Advertisement

Occurrence and Fate of Micropollutants in Private Wastewater Treatment Facility (WTF) and Their Impact on Receiving Water

  • Young-Min Kang
  • Moon-Kyung Kim
  • Taeyeon Kim
  • Tae-Kyoung Kim
  • Kyung-Duk ZohEmail author
Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigated the occurrence and removals of micropollutants in the sewage treatment tank (STT) which is a typical private wastewater treatment facility used in the rural communities in Korea, and their impact on receiving water. STTs were selected in eight provinces to examine the regional difference in the composition of micropollutant occurrence. We measured ten selected micropollutants in influents and effluents of STTs, as well as upstream and downstream of its receiving surface water. The dominant micropollutants in the influent of the STTs were caffeine (13,346 ng/L), acetaminophen (11,331 ng/L), ibuprofen (1440 ng/L), and naproxen (1313 ng/L), in agreement with the amounts produced annually in Korea. In the effluent, caffeine (1912 ng/L), acetaminophen (1586 ng/L), naproxen (475 ng/L), and ibuprofen (389 ng/L) were detected in relatively high concentrations. The composition of micropollutants in STT influents showed little regional variation by provinces, suggesting that the consumption pattern of these micropollutants did not show regional variation. The removal efficiencies of the selected micropollutants at the STTs ranged from 12% (carbamazepine) to 88% (acetaminophen), lower than typical removal by sewage treatment plants (STPs). This result is probably due to the automatic operation systems and simple treatment processes in STTs compared with STPs. The concentrations of selected micropollutants upstream of the receiving water were generally lower compared with those observed downstream, indicating that effluent from STTs was the main source. The per capita discharge loads of STTs and annual emissions rates (kg/year) from private wastewater treatment facilities were estimated for the selected micropollutants.

Highlights

  • The removal of micropollutants in sewage treatment tanks (STTs) was examined.

  • The composition of micropollutants in STT influents showed little regional variation.

  • STT effluent was the major source of micropollutants on the receiving river.

  • The per capita discharge load of target micropollutants in STTs was calculated.

  • National emission load of micropollutants from private STTs was calculated.

Keywords

Pharmaceuticals Endocrine disrupting compounds Micropollutant Sewage treatment tank Wastewater treatment facilities Per capita discharge 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the project for developing innovative drinking water and wastewater technologies funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (NO. 2019002710001).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

267_2019_1211_MOESM1_ESM.docx (228 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Andreozzi R, Raffaele M, Nicklas P (2003) Pharmaceuticals in STP effluents and their solar photodegradation in aquatic environment. Chemosphere 50(10):1319–1330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behera SK, Kim HW, Oh J-E, Park H-S (2011) Occurrence and removal of antibiotics, hormones and several other pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of the largest industrial city of Korea. Sci Total Environ 409(20):4351–4360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buerge IJ, Poiger T, Müller MD, Buser H-R (2003) Caffeine, an anthropogenic marker for wastewater contamination of surface waters. Environ Sci Technol 37(4):691–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM, Llompart Ma, Garcı́a-Jares C, Rodrı́guez I, Gomez M, Ternes T (2004) Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. Water Res 38(12):2918–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cespedes R, Lacorte S, Ginebreda A, Barceló D (2008) Occurrence and fate of alkylphenols and alkylphenol ethoxylates in sewage treatment plants and impact on receiving waters along the Ter River (Catalonia, NE Spain). Environ Pollut 153(2):384–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Y, Vymazal J, Březinová T, Koželuh M, Kule L, Huang J, Chen Z (2016) Occurrence, removal and environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in rural wastewater treatment wetlands. Sci Total Environ 566:1660–1669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cho E, Khim J, Chung S, Seo D, Son Y (2014) Occurrence of micropollutants in four major rivers in Korea. Sci Total Environ 491:138–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choi K, Kim Y, Park J, Park CK, Kim M, Kim HS, Kim P (2008) Seasonal variations of several pharmaceutical residues in surface water and sewage treatment plants of Han River, Korea. Sci Total Environ 405(1):120–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conn KE, Siegrist RL, Barber LB, Meyer MT (2010) Fate of trace organic compounds during vadose zone soil treatment in an onsite wastewater system. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(2):285–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davey P, Ferech M, Ansari F, Muller A, Goossens H (2008) Outpatient antibiotic use in the four administrations of the UK: cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis. J Antimicrobial Chemother 62(6):1441–1447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Du B, Price AE, Scott WC, Kristofco LA, Ramirez AJ, Chambliss CK, Yelderman JC, Brooks BW (2014) Comparison of contaminants of emerging concern removal, discharge, and water quality hazards among centralized and on-site wastewater treatment system effluents receiving common wastewater influent. Sci Total Environ 466:976–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. European Commission (2003) Technical Guidance Document on Risk Assessment in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, CommissionRegulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances, and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European CommunitiesGoogle Scholar
  13. Gracia-Lor E, Sancho JV, Serrano R, Hernández F (2012) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants at the Spanish Mediterranean area of Valencia. Chemosphere 87(5):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guerra P, Kim M, Shah A, Alaee M, Smyth S (2014) Occurrence and fate of antibiotic, analgesic/anti-inflammatory, and antifungal compounds in five wastewater treatment processes. Sci Total Environ 473:235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guyader ME, Warren LD, Green E, Bertram R, Proudian AP, Kiesling RL, Schoenfuss HL, Higgins CP (2018) Trace organic contaminant (TOrC) mixtures in Minnesota littoral zones: effects of on-site wastewater treatment system (OWTS) proximity and biological impact. Sci Total Environ 626:1157–1166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. K’oreje K, Vergeynst L, Ombaka D, De Wispelaere P, Okoth M, Van Langenhove H, Demeestere K (2016) Occurrence patterns of pharmaceutical residues in wastewater, surface water and groundwater of Nairobi and Kisumu city, Kenya. Chemosphere 149:238–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kay P, Hughes SR, Ault JR, Ashcroft AE, Brown LE (2017) Widespread, routine occurrence of pharmaceuticals in sewage effluent, combined sewer overflows and receiving waters. Environ Pollut 220:1447–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim S-K, Im J-K, Kang Y-M, Jung S-Y, Kho YL, Zoh K-D (2012) Wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs)-derived national discharge loads of perfluorinated compounds (PFCs). J Hazard Mater 201:82–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim U-J, Oh JK, Kannan K (2017) Occurrence, removal, and environmental emission of organophosphate flame retardants/plasticizers in a wastewater treatment plant in New York state. Environ Sci Technol 51(14):7872–7880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim Y, Lee K-B, Choi K (2016) Effect of runoff discharge on the environmental levels of 13 veterinary antibiotics: a case study of Han River and Kyungahn Stream, South Korea. Mar Pollut Bull 107(1):347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE) (2011) The 5th Study on the analysis method and occurrence of residual pharmaceuticals in Korea. A research report of KMOE 55–58Google Scholar
  22. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE) (2015) Environmental statistic. http://stat.me.go.kr/nesis/index.jsp
  23. Kosma CI, Lambropoulou DA, Albanis TA (2017) Photochemical transformation and wastewater fate and occurrence of omeprazole: HRMS for elucidation of transformation products and target and suspect screening analysis in wastewaters. Sci Total Environ 590:592–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kwun S-K, Cheon G-S, Kim S-B (2005) Enhancement of sewage treatment efficiencies by recirculation in absorbent biofilter system. J Korean Soc Agric Eng 47(3):69–76Google Scholar
  25. Li D, Kim M, Shim WJ, Yim UH, Oh J-R, Kwon Y-J (2004) Seasonal flux of nonylphenol in Han River, Korea. Chemosphere 56(1):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Y, Li Q, Zhou K, Sun X-L, Zhao L-R, Zhang Y-B (2016) Occurrence and distribution of the environmental pollutant antibiotics in Gaoqiao mangrove area, China. Chemosphere 147:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lin H, Li H, Chen L, Li L, Yin L, Lee H, Yang Z (2018) Mass loading and emission of thirty-seven pharmaceuticals in a typical municipal wastewater treatment plant in Hunan Province, Southern China. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 147:530–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lolić A, Paíga P, Santos LH, Ramos S, Correia M, Delerue-Matos C (2015) Assessment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory and analgesic pharmaceuticals in seawaters of North of Portugal: occurrence and environmental risk. Sci Total Environ 508:240–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2006) Elimination of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Environ Sci Technol 40(18):5811–5816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Matamoros V, Arias C, Brix H, Bayona JM (2009) Preliminary screening of small-scale domestic wastewater treatment systems for removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Water Res 43(1):55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McEneff G, Barron L, Kelleher B, Paull B, Quinn B (2014) A year-long study of the spatial occurrence and relative distribution of pharmaceutical residues in sewage effluent, receiving marine waters and marine bivalves. Sci Total Environ 476:317–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Papageorgiou M, Kosma C, Lambropoulou D (2016) Seasonal occurrence, removal, mass loading and environmental risk assessment of 55 pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Central Greece. Sci Total Environ 543:547–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Park Y-S, Kim D-S (2005) A comparison study on the simultaneous organic, nitrogen and phosphorus removal in sequencing batch reactor and sequencing batch biofilm reactor. Korean J Environ Health Sci 31(2):152–159Google Scholar
  34. Pothitou P, Voutsa D (2008) Endocrine disrupting compounds in municipal and industrial wastewater treatment plants in Northern Greece. Chemosphere 73(11):1716–1723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D (2009) Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Water Res 43(3):831–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rivera-Jaimes JA, Postigo C, Melgoza-Alemán RM, Aceña J, Barceló D, de Alda ML (2018) Study of pharmaceuticals in surface and wastewater from Cuernavaca, Morelos, Mexico: occurrence and environmental risk assessment. Sci Total Environ 613:1263–1274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schaider LA, Rodgers KM, Rudel RA (2017) Review of organic wastewater compound concentrations and removal in onsite wastewater treatment systems. Environ Sci Technol 51(13):7304–7317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sewerage Act, (2017) Act. No. 14839 of the 26 Jul 2017 on Sewerage Act. Korea Ministry of Environment (KMOE)Google Scholar
  39. Sim W-J, Lee J-W, Oh J-E (2010) Occurrence and fate of pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants and rivers in Korea. Environ Pollut 158(5):1938–1947CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Staniszewska M, Koniecko I, Falkowska L, Krzymyk E (2015) Occurrence and distribution of bisphenol A and alkylphenols in the water of the gulf of Gdansk (Southern Baltic). Mar Pollut Bull 91(1):372–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Subedi B, Balakrishna K, Sinha RK, Yamashita N, Balasubramanian VG, Kannan K (2015) Mass loading and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products, including psychoactive and illicit drugs and artificial sweeteners, in five sewage treatment plants in India. J Environ Chem Eng 3(4):2882–2891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sun Q, Li M, Ma C, Chen X, Xie X, Yu C-P (2016) Seasonal and spatial variations of PPCP occurrence, removal and mass loading in three wastewater treatment plants located in different urbanization areas in Xiamen, China. Environ Pollut 208:371–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sun Q, Lv M, Hu A, Yang X, Yu C-P (2014) Seasonal variation in the occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in a wastewater treatment plant in Xiamen, China. J Hazard Mater 277:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sun Q, Wang Y, Li Y, Ashfaq M, Dai L, Xie X, Yu C-P (2017) Fate and mass balance of bisphenol analogues in wastewater treatment plants in Xiamen City, China. Environ Pollut 225:542–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—a review. Sci Total Environ 429:123–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vieno NM, Tuhkanen T, Kronberg L (2005) Seasonal variation in the occurrence of pharmaceuticals in effluents from a sewage treatment plant and in the recipient water. Environ. Sci Technol 39(21):8220–8226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wu M-H, Que C-J, Xu G, Sun Y-F, Ma J, Xu H, Sun R, Tang L (2016) Occurrence, fate and interrelation of selected antibiotics in sewage treatment plants and their receiving surface water. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 132:132–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Xu EG, Liu S, Ying G-G, Zheng GJ, Lee JH, Leung KM (2014) The occurrence and ecological risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals in sewage effluents from three different sewage treatment plants, and in natural seawater from a marine reserve of Hong Kong. Mar Pollut Bull 85(2):352–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Yang Y, Ok YS, Kim K-H, Kwon EE, Tsang YF (2017) Occurrences and removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in drinking water and water/sewage treatment plants: a review. Sci Total Environ 596:303–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ying G-G, Kookana RS, Kolpin DW (2009) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceutically active compounds in sewage treatment plants with different technologies. J Environ Monit 11(8):1498–1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yoon Y, Ryu J, Oh J, Choi B-G, Snyder SA (2010) Occurrence of endocrine disrupting compounds, pharmaceuticals, and personal care products in the Han River (Seoul, South Korea). Sci Total Environ 408(3):636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang Y, Zheng N, Han R, Zheng B, Yu Z, Li S, Zheng S, Wang J (2014) Occurrence of tetracyclines, sulfonamides, sulfamethazine and quinolones in pasteurized milk and UHT milk in China’s market. Food control 36(1):238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zorita S, Mårtensson L, Mathiasson L (2009) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals in a municipal sewage treatment system in the south of Sweden. Sci Total Environ 407(8):2760–2770CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public HealthSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea
  2. 2.Institute of Health and EnvironmentSeoul National UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations