Climate Change Perceptions of NY State Farmers: The Role of Risk Perceptions and Adaptive Capacity
Climate change is expected to severely impact agricultural practices in many important food-producing regions, including the Northeast United States. Changing climate conditions, such as increases in the amount of rainfall, will require farmers to adapt. Yet, little is known with regard to farmers’ perceptions and understandings about climate change, especially in the industrialized country context. This paper aims at overcoming this research limitation, as well as determining the existing contextual, cognitive, and psychological barriers that can prevent adoption of sustainable practices of farmers in New York State. The study is framed within the adaptive capacity and risk perception literature, and is based on a qualitative analysis of in-depth interviews with farmers in 21 farms in two counties in Central New York. The results reveal diverging views about the long-term consequences of climate change. Results also reveal that past experience remains as the most important source of information that influences beliefs and perceptions about climate change, confirming previous research.
KeywordsAdaptation Adaptive capacity Climate change Farmers New York Risk perceptions
This study was funded by a grant from the Environmental Finance Center at Syracuse University.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adger N, Qader Agrawala M, Mirza C, Conde K, O’Brien J, Pulhin R, Pulwarty B, Smit, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. Climate Change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge U.KGoogle Scholar
- Burnham M, Ma Z (2015) Linking smallholder farmer climate change adaptation decisions to development. Clim DevGoogle Scholar
- Burnham M, Zhao M (In press) Climate change adaptation: factors affecting Chinese smallholders’ perceived ability and intent to adapt. Reg Environ ChangeGoogle Scholar
- Charmaz K (2006) Constructing grounded theory. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Eakin H, York A, Aggarwal R, Waters S, Welch J, Rubiños C, Smith-Heisters S, Bausch C, Anderies JM (2016) Cognitive and institutional influences on farmers’ adaptive capacity: insights into barriers and opportunities for transformative change in central Arizona. Reg Environ Change 16(3):801–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones C, Hine DW, and Marks ADG (2016) The future is now: reducing psychological distance to increase public engagement with climate change. Risk Anal doi: 10.1111/risa.12601
- Karl TR, Melillo JM, Peterson TC (eds) (2009) United states global change research program. Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USAGoogle Scholar
- N/A (2015) Noncitrus fruits and nuts 2014 summary. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service.Google Scholar
- Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, DeGaetano A, O'Grady M, Hassol S, Grabhorn P (Eds.). (2011). Responding to Climate Change in New York State: The ClimAID Integrated Assessment for Effective Climate Change Adaptation. Synthesis Report. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA), Albany, New York. www.nyserda.ny.gov
- Sacchi S, Riva P, Aceto A (2016) Myopic about climate change: cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism.J Exp Soc Psychol 65: 68–73Google Scholar
- Stuart D, Schewe RL, McDermott M (2012) Responding to climate change: barriers to reflexive modernization in U.S. agriculture. Organ Environ 25(3): 308–327. doi: 10.1177/1086026612456536
- USDA (2013) Climate change and agriculture in the United States: effects and adaptation. In: USDAPlease provide Editors name for ref ‘USDA, 2013’. Technical bulletin 1935. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- Wyborn C, Yung L, Murphy D, Williams DR (2014) Situating adaptation: how governance challenges and perceptions of uncertainty influence adaptation in the Rocky Mountains. Reg Environ Change:1–14Google Scholar