World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1086–1089 | Cite as

Preventing and Treating Parastomal Hernia

Article

Abstract

Parastomal hernia represents a major surgical challenge. There is no uniform definition of parastomal hernia, and the true rate is therefore difficult to establish, although it is probably higher than 30%. Many surgical techniques have been tried to prevent and treat parastomal hernia; but despite these efforts, herniation continues to be a problem. The only method that has reduced the rate of parastomal hernia in a randomized trial is the use of a prophylactic prosthetic mesh. A large-pore low-weight mesh with reduced polypropylene content and a high proportion of absorbable material placed in a sublay position at the primary operation significantly reduces the rate of parastomal hernia. Recurrence rates after surgical treatment of parastomal hernia are high unless mesh is used. Relocation of the stoma, with prophylactic mesh in a sublay position at the new site and sublay mesh repairing the incisional hernia at the primary site, is the standard method for treating parastomal hernia in our department.

References

  1. 1.
    Goligher JC. Surgery of the Anus, Colon and Rectum, 5th edition, London, Baillière Tindall, 1984;703–704Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia. Br. J.Surg. 2003;90:784–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birnbaum W, Ferrier P. Complications of abdominal colostomy. Am. J. Surg. 1952;83:64–67CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burns FJ. Complications of colostomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 1970;13:448–450PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abrams BL, Alsikafi FH, Waterman NG. Colostomy: a new look at morbidity and mortality. Am.Surg.1979;45:462–464PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burgess P, Matthew VV, Devlin HB. A review of terminal colostomy complications following abdominoperineal resection for carcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 1984;71:1004Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cevese PG, D’Amico DF, Biasiato R, et al. Peristomal hernia following end-colostomy: a conservative approach. Ital. J. Surg. Sci. 1984;14:207–209PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheung MT. Complications of an abdominal stoma: an analysis of 322 stomas. Aust. N.Z.J. Surg. 1995;65:808–811PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Londono-Schimmer EE, Leong AP, Phillips RK. Life table analysis of stomal complications following colostomy. Dis. Colon Rectum 1994;37:916–920CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ortiz H, Sara MJ, Armendariz P, et al. Does the frequency of paracolostomy hernias depend on the position of the colostomy in the abdominal wall? Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1994;9:65–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP, et al. Early local complications from intestinal stomas. Arch. Surg.1985;120:1145–1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sjodahl R, Anderberg B, Bolin T. Parastomal hernia in relation to site of the abdominal stoma. Br. J. Surg. 1988;75:339–341PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baslev A. Kolostomitilvaerelse. Ugeskr. Laeger 1973;135:2799–2804Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludvid K. Die versorgong der Parakolostomiehernie nach Sugarbaker. Zentralbl. Chir. 1999;124(Suppl. 2):13–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Makela JT, Turko PH, Laitenen ST. Analysis of latestomal complications following ostomy surgery. Ann.Chir.Gynaecol. 1997;86:305–310PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Everingham L. The parastomal hernia dilemma. World Council Enterostomal Therapists J. 1998;18:32–34Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tretbar L. Kirurgi vid stomikomplikationer. Stomijournalen Nord. Tidsk. Stomi Vård 1988;2:10–11Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Williams JG, Etherington R, Hayward MW, et al. Paraileostomy hernia: a clinical and radiological study. Br. J. Surg. 1990;77:1355–1357PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kingsnorth AN, LeBlanc KA. Parastomal hernia. In: Management of Abdomial Hernias, 3rd edition, London, Oxford University Press, 2003;257–266Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pearl RK. Parastomal hernias. World J.Surg. 1989;13:569–572CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Abcarian H. Peristomal Hernias, New York, lgaku-Shoin, 1995Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Parastomal hernia. Eur. Surg. 2003;35:28–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Incisional hernias in midline incisions: an eight-year follow up. Hernia 1998;2:175–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Marshall FF, Leadbetter WF, Dretler SP. Ileal conduit parastomal hernias. J. Urol. 1975;114:40–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Goligher JC. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon, 4th edition, London, Baillière Tindall, 1980Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hulten L, Kewenter J, Kock NG. [Complications of ileostomy and colostomy and their treatment]. Chirurg 1976;47:16–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pearl RK, Prasad ML, Orsay CP, et al. A survey of technical considerations in the construction of intestinal stomas. Ann. Surg. 1988;51:462–465Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Todd IP. Intestinal Stomas, London, Heinemann, 1978Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Marks CG, Ritchie JK. The complications of synchronous combined excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum at St-Mark’s Hospital. Br. J. Surg. 1975;62:901–905PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Eldrup J, Wied U, Bishoff N, et al. Parakolostomihernier: Incidens og relation till stomiens placering. Ugeskr. Laeger 1982;144:3742–3743PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kronberg O, Kramhohft J, Backer O, et al. Late complications following operations for cancer of the rectum and anus. Dis. Colon Rectum 1974;17:750Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    De Ruiter P, Bijnen AB. Successful local repair of paracolostomy hernia with a newly developed prosthetic device. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 1992;7:132–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Martin L, Foster G. Parastomal hernia. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1996;78:81–84PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Leslie D. The parastomal hernia. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1984;64:407–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ Jr, Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia: is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair? Arch. Surg. 1994;129:413–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Horgan K, Hughes LE. Para-ileostomy hernia: failure of a local repair technique. Br. J. Surg. 1986;73:439–440PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pearl RK, Sone JH. Management of peristomal hernia: techniques of repair. In: Fitzgibbons RJ, Greenburg AG (eds). Nyhus and Condon’s Hernia, 5 edition, Philadelphia, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2002;415–422Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br. J. Surg. 1988;75:416–418PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia. Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:534–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position. Am. J. Surg. 2000;179:186–188CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Rives J, Lardennois B, Flament JB,et al. [The utilisation of a Dacron material in the treatment of hernias of the groin]. Acta Chir. Belg. 1971;70:284–286PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Rives J, Pire JC, Flament JB, et al. [Treatment of large eventrations: new therapeutic indications apropos of 322 cases]. Chirurgie 1985;111:215–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Stoppa R, Petit J, Abourachid H, et al. [Original procedure of groin hernia repair: interposition without fixation of Dacron tulle prosthesis by subperitoneal median approach]. Chirurgie 1973;99:119–123PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Stephenson BM, Phillips RK. Parastomal hernia: local resiting and mesh repair. Br. J. Surg. 1995;82:1395–1396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique. Dis. Colon Rectum 1977;20:299–302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Abdu RA. Repair of paracolostomy hernias with Marlex mesh. Dis. Colon Rectum 1982;25:529–531PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Venditti D, Gargiani M, Milito G. Parastomal hernia surgery: personal experience with use of polypropylene mesh. Tech. Coloproctol. 2001;5:85–88CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Bayer I, Kyzer S, Chaimoff C. A new approach to primary strengthening of colostomy with Marlex mesh to prevent paracolostomy hernia. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. 1986;163:579–580PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Amin SN, Armitage NC, Abercrombie JF, et al. Lateral repair of parastomal hernia. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 2001;83:206–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Morris-Stiff G, Hughes LE. The continuing challenge of parastomal hernia: failure of a novel polypropylene mesh repair. Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Engl. 1998;80:184–187PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schumpelick V, Klosterhafen B, Müller M, et al. Minimized polypropylene meshes for preperitoneal mesh plasty in incisional hernia. Chirurg 1999;70:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Randomized clinical trial of the use of a prosthetic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br. J. Surg. 2004;91:280–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jänes A, Cengiz Y, Israelsson LA. Preventing parastomal hernia with a prosthetic mesh. Arch. Surg. 2004;139:1356–1358CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lamont PM, Ellis H. Incisional hernia in re-opened abdominal incisions: an overlooked risk factor. Br. J. Surg. 1988;75:374–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schumpelick V, Klinge U. Incisional abdominal hernia: the open mesh repair. Langenbecks Arch. Surg. 2004;389:1–5CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery and Perioperative ScienceUmeå UniversityUmeåSE-90187 Sweden
  2. 2.Kirurgkliniken Sundsvalls sjukhusSweden

Personalised recommendations