Environmental Management

, Volume 56, Issue 6, pp 1428–1447 | Cite as

Drivers of Environmental Institutional Dynamics in Decentralized African Countries

  • Emeline HassenforderEmail author
  • Olivier Barreteau
  • Katherine Anne Daniell
  • Jamie Pittock
  • Nils Ferrand


This paper builds on the assumption that an effective approach to support the sustainability of natural resource management initiatives is institutional “bricolage.” We argue that participatory planning processes can foster institutional bricolage by encouraging stakeholders to make their own arrangements based on the hybridization of old and new institutions. This papers aims at identifying how participatory process facilitators can encourage institutional bricolage. Specifically the paper investigates the specific contextual and procedural drivers of institutional dynamics in two case studies: the Rwenzori region in Uganda and the Fogera woreda in Ethiopia. In both cases, participatory planning processes were implemented. This research has three innovative aspects. First, it establishes a clear distinction between six terms which are useful for identifying, describing, and analyzing institutional dynamics: formal and informal; institutions and organizations; and emergence and change. Secondly, it compares the contrasting institutional dynamics in the two case studies. Thirdly, process-tracing is used to identify contextual and procedural drivers to institutional dynamics. We assume that procedural drivers can be used as “levers” by facilitators to trigger institutional bricolage. We found that facilitators need to pay particular attention to the institutional context in which the participatory planning process takes place, and especially at existing institutional gaps or failures. We identified three clusters of procedural levers: the selection and engagement of participants; the legitimacy, knowledge, and ideas of facilitators; and the design of the process, including the scale at which it is developed, the participatory tools used and the management of the diversity of frames.


Bricolage Informal institutions Institutional change Organizations Participatory planning process Process-tracing 



This work was supported by the AfroMaison European FP7 research project, the UNESCO Chair in Water Economics and Transboundary Water Governance and the Fenner School of Environment and Society from the Australian National University (ANU). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official position of the European Commission, UNESCO or the ANU. The authors thank the Ethiopian and Ugandan teams for their support, as well as all the participants to the participatory planning processes without whom this research could not have unfolded. The authors would also like to thank Rick Zentelis for proof-reading the revised version of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the European Commission 7th Framework Program ethical standards (2013): Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all individual participants for whom identifying information is included in this article.


  1. Abrami G, Ferrand N, Morardet S, Murgue C, Popova A, De Fooij H et al (2012) Wat-A-Game, a toolkit for building role-playing games about integrated water management. In: Seppelt R, Voinov AA, Lange S, Bankamp D (eds), iEMSs sixth biennial meeting. Leipzig.
  2. Acheson JM (2006) Institutional failure in resource management. Annu Rev Anthropol 35:117–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AfroMaison (2014) Uganda case study. Brussels.
  4. Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29(10):1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arts B, Leroy P (2006) Institutional processes in environmental governance: lots of dynamics, not much change? In: Arts B, Leroy P (eds) Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 267–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Battilana J, Leca B, Boxenbaum E (2009) How actors change institutions: towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Acad Manag Ann 3(1):65–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Booth D (2012) Development as a collective action problem addressing the real challenges of African governance. London.
  8. Bourdieu P (1980) Le sens pratique. Éditions de Minuit, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Brinks D (2003) Informal institutions and the rule of law: the judicial response to state killings in Buenos Aires and São Paulo in the 1990s. Comp Polit 36(1):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bromley DW (1992) The commons, common property, and environmental policy. Environ Resour Econ 2(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cash DW, Adger WN, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P et al (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8Google Scholar
  12. Cleaver F (2012) Development through bricolage: rethinking institutions for natural resource management. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cleveringa R, Kay M, Cohen A (2009) Synthesis of strategic approaches: enhancing pro-poor investments in water and rural livelihoods.
  14. Dacin MT, Goodstein J, Scott WR (2002) Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum. Acad Manag J 45(1):45–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Daniell KA, Barreteau O (2014) Water governance across competing scales: coupling land and water management. J Hydrol 519(C):2367–2380. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dewulf A, Craps M, Dercon G (2004) How issues get framed and reframed when different communities meet: a multi-level analysis of a collaborative soil conservation initiative in the Ecuadorian Andes. J Commun Appl Soc Psychol 14(3):177–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Douglas M (1986) How institutions think. Routledge & Kegan Paul, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Dovers S, Hussey K (2013) Environment & sustainability, 2nd edn. The Federation Press, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  19. Etienne M (ed) (2011) Companion modelling a participatory approach to support sustainable development. Editions Quae, VersaillesGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans P (2004) Development as institutional change: the pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Stud Comp Int Dev 38(4):30–52. doi: 10.1007/BF02686327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Methods 5(1):80–92Google Scholar
  22. Ferrand N, Hare M, Rougier J-E (2006) Iskar test site option description living with flood and drought. In: Methodological document to the Iskar Test Site, AquaStress IP, FP6, Europe, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrand N, Farolfi S, Abrami G, Du Toit D (2009) WAT-A-GAME: sharing water and policies in your own basin. In: Learn to game, game to learn, ISAGA 40th annual conference, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  24. George AL, Bennett A (2005) Process-tracing and historical explanation. In: George AL, Bennett A (eds) Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 205–232Google Scholar
  25. Grindle MS (2011) Governance reform: the new analytics of next steps. In: Governance.
  26. Hassenforder E, Ferrand N, Pittock JKAD, Barreteau O (2015). A participatory planning process as an arena for facilitating institutional bricolage—example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda. Soc Nat Resour (in press)Google Scholar
  27. Helmke G, Levitsky S (2004) Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research agenda. Perspect Polit 2(04):725–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hyden G (2006) African politics in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Kabaseke C (2012) Assessing the impact of Uganda’s wetland policy on the agroecosystems of the Rwenzori region during the period 1992–2011: a case study of river Mpanga catchment area. Uganda Martyrs University, MpigiGoogle Scholar
  30. Kingston C, Caballero G (2008) Comparing theories of institutional change. J Inst Econ 5(02):151Google Scholar
  31. Kotter J (1996) Leading change. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Lascoumes P, Le Galès P (2007) Sociologie de l’action publique. Armand Colin, ParisGoogle Scholar
  33. Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leach M, Rockström J, Raskin P, Scoones I, Stirling AC, Smith A et al (2012) Transforming Innovation for sustainability. Ecol Soc 17(2):11Google Scholar
  35. Lemos MC, Agrawal A (2006) Environmental governance. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:297–325. doi: 10.1146/ CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leroy M (2009) La participation dans les projets de développement, Une analyse critique. AgroParisTech-ENGREF, ParisGoogle Scholar
  37. Levy B (2004) Governance and economic development in Africa: meeting the challenge of capacity building. In: Levy B, Kpundeh S (eds) Building state capacity in Africa: new approaches, emerging lessons. World Bank/World Bank Institute, Washington, DC, pp 1–42Google Scholar
  38. Lovell C, Mandondo A, Moriarty P (2002) The question of scale in integrated natural resource management. Ecol Soc 5(2):25Google Scholar
  39. Meagher K (2007) Introduction: special issue on “Informal Institutions and Development in Africa. Afr Spectr 42(3), 405–418.
  40. Midgley G (2000) Systemic intervention: philosophy, methodology, and practice. Kluwer Academic/Plenum, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Migongo-Bake C, Catactutan D (2012) AfroMaison WP2 report chapter 6 context analysis of Rwenzori mountains/Albertine Rift. Uganda, NairobiGoogle Scholar
  42. Migongo-Bake C, Catacutan D, Namirembe S (2012) AfroMaison WP2 report chapter 5 assessment of the headwaters of the Blue Nile in Ethiopia (No. 149). Nairobi.
  43. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  45. Paavola J (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63(1):93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rosenau J, Czempiel E (1992) Governance without government: order and change in world politics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2000) Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci Technol Hum Values 25(1):3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Saleth RM (2006) Understanding water institutions: structure, environment and change process. In: Water governance for sustainable development: approaches and lessons from developing and transitional countries. Routledge, Paris, pp. 3–20Google Scholar
  49. Schusler TM, Decker DJ, Pfeffer MJ (2003) Social learning for collaborative natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 15:309–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scott WR (2010) Reflections: the past and future of research on institutions and institutional change. J Change Manag 10(1):5–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Smajgl A, Larson S (2007) Institutional dynamics and natural resource management. In: Smajgl A, Larson S (eds) Sustainable resource use: institutional dynamics and economics. Earthscan, London, pp 3–22Google Scholar
  52. Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. (W. Streeck & K. Thelen, Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  53. Stroud A (2003) Transforming institutions to achieve innovation in research and development. In: Pound B, Snapp S, McDougall C, Braun A (eds) Managing natural resources for sustainable livelihoods: uniting science and participation. Earthscan, London, pp 88–112Google Scholar
  54. Tang SY (1992) Institutions and collective action: self-governance in irrigation. Institute for Contemporary Studies Press, San Francisco.;US9187212
  55. Transparency International (2014) Corruption by country. Accessed 9 Dec 2014
  56. UN Habitat (2001) Building bridges between citizens and local governments to work more effectively together through participatory planning Part I—concepts and strategies.
  57. Unsworth S (2009) What’s politics got to do with it?: Why donors find it so hard to come to terms with politics, and why this matters. J Int Dev.
  58. Wakjira DT, Fischer A, Pinard MA (2013) Governance change and institutional adaptation: a case study from Harenna forest, Ethiopia. Environ Manag 51:912–925. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0017-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wiering M, Crabbé A (2006) The institutional dynamics of water management in the low countries. In: Arts B, Leroy P (eds) Institutional dynamics in environmental governance. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Young OR (2008) Institutions and environmental change: the scientific legacy of a decade of IDGEC research. In: Institutions and environmental change, principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 3–45Google Scholar
  61. Young OR (2010) Institutional dynamics: resilience, vulnerability and adaptation in environmental and resource regimes. Glob Environ Change 20(3):378–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Emeline Hassenforder
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Olivier Barreteau
    • 4
  • Katherine Anne Daniell
    • 5
  • Jamie Pittock
    • 3
  • Nils Ferrand
    • 4
  1. 1.Water Resource Management, Actors and Uses Joint Research Unit (UMR G-EAU)National Research Institute of Science and Technology for Environment and Agriculture (IRSTEA)Montpellier Cedex 5France
  2. 2.AgroParisTechParis Cedex 15France
  3. 3.Fenner School of Environment and SocietyThe Australian National University (ANU)ActonAustralia
  4. 4.IRSTEA, G-EauMontpellier Cedex 5France
  5. 5.Centre for European StudiesThe Australian National University (ANU)ActonAustralia

Personalised recommendations