World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 9, pp 1755–1762 | Cite as

Anti-High-Mobility Group Box Chromosomal Protein 1 Antibodies Improve Survival of Rats with Sepsis

  • Koichi Suda
  • Yuko Kitagawa
  • Soji Ozawa
  • Yoshiro Saikawa
  • Masakazu Ueda
  • Masahito Ebina
  • Shingo Yamada
  • Satoru Hashimoto
  • Shinji Fukata
  • Edward Abraham
  • Ikuro Maruyama
  • Masaki Kitajima
  • Akitoshi Ishizaka
Article

Abstract

Background

High-mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 (HMGB1) has recently been shown to be an important late mediator of endotoxin shock, intraabdominal sepsis, and acute lung injury, and a promising therapeutic target of severe sepsis. We sought to investigate the effect of antibodies to HMGB1 on severe sepsis in a rat cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) model.

Methods

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats underwent CLP and then were randomly divided into two groups: treatment with anti-HMGB1 polyclonal antibodies, and non-immune IgG-treated controls. The serum HMGB1 concentrations were measured at ten time points (preoperatively, and postoperatively at 4, 8, 20, 32, and 48 h and at 3, 4, 5, and 6 days). Hematoxylin-eosin staining, elastica-Masson staining, and immunohistochemical staining for HMGB1 were performed on the cecum and the lung to assess pathological changes 24 h after the CLP procedure.

Results

Treatment with anti-HMGB1 antibodies significantly increased survival [55% (anti-HMGB1) vs. 9% (controls); P< 0.01]. The serum HMGB1 concentrations at postoperative hours 20 and 32 of the anti-HMGB1 antibody-treated animals were significantly lower than those of the controls (P < 0.05). Treatment with anti-HMGB1 antibodies markedly diminished the pathological changes and the number of HMGB1-positive cells in the cecum and the lung.

Conclusions

The present study demonstrates that anti-HMGB1 antibodies are effective in the treatment of severe sepsis in a rat model, thereby supporting the relevance of HMGB1 eradication therapy for severe sepsis.

Keywords

Severe Sepsis Ileocolic Artery Serum HMGB1 Level Serum HMGB1 Concentration High Serum HMGB1 Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Satoru Fukinbara for advice on statistical analyses. The authors are indebted to Prof. J. Patrick Barron of the International Medical Communications Center of Tokyo Medical University for his review of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, et al. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science 1999;285:248–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abraham E, Arcaroli J, Carmody A, et al. Cutting edge: HMG-1 as a mediator of acute lung inflammation. J Immunol 2000;165:2950–2954PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang H, Yang H, Tracey KJ. Extracellular role of HMGB1 in inflammation and sepsis. J Intern Med 2004;255:320–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ueno H, Matsuda T, Hashimoto S, et al. Contributions of high mobility group box protein in experimental and clinical acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170:1310–1316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wichterman KA, Baue AE, Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shock—a review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 1980;29:189–201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker CC, Chaudry IH, Gaines HO, et al. Evaluation of factors affecting mortality rate after sepsis in a murine cecal ligation and puncture model. Surgery 1983;94:331–335PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Anton EO, Quintela AG, Soto AL, et al. Cecal ligation and puncture as a model of sepsis in the rat: influence of the puncture size on mortality, bacteremia, endotoxemia and tumor necrosis factor alpha levels. Eur Surg Res 2001;33:77–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heuer JG, Bailey DL, Sharma GR, et al. Cecal ligation and puncture with total parenteral nutrition: a clinically relevant model of the metabolic, hormonal, and inflammatory dysfunction associated with critical illness. J Surg Res 2004;121:178–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andersson U, Tracey KJ. HMGB1 in sepsis. Scand J Infect Dis 2003;35:577–584PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Muller S, Ronfani L, Bianchi ME. Regulated expression and subcellular localization of HMGB1, a chromatin protein with a cytokine function. J Intern Med 2004;255:332–343PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Querini PR, Capobianco A, Scaffidi P, et al. HMGB1 is an endogenous immune adjuvant released by necrotic cells. EMBO Rep 2004;5:825–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yang H, Ochani M, Li J, et al. Reversing established sepsis with antagonists of endogenous high-mobility group box 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004;101:296–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jensenius JC, Andersen I, Hau J, et al. Eggs: conveniently packaged antibodies. Methods for purification of yolk IgG. J Immunol Methods 1981;46:63–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abeyama K, Stern DM, Ito Y, et al. The N-terminal domain of thrombomodulin sequesters high-mobility group-B1 protein, a novel anti-inflammatory mechanism. J Clin Invest 2005;115:1267–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yamada S, Inoue K, Yakabe K, et al. High mobility group protein 1 (HMGB1) quantified by ELISA with a monoclonal antibody that does not cross-react with HMGB2. Clin Chem 2003;49:1535–1537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Naito Z, Ishiwata T, Kurban G, et al. Expression and accumulation of lumican protein in uterine cervical cancer cells at the periphery of cancer nests. Int J Oncol 2002;20:943–948PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Glyn E, Evans V, Sigurgeirsson B. Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis. BMJ 1999;318:1031–1035Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Suda K, Kitagawa Y, Ozawa S, et al. Serum concentrations of high-mobility group box chromosomal protein 1 before and after exposure to the surgical stress of thoracic esophagectomy: a predictor of clinical course after surgery? Dis Esophagus 2006;19:5–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ono S, Aosasa S, Mochizuki H. Effects of a protease inhibitor on reduction of surgical stress in esophagectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177:78–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sato N, Koeda K, Ikeda K, et al. Randomized study of the benefits of preoperative corticosteroid administration on the postoperative morbidity and cytokine response in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 2002;236:184–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sato N, Endo S, Kimura Y, et al. Influence of a Human Protease inhibitor on surgical stress induced immunosuppression. Dig Surg 2002;19:300–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watanabe T, Kubota S, Nagaya M, et al. The role of HMGB-1 on the development of necrosis during hepatic ischemia and hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury in mice. J Surg Res 2005;124:59–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Czura CJ, Yang H, Tracey KJ. High mobility group box-1 as a therapeutic target downstream tumor necrosis factor. J Infect Dis 2003;187:S391–S396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Mitchell BR, Ochani M, Li J, et al. IFN-γ induces high mobility group box 1 protein release partly through a TNF-dependent mechanism. J Immunol 2003;170:3890–3897PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yang H, Wang H, Tracey KJ. HMG-1 rediscovered as a cytokine. Shock 2001;15:247–253PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Koichi Suda
    • 1
  • Yuko Kitagawa
    • 1
  • Soji Ozawa
    • 1
  • Yoshiro Saikawa
    • 1
  • Masakazu Ueda
    • 1
  • Masahito Ebina
    • 2
    • 3
  • Shingo Yamada
    • 4
  • Satoru Hashimoto
    • 5
  • Shinji Fukata
    • 6
  • Edward Abraham
    • 7
  • Ikuro Maruyama
    • 8
  • Masaki Kitajima
    • 1
  • Akitoshi Ishizaka
    • 9
  1. 1.Department of Surgery, School of MedicineKeio UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Respiratory Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institute of Development, Aging and CancerTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan
  3. 3.Department of PathologyTohoku University School of MedicineSendaiJapan
  4. 4.Central InstituteShino-Test CorporationKanagawaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive CareKyoto Prefectural University of MedicineKyotoJapan
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryNational Center for Geriatrics and GerontologyAichiJapan
  7. 7.Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care MedicineUniversity of Colorado Health Sciences CenterDenverUSA
  8. 8.Department of Laboratory and Molecular MedicineKagoshima UniversityKagoshimaJapan
  9. 9.Department of Internal MedicineSchool of Medicine, Keio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations