Coexistence with Large Carnivores Supported by a Predator-Compensation Program
Compensation programs are used globally to increase tolerance for and help offset economic loss caused by large carnivores. Compensation program funding comes from a variety of sources, and in Wyoming and Idaho, USA and Alberta, Canada this includes revenue from hunting and fishing license sales. We review the patterns of livestock depredation and compensation costs of Alberta’s predator-compensation program, and compare Alberta’s program to compensation programs in neighboring Canadian and American jurisdictions. Current compensation costs in Alberta are well below historic levels, but have been rapidly increasing in recent years due to an increase in depredation events coupled with increased cattle prices. That increase has caused push back from Alberta’s hunting and fishing community that finances the compensation program, although less than 3.6% of Alberta’s license levy dollars are used for predator compensation. Hunting effort in Alberta is highest on the same privately owned lands with livestock depredation problems, suggesting that private lands support habitats for hunted ungulate species as well as carnivores. Although compensation programs do not prevent depredation events themselves, compensation programs effectively can support the maintenance of wildlife habitats on private lands.
KeywordsAlberta Compensation Depredation Human-wildlife conflicts Livestock Predator
We thank the Alberta Conservation Association for access to the predator compensation data. Thanks to the Alberta Government for access to hunting effort data as well as background shapefiles used to make the maps. A. Morehouse was supported by a grant from Shell Canada. M. Boyce acknowledges continuing support from the Alberta Conservation Association and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. We thank Todd Zimmerling, Adam Ford, and an anonymous reviewer who provided helpful feedback earlier versions of this manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alberta Grizzly Bear Recovery Plan 2008-2013 (2008) Alberta Sustainable Resource Development, Fish and Wildlife Division, Alberta Species at Risk Recovery Plan No. 15. Edmonton, p 68Google Scholar
- Dorrance MJ (1983) A philosophy of problem wildlife management. Wildl Soc B 11:319–324Google Scholar
- Fenson B (2016) Hunters still paying for predator compensation. Alta Outdoor 17(8):8Google Scholar
- Fish and Wildlife Historical Society (2005) Fish, fur, feathers: fish and wildlife conservation in Alberta 1905–2005. Fish and Wildlife Historical Society and Federation of Alberta Naturalists, EdmontonGoogle Scholar
- Gurba JB (1982) Compensation for vertebrate pest damage. In: Marsh, RE (ed), Proceedings of the 10th Vertebrate Pest Conference. University of California, Davis, pp 90–94Google Scholar
- Horstman LP, Gunson JR (1982) Black bear predation on livestock in Alberta. Wildl Soc B 10:34–39Google Scholar
- Nielsen SE, Cranston J, Stenhouse GB (2009) Identification of priority areas for grizzly bear conservation and recovery in Alberta, Canada. J Conserv Plan 5:38–60Google Scholar
- Nyhus PJ, Osofsky SA, Ferraro P, Madden F, Fischer H (2005) Bearing the costs of human-wildlife conflict: the challenges of compensation schemes. In: Woodroffe R, Thirgood S, Rabinowitz A. (eds), People and wildlife: Conflict or coexistence? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 107–121Google Scholar
- Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP et al (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343. https://doi.org/1241484Google Scholar
- Shivik JA, Martin DJ (2000) Aversive and disruptive stimulus applications for managing predation. Wildl Damage Manag Conf 9:111–119Google Scholar
- Stenhouse GB, Boulanger J, Efford M, Rovang S, McKay T, Sorensen A, Graham K (2015) Estimates of grizzly bear population size and density for the 2014 Alberta Yellowhead Population Unit (BMA3) and south Jasper National Park. FRI Research Grizzly Bear Program, Hinton, Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
- Torell LA, Bailey SA (2000) Is the profit motive an important determinant of grazing land use and the rancher motive? Western Agr Econ Assoc Annual Meeting, Vancouver, B.C. http://purl.umn.edu/36451
- Wagner KK, Scmidt RH, Conover MR (1997) Compensation programs for widlife damage in North America. Wildl Soc B 25:312–319Google Scholar
- Walters C (1986) Adaptive management of revewable resources. MacMillan Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar