Intraoperative Monitoring of the Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve in Thyroid Surgery
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy ranks among the leading reasons for medicolegal litigation of surgeons because of its attendant reduction in quality of life. As a risk minimization tool, intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) has been introduced to verify RLN function integrity intraoperatively. Nevertheless, a systematic evidence-based assessment of this novel health technology has not been performed.
The present study was based on a systematic appraisal of the literature using evidence-based criteria.
Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rates (RLNPR) varied widely after thyroid surgery, ranging from 0%–7.1% for transient RLN palsy to 0%–11% for permanent RLN palsy. These rates did not differ much from those reported for visual nerve identification without the use of IONM. Six studies with more than 100 nerves at risk (NAR) each evaluated RLNPR by contrasting IONM with visual nerve identification only. Recuurent laryngeal nerve palsy rates tended to be lower with IONM than without it, but this difference was not statistically significant. Six additional studies compared IONM findings with their corresponding postoperative laryngoscopic results. Those studies revealed high negative predictive values (NPV; 92%–100%), but relatively low and variable positive predictive values (PPV; 10%–90%) for IONM, limiting its utility for intraoperative RLN management.
Apart from navigating the surgeon through challenging anatomies, IONM may lend itself as a routine adjunct to the gold standard of visual nerve identification. To further reduce the number of false negative IONM signals, the causes underlying its relatively low PPV require additional clarification.
KeywordsRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy Vocal Cord Function Permanent Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Palsy Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Identification
The authors are indebted to the members of the German IONM Study Group: Ch. Blankenburg, MD, Dresden; St. Grond, MD, Halle; W. Hamelmann, MD, Kassel; H. Heidemann, MD, Berlin; B. Koch, MD, Kaiserslautern; E. Kruse, MD, Göttingen; D. Lehmann, Nordhausen, MD; N. Müller, MD, Kaiserslautern; A. Szelenyi, MD, Frankfurt/Main; W. Timmermann, MD, Hagen; F. Wenner, MD, Rothenburg.
- 4.Smith E, Verdolini K, Gray S et al (1996) Effect of voice disorders on quality of life. J Med Speech Language Pathol 4:223–244Google Scholar
- 8.Lahey FH (1938) Routine dissection and demonstration of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in subtotal thyroidectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 66:775–777Google Scholar
- 12.Moley JF, Lairmore TC, Doherty GM et al (1999) Preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerves in thyroid and parathyroid reoperations. Surgery 125:673–679Google Scholar
- 14.British Thyroid Association-BTAGuideline for the management of Thyroid Cancer in Adults. Available at: http://www.british-thyroid-association.org/guidelines.htm
- 15.Randolph GW (2003) Surgical anatomy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In: Randolph GW (ed) Surgery of the Thyroid and Parathyroid Glands. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, p. 300–342Google Scholar
- 25.Sheed DP, Burget GC, Haven N (1966) Identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Arch Surg 92:861–864Google Scholar
- 34.Maloney RW, Murcek BW, Steehler KW et al (1994) A new method for intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. ENT J 73:30–33Google Scholar
- 49.Bailleux S, Bozbc A, Cstillo L et al (2006) Thyroid surgery and recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoringJ Laryngol Otol 120:566–599Google Scholar
- 59.Horn D, Rötzscher V (1999) Intraoperative electromyogram monitoring of the recurrent laryngeal nerve: experience with an intralaryngeal surface electrode—a method to reduce the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve injury during thyroid surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg 384:392–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar