World Journal of Surgery

, 30:1033

Appendectomy versus Antibiotic Treatment in Acute Appendicitis. A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Johan Styrud
  • Staffan Eriksson
  • Ingemar Nilsson
  • Gunnar Ahlberg
  • Staffan Haapaniemi
  • Gunnar Neovius
  • Lars Rex
  • Ibrahim Badume
  • Lars Granström
Article

Abstract

Background

Appendectomy has been the treatment for acute appendicitis for over 120 years. Antibiotic treatment has occasionally been used in small uncontrolled studies, instead of operation, but this alternative has never before been tried in a multicenter randomized trial.

Patients and Methods

Male patients, 18–50 years of age, admitted to six different hospitals in Sweden between 1996 and 1999 were enrolled in the study. No women were enrolled by decision of the local ethics committee. If appendectomy was planned, patients were asked to participate, and those who agreed were randomized either to surgery or to antibiotic therapy. Patients randomized to surgery were operated on with open surgery or laparoscopically. Those randomized to antibiotic therapy were treated intravenously for 2 days, followed by oral treatment for 10 days. If symptoms did not resolve within 24 hours, an appendectomy was performed. Participants were monitored at the end of 1 week, 6 weeks, and 1 year.

Results

During the study period 252 men participated, 124 in the surgery group and 128 in the antibiotic group. The frequency of appendicitis was 97% in the surgery group and 5% had a perforated appendix. The complication rate was 14% in the surgery group. In the antibiotic group 86% improved without surgery; 18 patients were operated on within 24 hours, and the diagnosis of acute appendicitis was confirmed in all but one patient, and he was suffering from terminal ileitis. There were seven patients (5%) with a perforated appendix in this group. The rate of recurrence of symptoms of appendicitis among the 111 patients treated with antibiotics was 14% during the 1-year follow-up.

Conclusions

Acute nonperforated appendicitis can be treated successfully with antibiotics. However, there is a risk of recurrence in cases of acute appendicitis, and this risk should be compared with the risk of complications after appendectomy.

References

  1. 1.
    Harris CW. The first elective appendectomy? Can J Surg 1961;4:405–410PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitz RH. Perforating inflammation of the vermiform appendix. Am J Med Sci 1886;92:321–346Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coldrey E. Five years of conservative treatment of acute appendicitis. J Int Coll Surg 1959;32:255–261Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Anonymous. Combined traditional Chinese and Western medicine for acute appendicitis. Chinese Med J 1977;3:266–269Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Adams ML: The medical management of acute appendicitis in a nonsurgical environment: a retrospective case review. Milit Med 1990;155:345–347Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of appendeceal mass. Br J Surg 1993;80:8–20Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eriksson S, Styrud J. Interval appendicectomy: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg 1998;164:771–774PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eriksson S, Granström L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic treatment therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg 1995;82:166–169PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eriksson S, Granström L, Bark S. Laboratory tests in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acta Chir Scand 1989;155:117–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eriksson S, Granström L, Carlström A. The diagnostic value of repetitive preoperative analysis of C-reactive protein and total leukocyte count in patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Scand J Gastroenterol 1994;29:1145–1149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hallan S, Åsberg A. The accuracy of C-reactive protein in the diagnosing acute appendicitis—a meta analysis. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997;57:373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Styrud J, Eriksson S, Segelman J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy in 2351 patients undergoing appendicectomy for suspected acute appendicitis. Dig Surg 1999;16:39–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Styrud J, Josephson T, Eriksson S. Reducing negative appendectomy evaluation of ultrasonography and computer tomography in acute appendicitis. Int J Qual Health Care 2000;12:65–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Andersson RE, Hugander A, Thulin AJG: Diagnostic accuracy and perforation rate in appendicitis: association with age and sex of the patient and with appendectomy rate. Eur J Surg 1992;158:37–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A, et al. Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. Br Med J 1994;308:107–110Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Eriksson S, Tisell Å, Granström L. Ultrasonographic findings after conservative treatment of acute appendicitis and open appendicectomy. Acta Radiol 1995;36:173–177PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arnbjörnsson E: Small intestinal obstruction after appendectomy: an avoidable complication. 1984;41:354–357Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Andersson R, Hugander A, Ghazi S, et al. Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis. Eur J Surg 2000;166:796–802PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Johan Styrud
    • 1
  • Staffan Eriksson
    • 1
    • 7
  • Ingemar Nilsson
    • 2
  • Gunnar Ahlberg
    • 2
  • Staffan Haapaniemi
    • 3
  • Gunnar Neovius
    • 4
  • Lars Rex
    • 5
  • Ibrahim Badume
    • 6
  • Lars Granström
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryKarolinska Institutet at Danderyd HospitalSweden
  2. 2.Department of SurgerySt Göran Hospital, Karolinska InstitutetSweden
  3. 3.Department of SurgeryNorrköping HospitalSweden
  4. 4.Department of SurgeryKristianstad Central HospitalSweden
  5. 5.Department of SurgeryBorås HospitalSweden
  6. 6.Department of SurgeryKatrineholm HospitalSweden
  7. 7.Department of SurgeryVästerås HospitalSweden

Personalised recommendations