A prescription for drug-free rivers: uptake of pharmaceuticals by a widespread streamside willow
Following human excretion and limited removal with wastewater treatment, pharmaceuticals are accumulating in rivers worldwide. These chemicals can challenge the health of fish and aquatic organisms and since rivers provide drinking water sources, there is concern for cumulative exposure to humans. In this study, we discovered that sandbar willow (Salix exigua), a predominant riparian shrub along streams throughout North America, has the capacity to quickly remove pharmaceuticals from aqueous solutions. Our study tracked [3H]- or [14C]-labeled substances including 17α-ethynylestradiol (EE2), a synthetic estrogen in oral contraceptives; the antihypertensive, diltiazem (DTZ); and the anti-anxiety drug, diazepam (DZP); and for comparison, atrazine (ATZ), a root-absorbed herbicide. In growth chambers, willow saplings removed 40–80% of the substances from solutions in 24 h. Following uptake, the EE2 and DTZ were retained within the roots, while DZP and ATZ were partly passed on to the shoots. The absorbed EE2 was unextractable and apparently bound to the root tissue, while DTZ, DZP, and ATZ remained largely soluble (extractable). The uptake and translocation of the pharmaceuticals, reflected in the transpiration stream and root concentration factors, were reasonably predicted from their physicochemical properties, including octanol-water partitioning coefficients. These findings suggest the removal of pharmaceuticals as an unrecognized ecosystem service provided by riparian vegetation and especially the inundation tolerant sandbar willow. This encourages the conservation of riparian willows that line riverbanks, to remove pharmaceuticals and other contaminants. This phytoremediation also encourages the preservation of complex, braided channels and islands, which increase the extent of stream shorelines and riparian willows.
KeywordsAtrazine Diazepam Diltiazem Ethynylestradiol Phytoremediation Salix exigua
This study extended from the MSc thesis of the first author and we extend thanks to committee members Alice Hontela and Bryan Kolb (University of Lethbridge) and external examiner David Reid (University of Calgary). Funding to SBR was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Alberta Innovates and Alberta Environment and Parks.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Amlin NA, Rood SB (2001) Inundation tolerances of riparian willows and cottonwoods. JAWRA J Am Water Resour As 37:1709–1720. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03671.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Doucette WJ, Shunthirasingham C, Dettenmaier EM, Zaleski RT, Fantke P, Arnot JA (2018) A review of measured bioaccumulation data on terrestrial plants for organic chemicals: Metrics, variability, and the need for standardized measurement protocols. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3992 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elias AA, Busov VB, Kosola KR, Ma C, Etherington E, Shevchenko O, Gandhi H, Pearce DW, Rood SB, Strauss SH (2012) Green revolution trees: Semidwarfism transgenes modify gibberellins, promote root growth, enhance morphological diversity, and reduce competitiveness in hybrid poplar. Plant Physiol 160:1130–44. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.200741 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Franks CG (2006) Phytoremdiation of pharmaceuticals with Salix exigua. MSc Thesis, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, AB, Canada, 216 pp.Google Scholar
- Gilliom RJ, Barbash JE, Crawford CG, Hamilton PA, Martin JD, Nakagaki N, Nowell LH, Scott JC, Stackelberg PE, Thelin GP, Wolock DM (2006) The quality of our nation’s waters: Pesticides in the nation’s streams and ground water, 1992-2001. US Geol Surv Circ 1291:172Google Scholar
- Grassi M, Rizzo L, Farina A (2013) Endocrine disruptors compounds, pharmaceuticals and personal care products in urban wastewater: Implications for agricultural reuse and their removal by adsorption process. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:3616–3628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1636-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Maharjan, R (2014) Phytoremediation of selected pharmaceuticals and their phytotoxicity to aquatic macrophytes. University of Toledo, Theses and Dissertations. 1710. http://utdr.utoledo.edu/theses-dissertations/1710
- Petrie B, Smith BD, Youdan J, Barden R, Kasprzyk-Hordern B (2017) Multi-residue determination of micropollutants in Phragmites australis from constructed wetlands using microwave assisted extraction and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 959:91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2016.12.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Trapp S (2000) Modelling uptake into roots and subsequent translocation of neutral and ionisable organic compounds. Pest Manag Sci 56:767–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/1526-4998(200009)56:9<767::AID-PS198>3.0.CO;2-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- USDA, NRCS (2018) The PLANTS database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC, http://plants.usda 14 February 201827410-4901 USAGoogle Scholar