World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 31, Issue 6, pp 1251–1257 | Cite as

Impact of Preoperative Planning Using Virtual Segmental Volumetry on Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma




Accurate assessment of resection volume and vascular anatomy is mandatory in preoperative planning for safe and curative hepatectomy to treat cancer. Accordingly, we examined feasibility and accuracy of a preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) scan based simulation in patients with impaired liver function undergoing hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).


Hepatectomy simulation software was programmed to reconstruct detailed 3D vascular structure and calculate liver volume based on hepatic circulation. In 113 patients with HCC, liver resection volume was estimated preoperatively by both simulation and conventional planimetry. For validation, predicted resection volumes were compared with actual resected specimen weights. The resection margin as estimated by the simulation was compared with the margin in the specimen.


Simulation showed higher correlation and smaller discrepancy (r = 0.96; 9.3 ml) between predicted and actual liver resection volume than conventional planimetry (r = 0.74; 174 ml). Simulation showed correlation (p < 0.01) between estimated and actual segmental volume, which was not measurable by planimetry. Simulation showed a correlation (r = 0.84) between predicted and actual margin, with a difference of 1.6 mm.


Hepatectomy simulation in 3D predicted segmental liver volume and the resection margin accurately. This virtual method should contribute to preoperative planning to achieve safe, curative resection in HCC patients, whose hepatic function is compromised.


  1. 1.
    Bosch FX, Ribes J, Diaz M, et al. (2004) Primary liver cancer: Worldwide incidence and trends. Gastroenterology 127:S5–S16PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    El-Serag HB, Mason AC (1999) Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med 340:745–750PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kiyosawa K, Umemura T, Ichijo T, et al. (2004) Hepatocellular carcinoma: recent trends in Japan. Gastroenterology 127:S17–S26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fan ST, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. (1999) Hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma: toward zero hospital deaths. Ann Surg 229:322–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fong Y, Sun RL, Jamagin W, et al. (1999) An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a Western center. Ann Surg 229:790–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, et al. (2000) Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinomas: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. Hepatology 32:1224–1229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Regimbeau JM, Kianmanesh R, Farges O, et al. (2002) Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma. Surgery 131:311–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ince N, Wands JR (1999) The increasing incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 340:798–799PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Befeler AS, Di Bisceglie AM (2002) Hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnosis and treatment. Gastroenterology 122:1609–1619PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagasue N, Yukaya H, Ogawa Y, et al. (1987) Human liver regeneration after major hepatic resection. A study of normal liver and livers with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis. Ann Surg 206:30–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yamanaka N, Okamoto E, Oriyama T, et al. (1994) A prediction scoring system to select the surgical treatment of liver cancer. Further refinement based on 10 years of use. Ann Surg 219:342–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wu CC, Ho WL, Yeh DC, et al. (1996) Hepatic resection of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: is it unjustified in impaired liver function? Surgery 120:34–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Begg CB, Cramer LD, Hoskins WJ, et al. (1998) Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. JAMA 280:1747–1751PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glasgow RE, Showstack JA, Katz PP, et al. (1999) The relationship between hospital volume and outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 134:30–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Couinaud C. Le Foie: (1957) etudes anatomiques et chirurgicales. Paris, MassonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Makuuchi M, Hasegawa H, Yamazaki S (1985) Ultrasonically guided subsegmentectomy. Surg Gynecol Obstet 161:346–350PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hashimoto D, Dohi T, Tsuzuki M, et al. (1991) Development of a computer-aided surgery system: three-dimensional graphic reconstruction for treatment of liver cancer. Surgery 109:589–596PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Soyer P, Roche A, Gad M, et al. (1991) Preoperative segmental localization of hepatic metastases: utility of three-dimensional CT during arterial portography. Radiology 180:653–658PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marescaux J, Clement JM, Tassetti V, et al. (1998) Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann Surg 228:627–634PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lamade W, Glombitza G, Fischer L (2000) The impact of 3-dimensional reconstructions on operation planning in liver surgery. Arch Surg 135:1256–1261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rau HG, Schauer R, Helmberger T, et al. (2000) Impact of virtual reality imaging on hepatic liver tumor resection: calculation of risk. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 385:162–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wigmore SJ, Redhead DN, Yan XJ, et al. (2000) Virtual hepatic resection using three-dimensional reconstruction of helical computed tomography angioportograms. Ann Surg 233:221–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saito S, Yamanaka J, Miura K, et al. (2005) A novel 3D hepatectomy simulation based on liver circulation: application to liver resection and transplantation. Hepatology 41:1297–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hemming AW, Scudamore CH, Shackleton CR, et al. (1992) Indocyanine green clearance as a predictor of successful hepatic resection in cirrhotic patients. Am J Surg 163:515–518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Desmet V, Gerber M, Hoofnagle JH, et al. (1994) Classification of chronic hepatitis: diagnosis, grading, and staging. Hepatology 19:1513–1520PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Okamoto E, Kyo A, Yamanaka N, et al. (1984) Prediction of the safe limits of hepatectomy by combined volumetric and functional measurements in patients with impaired hepatic function. Surgery 95:586–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schindl MJ, Redhead DN, Fearon KCH, et al. (2005) The value of residual liver volume as a predictor of hepatic dysfunction and infection after major liver resection. Gut 54:289–296PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schindl MJ, Millar AM, Redhead DN, et al. (2006) The adaptive response of the reticuloendothelial system to major liver resection in humans. Ann Surg 243:507–514PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Heymsfield SB, Fulenwider T, Nordlinger B, et al. (1979) Accurate measurement of liver, kidney, and spleen volume and mass by computerized axial tomography. Ann Intern Med 90:185–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van Thiel DH, Hagler NG, Schade RR, et al. (1985) In vivo hepatic volume determination using sonography and computed tomography. Gastroenterology 88:1812–1817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kubota K, Makuuchi M, Kusaka K, et al. (1997) Measurement of liver volume and hepatic functional reserve as a guide to decision-making in resectional surgery for hepatic tumors. Hepatology 26:1176–1181PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Takayasu K, Okuda K (1997) Anatomy of the liver. In K. Takayasu K. Okuda, editors, Imaging in Liver Disease. Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press, 1–45Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lafortune M, Madore F, Patriquin H, et al. (1991) Segmental anatomy of the liver: a sonographic approach to the Couinaud nomenclature. Radiology 181:443–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Atri M, Bret PM, Fraser-Hill MA (1992) Intrahepatic portal venous variation: prevalence with US. Radiology 184:157–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schroeder T, Malago M, Debatin JF, et al. (2005) “All-in-one” imaging protocols for the evaluation of potential living liver donors: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and multidetector computed tomography. Liver Transpl 11:776–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Junichi Yamanaka
    • 1
  • Shinichi Saito
    • 1
  • Jiro Fujimoto
    • 1
  1. 1.First Department of SurgeryHyogo College of MedicineNishinomiyaJapan

Personalised recommendations