2006) The delivery of critical care services in US trauma centers: is the standard being met? J Trauma 60:773–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stahel PF, Heyde CE, Ertel W (2005) Current concepts of poytrauma management. Eur J Trauma 31:200–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Section for Surgical Research, Department of SurgeryMedical University of GrazGrazAustria

Personalised recommendations