Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 437–443 | Cite as

Arsenic–Iron Relationships in Aquifers of North East India: Implications for Public Health and the Environment

  • Abhik GuptaEmail author
  • Elangbam Jayantakumar Singh
Article

Abstract

Arsenic (As) contamination of groundwater in the Ganga–Brahmaputra–Meghna basin of India and Bangladesh poses severe risk to human health and the environment. Arsenic in the groundwater of this area is largely geogenic, derived from the microbial reductive dissolution of iron (Fe) oxyhydroxide and subsequent release of the sorbed As. The present study examined the correlation between As and Fe in groundwater sources in four districts of Manipur state, and in Cachar, Hailakandi, and Karimganj districts in the Barak Valley region of south Assam. Both the study areas are located in the northeastern region of India. The results reveal that As–Fe correlations in Manipur were more significant and positive, when compared to those in Barak Valley. The significance of these findings in the mobilization and transport of arsenic in the fluvial environment of these two areas of North East India, and in the prediction of arsenic-safe aquifers, are discussed and compared with existing literature. These findings, therefore, have implications in the sustainable management of groundwater resources in the study areas.

Keywords

Arsenic Iron Barak Valley Manipur Valley Groundwater management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Prof. D. Chakraborti, Director, School of Environmental Studies, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India, and the Head, Sophisticated Analytical Instrument Facility (SAIF), North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong, India, for arsenic and iron analysis.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acharyya SK, Lahiri S, Raymahashay BC, Bhowmik A (2000) Arsenic toxicity of groundwater in parts of the Bengal Basin in India and Bangladesh: The role of Quaternary stratigraphy and Holocene sea-level fluctuation. Environ Geol 39:1127–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacquart T, Frisbie S, Mitchell E, Grigg L, Cole C, Small C, Sarkar B (2015) Multiple inorganic toxic substances contaminating the groundwater of Myingyan township, Myanmar: Arsenic, manganese, fluoride, iron, and uranium Sci Total Environ 517:232–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhuyan B (2010) A study on arsenic and iron contamination of groundwater in three development blocks of Lakhimpur district, Assam, India. Report and Opinion 2(6) http://www.sciencepub.net/report. Accessed 17 May 2017
  4. Chakraborti D, Singh EJ, Das B, Shah BA, Hossain MA, Nayak B, Ahamed S, Singh NR (2008) Groundwater arsenic contamination in Manipur, one of the seven North-Eastern Hill states of India: a future danger. Environ Geol 56:381–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gupta A (2004) Drinking water quality in Barak Valley, Assam, North East India: Prioritizing management options. In: Takara K, Kojima T (eds) Proceedings of the 2nd APHW Conference, vol 1, Asia Pacific Association of Hydrology and Water Resources, Japan, pp 621–627Google Scholar
  6. Gupta A, Bhattacharjee D, Borah P, Debkanungo T, Paulchoudhury C (2015) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Barak Valley, Assam, India: Topography-based analysis and risk assessment. In: Ramanathan AL, Johnston S, Mukherjee A, Nath B (ed) Safe and Sustainable Use of Arsenic-Contaminated Aquifers in the Gangetic Plain: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Springer Publishing Company, Cham, Switzerland, with Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi, India, pp 81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hauke J, Kossowski T (2011) Comparison of values of Pearson’s and Spearman’s correlation coefficients on the same sets of data. Quaest Geogr 30(2):87–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hossain MM, Neaupane K, Tripathi NK, Piantanakulchai M (2013) Prediction of groundwater arsenic contamination using geographic information system and artificial neural network. Environ Asia 6(1):38–44Google Scholar
  9. Ibotombi S (1998) On the geology of Manipur. In: Proceedings of 9th Manipur Science Congress, Imphal, Manipur, India, pp 12–19Google Scholar
  10. Mahanta C, Enmark G, Nordborg D, Sracek O, Nath B, Nickson RT, Herbert R, Jacks G, Mukherjee A, Ramanathan AL, Choudhury R, Bhattacharya P (2015) Hydrogeochemical controls on mobilization of arsenic in groundwater of a part of Brahmaputra river floodplain, India. J Hydrol: Reg Stud 4:154–171Google Scholar
  11. Mukherjee A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Das B, Nayak B, Lodh D, Rahman MM, Chakraborti D (2006) Arsenic contamination in groundwater: A global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. J Health Popul Nutr 24(2):142–163Google Scholar
  12. Mukherjee A, von Brömssen M, Scanlon BR, Bhattacharya P, Fryar AE, Hasan MA, Ahmed KM, Chatterjee D, Jacks G, Sracek O (2008) Hydrogeochemical comparison and effects of overlapping redox zones on groundwater arsenic near the Western (Bhagirathi sub-basin, India) and Eastern (Meghna sub-basin, Bangladesh) margins of the Bengal Basin. J Contam Hydrol 99:31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nickson RT, McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Burgess WG, Ahmed KM (2000) Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Appl Geochem 15:403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Nordstrom K (2002) Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in ground water. Science 296:2143–2144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oinam JV, Ramanathan AL, Linda A, Singh G (2011) A study of arsenic, iron and other dissolved ion variations in the groundwater of Bishnupur district, Manipur, India. Environ Earth Sci 6:1183–1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pandey PK, Yadav S, Nair S, Pandey M (2004) Sampling and preservation artifacts in arsenic analysis: Implications for public health issues in developing countries. Curr Sci 86:1426–1432Google Scholar
  17. Saha D, Sahu S, Chandra PC (2011) Arsenic-safe alternate aquifers and their hydraulic characteristics in contaminated areas of Middle Ganga Plain, Eastern India. Environ Monit Assess 175:331–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Shah BA (2012) Role of Quaternary stratigraphy on arsenic-contaminated groundwater from parts of Barak Valley, Assam, North-East India. Environ Earth Sci 66:2491–2501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Singh EJK, Gupta A, Singh NR (2013) Groundwater quality in Imphal West district, Manipur, India, with multivariate statistical analysis of data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:2421–2434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yano Y, Ito K, Kodama A, Shiomori K, Tomomatsu S, Sezaki M, Yokota H (2012) Arsenic polluted groundwater and its countermeasures in the middle basin of the Ganges, Uttar Pradesh State, India. J Environ Prot 3:856–862CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ecology & Environmental ScienceAssam UniversitySilcharIndia

Personalised recommendations