World Journal of Surgery

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 80–86

Practice Patterns in Breast Cancer Surgery: Canadian Perspective

Original Scientific Reports


Breast cancer is a common disease, and the surgical management is continually evolving. The objective of this study was to describe the current breast cancer practice patterns among Canadian surgeons. All active General Surgeons (n = 1172), as accredited by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada, were sent a 31-item questionnaire. Anonymous responses were collected and analyzed regarding surgeon demographics, practice, and perceptions regarding surgical care of breast cancer patients. Overall 640 active surgeons responded; of these, 519 (81%) treated breast cancer and formed the study cohort. Practice settings included community (55%), community with university affiliation (28%), and academic (17%). The majority of surgeons (76%) stated that < 25% of their practice was devoted to breast disease, and 42% performed ≤ 2 breast cancer operations/month. Immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) was used by 57% of surgeons. On multivariate analysis, higher surgeon volume of breast cancer cases (p = 0.0008), fellowship training in Surgical Oncology (p = 0.009), community population (p = 0.001), and academic practice setting (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with the use of IBR. Of the 640 surgeons who responded, 79% stated that breast cancer surgery should be performed by “most general surgeons.” In Canada, most breast cancer surgery was performed by general surgeons who did not appear to have an interest, as defined by training or clinical volume, in breast cancer. Although variability regarding specific surgical issues was found among subgroups of surgeons, the majority of respondents felt that most general surgeons should treat breast cancer.


  1. 1.
    National Cancer Institute of Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2001, Toronto, Canada, 2001Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloodgood, JC 1930Problems of cancerJ. Kansas Med. Soc.31311316Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Veronesi, U, Banfi, A, Vecchio, M,  et al. 1986Comparison of Halsted mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in early breast cancer: long-term resultsEur. J. Cancer Clin. Oncol.2210851089PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher, B, Anderson, S, Bryant, J,  et al. 2002Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancerN. Engl. J. Med.34712331241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sarrazin, D, Lê, MG, Arriagada, R,  et al. 1989Ten-year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancerRadiother. Oncol.14177184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Blichert-Toft, RC, Andersen, JA, Overgaard, M,  et al. 1992Danish randomized trial comparing breast conservation therapy with mastectomy: six years of life-table analysisJ. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.111925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lichter, AS, Lippman, ME, Danforth, DN,  et al. 1992Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer InstituteJ. Clin. Oncol.10976983PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dongen, JA, Bartelink, H, Fentiman, IS,  et al. 1992Randomized clinical trial to assess the value of breast-conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer, EORTC 10801 TrialJ. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr.111518PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Early Breast Cancer Trialists Collaborative Group1995Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer: an overview of the randomized trialsN. Engl. J. Med.33314441455Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fisher, B, Brown, A, Mamounas, E,  et al. 1997Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18J. Clin. Oncol.1524832493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Buzdar, AU, Singletary, SE, Booser, DJ,  et al. 1995Combined modality treatment of stage III and inflammatory breast cancer: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experienceSurg. Oncol. Clin. North Am.4715734Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bonadonna, G, Valagussa, P, Brambilla, C,  et al. 1998Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer: eight-year experience at the Milan Cancer InstituteJ. Clin. Oncol.1693100PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Giuliano, AE, Kirgan, DM, Guenther, JM,  et al. 1994Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancerAnn. Surg.230390401Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Veronesi, U, Paganelli, G, Viale, G,  et al. 1999Sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection in breast cancer: results in a large seriesJ. Natl. Cancer Inst.91368373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cox, CE, Haddad, F, Bass, S,  et al. 1998Lymphatic mapping in the treatment of breast cancerOncology1212831292PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Krag, D, Weaver, D, Ashikaga, T,  et al. 1998The sentinel node in breast cancer: a multicenter validation studyN. Engl. J. Med.339941946PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McMasters, KM, Wong, SL, Chao, C,  et al. 2001Defining the optimal surgeon experience for breast cancer sentinel lymph node biopsy: a model for implementation of new surgical techniquesAnn. Surg.234292299CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cox, CE, Bass, SS, Boulware, D,  et al. 1999Implementation of new surgical technology: outcome measures for lymphatic mapping of breast carcinomaAnn. Surg. Oncol.6553561PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Patel, RT, Webster, DJ, Mansel, RE,  et al. 1993Is immediate postmastectomy reconstruction safe in the long term?Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.19372375PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Singletary, SE 1997Skin-sparing mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experienceAnn. Surg. Oncol.3411416Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Simmons, RM, Fish, SK, Gayle, L,  et al. 1999Local and distant recurrence rates in skin-sparing mastectomies compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomiesAnn. Surg. Oncol.6676681PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Porter GA, MacMulkin H. Sentinel lymph node biopsy practice patterns in breast cancer: the Canadian perspective. Ann. Surg. Oncol. In PressGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nattinger, AB, Gottlieb, MS, Veum, J,  et al. 1992Geographic variation in the use of breast-conserving treatment for breast cancerN. Engl. J. Med.32611021107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farrow, DC, Hunt, WC, Samet, M 1992Geographic variation in the treatment of localized breast cancerN. Engl. J. Med.32610971101PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Iscoe, NA, Goel, V, Wu, K,  et al. 1994Variation in breast cancer surgery in OntarioCan. Med. Assoc. J.150345363Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Guadagnoli, E, Weeks, JC, Shapiro, CL,  et al. 1998Use of breast-conserving surgery for treatment of stage I and stage II breast cancerJ. Clin. Oncol.16101106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sawka, C, Olivotto, I, Coldman, A,  et al. 1997The association between population-based treatment guidelines and adjuvant therapy for node-negative breast cancerBr. J. Cancer7515341542PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Guadagnoli, E, Shapiro, CL, Weeks, JC,  et al. 1998The quality of care for treatment of early stage breast carcinoma: is it consistent with national guidelines?Cancer83302309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Johnson, TP, Ford, L, Warnecke, RB,  et al. 1994Effect of a National Cancer Institute Clinical Alert on breast cancer practice patternsJ. Clin. Oncol.1217831788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hillner, BE, Smith, TJ, Desch, CE 2000Hospital physician volume specialization outcomes cancer treatment importance quality cancer careJ. Clin. Oncol.1823272340PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sosa, JA, Bowman, HM, Gordon, TA,  et al. 1998Importance of hospital volume in the overall management of pancreatic cancerAnn. Surg.228429438CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Birkmeyer, JD, Warshaw, AL, Finlayson, SR,  et al. 1999Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery126178183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Begg, CB, Cramer, LD, Hoskins, WJ,  et al. 1998Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgeryJAMA28017471751PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Patti, MG, Corvera, CU, Glasgow, RE,  et al. 1998A hospital’s annual rate of esophagectomy influences the operative mortality rateJ. Gastrointest. Surg.2186192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nguyen, HN, Averette, HE, Hoskins, W,  et al. 1993National survey of ovarian carcinoma: Part V—the impact of physician’s specialty on patients’ survivalCancer7236633670PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Porter, GA, Soskolne, CL, Yakimets, WW,  et al. 1998Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancerAnn. Surg.227157167CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    McCardle, CS, Hole, D 1991Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative mortality and morbidity and ultimate survivalBr. Med. J.30215011505Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Simons, AJ, Ker, R, Groshen, .,  et al. 1997Variations in treatment of rectal cancer: the influence of hospital type and caseloadDis. Colon Rectum40641646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Holm, T, Johansson, H, Cedermark, B,  et al. 1997Influence of hospital- and surgeon-related factors on outcome after treatment of rectal cancer with or without preoperative radiotherapyBr. J. Surg.84657663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Sainsbury, R, Haward, B, Rider, L,  et al. 1995Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancerLancet34512651270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gillis, CR, Hole, DJ 1996Survival outcome of care by specialist surgeons in breast cancer: a study of 3786 patients in the west of ScotlandBMJ312145148PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Roohan, PJ, Bickell, NA, Baptiste, MS,  et al. 1998Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancerAm. J. Public Health88454457PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kapiteijn, E, Putter, H, Velde, CJ 2002Impact The NetherlandsBr. J. Surg.8911421149CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lester, LJ 1979A critical viewpoint by a general surgeon toward reconstructive surgery after mastectomyClin. Plast. Surg.61517PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Noone, RB, Frazier, TG, Noone, GC,  et al. 1994Recurrence of breast carcinoma following immediate reconstruction: a 13-year reviewPlast. Reconstr. Surg.9396106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Morrow, M, Scott, SK, Menck, HR,  et al. 2001Factors influencing the use of breast reconstruction postmastectomy: a National Cancer Database studyJ. Am. Coll. Surg.19218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Groves, RM 1989Survey Errors and Survey CostsJohn Wiley and SonsNew YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Société Internationale de Chirurgie 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Surgery, Dalhousie UniversityCancer Care Nova Scotia HalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations