World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1074–1080

Intraoperative Blood Salvage in Penetrating Abdominal Trauma: a Randomised, Controlled Trial

  • Douglas M. Bowley
  • Philip Barker
  • Kenneth D. Boffard
Article

Abstract

Background

Blood is a scarce and costly resource. Transfusion is often required after major trauma but blood may not be readily available, and concerns remain over the potential adverse consequences of allogeneic blood transfusion. Intraoperative blood salvage (IBS) is used extensively after blunt abdominal trauma, but when blood is contaminated by enteric contents its use has been considered contraindicated.

Methods

This was a randomised, controlled trial conducted with Ethical Review Board approval in an inner city trauma unit. Patients with penetrating torso injury requiring a laparotomy and who had exhibited hypotension either pre-hospital or on arrival and in whom there was considered to be significant blood loss were randomly assigned to 2 groups. The control group was given allogeneic blood transfusion at the discretion of the attending medical staff. The cell save (CS) group underwent IBS with transfusion of both allogeneic and autologous blood. All patients received prophylactic antibiotics. The primary outcome was exposure to allogeneic blood up to the first 24 hours postinjury.

Results

Twenty-three patients were entered into the control group and 21 into the CS group. The groups were equivalent in demographic details, injury patterns and injury severity. The mean volume of salvaged blood re-infused in the CS group was 1,493 ml (range 0–2,690 ml). The mean number of units of allogeneic blood transfused in the first 24 hours in the control group was 11.17 compared to 6.47 in the CS group (P = 0.008). Enteric injury had been sustained in 17/23 (75%) of the control group and 18/21 (85%) of the CS group (P = NS). Survival in the control group was 8/23 (35%) compared to 7/21 (33.3%) in the CS arm (P = NS). Patients with documented postoperative sepsis were significantly more likely to die compared to those without sepsis (P = 0.04); however, those patients in the CS arm were no more likely to develop sepsis compared to those who received allogeneic blood alone.

Conclusion

In this randomised, controlled trial for patients with penetrating abdominal injuries, IBS led to a significant reduction in allogeneic blood usage with no discernable effect on rates of postoperative infection or mortality.

References

  1. 1.
    Moore FA, Moore EE, Sauaia A. Blood transfusion. An independent risk factor for postinjury multiple organ failure. Arch Surg 1997;132(6):620–624PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Schulman CI, Nathe K, Brown M, et al. Impact of age of transfused blood in the trauma patient. J Trauma 2002;52(6):1224–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coupland R. Abdominal wounds in war. Br J Surg 1996;83(11):1505–1511PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Smith LA, Barker DE, Burns RP. Autotransfusion utilization in abdominal trauma. Am Surg 1997;63(1):47–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vanderlinde ES, Heal JM, Blumberg N. Autologous transfusion. BMJ 2002;324(7340):772–775PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Napier JA, Bruce M, Chapman J, et al. Guidelines for autologous transfusion. II. Perioperative haemodilution and cell salvage. British Committee for Standards in Haematology Blood Transfusion Task Force. Autologous Transfusion Working Party. Br J Anaesth 1997;78(6):768–771PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Timberlake GA, McSwain NE Jr. Autotransfusion of blood contaminated by enteric contents: a potentially life-saving measure in the massively hemorrhaging trauma patient? J Trauma 1988;28(6):855–857PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ozmen V, McSwain NE Jr, Nichols RL, et al. Autotransfusion of potentially culture-positive blood (CPB) in abdominal trauma: preliminary data from a prospective study. J Trauma 1992;32(1):36–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gurin NN, Vovk VI, Novitskii LV. Blood reinfusion in penetrating gunshot wounds of the abdomen. Voen Med Zh 1992;(6):10–12Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Horst HM, Dlugos S, Fath JJ, et al. Coagulopathy and intraoperative blood salvage (IBS). J Trauma 1992;32(5):646–652PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jeng JC, Boyd TM, Jablonski KA, et al. Intraoperative blood salvage in excisional burn surgery: an analysis of yield, bacteriology, and inflammatory mediators. J Burn Care Rehabil 1998;19(4):305–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sloan EP, Nagy K, Barrett J. A proposed consent process in studies that use an exception to informed consent. Acad Emerg Med 1999;6(12):1283–1291PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moore EE, Dunn EL, Moore JB, et al. Penetrating abdominal trauma index. J Trauma 1981;21(6):439–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Haynes SL, Torella F, Wong JC, et al. Economic evaluation of a randomized clinical trial of haemodilution with cell salvage in aortic surgery. Br J Surg 2002;89:731–736PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Schaik HD. Penetrating wounds of the abdomen. J Florida Med Assoc 1927;14:33–34Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Griswold RA, Ortner AB. The use of autotransfusion in surgery of the serous cavities. Surg Gynaecol and Obstet 1943;77:167–177Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glover JL, Smith R, Yaw PB, et al. Autotransfusion of blood contaminated by intestinal contents. JACEP 1978;7(4):142–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Smith RN, Yaw PB, Glover JL. Autotransfusion of contaminated intraperitoneal blood: an experimental study. J Trauma 1978;18(5):341–344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jurkovich GJ, Moore EE, Medina G. Autotransfusion in trauma. A pragmatic analysis. Am J Surg 1984;148(6):782–785PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sugai Y, Sugai K, Fuse A. Current status of bacterial contamination of autologous blood for transfusion. Transfus Apheresis Sci 2001;24(3):255–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ezzedine H, Baele P, Robert A. Bacteriologic quality of intraoperative autotransfusion. Surgery 1991;109(3 Pt 1):259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Locher MC, Sailer HF. The use of the Cell Saver in transoral maxillofacial surgery: a preliminary report. J Crani omaxillofac Surg 1992;20(1):14–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Healy JC, Frankforter SA, Graves BK, et al. Preoperative autologous blood donation in total hip arthroplasty; a cost effectiveness analysis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118:465–470PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blumberg N, Kirkley SA, Heal JM. A cost analysis of autologous and allogeneic transfusions in hip replacement surgery. Am J Surg 1996;171:324–330PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Huber TS, McGorray SP, Carlton LC, et al. Intraoperative autologous transfusion during elective infrarenal aortic reconstruction: a decision analysis model. J Vasc Surg 1997;25(6):984–993PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bilski TR, Baker BC, Grove JR, et al. Battlefield casualties treated at Camp Rhino, Afghanistan: lessons learned. J Trauma 2003;54(5):814–821PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hess JR, Thomas MJ. Blood use in war and disaster: lessons from the past century. Transfusion 2003;43(11):1622–1633PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hughes LG, Thomas DW, Wareham K, et al. Intra-operative blood salvage in abdominal trauma: a review of 5 years’ experience. Anaesthesia 2001;56(3):217–220PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Victorino G, Wisner DH. Jehovah’s Witnesses: unique problems in a unique trauma population. J Am Coll Surg 1997;184(5):458–468PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Douglas M. Bowley
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Philip Barker
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kenneth D. Boffard
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity of the Witwatersrand Medical SchoolJohannesburgRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryMedical SchoolJohannesburgRepublic of South Africa
  3. 3.UK Defence Medical Services 

Personalised recommendations