Advertisement

World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 29, Issue 11, pp 1374–1383 | Cite as

Evaluation of Effect of Hemihepatic Vascular Occlusion and the Pringle Maneuver during Hepatic Resection for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Impaired Liver Function

  • Gar-Yang ChauEmail author
  • Wing-Yiu Lui
  • Kuang-Liang King
  • Chew-Wun Wu
Article

Abstract

Reducing blood loss during resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with impaired liver function is important. This study evaluated the effect and safety of inflow occlusion (hemihepatic vascular occlusion and the Pringle maneuver) in reducing blood loss during hepatectomy. A total of 120 HCC patients with impaired liver function (with a preoperative indocyanine green retention rate at 15 minutes > 10%) who underwent hepatectomy were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups, no-occlusion (n = 30), hemihepatic vascular occlusion (n = 49), and Pringle maneuver (n = 41). There was one hospital death in each group. Of all three groups, 50 patients (41.7%) had blood loss less than 1000 ml. The three groups were similar in terms of clinocopathological features. All patients underwent minor resection. Blood loss was significantly greater in the no-occlusion group; there was no difference between the hemihepatic group and the Pringle group. Multivariate analysis revealed that risk factors related to blood loss included no inflow occlusion [odds ratios (ORs), 2.93; 95% confidence intervals (CIs) 1.13–7.59], tumor centrally located (ORs, 3.85; 95% CIs, 1.50–9.90), serum albumin level < 3.5 gm/dl (ORs, 5.15; 95% CIs, 1.20–22.07), and serum alanine aminotransferase >120 U/l (ORs, 3.58; 95% CIs, 1.19–10.80). For patients with occlusion time ≥ 45 minutes, postoperative serum total bilirubin and aspartate aminotransferase levels in the Pringle group were significantly higher than those in the hemihepatic and no-occlusion groups (P < 0.05). In HCC patients with impaired liver function undergoing hepatectomy, both hemihepatic vascular occlusion and the Pringle maneuver are safe and effective in reducing blood loss. Patients subjected to hemihepatic vascular occlusion responded better than those subjected to the Pringle maneuver in terms of earlier recovery of postoperative liver function, especially when occlusion time was ≥ 45 minutes.

Keywords

Liver Resection Hepatic Resection Impaired Liver Function Pringle Maneuver Occlusion Time 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (VGH-92-82).

References

  1. 1.
    Arii S, Yamaoka Y, Futagawa S, et al. Results of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for small-sized hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective and nationwide survey in Japan. The Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Hepatology 2000;32:1224–1229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen YJ, Chau GY, Lui WY, et al. Clinicopathologic features and factors related to survival of patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. World J Surg 2003;27:294–298PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nonami T, Nakao A, Kurokawa T, et al. Blood loss and ICG clearance as best prognostic markers of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Hepatogastroenterology 1999;46:1669–1677PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Belghiti J, Noun R, Zante E, et al. Portal triad clamping or hepatic vascular exclusion for major liver resection. A controlled study. Ann Surg 1996;224:155–161CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pringle JH. Notes on the arrest of hepatic hemorrhage due to trauma. Ann Surg 1908;48:541–549Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Man K, Fan ST, Ng IOL, et al. Tolerance of the liver to intermittent Pringle maneuver in hepatectomy for liver tumors. Ann Surg 1999;134:533–539Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malassagne B, Cherqui D, Alon R, et al. Safety of selective vascular clamping for major hepatectomies. J Am Coll Surg 1998;187:482–486CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Makuuchi M, Mori T, Gunven P, et al. Safety of hemihepatic vascular occlusion during resection of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;164:155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yamamoto Y, Ikai I, Kume M, et al. New simple technique for hepatic parenchymal resection using a Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and bipolar cautery equipped with a channel for water dripping. World J Surg 1999;23:1032–1037PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chau GY, Lui WY, Tsay SH, et al. Prognostic significance of surgical margin in hepatocellular carcinoma resection: an analysis of 165 Childs’ A patients. J Surg Oncol 1997;66:122–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lui WY, Chau GY, Loong CC, et al. Hepatic segmentectomy for curative resection of primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Arch Surg 1995;130:1090–1097PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lui WY, Chau GY. Operative approaches to hepatocellular carcinoma in the cirrhotic patient. In Wanebo HJ, editor, Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Multidisciplinary Approach, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Lippincott-Raven, 1997;533–539Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang CH, Chau GY, Lui WY, et al. Long-term results of hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma originating from the noncirrhotic liver. Arch Surg 2004;139:320–325PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goseki N, Kato S, Takamatsu S, et al. Hepatic resection under the intermittent selective portal branch occlusion by balloon catheter. J Am Coll Surg 1994;179:673–678PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stephen MS, Sheil AGR, Thompson JF, et al. Aortic occlusion and vascular isolation allowing avascular hepatic resection. Arch Surg 1990;125:1482–1485PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taniguchi H, Takahashi T, Shioaki Y, et al. Vascular inflow exclusion and hepatic resection. Br J Surg 1992;79:672–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ezaki T, Seo Y, Tomoda H, et al. Partial hepatic resection under intermittent hepatic inflow occlusion in patients with chronic liver disease. Br J Surg 1992;79:224–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hasselgren PO. Prevention and treatment of ischemia of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1987;164:187–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miyagawa S, Makuuchi M, Kawasaki S, et al. Serum amylase elevation following hepatic resection in patients with chronic liver disease. Am J Surg 1996;171:235–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Couinaud C. The Vasculo-biliary Sheaths. Surgical Anatomy of the Liver Revisited. Paris, Couinaud, 1989;29–39Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Launois B, Jamieson GG. The posterior intrahepatic approach for hepatectomy or removal of segments of the liver. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:155–158PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Clavien PA, Selzner M, Rudiger HA, et al. A prospective randomized study in 100 consecutive patients undergoing major liver resection with versus without ischemic preconditioning. Ann Surg 2003;238:843–852PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Millat B, Hay JM, Descottes B, et al. Prospective evaluation of ultrasonic surgical dissectors in hepatic resection: a cooperative multicenter study. HPB Surg 1992;5:135–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones RM, Moulton CE, Hardy KJ. Central venous pressure and its effect on blood loss during liver resection. Br J Surg 1998;85:1058–1060PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chouker A, Schachtner T, Schauer R, et al. Effects of Pringle manoeuvre and ischaemic preconditioning on haemodynamic stability in patients undergoing elective hepatectomy: a randomized trial. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:204–211CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen H, Merchant NB, Didolkar MS. Hepatic resection using intermittent vascular inflow occlusion and low central venous pressure anesthesia improves morbidity and mortality. J Gastrointest Surg 2000;4:162–167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gar-Yang Chau
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Wing-Yiu Lui
    • 1
    • 2
  • Kuang-Liang King
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chew-Wun Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of General SurgeryDepartment of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General HospitalTaipei 112Republic of China
  2. 2.School of MedicineNational Yang-Ming UniversityTaipei 112Republic of China

Personalised recommendations