World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 8, pp 737–740 | Cite as

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy as a Day Surgery Procedure: Implementation and Audit of 136 Consecutive Cases in a University Hospital

  • Henri VuilleumierEmail author
  • Nermin Halkic
Original Scientific Reports


Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been routinely performed since 1989 at our institution, and patients were traditionally admitted for 2 days. In 1996 we implemented a protocol for LC as a day surgery procedure at our center. Although initially reported by others, it has not yet been introduced as routine in Switzerland. The objective of this prospective study was to determine acceptability and safety of LC as an outpatient procedure in a university hospital. Data were collected prospectively for 136 LCs between January 1996 and December 2001. Patients were selected for the study if they wanted to go home within less than 24 hours, had no previous jaundice, and had no anesthetic contraindication. Systematic preoperative liver function tests and hepatic ultrasonography were performed. All patients were admitted on the day of operation. LC was performed using a three-trocar technique. Systematic cholangiography was performed, and all the procedures were completed laparoscopically. There were no common bile duct explorations. Postoperative complications were the following: nausea in seven patients, a minor umbilical hematoma in two. According to patient preference, 101 (74%) were discharged after an overnight stay (less than 24 hours) and 32 (24%) on the same day. The unplanned admission rate was 2%, and none of the patients was subsequently readmitted. The reasons for unplanned admissions were two patients with persistent nausea and one patient for whom an overnight stay was scheduled who presented with a ruptured subcapsular hematoma of the liver. Altogether, 97% of the patients were satisfied with the care they received. Operative costs were not significantly different when comparing inpatient and outpatient LC. The main postoperative savings were in the postoperative costs. Our results confirm that LC as a day surgery procedure is safe, effective, and acceptable to patients and their relatives. These results were achieved by using selection criteria that considered not only the surgical pathology but also the individual and by using appropriate techniques and planned postoperative analgesia.


Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Common Bile Duct Stone Mefenamic Acid Common Bile Duct Exploration Overnight Stay 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Reddick, EJ, Olsen, DO 1990Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomyAm. J. Surg.60485489Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Farha, GJ, Green, BP, Beamer, R 1994Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a freestanding outpatient surgery centerJ. Laparoendosc. Surg.4291294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Narain, PK, DeMaria, EJ 1997Initial results of a prospective trial of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomySurg. Endosc.1110911094CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fiorillo, MA, Davidson, PG, Fiorillo, M,  et al. 1996149 Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomiesSurg. Endosc.105256CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lillemoe, KD, Lin, JW, Talamini, MA,  et al. 1999Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a “true” outpatient procedure: initial experience in 130 consecutive patientsJ. Gastrointest. Surg.34449CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Keulemans, Y, Eshuis, J, Haes, H,  et al. 1998Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: day-care versus clinical observationAm. Surg.228734740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mjaland, O, Raeder, J, Aasboe, V,  et al. 1997Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomyBr. J. Surg.84958961PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bringman, S, Anderberg, B, Heikkinen, T,  et al. 2001Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomyAmbul. Surg.98386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Forrest Calland, J, Tanaka, K, Foley, E 2001et al. Outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy: patient outcomes after implementation of a clinical pathwayAnn. Surg.233704715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Curet, MJ, Contreras, M, Weber, DM,  et al. 2002Laparoscopic cholecystectomySurg. Endosc.16453457CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roizen, MF 1994Preoperative evaluationMiller, RD eds. Anesthesia4th editionChurchill LivingstoneNew York827882Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liberman, MA, Howe, S, Lane, M 2000Ondansetron versus placebo for prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomyAm. J. Surg.1796062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Narchi, P, Benhamou, D, Fernandez, H 1991Intraperitoneal local anaesthetic for shoulder pain after day-case laparoscopyLancet33815691570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Michaloliakou, C, Chung, F, Sharma, S 1996Preoperative multimodal analgesia facilitates recovery after ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomyAnesth. Analg.824451PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alexander, DJ, Ngoi, SS, Lee, L,  et al. 1996Randomized trial of periportal bupivacaine for pain relief after laparoscopic cholecystectomyBr. J. Surg.8312231225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weber, A, Munoz, J, Garteiz, D,  et al. 1997Use of subdiaphragmatic bupivacaine instillation to control postoperative pain after laparoscopic surgerySurg. Laparosc. Endosc.768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kehlet, H 1999Acute pain control and accelerated postoperative surgical recoverySurg. Clin. North Am.79431443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Greenburg, AG, Greenburg, JP, Tewel, A,  et al. 1996Hospital admission following ambulatory surgeryAm. J. Surg.1722123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pradervand Mooser, M, Gardaz, JP, Capt, H 2002et al. Relative anesthesia-cost for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: fairly lowCan. J. Anesth.49540544Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SurgeryUniversity HospitalLausanne-CHUVSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations