Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 57, Issue 5, pp 987–997 | Cite as

Understanding Climate Adaptation on Public Lands in the Upper Midwest: Implications for Monitoring and Tracking Progress

  • Christine M. Anhalt-DepiesEmail author
  • Tricia Gorby Knoot
  • Adena R. Rissman
  • Anthony K. Sharp
  • Karl J. Martin
Article

Abstract

There are limited examples of efforts to systematically monitor and track climate change adaptation progress in the context of natural resource management, despite substantial investments in adaptation initiatives. To better understand the status of adaptation within state natural resource agencies, we utilized and problematized a rational decision-making framework to characterize adaptation at the level of public land managers in the Upper Midwest. We conducted in-depth interviews with 29 biologists and foresters to provide an understanding of managers’ experiences with, and perceptions of, climate change impacts, efforts towards planning for climate change, and a full range of actions implemented to address climate change. While the majority of managers identified climate change impacts affecting their region, they expressed significant uncertainty in interpreting those signals. Just under half of managers indicated planning efforts are underway, although most planning is remote from local management. Actions already implemented include both forward-looking measures and those aimed at coping with current impacts. In addition, cross-scale dynamics emerged as an important theme related to the overall adaptation process. The results hold implications for tracking future progress on climate change adaptation. Common definitions or measures of adaptation (e.g., presence of planning documents) may need to be reassessed for applicability at the level of public land managers.

Keywords

Adaptation tracking Climate change adaptation Cross-scale dynamics Decision making Public lands 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors greatly appreciate project assistance and review by Suzanne Hagell, Mike Larson, Catherine Harris, Tara Bergeson, Alan Crossley, Andy Paulios, Greg Edge, Colleen Matula, Mike Dockry, Maria Janowiak, Jordan Petchenik, William D. Walker, Bob Holsman, Kim Hall, Chris Hoving, Clarence Turner, Earl Flegler, and Amy Clark Eagle. We thank interview participants for their valuable time and insights. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. Support for this work was provided by the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes Landscape Conservation Cooperative and the Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau of Science Services.

References

  1. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate across scales. Glob Environ Chang 15:77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archie K, Dilling ML, Milford JB, Pample FC (2012) Climate change and western public lands: a survey of US federal land managers on the status of adaptation efforts. Ecol Soc 17:20–45Google Scholar
  3. Berrang-Ford L, Ford JD, Paterson J (2011) Are we adapting to climate change? Global Environ Chang 21:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bierbaum R, Smith JB, Lee A, Blair M, Carter L, Chapin FS III, Fleming P, Ruffo S, Stults M, McNeeley S, Wasley E, Verduzco L (2013) A comprehensive review of climate adaptation in the United States: more than before, but less than needed. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 18:361–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Biggs BN, Abel N, Knight AT, Leitch A, Langston A, Ban NC (2011) The implementation crisis in conservation planning: could “mental models” help? Conserv Lett 4:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carter SK, Keuler NS, Pidgeon AM, Radeloff VC (2014) Evaluating the influence of conservation plans on land protection action in Wisconsin, USA. Biol Conserv 178:37–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Level L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8–19Google Scholar
  8. Dziegielewska D (2012) Within the boundaries: management options for conservation lands in an era of climate change. Report for the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes Landscape Conservation Cooperative. www.greatlakeslcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/Within-the-Boundaries_May-2012_Final-Report.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2015
  9. Ellenwood MS, Dilling L, Milford JB (2012) Managing United States public lands in response to climate change: a view from the ground up. Environ Manag 49(5):954–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Paterson J (2011) A systematic review of observed climate change adaptation in developed nations. Clim Chang 106:327–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ford JD, Berrang-Ford L, Lenikowski A, Barrera M, Jeymann SJ (2013) How to track adaptation to climate change: a typology of approaches for national-level application. Ecol Soc 18:40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gregg RM, Feifel KM, Kershner JM, Hitt JL (2012) The state of climate change adaptation in the Great Lakes Region. EcoAdapt, Bainbridge IslandGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagell S, Ribic CA (2014) Barriers to climate-adaptive management: a survey of wildlife researchers and managers in Wisconsin. Wildl Soc Bull 38:672–681. doi: 10.1002/wsb.459 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability, contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kates RW, Travis WR, Wilbanks TJ (2012) Transformational adaptation when incremental adaptations to climate change are insufficient. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:7156–7161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin K, Knoot T, Anhalt C, Sharp A, LeDee O, Zuckerberg B (2014) Barriers and opportunities to managing for disturbance and environmental change in the Upper Midwest. Report for the Upper Midwest and Great Lakes Landscape Conservation Cooperative. www.greatlakeslcc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Final_LCC_Report_Barriers-and-Opportunities-in-Upper-Midwest_03312014.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2015
  18. Mawdsley JR, O’Malley R, Ojima DS (2009) A review of climate-change adaptation strategies for wildlife management and biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 23:1080–1089CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:22026–22031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moynihan DP, Landuyt N (2009) How do public organizations learn? Bridging cultural and structural perspectives. Public Adm Rev 69:1097–1105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environ Chang 19:354–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  23. Petersen B, Hall KR, Kahl K, Doran PJ (2013) In their own words: Perceptions of climate change adaptation from the Great Lakes region’s resource management community. Environ Pract 15:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. QSR International (2012) NVivo 10. QSR International Pty Ltd, DoncasterGoogle Scholar
  25. Sabatier PA (ed) (2007) Theories of the policy process, 2nd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  26. Sabatier PA, Focht W, Lubell M, Trachtenberg Z, Vedlitz A, Matlock M (eds) (2005) Swimming upstream: collaborative approaches to watershed management. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  27. Sarewitz D, Pielke RA (2007) The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 10:5–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity, and vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:282–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stein BA, Staudt A, Cross MS, Dubois NS, Enquist C, Griffis R, Hansen LJ, Hellmann JJ, Lawler JJ, Nelson EJ, Pairis A (2013) Preparing for and managing change: climate adaptation for biodiversity and ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 11:502–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  31. Tarlock AD (1993) The nonequilibrium paradigm in ecology and the partial unraveling of environmental law. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev 27:1121–1144Google Scholar
  32. Turner WR, Bradley BA, Estes LD, Hole DG, Oppenheimer M, Wilcove DS (2010) Climate change: helping nature survive the human response. Conserv Lett 3:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Watson JEM (2014) Human responses to climate change will seriously impact biodiversity conservation: it’s time we start planning for them. Conserv Lett 7:1–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. West JM, Julius SH, Kareiva P, Enquist C, Lawler JJ, Petersen B, Johnson AE, Shaw MR (2009) US natural resources and climate change: concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environ Manag 44:1001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine M. Anhalt-Depies
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tricia Gorby Knoot
    • 2
  • Adena R. Rissman
    • 1
  • Anthony K. Sharp
    • 2
  • Karl J. Martin
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Forest and Wildlife EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Wildlife and Forestry Research SectionWisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesMadisonUSA
  3. 3.Cooperative ExtensionUniversity of Wisconsin-ExtensionMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations