Quantifying the Hydrological Effect of Permitted Water Abstractions across Spatial Scales

Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Water abstraction from rivers and aquifers has considerable potential to alter flow regimes, thereby influencing the physical, chemical, and ecological well-being of freshwater ecosystems. The economic and social benefits of abstraction need to be balanced against its potentially deleterious consequences for hydrologically-driven ecological functions, ecosystem services, cultural values, and recreation. In New Zealand, recent legislation states that limits for the use of water resources should be set for all waterbodies to manage the potential cumulative impacts of abstraction and reduce allocation of the hydrological resource in over-allocated catchments. These limits must comprise at least a predefined minimum flow (the flow at which all abstraction must cease) and a total allocation (the maximum rate of abstraction summed across upstream abstractions). Over-allocation occurs when the sum of all upstream abstractions exceeds the total allocation. A national database describing consents to abstract water was collated. A replicable, transferable, and objective method was applied to calculate total allocation at the national, catchment, and reach scales across the entire country. Total allocation for each catchment was expressed by mapping Weighted Allocation Impact; an index that integrates magnitude and spread of water resource allocation across entire catchments. Results show that existing consents have caused over-allocation in several catchments, prompting questions about how to reduce abstraction in these locations.

Keywords

Water resource Limits Consents Over-allocation Headroom 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NIWA (National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, New Zealand) as part of the funded Sustainable Water Allocation Programme (SWAP) and built upon development of water allocation indicators for environmental reporting purposes for the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment (Ministry for the Environment and Stats NZ 2017). Thanks to Helen Rouse for providing internal NIWA review. Thanks to the reviews and editor for their helpful suggestions to improve an earlier draft. The views expressed are those of the author only. Many thanks to all regional council staff who helped provide consent data. Data associated with this publication are available through the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment data portal.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acreman MC, Dunbar MJ, Hannaford J, Mountford O, Wood P, Holmes N, Cowx I, Noble R, Extence C, Aldrick J, King J, Black A, Crookall D (2008) Developing environmental standards for abstractions from UK rivers to implement the EU Water Framework Directive. Hydrol Sci J 53:1105–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baalousha H (2009) Stochastic water balance model for rainfall recharge quantification in Ruataniwha Basin, New Zealand. Environ Geol 58:85–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlow PM, Leake SA (2012) Streamflow depletion by wells—understanding and managing the effects of groundwater pumping on streamflow (No. 1376, pp. i–84). US Geological SurveyGoogle Scholar
  4. Biggs BJF (2000) Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. J North Am Benthol Soc 19:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Booker DJ (2010) Predicting width in any river at any discharge. Earth Surf Process Landf 35:828–841Google Scholar
  6. Booker DJ (2013) Spatial and temporal patterns in the frequency of events exceeding three times the median flow (FRE3) across New Zealand. J Hydrol 52:15–40Google Scholar
  7. Booker DJ (2016) Generalized models of riverine fish hydraulic habitat. J Ecohydraulics 1(1–2):31–49.  https://doi.org/10.1080/24705357.2016.1229141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Booker DJ, Franklin PA, Dietrich JC, Rouse HL (2014b) Implementing water resource use limits: same rules different outcomes. J Hydrol 53:129–151Google Scholar
  9. Booker DJ, Hicks DM (2013) Estimating wetted width and fish habitat areas across New Zealand's rivers. NIWA Report to Department of Conservation. CHC2013–CHC2075, 33ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Booker DJ, Snelder TH (2012) Comparing methods for estimating flow duration curves at ungauged sites. J Hydrol 434–435:78–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Booker DJ, Snelder TH, Greenwood MJ, Crow SK (2014a) Relationships between invertebrate community composition and both flow regime and other environmental factors across New Zealand rivers. Ecohydrology. https://doi.org/10.1002/eco.1481Google Scholar
  12. Booker DJ, Whitehead AL, Henderson RD, Yang J (2016) Nationally consistent methods for calculating water allocation indicators. NIWA report to Ministry for the Environment. 2016023CH 46pp. http://www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Fresh%20water/nationally-consistent-methods-report.pdf
  13. Booker DJ, Woods RA (2014) Comparing and combining physically-based and empirically-based approaches for estimating the hydrology of ungauged catchments. J Hydrol 508:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brauman KA, Richter BD, Postel S, Malsy M, Flörke M (2016) Water depletion: an improved metric for incorporating seasonal and dry-year water scarcity into water risk assessments. Elementa 4. Article 000083. http://dx.doi.org/10.12952/journal.elementa.000083.Google Scholar
  15. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30:492–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Canterbury Water Management Strategy (2009) Canterbury Water Management Strategy: strategic framework, Environment Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand, pp 151Google Scholar
  17. Caruso B, Booker DJ, Scarsbrook M (2016) Changes in regional hydrology, water quality and ecology in the last 10 years. In: Jellyman PG, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS (eds) Advances in freshwater research, New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 17–34Google Scholar
  18. Dalin C, Wada Y, Kastner T, Puma MJ (2017) Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 543:700–704.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature21403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daughney CJ, Reeves RR (2006) Analysis of temporal trends in New Zealand's groundwater quality based on data from the national groundwater monitoring programme. J Hydrol 45(1):41–62Google Scholar
  20. Death RG, Collier KJ (2010) Measuring stream macroinvertebrate responses to gradients of vegetation cover: when is enough enough? Freshw Biol 55:1447–1464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Döll P, Fiedler K, Zhang J (2009) Global-scale analysis of river flow alterations due to water withdrawals and reservoirs. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13(12):2413–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Doran GT (1981) There’s a SMART way to write management’s goals and objectives. Manag Rev 70(11):35–36Google Scholar
  23. Ghassemi F, White I (2007) Inter-basin water transfer: case studies from Australia. Cambridge University Press, Canada, China, and IndiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenwood MJ, Booker DJ (2016) Influence of hydrological regime and land cover on traits and potential export capacity of adult aquatic insects from river channels. Oecologia 180(2):551–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hoekstra A, Mekonnen M (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(9):3232–3237.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1109936109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoekstra AY (2014) Sustainable, efficient, and equitable water use: the three pillars under wise freshwater allocation. WIREs Water 1:31–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1000 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM, Chapagain AK, Mathews RE, Richter BD (2012) Global monthly water scarcity: blue water footprints versus blue water availability. PLoS ONE 7(2):e32688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horne A, Webb A, Stewardson M, Richter B, Acreman M (eds) (2017) Water for the environment: from policy and science to implementation and management. Academic Press, Cambridge, UK, p 758Google Scholar
  29. Hunt B (2012) Review of stream depletion solutions, behavior, and calculations. J Hydrol Eng 19(1):167–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hunt B, Weir J, Clausen B (2001) A stream depletion field experiment. Groundwater 39(2):283–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Konar M, Evans TP, Levy M, Scott CA, Troy TJ, Vörösmarty CJ, Sivapalan M (2016) Water resources sustainability in a globalizing world: who uses the water? Hydrol Process 30(18):3330–3336.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10843 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehner B, Liermann CR, Revenga C, Vörösmarty C, Fekete B, Crouzet P, Döll P, Endejan M, Frenken K, Magome J, Nilsson C (2011) High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management. Front Ecol Environ 9(9):494–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li FY, Snow VO, Holzworth DP (2011) Modelling the seasonal and geographical pattern of pasture production in New Zealand. NZ J Agric Res 54(4):331–352.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2011.613403 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McMillan HK, Booker DJ, Cattoen C (2016) Validation of a national hydrological model. J Hydrol 541:800–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ministry for the Environment (2008) Proposed national environmental standard on ecological flows and water levels: discussion document. New Zealand Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, ME 868, 61ppGoogle Scholar
  36. Ministry for the Environment (MFE (2011) National policy statement for freshwater management 2011: implementation guide. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 50ppGoogle Scholar
  37. Ministry for the Environment (MFE (2015) A guide to the national policy statement for freshwater management 2014. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, 96ppGoogle Scholar
  38. Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2017) New Zealand’s environmental reporting series: our fresh water 2017. Ministry for the Environment, Wellington, New Zealand, p 98Google Scholar
  39. New Zealand Government (2011) National policy statement for freshwater management 2011. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand, 11ppGoogle Scholar
  40. New Zealand Government (2014) National policy statement for freshwater management 2014. New Zealand Government, Wellington, New Zealand, 34ppGoogle Scholar
  41. Nilsson C, Reidy CA, Dynesius M, Revenga C (2005) Fragmentation and flow regulation of the world's large river systems. Science 308(5720):405–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nyholm T, Rasmussen KR, Christensen S (2003) Estimation of stream flow depletion and uncertainty from discharge measurements in a small alluvial stream. J Hydrol 274(1):129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Poff NL, Richter BD, Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Naiman RJ, Kendy E, Acreman M, Apse C, Bledsoe BP, Freeman MC, Henriksen J, Jacobson RB, Kennen JG, Merritt DM, O’Keefe JH, Olden JD, Rogers K, Tharme RE, Warner A (2010) The ecological limits of hydrologic alteration (ELOHA): a new framework for developing regional environmental flow standards. Freshw Biol 55:147–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Poff NL, Allan JD, Bain MB, Karr JR, Prestegaard KL, Richter BD, Sparks RE, Stromberg JC (1997) The natural flow regime: a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47:769–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pokhrel YN, Felfelani F, Shin S, Yamada TJ, Satoh Y (2017) Modeling large-scale human alteration of land surface hydrology and climate. Geosci Lett 4(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-017-0076-5
  46. Poyck S, Hendrikx J, McMillan H, Hreinsson EO, Woods R (2011) Combined snow and streamflow modelling to estimate impacts of climate change on water resources in the Clutha River, New Zealand. J Hydrol 50(2):293–312Google Scholar
  47. Richter BD, Davis MM, Apse C, Konrad C (2012) A presumptive standard for environmental flow protection. River Res Appl 28(8):1312–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schneider JC, Ahlfeld DP, Spalding CP (2017) Allocation of streamflow depletion impacts under nonlinear conditions. J Am Water Resour Assoc. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12525.Google Scholar
  49. Scott DM (2009) Discussion of “Stream depletion by groundwater pumping in Leaky aquifers” by Vitaly A. Zlotnik and Daniel M. Tartakovsky. J Hydrol Eng 14(8):887–889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sivapalan M, Wagener T, Uhlenbrook S, Zehe E, Lakshmi V, Liang X, Tachikawa Y, Kumar P (2006) Predictions in ungauged basins (PUB): promise and progress. Proceedings of the PUB Symposium, IAHS Scientific Congress, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil. IAHS Publication No. 301, IAHS Press, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, 520ppGoogle Scholar
  51. Smakhtin VU (2001) Low flow hydrology: a review. J Hydrol 240(3–4):147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Snelder TH, Biggs BJF (2002) Multi-scale river environment classification for water resources management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 38:1225–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Snelder TH, Booker DJ, Lamouroux N (2011) A method to assess and define environmental flow rules for large jurisdictional regions. J Am Water Resour Assoc 47:828–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Snelder TH, Dey K, Leathwick J (2005) Definition of the multivariate environmental river classification—“Freshwater Environments of New Zealand”. NIWA Client report to the Department on Conservation. DOC04504Google Scholar
  55. Soil Conservation and River Control Council (1956) River and stream catchments of New Zealand. Soil Conservation and River Control Council, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  56. Tait AB, Henderson RD, Turner RW, Zheng X (2006) Thin plate smoothing spline interpolation of daily rainfall for New Zealand using a climatological rainfall surface. Int J Climatol 26(4):2097–2115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tipa G, Harmsworth GH, Williams E, Kitson JC (2016) Integrating mātauranga māori into freshwater management, planning and decision-making. In: Jellyman PG, Davie TJA, Pearson CP, Harding JS (eds) Advances in freshwater research. New Zealand Freshwater Sciences Society Publication, Wellington, New Zealand, pp 613–631Google Scholar
  58. Vickers A (2001) Handbook of water use and conservation. WaterPlow Press, Amherst, MA, p 464Google Scholar
  59. Vogel RM, Fennessey NM (1995) Flow duration curves II: a review of applications in water resources planning. J Am Water Resour Assoc 31:1029–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wada Y, van Beek LP, van Kempen CM, Reckman JW, Vasak S, Bierkens MF (2010) Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophys Res Lett 37:L20402.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL044571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wada Y, Van Beek LP, Bierkens MF (2011) Modelling global water stress of the recent past: on the relative importance of trends in water demand and climate variability. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15(12):3785–3808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White PA, Hong YS, Murray DL, Scott DM, Thorpe HR (2003) Evaluation of regional models of rainfall recharge to groundwater by comparison with lysimeter measurements, Canterbury, New Zealand. J Hydrol 42(1):39–64Google Scholar
  63. Woodward SJR, Barker DJ, Zyskowski RF (2001) A practical model for predicting soil water deficit in New Zealand pastures. NZ J Agric Res 44(1):91–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2001.9513464 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Young R, Smart G, Harding J (2004) Impacts of hydro-dams, irrigation schemes and river control works. In: Harding JS, Mosley MP, Pearson CP, Sorrell BK (eds) Freshwaters of New Zealand. New Zealand Hydrological Society and New Zealand Limnological Society, Christchurch, pp 31–37Google Scholar
  65. Zlotnik VA, Tartakovsky DM (2008) Stream depletion by groundwater pumping in leaky aquifers. J Hydrol Eng 13(2):43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of Water and Atmospheric ResearchChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations