Advertisement

Assessing the Establishment and Implementation of Environmental Flows in Spain

  • Gabriel MezgerEmail author
  • Lucia De Stefano
  • Marta González del Tánago
Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

The alteration of natural flows due to water withdrawals and the presence of hydraulic infrastructure poses significant threats to the integrity of riverine ecosystems. The establishment of environmental flows (EF) has been conceived as a water management tool to mitigate the impact of in-stream flows alteration. To date, a large body of literature has focused on methods to define EF, but less attention has been paid to documenting and assessing their actual implementation on the ground. This article provides a framework to describe and assess the process of design, application, and monitoring of EF at a river basin level. The framework is applied to Spain, where significant efforts have been made during the past decade to define and implement EF across the country. The goal of the paper is to identify strengths and opportunities for improving the implementation of EF at country level. The Spanish legislation establishes that EF should contribute to the achievement of the good ecological status of surface water bodies as required by the European Union Water Framework Directive. Several pitfalls in the design, application, and monitoring of this important river management measure constrain the ability of the existing EF to deliver that fundamental outcome.

Keywords

Environmental flows Assessment Water Framework Directive Adaptive management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by a research grant provided by the Botín Foundation and Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán El Bueno Foundation. The authors thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive feedback of the paper; Alberto Garrido and Antonio Bolinches for their valuable comments and Guillermo Reboreda for his assistance with data preprocessing.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

267_2019_1222_MOESM1_ESM.docx (26 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Acreman MC, Dunbar MJ (2004) Defining environmental flow requeriments? a review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, European Geosciences Union, 861–876Google Scholar
  2. Acreman MC, Ferguson AJD (2010) Environmental flows and the European Water Framework Directive. Freshw Biol 55:32–48.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02181.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcázar J, Palau A (2010) Establishing environmental flow regimes in a Mediterranean watershed based on a regional classification. J Hydrol 388(1–2):41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alcázar J, Palau A, Vega-Garcı C (2008) A neural net model for environmental flow estimation at the Ebro River Basin, Spain. J Hydrol 349(1–2):44–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen CR, Fontaine JJ, Pope KL, Garmestani AS (2011) Adaptive management for a turbulent future. J Environ Manag 92:1339–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.11.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Angelopoulos NV, Cowx IG, Buijse AD (2017) Integrated planning framework for successful river restoration projects: Upscaling lessons learnt from European case studies. Environ Sci Policy 76:12–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.06.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecol Appl 16:1311–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baeza SD, Gallego BMS, Herrera GT, La Calle MA, Martínez FJ (2018) Caudales ecológicos: valoración de experiencias en las cuencas españolas y propuestas adaptativas frente al cambio climático. Proyecto Q-Clima. Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua. Zaragoza, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  9. Bardina M, Honey-Rosés J, Munné A (2015) Implementation strategies and a cost/benefit comparison for compliance with an environmental flow regime in a Mediterranean river affected by hydropower. Water Policy 18:197–216.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2015.169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Belmar O, Velasco J, Martinez-Capel F (2011) Hydrological classification of natural flow regimes to support environmental flow assessments in intensively regulated Mediterranean Rivers, Segura River Basin (Spain). Environ Manag 47:992.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-011-9661-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bovee KD, Lamb BL, Bartholow JM, Stalnaker CB, Taylor J, Henriksen J (1998) Stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental methodology. Geological Survey Reston Biological resources Div, Springfield, VirginiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Brisbane Declaration (2007) Environmental flows are essential for freshwater ecosystem health and human well-being. In 10th International River Symposium, pp 3–6. Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  13. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30(4):492–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Plan Hidrológico de la Demarcación Hidrográfica de Galicia Costa. Confederación Hidrográfica de Galicia Costa—CHGAC (2015) Anexo IV. Caudales ecológicos. EspañaGoogle Scholar
  15. Plan Hidrológico de la Demarcación del Cantábrico Occidental. Confederación Hidrográfica del Cantábrico Occidental—CHCOC (2015) Anexo V. Caudales ecológicos. EspañaGoogle Scholar
  16. Plan Hidrológico de la Demarcación del Cantábrico Oriental. Confederación Hidrográfica del Cantábrico Oriental—CHCOR (2015) Anexo V. Caudales ecológicos. EspañaGoogle Scholar
  17. Plan Hidrológico de la Demarcación del Júcar. Confederación Hidrográfica del Júcar—CHJ (2015) Anexo V. Caudales ecológicos. Apéndices IV, V y VI. EspañaGoogle Scholar
  18. Dirección General del Agua y Centro de Estudios y Experimentación de Obras Públicas—DGA y CEDEX (2018) Síntesis de los Planes Hidrológicos Españoles: Segundo ciclo de la DMA (2015–2021). Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica, Centro de Publicaciones, Madrid, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  19. Estrela T, Quintas L (1996) El sistema integrado de modelización precipitación-escorrentía SIMPA. Revista Digital del CEDEX, 104, 43–43. Madrid, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  20. European Commission - EC (2015) Ecological flows in the implementation of the water framework directive Guidance Document nº 31. European Union publications office, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  21. Feld CK, Segurado P, Gutiérrez-Cánovas C (2016) Analysing the impact of multiple stressors in aquatic biomonitoring data: a ‘cookbook’with applications in R. Sci Total Environ 573:1320–1339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. García de Jalón D (2003) The Spanish experience in determining minimum flow regimes in regulated streams. Canadian. Water Resour Manag 28:185–198Google Scholar
  23. García de Jalón D, Bussettini M, Rinaldi M, Grant G, Friberg N, Cowx IG, Magdaleno F, Buijse T (2017a) Linking environmental flows to sediment dynamics. Water Policy 19:358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. García de Jalón S, González del Tánago M, Alonso C, García de Jalón D (2017b) The environmental costs of water flow regulation: an innovative approach based on the ‘Polluter Pays’ principle. Water Resour Manag 31:2809–2822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García de Jalón S, González del Tánago M, García, de Jalón D (2019) A new approach for assessing natural patterns of flow variability and hydrological alterations: the case of the Spanish rivers. J Environ Manag 233:200–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gebler D, Wiegleb G, Szoszkiewicz K (2018) Integrating river hydromorphology and water quality into ecological status modelling by artificial neural networks. Water Res 139:395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harwood A, Johnson S, Richter B, Locke A, Yu X, Tickner D (2017) Listen to the river: lessons from a global review of environmental flow success stories. WWF, UKGoogle Scholar
  28. Harwood A, Tickner D, Richter B, Locke A, Johnson S, Yu X (2018) Critical factors for water policy to enable effective environmental flow implementation. Front Environ Sci 6:37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Higgins JV, Konrad CP, Warner A, Hickey JT (2011) A framework for monitoring, reporting and managing dam operations for environmental flows. Version 1.0. SRP measures working group. https://www.conservationgateway.org/Documents/SRP%20Monitoring%20Document%20-%202011-02-11.pdf
  30. Horne AC, Webb JA, O’Donnell E, Arthington AH, McClain M, Bond N, Acreman M, Hart B, Stewardson MJ, Richter B, Poff NL (2017) Research priorities to improve future environmental water outcomes. Front Environ Sci 5:89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jiménez JA (2005) Conceptualización de caudal ambiental en Costa Rica: determinación inicial para el Río Tempisque. UICNGoogle Scholar
  32. King AJ, Gawne B, Beesley L, Koehn JD, Nielsen DL, Price AJ (2015) Improving ecological response monitoring of environmental flows. Environ Manag 55:991–1005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Le Quesne T, Kendy E, Weston D (2010) The implementation challenge: taking stock of government policies to protect and restore environmental flows. The Nature Conservancy, UKGoogle Scholar
  34. Lytle DA, Poff NL (2004) Adaptation to natural flow regimes. Trends Ecol evolution 19:94–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Magdaleno F (2017) Experimental floods: a new era for Spanish and Mediterranean rivers? Environ Sci Policy 75:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Magdaleno F, Fernández JA (2011) Hydromorphological alteration of a large Mediterranean river: relative role of high and low flows on the evolution of riparian forests and channel morphology. River Res Appl 27:374–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martinez C, Fernández Yuste J (2010) IAHRIS Índices de Alteración Hidrológica en Ríos. Versión 2.2. Manual de usuario y Manual de referencias metodológicas. Universidad Politécnica de Madrid. Madrid, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  38. Martinez-Capel F (2000) Preferencia de microhábitat de Barbus bocagei, Chondrostoma polylepis y Leuciscus pyrenaicus en la cuenca del río Tajo. Tesis Doctoral. Tesis doctoral. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Montes de la Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, MadridGoogle Scholar
  39. Martinez‐Capel F, García de Jalón D, Werenitzky D, Baeza SD, Rodilla-Alamá M (2009) Microhabitat use by three endemic Iberian cyprinids in Mediterranean rivers (Tagus River Basin, Spain). Fish Manag Ecol 16(1):52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Martinez-Capel F, Parada M, Mascarell AB, Munné T (2008) Nose velocity calculation for spatial analysis of habitat and environmental flow assessments. 4th ECRR International Conference on River Restoration, Venezia, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  41. McCook LJ, Ayling T, Cappoo M, Choat JH, Evans RD, De Freitas DM, Marsh H (2010) Adaptive management of the Great Barrier Reef: a globally significant demonstration of the benefits of networks of marine reserves. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 107(43): 18278–18285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica—MITECO (2015) Recuperado de https://www.miteco.gob.es/es/cartografia-y-sig/ide/descargas/default.aspx
  43. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica—MITECO (2017) Síntesis de los planes hidrológicos españoles. Segundo ciclo de la DMA (2015–2021) (Borrador. Versión 2.82). Madrid, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  44. Ministerio para la Transición Ecológica—MITECO (2018a) Recuperado de https://sig.mapama.gob.es/93/ClienteWS/snczi/default.aspx?origen=8&nombre=PRESA_ESTADISTICA_4&claves=&valores=
  45. Moore M (2004) Perceptions and interpretations of environmental flows and implications for future water resource management: a survey study. Linköping University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  46. O’Keeffe J, Le Quesne T (2009) Keeping rivers alive. A primer on environmental flows and their assessment. WWF Water Security Series 2. Gland, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  47. Ollero A (2010) Channel changes and floodplain management in the meandering middle Ebro River, Spain. Geomorphology 117(3–4):247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Orden ARM/2656/2008, de 10 de septiembre, por la que se aprueba la Instrucción de Planificación Hidrológica. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE-A-2008-15340), de 22 de septiembre de 2008, núm. 229, España. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/o/2008/09/10/arm2656
  49. Palau A, Alcázar J (1996) The basic flow: an alternative approach to calculate minimum environmental instream flows. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Habitat Hydraulics. pp 547–558. Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  50. Paredes‐Arquiola J, Martinez‐Capel F, Solera A, Aguilella V (2013) Implementing environmental flows in complex water resources systems–case study: the Duero river basin, Spain. River Res Appl 29:451–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Paredes-Arquiola J, Solera A, Martinez-Capel F, Momblanch A, Andreu J (2014) Integrating water management, habitat modelling and water quality at the basin scale and environmental flow assessment: case study of the Tormes River, Spain. Hydrological Sci J 59(3–4):878–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Peñas FJ, Barquín J (2019) Assessment of large-scale patterns of hydrological alteration caused by dams. J Hydrol 572:706–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Petts GE, Gurnell AM (2005) Dams and geomorphology: research progress and future directions. Geomorphol 71:27–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter B, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. BioScience 47:769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Poff NL, Richter B, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keeffe J, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55:147–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ramos V, Formigo N, Maia R (2018) Environmental flows under the WFD implementation. Water Resour Manag 32:5115–5149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Real Decreto-RD 638/2016, de 9 de diciembre, por el que se modifica el Reglamento del Dominio Público Hidráulico aprobado por el Real Decreto 849/1986, de 11 de abril, el Reglamento de Planificación Hidrológica, aprobado por el Real Decreto 907/2007, de 6 de julio, y otros reglamentos en materia de gestión de riesgos de inundación, caudales ecológicos, reservas hidrológicas y vertidos de aguas residuales (BOE-A-2016-12466). España. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2016/12/09/638
  58. Real Decreto-RD 907/2007, de 6 de julio, por el que se aprueba el Reglamento De Planificación Hidrológica. Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE-A-2007-13182), de 7 de julio, núm. 162, España. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/rd/2007/07/06/907
  59. Richter B, Baumgartner JV, Powell J, Braun DP (1996) A method for assessing hydrologic alteration within ecosystems. Conserv Biol 10:1163–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruíz JM (1998) Desarrollo de un modelo hidrológico conceptual distribuido de simulación continua integrado con un SIG. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia. Valencia, EspañaGoogle Scholar
  61. Smakhtin V, Revenga C, Döll P (2004) A pilot global assessment of environmental water requirements and scarcity. Water Int 29(3):307–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smith CB (2011) Adaptive management on the central platte river–science, engineering, and decision analysis to assist in the recovery of four species. J Environ Manag 92:1414–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Solans MA, García de Jalón D (2016) Basic tools for setting environmental flows at the regional scale: application of the ELOHA framework in a Mediterranean river basin. Ecohydrology 9(8):1517–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Souchon Y, Sabaton C, Deibel R, Reiser D, Kershner J, Gard M, Katopodis C, Leonard P, Poff NL, Miller WJ, Lee Lamb B (2008) Detecting biological responses to flow management: missed opportunities; future directions. River Res Appl 24(5):506–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Summers M, Holman I, Grabowski RJ (2015) Adaptive management of river flows in Europe: a transferable framework for implementation. J Hydrol 531:696–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tockner K, Pusch M, Borchardt D, Lorang MS (2010) Multiple stressors in coupled river–floodplain ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  68. Van Wilgen B, Biggs HC (2011) A critical assessment of adaptive ecosystem management in a large savanna protected area in South Africa. Biol Conserv 144:1179–1187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Vicente-Serrano SM, Zabalza-Martínez J, Borràs G, López-Moreno JI, Pla E, Pascual D, Savé R, Biel C, Funes I, Martín-Hernández N, Peña-Gallardo M (2017) Effect of reservoirs on streamflow and river regimes in a heavily regulated river basin of Northeast Spain. Catena 149:727–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Warner A, Bach LB, Hickey JT (2014) Restoring environmental flows through adaptive reservoir management: planning, science, and implementation through the Sustainable Rivers Project. Hydrol Sci J 59:770–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Webb JA, Little SC, Miller KA, Sterwardson MJ, Rutherfurd ID, Sharpe AK, Patulny L, Poff NL (2015) A general approach to predicting ecological responses to environmental flows: making best use of the literature, expert knowledge, and monitoring data. River Res Appl 31(4):505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Webb JA, Watts RJ, Allan C, Conallin JC (2018) Adaptive management of environmental flows. Environ Manag 61(3):339–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias GeológicasUniversidad Complutense de MadridMadridEspaña
  2. 2.Observatorio del AguaFundación BotínMadridSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de Sistemas y Recursos Naturales, E. T. S. de Ingeniería de Montes, Forestal y del Medio NaturalUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridEspaña

Personalised recommendations