Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 60, Issue 5, pp 989–1009 | Cite as

Visioning the Future: Scenarios Modeling of the Florida Coastal Everglades

  • Hilary Flower
  • Mark Rains
  • Carl Fitz
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we provide screening-level analysis of plausible Everglades ecosystem response by 2060 to sea level rise (0.50 m) interacting with macroclimate change (1.5 °C warming, 7% increase in evapotranspiration, and rainfall that either increases or decreases by 10%). We used these climate scenarios as input to the Ecological Landscape Model to simulate changes to seven interactive hydro-ecological metrics. Mangrove forest and other marine influences migrated up to 15 km inland in both scenarios, delineated by the saltwater front. Freshwater habitat area decreased by 25–30% under our two climate change scenarios and was largely replaced by mangroves and, in the increased rainfall scenario, open water as well. Significant mangroves drowned along northern Florida Bay in both climate change scenarios due to sea level rise. Increased rainfall of 10% provided significant benefits to the spatial and temporal salinity regime within the marine-influenced zone, providing a more gradual and natural adjustment for at-risk flora and fauna. However, increased rainfall also increased the risk of open water, due to water depths that inhibited mangrove establishment and reduced peat accumulation rates. We infer that ecological effects related to sea level rise may occur in the extreme front-edge of saltwater intrusion, that topography will control the incursion of this zone as sea level rises, and that differences in freshwater availability will have ecologically significant effects on ecosystem resilience through the temporal and spatial pattern of salinity changes.

Keywords

Restoration Mangroves Peat Climate change Sea level rise Resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation through the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research program under Cooperative Agreements No. DEB-1237517, Grant No. DBI-0620409, and Grant No. DEB-9910514. This is contribution number 840 from the Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University. We would like to thank Dr. Jayantha Obeysekera and Jenifer Barnes of Hydrologic & Environmental Systems Modeling, South Florida Water Management District, for providing results of simulation runs of the South Florida Water Management Model. The performance assessments of our Everglades Landscape Model would not have been possible without the long-term monitoring data sets provided by the Florida Coastal Everglades Long Term Everglades Research Program. In particular we appreciate Dr. Evelyn Gaiser and Dr. Daniel Childers for sharing their extensive long term water quality data sets from Shark River Slough (Gaiser and Childers 2016). We also appreciate Dr. Tiffany Troxler for sharing her extensive long term water quality data sets from Taylor Slough (Troxler 2017a; Troxler 2017b; Troxler and Childers 2008).

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

267_2017_916_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (824 kb)
Online Resource

References

  1. Aburto-Oropeza O, Ezcurra E, Danemann G, Valdez V, Murray J, Sala E (2008) Mangroves in the Gulf of California increase fishery yields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:10456–10459Google Scholar
  2. Aumen NG, Havens KE, Best GR, Berry L (2015) Predicting ecological responses of the Florida Everglades to possible future climate scenarios: Introduction. Environ Manag 55:741–748Google Scholar
  3. Barbier EB et al. (2008) Coastal ecosystem-based management with nonlinear ecological functions and values. Science 319:321–323Google Scholar
  4. Brand LE (2002) The transport of terrestrial nutrients to South Florida coastal waters The Everglades. Florida Bay, and Coral Reefs of the Florida Keys CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, p 353–406Google Scholar
  5. Caljon A (2012) Brackish-water phytoplankton of the Flemish lowland, vol 18. Springer Science & Business Media, The Hague, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter L et al. (2014) Southeast and the caribbean climate change impacts in the United States: The third national climate assessment. 396–417Google Scholar
  7. Catano CP et al. (2015) Using scenario planning to evaluate the impacts of climate change on wildlife populations and communities in the Florida Everglades. Environ Manag 55:807–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers LG, Davis SE, Troxler T, Boyer JN, Downey-Wall A, Scinto LJ (2014) Biogeochemical effects of simulated sea level rise on carbon loss in an Everglades mangrove peat soil. Hydrobiologia 726:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craighead F (1964) Land, mangroves and hurricanes. Fairchild Tropical Garden Bulletin, 19; 5-32. 1971. The trees of South Florida. The natural environments and their succession, vol 1. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, FLGoogle Scholar
  10. Enfield DB, Mestas‐Nuñez AM, Trimble PJ (2001) The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation and its relation to rainfall and river flows in the continental US. Geophys Res Lett 28:2077–2080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. EPA (2013) Secondary Drinking Water Regulations: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: Secondary drinking water regulations; guidance for nuisance chemicals Report 816–f–10–079. https://www.epa.gov/dwstandardsregulations/secondary-drinking-water-standardsguidance-nuisance-chemicals. Accessed 8 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  12. Fernald E, Purdum E (1998) Water Resour Atlas, ch. 6. Florida State University: Institute of Public Affairs Tallahassee, FL, p 114–119Google Scholar
  13. Fitterman DV, Deszcz-Pan M (1998) Helicopter EM mapping of saltwater intrusion in Everglades National Park, Florida. Explor Geophys 29:240–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitz C, Sklar F, Waring T, Voinov A, Costanza R, Maxwell T (2004) Development and application of the Everglades Landscape Model. In: Landscape Simulation Modeling. Springer, New York, NY, p 143–171Google Scholar
  15. Fitz HC, Kiker GA, Kim J (2011) Integrated ecological modeling and decision analysis within the Everglades landscape. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:517–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fitz HC, Paudel R (2012) Documentation of the Everglades landscape model: ELM v2.8.4 Ft Lauderdale Research and Education Center, IFAS, University of Florida, Ft Lauderdale, FL, http://wwwecolandmodcom/publications 364 pagesGoogle Scholar
  17. Fitz HC, Sklar FH (1999) Ecosystem analysis of phosphorus impacts and altered hydrology in the Everglades: a landscape modeling approach. In: Reddy KR, O’Connor GA, Schelske CL (eds) Phosphorus Biogeochemistry in Subtropical Ecosystems. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, p 585–620Google Scholar
  18. Fitz HC, Trimble B (2006) Documentation of the Everglades landscape model: ELM v2. 5. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  19. Gabler CA et al. (2017) Macroclimatic change expected to transform coastal wetland ecosystems this century. Nat Clim Change 7:142–147Google Scholar
  20. Gaiser E (2009) Periphyton as an indicator of restoration in the Florida Everglades. Ecol Indic 9:S37–S45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaiser E, Childers D (2016) Water Quality Data (Extensive) from the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), from October 2000 to Present. Environmental Data Initiative. doi:10.6073/pasta/4606a6abdda742225de953d079934ce4. Accessed 8 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  22. Gaiser E et al. (2012) The Florida Everglades Wetland Habitats of North America Ecology and Conservation Concerns. In: Batzer D, Baldwin A (eds) University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaiser EE et al. (2005) Cascading ecological effects of low-level phosphorus enrichment in the Florida Everglades. J Environ Qual 34:717–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaiser EE, Zafiris A, Ruiz PL, Tobias FA, Ross MS (2006) Tracking rates of ecotone migration due to salt-water encroachment using fossil mollusks in coastal South Florida. Hydrobiologia 569:237–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gornitz V (1991) Global coastal hazards from future sea level rise. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 89:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hackney CT, Williams A (2012) Impact of Sea Level Rise and Salt Intrusion On Everglades Peat: Review and Recommendations Jacksonville. Department of Biology, University of North Florida, FL, Online at http://14123210Google Scholar
  27. Havens KE, Steinman AD (2015) Ecological responses of a large shallow lake (Okeechobee, Florida) to climate change and potential future hydrologic regimes. Environ Manag 55:763–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirwan ML, Megonigal JP (2013) Tidal wetland stability in the face of human impacts and sea-level rise. Nature 504:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Koch EW et al. (2009) Non‐linearity in ecosystem services: temporal and spatial variability in coastal protection. Front Ecol Environ 7:29–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langevin C, Swain E, Wolfert M (2005) Simulation of integrated surface-water/ground-water flow and salinity for a coastal wetland and adjacent estuary. J Hydrol 314:212–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Larsen L et al. (2011) Recent and historic drivers of landscape change in the Everglades ridge, slough, and tree island mosaic. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41:344–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. López‐Medellín X, Ezcurra E, González‐Abraham C, Hak J, Santiago LS, Sickman JO (2011) Oceanographic anomalies and sea‐level rise drive mangroves inland in the Pacific coast of Mexico. J Veg Sci 22:143–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Melillo JM, Terese (T.C.) R, Gary WY (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third national climate assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program. Washington DC, p 841. doi:10.7930/J0Z31WJ2Google Scholar
  34. Mitsch W, Gosselink J (2000) Wetlands, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  35. Mitsch WJ, Band LE, Cerco CF (2007) Everglades Landscape Model (ELM), Version 2.5Google Scholar
  36. Moss RH et al. (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NRC (2010) National Research Council: Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Third Biennial Review. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, p 326. doi:10.17226/12988Google Scholar
  38. NRC (2014a) National Research Council: Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fifth Biennial Review. The National Academies Press, Washington DC, p 302Google Scholar
  39. NRC (2014b) “Chapter 5: Climate Change and Sea-Level Rise: Implications for Everglades Restoration”, in Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fifth Biennial Review, 2014. National Academies Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Nungesser M, Saunders C, Coronado-Molina C, Obeysekera J, Johnson J, McVoy C, Benscoter B (2015) Potential effects of climate change on Florida’s Everglades. Environ Manag 55:824–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Obeysekera J, Barnes J, Nungesser M (2015) Climate sensitivity runs and regional hydrologic modeling for predicting the response of the greater Florida Everglades ecosystem to climate change. Environ Manag 55:749–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Obeysekera J, Irizarry M, Park J, Barnes J, Dessalegne T (2011) Climate change and its implications for water resources management in south Florida. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:495–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Orem W, Fitz HC, Krabbenhoft D, Tate M, Gilmour C, Shafer M (2014) Modeling sulfate transport and distribution and methylmercury production associated with Aquifer Storage and Recovery implementation in the Everglades protection area. Sustain Water Qual Ecol 3:33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Orem W, Newman S, Osborne TZ, Reddy KR (2015) Projecting changes in Everglades soil biogeochemistry for carbon and other key elements, to possible 2060 climate and hydrologic scenarios. Environ Manag 55:776–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Osborne T, Fitz H, Davis S,III (2017) Restoring the foundation of the Everglades ecosystem: assessment of edaphic responses to hydrologic restoration scenarios. Restoration Ecol. doi:10.1111/rec.12496Google Scholar
  46. Osland MJ, Enwright NM, Day RH, Gabler CA, Stagg CL, Grace JB (2016) Beyond just sea‐level rise: considering macroclimatic drivers within coastal wetland vulnerability assessments to climate change. Glob Change Biol 22:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pearlstine LG, Pearlstine EV, Aumen NG (2010) A review of the ecological consequences and management implications of climate change for the Everglades. J North Am Benthol Soc 29:1510–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Peterson GD, Cumming GS, Carpenter SR (2003) Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conserv Biol 17:358–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Price RM, Swart PK (2006) Geochemical indicators of groundwater recharge in the surficial aquifer system, Everglades National Park, Florida, USA Geological Society of America Special Papers 404:251–266Google Scholar
  50. Price RM, Swart PK, Fourqurean JW (2006) Coastal groundwater discharge–an additional source of phosphorus for the oligotrophic wetlands of the Everglades. Hydrobiologia 569:23–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Richardson CJ, King RS, Qian SS, Vaithiyanathan P, Qualls RG, Stow CA (2007) Estimating ecological thresholds for phosphorus in the Everglades. Environ Sci Technol 41:8084–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riscassi AL, Schaffranek RW (2004) Flow velocity, water temperature, and conductivity in Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida: June 2002–July 2003Google Scholar
  53. Ross M, Meeder J, Sah J, Ruiz P, Telesnicki G (2000) The southeast saline Everglades revisited: 50 years of coastal vegetation change. J Veg Sci 11:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saha AK, Moses CS, Price RM, Engel V, Smith TJ, Anderson G (2012) A hydrological budget (2002–2008) for a large subtropical wetland ecosystem indicates marine groundwater discharge accompanies diminished freshwater flow. Estuaries Coasts 35:459–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saha AK et al. (2011) Sea level rise and South Florida coastal forests. Clim Change 107:81–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schallenberg M, Hall C, Burns C (2001) Climate change alters zooplankton community structure and biodiversity in coastal wetlands Report of Freshwater Ecology Group, University of Otago, HamiltonGoogle Scholar
  57. SFRCCC (2015) South Florida Regional Climate Change Compact: A unified sea level rise projection for Southeast Florida. Southeast Florida Regional Climate Change Compact, Miami, FLGoogle Scholar
  58. SFWMD (2005) South Florida Water Management District: Documentation of the South Florida Water Management Model. South Florida Water Management District, West Palm Beach, FL, Version 5.5Google Scholar
  59. Sklar FH et al. (2005) The ecological-societal underpinnings of Everglades restoration Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3:161–169Google Scholar
  60. Smith TJ, Anderson GH, Balentine K, Tiling G, Ward GA, Whelan KR (2009) Cumulative impacts of hurricanes on Florida mangrove ecosystems: sediment deposition, storm surges and vegetation. Wetlands 29:24–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smoak JM, Breithaupt JL, Smith TJ, Sanders CJ (2013) Sediment accretion and organic carbon burial relative to sea-level rise and storm events in two mangrove forests in Everglades National Park. Catena 104:58–66Google Scholar
  62. Stabenau E, Engel V, Sadle J, Pearlstine L (2011) Sea-level rise: Observations, impacts, and proactive measures in Everglades National Park Park. Science 28:26–30Google Scholar
  63. Tarboton K, Neidrauer C, Santee E, Needle J (1999) Regional hydrologic modeling for planning the management of South Florida’s water resources through 2050. Am Soc Agric Eng Paper, Paper Number 992062Google Scholar
  64. Troxler T (2017a) Water Quality Data (Extensive) from the Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), from April 1996 to Present. Environmental Data Initiative. doi:10.6073/pasta/8e3c2cc6502bf658dbf6f42be1822f28. Accessed 8 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  65. Troxler T (2017b) Water Quality Data (Extensive) from the Taylor Slough, Everglades National Park (FCE), South Florida from July 1999 to Present. Environmental Data Initiative. doi:10.6073/pasta/241bc3e309edcb2aaaa4328d99bf0680. Accessed 8 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  66. Troxler T, Childers D (2008) Water Quality Data (Extensive) from the Taylor Slough, just outside Everglades National Park (FCE), from August 1998 to December 2006. Environmental Data Initiative.doi:10.6073/pasta/3a668167984681792eb010cd334d19af. Accessed 8 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  67. USACE (1999) U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and South Florida Water Management District: The Central and Southern Florida Flood Control Project Comprehensive Review Study Final Integrated Feasibility Report and Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (PEIS), West Palm Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  68. van der Valk AG, Volin JC, Wetzel PR (2015) Predicted changes in interannual water-level fluctuations due to climate change and its implications for the vegetation of the Florida Everglades. Environ Manag 55:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Venice_System (1959) The Venice System for the Classification of Marine Waters According to Salinity. Arch Oceanogr Limnol 9:243–245Google Scholar
  70. Wanless HR, Parkinson RW, Tedesco LP (1994) Sea level control on stability of Everglades wetlands Everglades. the Ecosystem and Its Restoration St Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, p 199–223Google Scholar
  71. Wdowinski S, Bray R, Kirtman BP, Wu Z (2016) Increasing flooding hazard in coastal communities due to rising sea level. Case Study Miami Beach, Fla Ocean & Coast Manag 126:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. West JM et al. (2009) US natural resources and climate change: concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environ Manag 44:1001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zapata‐Rios X, Rivero RG, Naja GM, Goovaerts P (2012) Spatial and temporal phosphorus distribution changes in a large wetland ecosystem Water Resour Res 48, Article number: W09512Google Scholar
  74. Zhang K (2011) Analysis of non-linear inundation from sea-level rise using LIDAR data: a case study for South Florida. Clim Change 106:537–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of GeosciencesUniversity of South FloridaTampaUSA
  2. 2.EcoLandMod, Inc.Fort PierceUSA

Personalised recommendations