World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 127–133 | Cite as

Effects of Peritoneal Lavage with Scolicidal Agents on Survival and Adhesion Formation in Rats

Article

Abstract

Intraoperative irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with scolicidal agents is frequently recommended when dealing with traumatic or spontaneous rupture of hydatid cysts. The present experimental study was designed to examine the influence of various scolicidal agents on adhesion formation and survival. A total of 149 rats were randomly allocated to nine groups. Peritoneal lavage through a median laparotomy was performed with the following scolicidal agents. Group 1 (0.9% saline: controls), group 2 (20% hypertonic saline), group 3 (0.04% chlorhexidine gluconate), group 4 (3% hydrogen peroxide), group 5 (0.5% silver nitrate), group 6 (1% polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine, or PVP-I ), group 7 (5% PVP-I), group 8 (0.5% cetrimide/0.05% chlorhexidine), and group 9 (10% PVP-I). The surviving animals were sacrificed on postoperative day 15. Adhesion formation was macroscopically graded by the Nair criteria. The severity of adhesion formation was evaluated microscopically using the fibrosing scoring criteria and the strain test. Group 9 (10% PVP-I) was excluded from the adhesion evaluation because all of the rats died in this group. The mortality rate was significantly higher in groups 5 and 7 than in groups 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8. Adhesion scores were significantly lower in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4 than in groups 5, 6, 7, and 8. The lowest adhesion score was found in group 3 and the highest in the group 7. These results indicate that 0.04% chlorhexidine gluconate, the most potent scolicidal agent in vitro and in vivo, was associated with the lowest adhesion formation and mortality among various scolicidal agents in this experimental study.

References

  1. 1.
    Ellis H, Moran BJ, Thampson JN, et al. Adhesion related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;353:1476–1480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Cherney AH, Dizerega GS. Clinical problem of peritoneal adhesion formation following general surgery and use of adhesion prevention barriers. Clin North Am 1997;77:671–688Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    diZerega GS. Use of adhesion prevention barriers in ovarian surgery, tubalplasty, ectopic pregnancy, endometriosis, adhesiolysis, and myomectomy. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1996;8:230–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ray NF, William G, Denton RN, et al. Abdominal adhesiolysis: inpatient care and expenditures in the United States in 1994. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186:1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taylor DH, Morris DL. The current management of hydatid disease. Br J Clin Pract 1988;42:401–406PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Langer B. Surgical treatment of hydatid disease of the liver. Br J Surg 1987;74:237–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mottaghian H, Saidi F. Postoperative recurrences of hydatid disease. Br J Surg 1978;65:237–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cakmakci M, Sayek I. Prophylactic effect of albendazole in experimental peritoneal hydatidosis. Hepatogastroenterology 1992;39:424–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nair SK, Bhat KI, Aurora LA. Role of proteolytic enzyme in the prevention of postoperative intraperitoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1974;108:849–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Erenoglu C, Akın ML, Aydın S, et al. The prophylactic effect of interferon and vitamin E on postoperative peritoneal adhesions (experimental study). Cagdas J Surg 1997;11:195–198Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions: how big is the problem? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:60-63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ray NF, Larsen JW, Stillman RU, et al. Economic impact of hospitalization for lower abdominal adhesiolysis in the United States in 1988. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Amir-Jahed AK, Fardin R, Farzad A, et al. Clinical echinococcosis. Ann Surg 1975;182:541–546PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Little JM, Holland MJ, Ekberg H. Recurrence of hydatid disease. World J Surg 1988;65:700–704Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barros JL. Hydatid disease of the liver. Am J Surg 1978;135:597–600PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gokce O, Gokce C, Yilmaz M, et al. Povidone-iodine in experimental peritoneal hydatidosis. Br J Surg 1991;78:495–496PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Landa Garcia JI, Alonso E, Gonzalez-Uriarte J, et al. Evaluation of scolicidal agents in an experimental hydatid disease model. Eur Surg Res 1997;29:202–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Puryan K, Karadayi K, Topcu O, et al. Chlorhexidine gluconate: an ideal scolicidal agent in the treatment of intraperitoneal hydatidosis? World J Surg 2005;29:227–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Besim H, Karayalcin K, Hamamci O, et al. Scolicidal agents in hydatid cyst surgery. HPB Surg 1998;10:347–355PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    LeVeen HH, LeVeen FR, LeVeen EG. The mythology of povidone-iodine and the development of self-sterilizing plastics. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1993;176:183–189PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazuji MK, Fadhli HA. Peritoneal adhesions. Arch Surg 1965;19:872–874Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Badowski A, Daciews Z. The importance of high molecular weight colloid substances in prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Polish Med J 1971;10:147–153Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Janik JS, Nagaraj HS, Groff DB. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: efficacy of povidone. Arch Surg 1982;117:1321–1324PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gilmore OJ, Reid C. Prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions: a comparison of noxythiolin and a new povidone-iodine/PVP solution. Br J Surg 1979;66:197–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Van Westreenen M, van den Tol PM, Pronk A, et al. Perioperative lavage promotes intraperitoneal adhesion in the rat. Eur Surg Res 1999;31:196–201PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts LM, Sanfilippo JS, Raab S. Effects of laparoscopic lavage on adhesion formation and peritoneum in an animal model of pelvic inflammatory disease. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2002;9:503–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mund-Hoym S, Roberg A. Adhesion prophylaxis-a comparative experimental animal study. Res Exp Med 1982;181:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Meymerian E, Luttermoser GW, Frayha GJ, et al. Host-parasite relationships in echinococcosis. X. Laboratory evaluation of chemıcal scolicides as adjuncts to hydatid surgery. Ann Surg 1963;2:211–215Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    WHO Informal Working Group on Echinococcosis. Bull WHO 1996;74:231–242Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Magistrelli P, Masetti R, Coppola R, et al. Surgical treatment of hydatid disease of the liver: a 20-year experience. Arch Surg 1991;126:518–523PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Djilali G, Mahrour A, Oussedik T, et al. Hydrogen peroxide in the surgery of hydatid cyst. Presse Med 1983;12:235–237PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Belghiti J, Perniceni T, Kabbej M, et al. Complications of peroperative sterilization of hydatid cysts of the liver: apropos of 6 cases. Chirurgie 1991;117:343–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kayaalp C, Balkan M, Aydin C, et al. Hypertonic saline in hydatid disease. World J Surg 2001;25:975–979PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Sonisik M, Korkmaz A, Besim H, et al. Efficacy of cetrimide-chlorhexidine combination in surgery for hydatid cyst. Br J Surg 1998;85:1277PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Baraka A, Wakid N, Yamout F. Methemoglobinemia during surgical excision of hydatid cyst. Middle East J Anaesthesiol 1980;5:509–513PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Momblano P, Pradere B, Jarrige N, et al. Metabolic acidosis induced by cetrimonium bromide. Lancet 1984;2:1045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Gilchrist DS. Chemical peritonitis after cetrimide washout in hydatid-cyst surgery. Lancet 1979;2:1374PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Karayalcin K, Besim H, Koyuncu A, et al. Effect of peritoneal lavage with cetrimide-chlorhexidine solution on survival and adhesion formation in rat: an experimental study. T Clin J Med Res 1998;16:26–28Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Laufhman H. Current use of skin and wound cleansers and antiseptics. Am J Surg 1989;157:359–365Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Platt J, Jones RA, Bucknall RA. Intraperitoneal antiseptics in experimental bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 1984;71:626–628PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Celdran Uriarte A, Inarrea Lasheras P, Marijuan Martin JL, et al. Effect of povidone iodine and chlorhexidine on the mortality and bacterial clearance in the abdominal cavity of peritonitis rats. Eur J Surg 1991;157:393–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vallance S, Waldron R. Antiseptic vs saline lavage in purulent and faecal peritonitis. J Hosp Infect 1985;6:87–91PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bondar VM, Rago C, Cottone FJ, et al. Chlorhexidine lavage in the treatment of experimental intra-abdominal infection. Arch Surg 2000;135:309–314PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Maleckas A, Daubaras V, Vaitkus V, et al. Increased postoperative peritoneal adhesion formation after the treatment of experimental peritonitis with chlorhexidine, Langenbecks Arch Surg 2004;389:256–260Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General SurgeryCumhuriyet University, School of MedicineTurkey
  2. 2.Department of PathologyAnkara University, School of MedicineTurkey
  3. 3.Department of General SurgeryAnkara University, School of MedicineTurkey

Personalised recommendations