World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 213–216 | Cite as

New Technologies for the Surgical Curriculum

  • Rajesh Aggarwal
  • Julian Leong
  • Daniel Leff
  • Oliver Warren
  • Guang-Zhong Yang
  • Ara Darzi
Article

Abstract

The aim of a surgical residency program is to produce competent professionals displaying the cognitive, technical, and personal skills required to meet the needs of society. Current changes to the delivery of healthcare necessitate the development of new models of training. These can be supported with the development of new technologies to train and assess surgical practitioners. This article describes recent developments within Imperial College London with regard to eye tracking, noninvasive brain imaging, and an innovative mentoring scheme for the new surgical curriculum. The concept of eye tracking is described, together with surgical application for this technique in terms of dexterity analysis during minimally invasive procedures. We have also begun to understand spatial localization within the brain cortex during surgical knot-tying tasks. The aim is to develop a map of the cortex with regard to surgical novices and experienced surgeons and then to develop the hypothesis that a translational process of cortical plasticity occurs during training. Finally, the article is intended to describe a training scheme that goes beyond dexterity, and moves toward the development of a successful surgeon through surgical mentoring. It is hoped that some of these tools will enhance the training of future surgeons in order to continue to provide a high-quality service to our patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Aggarwal R, Hance J, Darzi A (2004) Surgical education and training in the new millennium. Surg Endosc 18:1409–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2007) Competency-based training and practice—what does it really mean? J Am Coll Surg 205:192–193PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aggarwal R, Darzi A (2006) Technical-skills training in the 21st century. N Engl J Med 355:2695–2696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flin R, O’Connor P, Mearns K (2002) Crew resource management: improving teamwork in high reliability industries. Team Perform Manag 8:68–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS (2000) To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aggarwal R, Moorthy K, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic skills training and assessment. Br J Surg 91:1549–1558PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aggarwal R, Undre S, Moorthy K, et al. (2004) The simulated operating theatre: comprehensive training for surgical teams. Qual Saf Health Care 13(Suppl):i27–i32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ballard DH, Hayhoe MM, Li F, et al. (1992) Hand-eye coordination during sequential tasks. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 337:331–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang GZ, Dempere-Marco L, Hu XP, et al. (2002) Visual search: psychophysical models and practical applications. Image Vision Comput 20:291–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nicolaou M, Atallah L, James A, et al. (2006) The effect of depth perception on visual-motor compensation in minimal invasive surgery. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4091:156–163Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Crawford JD, Medendorp WP, Marotta JJ (2004) Spatial transformations for eye-hand coordination. J Neurophysiol 92:10–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sailer U, Flanagan JR, Johansson RS (2005) Eye-hand coordination during learning of a novel visuomotor task. J Neurosci 25:8833–8842PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jobsis FF (1977) Noninvasive, infrared monitoring of cerebral and myocardial oxygen sufficiency and circulatory parameters. Science 198:1264–1267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ogawa S, Menon RS, Tank DW, et al. (1993) Functional brain mapping by blood oxygenation level-dependent contrast magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison of signal characteristics with a biophysical model. Biophys J 64:803–812PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roy CS, Sherrington CS (1890) On the regulation of the blood-supply of the brain. J Physiol 11(1–2):85–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leff DR, Aggarwal R, Deligani F, et al. (2006) Optical mapping of the frontal cortex during a surgical knot-tying task, a feasibility study. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4091:140–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wanzel KR, Anastakis DJ, McAndrews MP, et al. (2007) Visual-spatial ability and fMRI cortical activation in surgery residents. Am J Surg 193:507–510PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Strangman G, Boas DA, Sutton JP (2002) Non-invasive neuroimaging using near-infrared light. Biol Psychiatry 52:679–693PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Leff DR, Atallah L, Athanasiou T, et al. The discrimination of expert and novice surgeons based upon prefrontal cortical activation during a technical surgical task. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons, March 2007Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewellen-Williams C, Johnson VA, Deloney LA, et al. (2006) The POD: a new model for mentoring underrepresented minority faculty. Academic Med 81:275–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Poole A (2003) The implications of modernising medical careers for specialist registrars. BMJ 326(7401):s194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roche GR (1979) Much ado about mentors. Harvard Bus Rev 57:14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rajesh Aggarwal
    • 1
  • Julian Leong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Daniel Leff
    • 1
    • 2
  • Oliver Warren
    • 1
  • Guang-Zhong Yang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ara Darzi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biosurgery & Surgical TechnologyImperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Institute of Biomedical EngineeringImperial College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations