Surgeons’ Non-technical Skills in the Operating Room: Reliability Testing of the NOTSS Behavior Rating System
- 2.1k Downloads
Previous research has shown that surgeons’ intraoperative non-technical skills are related to surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the NOTSS (Non-technical Skills for Surgeons) behavior rating system. Based on task analysis, the system incorporates five categories of skills for safe surgical practice (Situation Awareness, Decision Making, Task Management, Communication & Teamwork, and Leadership).
Consultant (attending) surgeons (n = 44) from five Scottish hospitals attended one of six experimental sessions and were trained to use the NOTSS system. They then used the system to rate consultant surgeons’ behaviors in six simulated operating room scenarios that were presented using video. Surgeons’ ratings of the behaviors demonstrated in each scenario were compared to expert ratings (“accuracy”), and assessed for inter-rater reliability and internal consistency.
The NOTSS system had a consistent internal structure. Although raters had minimal training, rating “accuracy” for acceptable/unacceptable behavior was above 60% for all categories, with mean of 0.67 scale points difference from reference (expert) ratings (on 4-point scale). For inter-rater reliability, the mean values of within-group agreement (r wg) were acceptable for the categories Communication & Teamwork (.70), and Leadership (.72), but below a priori criteria for other categories. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) indicated high agreement using average measures (values were .95–.99).
With the requisite training, the prototype NOTSS system could be used reliably by surgeons to observe and rate surgeons’ behaviors. The instrument should now be tested for usability in the operating room.
KeywordsSituation Awareness Task Management Reference Rating Element Rating Crew Resource Management
The NOTSS system was developed under funding from the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh and NHS Education Scotland. The views presented are those of the authors and should not be taken to represent the position or policy of the funding bodies. The authors thank the surgeons who took part in this study.
- 3.Stevenson KS, Gibson SC, Rogers PN, et al. Process of care in acute surgical admissions: room for improvement. Br J Surg in pressGoogle Scholar
- 8.Templeton S, Feinmann J (2006) Arrogant surgeons ‘risk another Bristol babies scandal’. The Sunday Times London September 3Google Scholar
- 10.Flin R, Maran N (2004) Identifying and training non-technical skills in acute medicine. Qual Safety Healthcare i180–i184Google Scholar
- 11.Flin R, Martin L, Goeters K, et al. (2003) Pilots’ non-technical skills: NOTECHS. Hum Factors Aerospace Safety 3:95–117Google Scholar
- 13.Klampfer B, Flin R, Helmreich RL, et al. (2001) Enhancing performance in high risk environments: recommendations for the use of behavioral markers. Berlin: GIHREGoogle Scholar
- 14.Baker D, Mulqueen C, Dismukes R (2001) Training raters to assess resource management skills. In Salas E, Bowers C, Edens E, editors, Improving Teamwork in Organizations. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Earlbaum, 131–145Google Scholar
- 15.Flin R, Yule S, Paterson-Brown S, et al. (2005) Surgeons’ non-technical skills. Surg News 4:83–85Google Scholar
- 19.Nunnally J, Bernstein I (1993) Psychometric Theory. New York, McGraw HillGoogle Scholar
- 20.Bliese P (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability. Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In Klein K, Kozlowski S, editors, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations. San Francisco, Jossey-BassGoogle Scholar
- 22.O’Connor P, Hormann HJ, Flin R, et al. (2002) Developing a method for evaluating Crew Resource Management skills: a European perspective. Int J Aviation Psychology 12:265–288Google Scholar
- 23.Holt R, Boehm-Davis D, Beaubien J (2001) Evaluating resource management training. In Salas E, Bowers C, Edens E, editors. Improving Teamwork in Organizations. Applications of Resource Management Training. Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Earlbaum AssociatesGoogle Scholar
- 24.Yule S, Flin R, Rowley D, et al. Debriefing surgeons on non-technical skills (NOTSS). Cognition, Technology & Work (in press)Google Scholar
- 26.Donaldson LJ (2006) Good doctors, safer patients: proposals to strengthen the system to assure and improve the performance of doctors and to protect the safety of patients. London, Department of HealthGoogle Scholar
- 27.Flin R, O’Connor P, Crichton M (2007) Safety at the Sharp End. A Guide to Non-Technical Skills. Aldershot, UK, Ashgate, in pressGoogle Scholar