Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 6, pp 1147–1156 | Cite as

Standardized Algorithms for Management of Anastomotic Leaks and Related Abdominal and Pelvic Abscesses After Colorectal Surgery

  • R. Phitayakorn
  • C. P. DelaneyEmail author
  • H. L. Reynolds
  • B. J. Champagne
  • A. G. Heriot
  • P. Neary
  • A. J. Senagore
  • International Anastomotic Leak Study Group
Article

Abstract

Background

The risk factors and incidence of anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery are well reported in the literature. However, the management of the multiple clinical scenarios that may be encountered has not been standardized.

Methods

The medical literature from 1973 to 2007 was reviewed using PubMed for papers relating to anastomotic leaks and abdominal abscess, with a specific emphasis on predisposing factors, prevention strategies, and treatment approaches. A six-round modified Delphi research method was utilized to find consensus among a group of expert colorectal surgeons and interventional radiologists regarding standardized management algorithms for anastomotic leaks.

Results

Management scenarios were divided into those for intraperitoneal anastomoses, extraperitoneal (low pelvic) anastomoses, and anastomoses with proximal diverting stomas. Management options were then based on the clinical presentation and radiographic findings and organized into three interconnected algorithms.

Conclusions

This process was a useful first step toward establishing guidelines for the management of anastomotic leak.

Keywords

Anastomotic Leak Abscess Cavity Delphi Technique Ileoanal Anastomosis Generalize Peritonitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The International Anastomotic Leak Study Group consisted of an initial hypothesis group of R. Phitayakorn, C.P. Delaney, H.L. Reynolds, B.J. Champagne, A.G. Heriot, P. Neary, A.J. Senagore and an international collaborative group of the following coauthors: P. Ambrosetti, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland; C. Bailey, Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France; R.P. Billingham, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA; M. Braga, San Raffaele University Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy; W.D. Buie, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; A.W. Darzi, Imperial College, London, UK; P.R. Douglas, Prince of Wales Hospital, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; E.J. Dozois, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA; N.S. Fearnhead, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK; F.A. Frizelle, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand; S.L. Gearhart, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Lutherville, MD, USA; Q.H. Gonzalez, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion S.Z., Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico; J.R. Haaga, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA; G.J. Harris, St. Richard’s Hospital, West Sussex, UK; A.F. Horgan, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK; P.G. Horgan, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, Scotland, UK; H. Kehlet, The Juliane Marie Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; S.H. Kim, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; A.M. Lacy, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; J. Leroy, Universite Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France; F. López-Kostner, Hospital Clínico Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile; K.A. Ludwig, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA; J. Marks, The Lankenau Hospital and Institute for Medical Research, Wynnewood, PA, USA; A.J. Megibow, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; J.I. Merlino, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; J.R. Monson, University of Hull and Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, East Yorkshire, UK; R.W. Motson, Colchester General Hospital, Turner Road, Colchester, UK; D.A. Nakamoto, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH, USA; G.L. Newstead, Sydney Colorectal Associates, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, New South Wales, Australia; P.R. O’Connell, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland; Y. Panis, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy-Paris, France; F. Penninckx, University Clinic Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; A. Rajput, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; F. Seow Choen, Mt. Elizabeth Medical Centre, Singapore; M.J. Stamos, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, CA, USA; A. Vignali, San Raffaele University Vita-Salute, Milan, Italy; S.D. Wexner, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA; K.S. Wong, National University Hospital Singapore, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore

References

  1. 1.
    Peel AL, Taylor EW (1991) Proposed definitions for the audit of postoperative infection: A discussion paper. Surgical Infection Study Group. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 73:385–388PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schrock TR (2005) Anastomotic leak after colon and rectal resections. In Current Therapy in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2nd edition. Fazio VW, Church JM, and Delaney CP eds. (Philadelphia, PA): Mosby, pp 525–528Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Galandiuk S (2005) To drain or not to drain. Ann Surg 241:14–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alberts JCJ, Parvaiz A, Moran BJ (2003) Predicting risk and diminishing the consequences of anastomotic dehiscence following rectal resection. Colorectal Dis 5:478–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fielding LP, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L et al (1980) Anastomotic integrity after operations for large-bowel cancer: A multicentre study. BMJ 281:411–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ansari MZ, Collopy BT, Hart WG et al (2000) In-hospital mortality and associated complications after bowel surgery in Victorian public hospitals. ANZ J Surg 70:6–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mäkelä JT, Kiviniemi H, Laitnen S (2003) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after left-sided colorectal resection with rectal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 46:653–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: cost-benefit analysis in a single-center randomized trial. Ann Surg 242:890–895, discussion 895–896PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Golub R, Golub RW, Cantu R Jr et al (1997) A multivariate analysis of factors contributing to leakage of intestinal anastomoses. J Am Coll Surg 184:364–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alves A, Panis Y, Pocard M et al (1999) Management of anastomotic leak after non-diverted large bowel resection. J Am Coll Surg 189:554–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Branagan G, Finnis D (2005) Prognosis after anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 48:1021–1026PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Merkel S, Wang WY, Schmidt O et al (2001) Locoregional recurrence in patients with anastomotic leak after anterior resection for rectal carcinoma. Colorectal Dis 3:154–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang SC, Lin JK, Yang SH et al (2003) Long-term outcome of anastomosis leak after curative resection for mid and low rectal cancer. Hepatgastroenterology 50:1898–1902 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Walker KG, Bell SW, Rickard MJ et al (2004) Anastomotic leak is predictive of diminished survival after potentially curative resection for colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 240:255–259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell SW, Walker KG, Rickard MJ et al (2003) Anastomotic leak after curative anterior resection results in higher prevalence of local recurrence. Br J Surg 90:1261–1266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC (2001) Outcome and late functional results after anastomotic leak following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 88:400–404PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heald RJ, Leicester RJ (1981) The low stapled anastomosis. Br J Surg 68:333–337PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bellamy N, Anastassiades P, Watson-Buchanan W et al (1991) Rheumatoid arthritis antirheumatic drug trials. III. Setting the delta for clinical trials of antirheumatic drugs—results of a consensus development (Delphi) exercise. J Rheumatol 18:1908–1915PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clayton MJ (1997) Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol 17:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Critcher C, Gladstone B (1998) Utilizing the Delphi technique in policy discussion: a case study of a privatized utility in Britain. Public Admin 76:431–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jones J, Hunter D (1995) Consensus methods for medical and health services research. BMJ 311:376–380PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    de Villiers MR, de Villiers PJ, Kent AP (2005) The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Med Teach 27:639–643 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Roddy E, Zhang W, Doherty M et al (2006) Evidence-based clinical guidelines: a new system to better determine true strength of recommendation. J Eval Clin Pract 12:347–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oncel M, Remzi FH (2003) Perioperative complications in colorectal surgery. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 16:143–152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Truong S, Bohm G, Klinge U et al (2004) Results after endoscopic treatment of postoperative upper gastrointestinal fistulas and leaks using combined Vicryl plug and fibrin glue. Surg Endosc 18:1105–1108 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bonanomi G, Prince JM, McSteen F et al (2004) Sealing effect of fibrin glue on the healing of gastrointestinal anastomoses: implications for the endoscopic treatment of leaks. Surg Endosc 18:1620–1624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Nesbakken A, Nygaard K, Lunde OC et al (2005) Anastomotic leak following mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: true incidence and diagnostic challenges. Colorectal Dis 7:576–581PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kumar RR, Kim JT, Haukoos JS et al (2006) Factors affecting the successful management of intra-abdominal abscesses with antibiotics and the need for percutaneous drainage. Dis Colon Rectum 49:183–189 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haaga JR, Nakamoto D, Stellato T et al (2000) Intracavitary urokinase for enhancement of percutaneous abscess drainage: phase II trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:1681–1685 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Haaga JR, Nakamoto D (2004) Computed tomography-guided drainage of intra-abdominal infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep 6:105–114 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Siewert B, Tye G, Kruskal J et al (2006) Impact of CT-guided drainage in the treatment of diverticular abscesses: size matters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:680–686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Whitlow CB, Opelka FG, Gathright JB Jr et al (1997) Treatment of colorectal and ileoanal anastomotic sinuses. Dis Colon Rectum 40:760–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Fleshman JW, McLeod RS, Cohen Z et al (1988) Improved results following use of an advancement technique in the treatment of ileoanal anastomotic complications. Int J Colorectal Dis 3:161–165 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schrock TR, Deveney CW, Dunphy JE (1973) Factors contributing to leak of colonic anastomoses. Ann Surg 177:513–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Brennan SS, Pickford IR, Evans M et al (1982) Staples or sutures for colonic anastomoses: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg 69:722–724PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    McGinn FP, Gartell PC, Clifford PC et al (1985) Staples or sutures for low colorectal anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial. Br J Surg 72:603–605PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Beard JD, Nicholson ML, Sayers RD et al (1990) Intraoperative air testing of colorectal anastomosis: a prospective, randomized trial. Br J Surg 77:1095–1097PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Mealy K, Burke P, Hyland J (1992) Anterior resection with a defunctioning colostomy: Questions of safety. Br J Surg 79:305–317 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kracht M, Hay JM, Fagniez PL et al (1993) Ileocolonic anastomosis after right hemicolectomy for carcinoma: stapled or hand-sewn? A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 8:29–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Redmond HP, Austin OM, Clery AP et al (1993) Safety of double-stapled anastomosis in low anterior resection. Br J Surg 80:924–927PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Karanjia ND, Corder AP, Bearn P et al (1994) Leakage from stapled low anastomosis after total mesorectal excision for carcinoma of the rectum. Br J Surg 81:1224–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Santos JC Jr, Batista J, Sirimarco MT et al (1994) Prospective randomized trial of mechanical bowel preparation in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 81:1673–1676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Fingerhut A, Hay JM, Elhadad A et al (1995) Supraperitoneal colorectal anastomosis: hand-sewn versus circular staples–a controlled clinical trial; French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery 118:479–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sagar PM, Hartley MN, Macfie J et al (1995) Randomized trial of pelvic drainage after rectal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 38:254–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Hansen O, Schwenk W, Hucke HP et al (1996) Colorectal stapled anastomoses. Experiences and results. Dis Colon Rectum 39:30–36 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mann B, Kleinschmidt S, Stremmel W (1996) Prospective study of hand-sutured anastomosis after colorectal resection. Br J Surg 83:29–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vignali A, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al (1997) Factors associated with the occurrence of leaks in stapled rectal anastomoses: a review of 1,014 patients. J Am Coll Surg 185:105–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Dehni N, Schlegel RD, Cunningham C et al (1998) Influence of a defunctioning stoma on leakage rates after low colorectal anastomosis and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 85:1114–1117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Peterson S, Freitag M, Hellmich G et al (1998) Anastomotic leak: Impact on local recurrence and survival in surgery of colorectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 13:160–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rullier E, Laurent C, Garrelon JL et al (1998) Risk factors for anastomotic leak after resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 85:355–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Watson AJM, Krukowski ZH, Munro A (1999) Salvage of large bowel anastomotic leak. Br J Surg 86:499–500 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Marijnen CA, Kapiteijn E, van de Velde CJ et al (2002) Acute side effects and complications after short-term preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision in primary rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:817–825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Value of a protective stoma in low anterior resections for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1164–1171PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wong NY, Eu KW (2005) A defunctioning ileostomy does not prevent clinical anastomotic leak after a low anterior resection: a prospective, comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2076–2079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Platell C, Barwood N, Dorfmann G,et al (2007) The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:71–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Phitayakorn
    • 1
  • C. P. Delaney
    • 1
    Email author
  • H. L. Reynolds
    • 1
  • B. J. Champagne
    • 1
  • A. G. Heriot
    • 2
  • P. Neary
    • 3
  • A. J. Senagore
    • 4
  • International Anastomotic Leak Study Group
  1. 1.Division of Colorectal SurgeryCase Medical CenterClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Peter MacCallum Cancer CentreMelbourneAustralia
  3. 3.Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Incorporating the National Childrens HospitalDublinIreland
  4. 4.Michigan State UniversityGrand RapidsUSA

Personalised recommendations