World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 352–357 | Cite as

Interval Appendectomy after Conservative Treatment of an Appendiceal Mass

  • Hung-Wen Lai
  • Che-Chuan Loong
  • Jen-Hwey Chiu
  • Gar-Yang Chau
  • Chew-Wun Wu
  • Wing-Yui Lui



The purpose of this study was to clarify the role of interval appendectomy after conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass.


From January 1998 to December 2003, patients with an appendiceal mass who received conservative treatment at the Taipei Veterans General Hospital were studied retrospectively. Data on demographics, rate of appendicitis recurrence, duration of hospital stay, and complication rate were collected and analyzed.


A total of 165 patients were included (89 males, 76 females). The mean age was 53.6 years (range 7–89 years). The rate of appendicitis recurrence after conservative treatment was 25.5%; most recurred within 6 months after discharge (83.3%). The benefit of preventing recurrence is less than 16% if interval appendectomy is performed 6 weeks after discharge and less than 10% if it is done 12 weeks later. The complication rate of appendectomy performed before or after recurrence was 10% in both groups. The duration of the second hospital stay for patients who underwent interval appendectomy before or after recurrence was 4.43 ± 3.32 vs. 6.75 ± 5.73 days (P = 0.023). Of the 165 patients, 17 (10.3%) had their diagnosis changed after survey or surgery, and 5 (3.03%) were found to have colon cancer upon follow-up.


Patients who recovered from conservative treatment of an appendiceal mass should undergo colonoscopy or barium enema to detect any underlying diseases and to rule out coexistent colorectal cancer. Routine interval appendectomy benefits less than 20% of patients.


  1. 1.
    Nitecki S, Assalia A, Schein M. Contemporary management of the appendiceal mass. Br J Surg 1993;80:18–20PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vakili C. Operative treatment of appendix mass. Am J Surg 1976;131:312–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    McPherson AG, Kinmonth JB. Acute appendicitis and the appendix mass. Br J Surg 1945;32:365–370Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mosegaard A, Nielsen OS. Interval appendectomy. Acta Chir Scand 1979;145:109–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Friedell ML, Perez-Izquierdo M. Is there a role for interval appendectomy in the management of acute appendicitis? Am Surg 2000;68:1158–1162Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Skoubo-Kristensen E, Hvid I. The appendix mass. Ann Surg 1982;196:584–587PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Engkvist O. Appendectomy a froid a superfluous routine operation? Acta Chir Scand 1971;137:797–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hoffmann J, Lindhard A, Jensen H. Appendix mass: conservative management without interval appendectomy. Am J Surg 1984;148:379–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ein SH, Shandling B. Is interval appendectomy necessary after rupture of an appendiceal mass? J Pediatr Surg 1996;31:849–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Thomas DR. Conservative management of the appendix mass. Surgery 1973;73:677–680PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Foran B, Berne TV, Rosoff L. Management of the appendiceal mass. Arch Surg 1978;113:1144–1145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bradley EL, Isaacs J. Appendiceal abscess revisited. Arch Surg. 1978;113:130–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paull DL, Bloom GP. Appendiceal abscess. Arch Surg 1982;117:1017–1019PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Yamini D, Vargas H, Bongard F, et al. Perforated appendicitis: is it truly a surgical urgency? Am Surg 1998; 64:970–975PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barnes BA, Behringer GE, Weelock FC, et al. Treatment of appendicitis at the Massachusetts General Hospital (1937–1959). JAMA 1962;180:122–126PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Willemsen P, Hoorntje LE, Eddes EH, et al. The need for interval appedectomy after resolution of an appendiceal mass questioned. Dig Surg 2002;19:216–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jordan JS, Kovalcik PJ, Schwab CW. Appendicitis with a palpable mass. Ann Surg 1981;193:227–229PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bagi P, Dueholm S. Nonoperative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass. Surgery 1987;101:602–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eriksson S, Styrud J. Interval appendicectomy: a retrospective study. Eur J Surg 1998;164:771–774PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lai HW, Loong CC, Wu CW, et al. Watchful waiting versus interval appendectomy for patients recovered from acute appendicitis with tumor formation: a cost-effectiveness analysis. J Chin Med Assoc 2005;68:431–434PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mazziotti MV, Marley EF, Winthrop AL, et al. Histopathologic analysis of interval appendectomy specimen: support for the role of interval appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg 1997;32:806–809PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hsia CY, Chiu JH, Lui WY. Elective interval laparoscopic management for periappendiceal abscess. Chin Med J 1995;56:52–57Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ahmed I, Deakin D, Parsons SL. Appendix mass: do we know how to treat it? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2005;87:191–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hung-Wen Lai
    • 1
  • Che-Chuan Loong
    • 1
  • Jen-Hwey Chiu
    • 1
  • Gar-Yang Chau
    • 1
  • Chew-Wun Wu
    • 1
  • Wing-Yui Lui
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of General Surgery, Department of SurgeryTaipei Veterans General HospitalTaipei 112ROC

Personalised recommendations