Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 57, Issue 3, pp 660–670 | Cite as

Sustainable Remediation of Legacy Mine Drainage: A Case Study of the Flight 93 National Memorial

  • Lisa A. EmiliEmail author
  • Joseph Pizarchik
  • Carolyn G. Mahan
Article

Abstract

Pollution from mining activities is a global environmental concern, not limited to areas of current resource extraction, but including a broader geographic area of historic (legacy) and abandoned mines. The pollution of surface waters from acid mine drainage is a persistent problem and requires a holistic and sustainable approach to addressing the spatial and temporal complexity of mining-specific problems. In this paper, we focus on the environmental, socio-economic, and legal challenges associated with the concurrent activities to remediate a coal mine site and to develop a national memorial following a catastrophic event. We provide a conceptual construct of a socio-ecological system defined at several spatial, temporal, and organizational scales and a critical synthesis of the technical and social learning processes necessary to achieving sustainable environmental remediation. Our case study is an example of a multi-disciplinary management approach, whereby collaborative interaction of stakeholders, the emergence of functional linkages for information exchange, and mediation led to scientifically informed decision making, creative management solutions, and ultimately environmental policy change.

Keywords

Coal mine reclamation Water resources Mine drainage Socio-ecological system Sustainable development 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper would not have been possible without the cooperation and assistance of many people and agencies. We thank Patrick White (Families of Flight 93) for his assistance with constructing the timeline and his explanations of the legal processes associated with the land purchase, Martin Sokolow (DEP) for providing and explaining the Consent Agreements, Donna Glassner (Friends of Flight 93 National Memorial) for providing us access to archived materials, Jay Winter (California District Mining Office) for providing geologic reports and maps, Randall Musser (Musser Engineering) and Beth Kern (PBS Coals, Inc.) for their assistance with digital copies of coal mining permit maps, Timothy Dolney (Penn State Altoona) for his assistance with GIS and figure creation, and William White (Penn State Altoona) for his assistance in the editing of this paper.

References

  1. Altay N, Green WG III (2006) OR/MS research in disaster operations management. Eur J Oper Res 175:475–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argothy V (2003) Framing volunteerism in a consensus crisis: mass media coverage of volunteers in the 9/11 response. Preliminary Paper #335. University of Delaware Disaster Research Center. http://udspace.udel.edu/handle/19716/296. Accessed 24 March 2015
  3. Bridge G (2004) Contested terrain: mining and the environment. Annu Rev Environ Resour 29:205–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne P, Wood PJ, Reid I (2012) The impairment of river systems by metal mine contamination: a review including remediation options. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 42:2017–2077. doi: 10.1080/10643389.2011.574103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarvis MH, Allan A (2014) Adaptive capacity in a Chilean context; a questionable model for Latin America. Environ Sci Policy 43:78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2007) Consent order and agreement between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Department of Environmental Protection and PBS Coals, IncGoogle Scholar
  7. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2008a) Treatment trust agreement between PBS Coals, Inc. and Somerset Trust CompanyGoogle Scholar
  8. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania (2008b) Consent Order and agreement between the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Department of Environmental Protection, PBS Coals, Inc. and the Families of Flight 93Google Scholar
  9. Courtney R (2013) Mine tailings composition in a historic site: implications for ecological restoration. Environ Geochem Health 35:79–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) Scale mismatches in social-ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions. Ecol Soc 11(1):14Google Scholar
  11. da Silveira AR, Richards KS (2013) The link between polycentrism and adaptive capacity in river basin governance systems: insights from the river Rhine and the Zhujiang (Pearl River) basin. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(2):319–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Department of Environmental Protection (Pennsylvania) (2014) Integrated list of all waters. http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/water_quality_standards/10556/integrated_water_quality_report_-_2014/1702856. Accessed 24 March 2015
  13. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) Letter from the Director of the Engineering and Analysis Division of the Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America to the Superintendent of the Flight 93 National MemorialGoogle Scholar
  14. Environmental Protection Agency, United States of America (2014) National recommended water quality criteria. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/swguidance/standards/criteria/current/. Accessed 24 March 2015
  15. Environmental Resources Management (2002) Final closure report for United Airlines Flight 93. Environmental Resources Management, WexfordGoogle Scholar
  16. European IPPC Bureau (2004) Reference document on best available techniques for management of mine and waste-rock in mining activities July 2004. Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technology Studies. http://www.geology.cz/rroum/stazeni/2004_BAT_REFERENCE_DOCUMENT.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2015
  17. Grant NK, Hoover DH, Scarisbrick-Hauser A, Muffet SL (2002a) Terrorism in Shanksville: a study in preparedness and response. Quick response research report #157. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado. Boulder, CO. http://www.colorado.edu/hazards/qr/qr157/qr157.html. Accessed 24 March 2015
  18. Grant NK, Hoover DH, Scarisbrick-Hauser A, Muffet SL (2002b) The crash of United Flight 93 in Shanksville, PA. Natural Hazards Research and Applications Information Center, University of Colorado. Boulder, CO. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/review/docket261/pdfs/BeyondSeptember11th_TheCrashofFlight93.pdf. Accessed 24 March 2015
  19. Harris F, Lyon F (2013) Transdisciplinary environmental research: building trust across professional cultures. Environ Sci Policy 31:109–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hou D, Al-Tabbaa A (2014) Sustainability: a new imperative in contaminated land remediation. Environ Sci Policy 39:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Howe PD, Yarnal B, Coletti A, Wood NJ (2013) The participatory vulnerability scoping diagram: deliberative risk ranking for community water systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(2):343–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jordan G, Abdaal A (2013) Decision support methods for the environmental assessment of contamination at mining sites. Environ Monit Assess 185:7809–7832. doi: 10.1007/s10661-013-3137-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kim S-M, Choi Y, Suh J, Oh S, Park H-D, Yoon S-H, Go W-R (2012) ArcMine: a GIS extension to support mine reclamation planning. Comput Geosci 46:84–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knights AM, Culhane F, Hussain SS, Papadopoulou KN, Piet GJ, Raakœr J, Rogers SI, Robinson LA (2014) A step-wise process of decision-making under uncertainty when implementing environmental policy. Environ Sci Policy 39:56–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruse NA, DeRose L, Korenowsky R, Bowman JR, Lopez D, Johnson K, Rankin E (2013) The role of remediation, natural alkalinity sources and physical stream parameters in stream recovery. J Environ Manag 128:1000–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leith P, O’Toole K, Haward M, Coffey B, Rees C, Ogier E (2014) Analysis of operating environments: a diagnostic model for linking science, society and policy for sustainability. Environ Sci Policy 39:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lemming G, Hauschild MZ, Bjerg PL (2010) Life cycle assessment of soil and groundwater remediation technologies: literature review. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15:115–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang HC, Thomson BM (2009) Minerals and mine drainage. Water Environ Res 49:1615–1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. National Park Service, United States of America (2007a) Flight 93 national memorial final general management plan/environmental impact statement, vol 72(207). United States Department of the Interior, Federal Register, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. National Park Service, United States of America (2007b) Manganese discharge on PBS coal property, briefing statement. National Parks of Western Pennsylvania, Somerset, PAGoogle Scholar
  31. Nursey-Bray MJ, Vince J, Scott M, Haward M, O’Toole K, Smith T, Harvey N, Clarke B (2014) Science into policy? Discourse, coastal management and knowledge. Environ Sci Policy 38:107–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation Enforcement (2014) AMDTreat Version 5.0. Department of the Interior, United States of America. http://amd.osmre.gov/. Accessed 24 March 2015
  33. Quarantelli EL, Dynes RR (1976) Community conflict: its absence and its presence in national disasters. Mass Emerg 1:139–152Google Scholar
  34. Rahm BG, Riha SJ (2012) Toward strategic management of shale gas development: regional, collective impacts on water resources. Environ Sci Policy 17:12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Redman C, Grove MJ, Kuby L (2004) Integrating social science into the long term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2):161–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwarzenbach RP, Egli T, Hofstetter TB, von Gunten U, Wehrli B (2010) Global water pollution and human health. Annu Rev Environ Resour 35:109–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williams BK, Brown ED (2014) Adaptive management: from more talk to real action. Environ Manag 53:465–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Williams BK, Szaro RC, Shapiro CD (2009) Adaptive management: The United States Department of the interior technical guide. Adaptive Management Working Group, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D.CGoogle Scholar
  39. Worrall R, Neil D, Brereton D, Mulligan D (2009) Towards a sustainability criteria and indicators framework for legacy mine land. J Clean Prod 17(16):1426–1434CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa A. Emili
    • 1
    Email author
  • Joseph Pizarchik
    • 2
  • Carolyn G. Mahan
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Mathematics and Natural SciencesPenn State AltoonaAltoonaUSA
  2. 2.Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and EnforcementUnited States Department of the InteriorWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations