World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 1066–1072 | Cite as

Incisional Hernia: Open Techniques

  • Uwe Klinge
  • Joachim Conze
  • Carsten J. Krones
  • Volker Schumpelick
Article

Abstract

Even with the routine use of mesh, repairing an incisional hernia is a challenge. Increasing evidence of impaired wound healing in these patients supports routine use of an open prefascial, retromuscular mesh repair. Basic pathophysiologic principles dictate that for a successful long-term outcome and prevention of recurrence a wide overlap underneath healthy tissue is required. The extent of this overlap should be 5 cm in all directions: surrounding the wound closure, subxiphoidal underneath the ribs, below the arcuate line, and retropubic.

References

  1. 1.
    Van ‘t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, et al. Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:1350–1356CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Israelsson LA. The surgeon as a risk factor for complications of midline incisions Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:353–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional Lancet 2003;362:1561–1571CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cassar K, Munro A. Surgical treatment of incisional hernia Br. J.Surg 2002;89:534–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paul A, Korenkov M, Peters S, et al. Unacceptable results of the Mayo procedure for repair of abdominal incisional hernias Eur. J. Surg. 1998;164:361–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Read RC. Milestones in the history of hernia surgery: prosthetic repair Hernia 2004;8:8–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Usher F, Ochsner J, Tuttle LL Jr. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of incisional hernias Am. Surg. 1958;24:969–974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morris Stiff GJ, Hughes LE. The outcomes of nonabsorbable mesh placed within the abdominal cavity: literature review and clinical experience J. Am. Coll. Surg. 1998;186:352–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, van den Tol MP, et al. A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia N. Engl. Med. 2000;343:392–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Burger JW, Luijendijk RW, Hop WC, et al. Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia Ann. Surg. 2004;204:578–585Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flum DR, Horvath K, Koepsell T. Have outcomes of incisional hernia repair improved with time? A population-based analysis Ann. Surg. 2003;237:129–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jansen PL, Mertens Pr P, Klinge U, et al. The biology of hernia formation Surgery 2004;136:1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, et al. Review of wound healing with reference to an unrepairable abdominal hernia Eur. J. Surg. 2002;168:67–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Junge K, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, et al. Influence of mesh materials on collagen deposition in a rat model J. Invest. Surg. 2002;15:319–328CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chan G, Chan CK. A review of incisional hernia repairs: preoperative weight loss and selective use of the mesh repair Hernia 2005;9:37–41CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conze J, Prescher A, Kisielinski K, et al. Technical consideration for subxiphoidal incisional hernia repair Hernia 2005;9:84–87CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Machairas A, Misiakos EP, Liakakos T, et al. Incisional hernioplasty with extraperitoneal onlay polyester mesh Am. Surg. 2004;70:726–729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Korenkov M, Sauerland S, Arndt M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of suture repair, polypropylene mesh or autodermal hernioplasty for incisional hernia Br. J. Surg. 2002;89:50–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Basoglu M, Yildirgan MI, Yilmaz I, et al. Late complications of incisional hernias following prosthetic mesh repair Acta Chir. Belg. 2004;104:425–428PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias Arch. Surg. 1998;133:378–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM. Management of chronic postoperative pain following incisional hernia repair with Composix mesh: a report of two cases Hernia 2002;6:194–197CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Langer C, Liersch T, Kley C, et al. [Twenty-five years of experience in incisional hernia surgery: a comparative retrospective study of 432 incisional hernia repairs] Chirurg 2003;74:638–645CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schumpelick V, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, et al. Minimierte Polypropylen Netze zur präperitonealen Netzplastik (PNP): eine prospektive randomisierte klinische Studie Chirurg 1999;70:422–430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Stoppa R, Ralaimiaramanana F, Henry X, et al. Evaluation of large ventral incisional hernias repair; the French contribution to the problem Hernia 1999;3:1–3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liakakos T, Karanikas I, Panagiotidis H, et al. Use of Marlex mesh in the repair of recurrent incisional hernia Br. J. Surg. 1994;81:248–249PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Usher F. Hernia repair with Marlex mesh Arch. Surg. 1962;84:325–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Kingsnorth AN. A clinical classification for patients with inguinal hernia Hernia 2004;8:283–284CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Millikan KW. Incisional hernia repair Surg. Clin. North Am. 2003;83:1223–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uwe Klinge
    • 1
  • Joachim Conze
    • 1
  • Carsten J. Krones
    • 1
  • Volker Schumpelick
    • 1
  1. 1.Surgical DepartmentRhenisch Westfalian Technical UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations