Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Stakeholder Interaction in Participatory Land Restoration in Iceland: Environmental Officers’ Challenges and Strategies

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Participatory approaches involve stakeholder interaction but environmental agency employees engaged in participatory undertakings often lack training for interaction tasks. This study explored how district officers at the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland (SCSI) experienced and dealt with stakeholder interaction in participatory land restoration. We made semi-structured interviews with all district officers with at least 1-year experience; seven in total. A thematic content analysis revealed five challenges facing the officers in their interaction activities and seven strategies that they used to deal with these challenges. The core challenge was to establish and maintain contacts with farmers and other stakeholders as it enabled the SCSI to support and influence their land restoration practices. Other challenges were to: accomplish SCSI’s objectives; represent the SCSI and the government; have adequate skills, knowledge, and background; and deal with one's own emotions. Four of the strategies seemed to promote collaboration: create win–win scenarios; “go local”; direct and positive communication; and motivation and knowledge sharing. The other strategies: supportive district officer team; self-reliance and personal background; and self-control supported the officers in their interaction tasks. Factors undermining their collaboration efforts included insufficient time and other resources, an unsupportive organizational culture and a legal duty to assess the condition of vegetation cover on farmland. Increased resource allocation to the SCSI’s local operations, more attention to emotional issues, and efforts to develop a more flexible and learning organizational culture that supports collaboration could counteract these factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnalds A (2005) Approaches to landcare: a century of soil conservation in Iceland. Land Degrad Dev 16(2):113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkarson BH, Jóhannsson MH (2009) Arctic landcare. In: Catacutan D, Neely C, Johnson M, Poussard H, Youl R (eds) Landcare: local action – global progress. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 55–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Beierle TC (2002) The quality of stakeholder-based decicions. Risk Anal 22(4):739–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergeå HL (2007) Negotiating fences: interaction in advisory encounters. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

  • Bergeå HL, Ljung M (2007) Implementing nature conservation policy in the name of participation: field-level bureaucrats as a lubricant. In: Bergeå HL Negotiating fences: interaction in advisory encounters. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences

  • Berglund B, Hallgren L, Aradóttir ÁL (2013) Cultivating communication: participatory approaches in land restoration in Iceland. Ecol Soc 18(2):35

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynleifsdóttir SJ (2012) Bændur græða landið: ársskýrsla 2011. LR-2012/13. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/bgl-skyrsla.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014

  • Buchy M, Hoverman S (2000) Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. For Policy Econ 1:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B (2008) Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 204(8):429–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan T, Buzan B (2006) The mind map book. BBC Active, Harlowe

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell A (1994) Community first: landcare in Australia., Gatekeeper Series SA42International Institution for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cast AD (2004) Role-taking and interaction. Soc Psychol Q 67(3):296–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charon J (2010) Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Prentice Hall, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper E, Smith G (2012) Organizing deliberation: the perspectives of professional participation practitioners in Britain and Germany. J Public Delib 8(1):3

    Google Scholar 

  • Crofts R (2011) Healing the land. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland, Gunnarsholt

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmers association of Iceland (2010) Hagtölur landbúnaðarins 2010. http://www.sjavarutvegsraduneyti.is/media/Skyrslur/Hagtolur_landbunadarins_2010.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2013

  • Forester J (1999) The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jónsson JB (2009) Bændur græða landið: framkvæmd verkefnisins árið 2009. LR-2009/18. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/Arsskyrsla_BGL_2009.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014

  • Jónsson JB (2010) Bændur græða landið: framkvæmd verkefnisins árið 2010. LR-2010/20. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/Arsskyrsla_BGL_2010.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014

  • Lowndes V, Pratchett L, Stoker G (2001) Trends in public participation: part 1–local government perspectives. Public Admin 79(1):205–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luz F (2000) Participatory landscape ecology: a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landsc Urban Plan 50:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon M, Farrell M, McDonagh J (2010) Power, positionality and the view from within: agricultural advisers’ role in implementing participatory extension programmes in the Republic of Ireland. Sociol Rural 50(2):104–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maru YT, Davies J (2011) Supporting cross-cultural brokers is essential for employment among Aboriginal people in remote Australia. Rangel J 33(4):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michener V (1998) The participatory approach: contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso. World Dev 26(12):2105–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore SA, Jennings S, Tacey WH (2001) Achieving sustainable natural resource management outcomes the ground: the key elements of stakeholder involvement. Aust J Environ Manag 8(2):91–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petursdottir T, Arnalds O, Baker S, Montanarella L, Aradóttir ÁL (2013) A social–ecological system approach to analyze stakeholders’ interactions within a large-scale rangeland restoration program. Ecol Soc 18(2):29

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23(8):1247–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Conserv Biol 141:2417–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30(2):251–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt G (2000) Bændur græða landið: viðhorf bænda. Ráðunautafundur 2000:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider F, Fry P, Ledermann T, Rist S (2009) Social learning in Swiss soil protection: the ‘From farmer to famer’ project. Hum Ecol 37:475–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • SCSI [Soil Conservation Service of Iceland] (2012) History of the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. URL:http://www.land.is/english/history-of-scsi. Accessed 15 Jan 2014

  • SCSI [Soil Conservation Service of Iceland] (2014) Main projects. http://www.land.is/english/main-projects. Accessed 2 Dec 2014

  • Senecah SL (2004) The trinity of voice: the role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. Depoe SP, Delicath JW, Elsenbeer M-FA (edt) Communication and public participation in environmental decisionmaking. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 13–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenseke M (2009) Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 26:214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS (2006) Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc 11(2):39

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton D (1997) Participatory action in the countryside: a literature review. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger R (2001) What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ Manag 27(3):435–450

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wenger E (2009) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7:225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westberg L, Hallgren L, Setterwall A (2010) Communicative skills development of administrators: a necessary step for implementing participatory policies in natural resource management. Environ Commun 4(2):225–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Our warmest thanks to the interviewees and the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. We are also grateful for the financial support provided by Landsvirkjun’s Energy Research Fund and for valuable comments from the reviewers of a previous draft of this manuscript.

Ethical Standard

The research in this study complies with Icelandic laws and was conducted with the permission of the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brita Berglund.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Berglund, B., Hallgren, L. & Aradóttir, Á.L. Stakeholder Interaction in Participatory Land Restoration in Iceland: Environmental Officers’ Challenges and Strategies. Environmental Management 56, 519–531 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0506-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0506-0

Keywords

Navigation