Arsenic–Iron Relationships in Aquifers of North East India: Implications for Public Health and the Environment
- 132 Downloads
Arsenic (As) contamination of groundwater in the Ganga–Brahmaputra–Meghna basin of India and Bangladesh poses severe risk to human health and the environment. Arsenic in the groundwater of this area is largely geogenic, derived from the microbial reductive dissolution of iron (Fe) oxyhydroxide and subsequent release of the sorbed As. The present study examined the correlation between As and Fe in groundwater sources in four districts of Manipur state, and in Cachar, Hailakandi, and Karimganj districts in the Barak Valley region of south Assam. Both the study areas are located in the northeastern region of India. The results reveal that As–Fe correlations in Manipur were more significant and positive, when compared to those in Barak Valley. The significance of these findings in the mobilization and transport of arsenic in the fluvial environment of these two areas of North East India, and in the prediction of arsenic-safe aquifers, are discussed and compared with existing literature. These findings, therefore, have implications in the sustainable management of groundwater resources in the study areas.
KeywordsArsenic Iron Barak Valley Manipur Valley Groundwater management
We are thankful to Prof. D. Chakraborti, Director, School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, and the Head, Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India, for arsenic and iron analysis.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Bhuyan B (2010) A study on arsenic and iron contamination of groundwater in three development blocks of Lakhimpur district, Assam, India. Report and Opinion 2(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report. Accessed 17 May 2017
- Gupta A (2004) Drinking water quality in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India: Prioritizing management options. In: Takara K, Kojima T (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd APHW Conference, vol 1, Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resources, Japan, pp 621–627Google Scholar
- Gupta A, Bhattacharjee D, Borah P, Debkanungo T, Paulchoudhury C (2015) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Barak Valley, Assam, India: Topography-based analysis and risk assessment. In: Ramanathan AL, Johnston S, Mukherjee A, Nath B (ed) Safe and Sustainable Use of Arsenic-Contaminated Aquifers in the Gangetic Plain: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer Publishing Company, Cham, Switzerland, with Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hossain MM, Neaupane K, Tripathi NK, Piantanakulchai M (2013) Prediction of groundwater arsenic contamination using geographic information system and artificial neural network. Environ Asia 6(1):38–44Google Scholar
- Ibotombi S (1998) On the geology of Manipur. In: Proceedings of 9th Manipur Science Congress, Imphal, Manipur, India, pp 12–19Google Scholar
- Mahanta C, Enmark G, Nordborg D, Sracek O, Nath B, Nickson RT, Herbert R, Jacks G, Mukherjee A, Ramanathan AL, Choudhury R, Bhattacharya P (2015) Hydrogeochemical controls on mobilization of arsenic in groundwater of a part of Brahmaputra river floodplain, India. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 4:154–171Google Scholar
- Mukherjee A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Das B, Nayak B, Lodh D, Rahman MM, Chakraborti D (2006) Arsenic contamination in groundwater: A global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. J Health Popul Nutr 24(2):142–163Google Scholar
- Mukherjee A, von Brömssen M, Scanlon BR, Bhattacharya P, Fryar AE, Hasan MA, Ahmed KM, Chatterjee D, Jacks G, Sracek O (2008) Hydrogeochemical comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the Western (Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and Eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) margins of the Bengal Basin. J Contam Hydrol 99:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pandey PK, Yadav S, Nair S, Pandey M (2004) Sampling and preservation artifacts in arsenic analysis: Implications for public health issues in developing countries. Curr Sci 86:1426–1432Google Scholar