World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 606–609 | Cite as

Limits of Evidence-based Surgery

  • Karem SlimEmail author


Evidence-based medicine can be summarized as the use of current best evidence in the care of individual patients. When applied to surgical practice, it appears clearly that the concept of evidence-based medicine involves some limitations. To discuss these limits, the author went back over the terms of the evidence-based medicine definition. Limits are related to the low quantity and quality of randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses in surgery, the difficulties when critically appraising the literature and applying the results of evidence to individual patients, and bringing surgeons more willing to endorse the principles of evidence-based medicine. However all these limits can be overcome in the future, with the aim that evidence-based surgery will not be a passing fad.


Nonrandomized Study Current Good Evidence Australian Survey Restrictive Inclusion Criterion Relevant Clinical Study 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Straus, SE, McAlister, FA 2000Evidence-based medicine: a commentary on common criticismsCan. Med. Assoc. J.163837841Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sackett, DL, Rosenberg, WMC, Gray, JAM,  et al. 1996Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’tB.M.J.3127172Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horton, R. 1996Surgical research or comic opera: questions but few answersLancet347984CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Slim, K, Haugh, M, Fagniez, PL,  et al. 2000Ten-year audit of randomized trials in digestive surgery from EuropeBr. J.Surg.8714721473Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Solomon, MJ, McLeod, RS. 1993Clinical studies in surgical journals: have we improved?Dis Colon Rectum364348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wente, MN, Seiler, CM, Uhl, W,  et al. 2003Perspectives of evidence-based surgeryDig. Surg.20263269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Slim, K. 2000Evidence-based surgery: from concept to everyday practiceAnn. Chir.125605608CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Solomon, MJ, Laxamana, A, Devore, L,  et al. 1994Randomized controlled trials in surgerySurgery115707712PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hall, JC, Mills, B, Nguyen, H,  et al. 1996Methodological standards in surgical trialsSurgery19466472Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hall, JC, Hall, JL. 2002Randomization in surgical trialsSurgery132513518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Slim, K, Bousquet, J, Kwiatkowski, F,  et al. 1997Analysis of randomised controlled trials in laparoscopic surgeryBr. J. Surg.84610614CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thakur, A, Wang, EC, Chiu, TT,  et al. 2001Methodology standards associated with quality reporting in clinical studies in pediatric surgery journalsJ. Pediatr. Surg.3611601164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Curry, JI, Reeves, B, Stringer, MD. 2003Randomized controlled trials in pediatric surgery: could we do better?J. Pediatr. Surg38556559CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wiebe, S. 2003Randomized controlled trials of epilepsy surgeryEpilepsia443843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grimes, DA, Schulz, KF. 1996Methodology citations and the quality of randomized controlled trials in obstetrics and gynecologyAm. J. Obstet. Gynecol.17413121315PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bhandari, M, Morrow, F, Kulkarni, AV,  et al. 2001Meta-analyses in orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review of their methodologiesJ. Bone Joint Surg. Am.8314331435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moher, D, Cook, DJ, Eastwood, S,  et al. 2000Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statementBr. J. Surg.8714481454CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Solomon, MJ, McLeod, RS. 1995Should we be performing more randomised controlled trials evaluating surgical operations?Surgery118459467PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCulloch, P, Taylor, I, Sasako, M,  et al. 2002Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutionsB.M.J.32414481451Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Solomon, MJ, Pager, CK, Young, JM,  et al. 2003Patient entry into randomised controlled trials of colorectal cancer treatment: factors influencing participationSurgery133608613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Young, JM, Solomon, MJ. 2003Improving the evidence-base in surgery: evaluating surgical effectivenessA.N.Z. J. Surg.73507510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barton, S. 2000Which clinical studies provide the best evidence?B.M.J.321255256Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Downs, SH, Black, N. 1998The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventionsJ. Epidemiol. Community Health52377384PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Deeks, JJ, Dinnes, J, D’Amico, R,  et al. 2003Evaluating non-randomised intervention studiesHealth Technol. Assess.71173Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Slim, K, Nini, E, Forestier, D,  et al. 2003Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrumentA.N.Z. J. Surg.73712716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    MacLehose, RR, Reeves, BC, Harvey, IM,  et al. 2000A systematic review of comparisons of effect sizes derived from randomised and non-randomised studiesHealth Technol. Assess.41154Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rosenberg, W, Donald, A. 1995Evidence based medicine: an approach to clinical problem solvingB.M.J.31011221126Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bergmann JF. Can one be a urologist without being familiar with the methodology of therapeutic trials? Prog. Urol. 1996;6:199–204Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
    Rothwell, PM. 1995Can overall results of clinical trials be applied to all patients?Lancet34516161619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Mant, D. 1999Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients?Lancet353743746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Glasziou, PP, Irwig, LM. 1995An evidence based approach to individualising treatmentB.M.J.31113561359Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Young, JM, Hollands, MJ, Ward, J,  et al. 2003Role of opinion leaders in promoting evidence-based surgeryArch. Surg.138785791CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Aldrich, R, Kemp, L, Stewart Williams, J,  et al. 2003Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelinesB.M.J.32712831285Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine : how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd edition, Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2000Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Salkeld, G, Solomon, MJ. 2003An economic perspective on evidence-based patient choice in surgeryA.N.Z. J. Surg.73427430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bensing, J. 2000Bridging the gap: the separate worlds of evidence-based medicine and patient-centered medicinePatient Educ. Couns.391725CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Solomon, MJ, Pager, CK, Keshava, A,  et al. 2003What do patients want? Patient preferences and surrogate decision making in the treatment of colorectal cancerDis. Colon Rectum4613511357CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Haynes, RB. 1993Where’s the meat in clinical journals?A.C.P. J. Club119A23A24Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Schuster, M, McGlynn, E, Brook, R 1998How good is the quality of health care in the United States?Milbank Q76517563CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Grol, R. 2001Successes, failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practiceMed. Care394654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ward, JE, Gattellari, M, Solomon, MJ. 2002Management of patients with colorectal cancer: do Australian surgeons know the scientific evidence?Arch. Surg.13713891394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Haines, SJ, Nicholas, JS. 2003Teaching evidence-based medicine to surgical subspecialty residentsJ. Am. Coll. Surg.197285289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Black, N. 1999Evidence-based surgery: a passing fad?World J. Surg23789793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of General and Digestive SurgeryHotel-Dieu, Boulevard Leon MalfreytClermont-FerrandFrance

Personalised recommendations