Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 4, pp 553–559 | Cite as

Factors Predicting Long-term Responses to Splenctomy in Patients with Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura

  • Hitoshi Ojima
  • Toshihide Kato
  • Kenichirou Araki
  • Kaori Okamura
  • Ryokuhei Manda
  • Isao Hirayama
  • Yasuo Hosouchi
  • Yasuji Nishida
  • Hiroyuki Kuwano
Article

Abstract

Background

Idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an autoimmune disorder for which appropriate diagnostic treatments are uncertain. The response to splenectomy varies from 60% to 90%, and the remaining patients relapse and require further treatment. Therefore, it is important to predict the outcome of splenectomy before and after surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of splenectomy in patients diagnosed with ITP.

Materials and Methods

From 1988 to 2004, we splenectomized 32 patients with ITP; 17 underwent laparoscopic splenectomy (LS) and 15 underwent conventional open splenectomy (OS). For analysis, patients were separated retrospectively into two groups: the “responding group,” those who showed good outcomes with splenectomy, and the “non-responding group,” those who did not show good outcomes with splenectomy. Blood samples were examined before and immediately after surgery (day 0) and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3, 5, and 7.

Results

The median follow-up was 8.3 years (range: 1–16 years). The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates after splenectomy were 96.9% (one death). The responding group included 24 patients (75%), and the non-responding group included 7 (21.9%). Platelet counts in the responding group increased gradually until POD 7, and although platelet counts in the non-responding group were almost constant until POD 5, they subsequently decreased until POD 7. Average platelet counts in the responding and non-responding groups were 269 and 124 × 109/l on POD 7, respectively (P < 0.05). The pre- to post-surgery ratio of platelet counts were almost the same as the result of the actual data. Platelet counts during the long-term follow-up for the responding and non-responding groups were related to those noted on discharge.

Conclusions

A high platelet count on POD 7 was associated with a good response to splenectomy, but age at surgery, the time interval between diagnosis and splenectomy, and prior responses to corticosteroid were not. We suggest that long-term outcomes of splenectomy can easily be predicted by platelet counts on POD 7.

Keywords

Platelet Count Idiopathic Thrombocytopenic Purpura Laparoscopic Splenectomy Accessory Spleen Average Platelet Count 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fenaux P, Caulier MT, Hirschauer MC, et al. Reevaluation of the prognostic factors for splenectomy in chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP): a report on 181 cases. Eur J Haematol 1989;42:259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Najean Y, Ardaillou N. The sequestration site of platelets in idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: its correlation with the results of splenectomy. Br J Haematol 1971;21:153–164PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Akwari OE, Itani KM, Coleman RE, et al. Splenectomy for primary and recurrent immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Current criteria for patient selection and results. Ann Surg 1987;206:529–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gugliotta L, Isacchi G, Guarini A, et al. Chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP): site of platelet sequestration and results of splenectomy. A study of 197 patients. Scand J Haematol 1981;26:407–412PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Diaz J, Eisenstat M, Chung RS. Laparoscopic resection of accessory spleen for recurrent immune thrombocytopenic purpura 19 years after splenectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg 1996; 6:337–339PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mazzucconi MG, Arista MC, Peraino M, et al. Long-term follow-up of autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (ATP) patients submitted to splenectomy. Eur J Haematol 1999;62:219–222PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Szold A, Schwartz J, Abu-Abeid S, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomies for idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: experience of sixty cases. Am J Hematol 2000;63:7–10CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cines DB, Blanchette VS. Immune thrombocytopenic purpura. N Engl J Med 2002;28;346:995–1008Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maloisel F, Andres E, Zimmer J, et al. Danazol therapy in patients with chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: long-term results. Am J Med 2004;116:590–594CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delaitre B, Maignien B. Splenectomy by the laparoscopic approach. Report of a case Presse Med 1991;20:2263Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Friedman RL, Hiatt JR, Korman JL, et al. Laparoscopic or open splenectomy for hematologic disease: which approach is superior? J Am Coll Surg 1997;185:49–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Park A, Marcaccio M, Sternbach M, et al. Laparoscopic vs open splenectomy. Arch Surg. 1999;134:1263–1269PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Watson DI, Coventry BJ, Chin T, et al. Laparoscopic versus open splenectomy for immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Surgery 1997;121:18–22CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berchtold P, McMillan R. Therapy of chronic idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in adults. Blood 1989;74:2309–2317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zoghlami-Rintelen C, Weltermann A, Bittermann C, et al. Efficacy and safety of splenectomy in adult chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Ann Hematol 2003;82:290–294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bourgeois E, Caulier MT, Delarozee C, et al. Long-term follow-up of chronic autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura refractory to splenectomy: a prospective analysis. Br J Haematol 2003;120:1079–1088CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Najean Y, Rain JD, Billotey C. The site of destruction of autologous 111In-labelled platelets and the efficiency of splenectomy in children and adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura: a study of 578 patients with 268 splenectomies. Br J Haematol 1997;97:547–550CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Najean Y, Dufour V, Rain JD, et al. The site of platelet destruction in thrombocytopenic purpura as a predictive index of the efficacy of splenectomy. Br J Haematol 1991;79:271–276PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zimmer J, Andres E, Noel E, et al. Current management of adult idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in practice: a cohort study of 201 patients from a single center. Clin Lab Haematol 2004;26:137–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    El-Alfy MS, El-Tawil MM, Shahein N. 5- to 16-year follow-up following splenectomy in chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura in children. Acta Haematol 2003;110:20–24CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vianelli N, Valdre L, Fiacchini M, et al. Long-term follow-up of idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura in 310 patients. Haematologica 2001;86:504–509PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Portielje JE, Westendorp RG, Kluin-Nelemans HC, et al. Morbidity and mortality in adults with idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. Blood 2001;97:2549–2554CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Machado MA, Makdissi FF, Herman P, et al. Exposure of splenic hilum increases safety of laparoscopic splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:23–25PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kercher KW, Novitsky YW, Czerniach DR, et al. Staple line bleeding following laparoscopic splenectomy: intraoperative prevention and postoperative management with splenic artery embolization. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2003;13:353–356PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iwase K, Higaki J, Yoon HE, et al. Splenic artery embolization using contour emboli before laparoscopic or laparoscopically assisted splenectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:331–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Totte E, Van Hee R, Kloeck I, et al. Laparoscopic splenectomy after arterial embolisation. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:773–776PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hitoshi Ojima
    • 1
    • 2
  • Toshihide Kato
    • 1
  • Kenichirou Araki
    • 1
  • Kaori Okamura
    • 1
  • Ryokuhei Manda
    • 1
  • Isao Hirayama
    • 1
  • Yasuo Hosouchi
    • 1
  • Yasuji Nishida
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Kuwano
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryGunma Prefecture Saiseikai-Maebashi HospitalMaebashiJapan
  2. 2.Department of General Surgical ScienceGunma University Faculty of MedicineMaebashiJapan

Personalised recommendations