Abstract
Participatory approaches involve stakeholder interaction but environmental agency employees engaged in participatory undertakings often lack training for interaction tasks. This study explored how district officers at the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland (SCSI) experienced and dealt with stakeholder interaction in participatory land restoration. We made semi-structured interviews with all district officers with at least 1-year experience; seven in total. A thematic content analysis revealed five challenges facing the officers in their interaction activities and seven strategies that they used to deal with these challenges. The core challenge was to establish and maintain contacts with farmers and other stakeholders as it enabled the SCSI to support and influence their land restoration practices. Other challenges were to: accomplish SCSI’s objectives; represent the SCSI and the government; have adequate skills, knowledge, and background; and deal with one's own emotions. Four of the strategies seemed to promote collaboration: create win–win scenarios; “go local”; direct and positive communication; and motivation and knowledge sharing. The other strategies: supportive district officer team; self-reliance and personal background; and self-control supported the officers in their interaction tasks. Factors undermining their collaboration efforts included insufficient time and other resources, an unsupportive organizational culture and a legal duty to assess the condition of vegetation cover on farmland. Increased resource allocation to the SCSI’s local operations, more attention to emotional issues, and efforts to develop a more flexible and learning organizational culture that supports collaboration could counteract these factors.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnalds A (2005) Approaches to landcare: a century of soil conservation in Iceland. Land Degrad Dev 16(2):113–125
Barkarson BH, Jóhannsson MH (2009) Arctic landcare. In: Catacutan D, Neely C, Johnson M, Poussard H, Youl R (eds) Landcare: local action – global progress. World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi, pp 55–66
Beierle TC (2002) The quality of stakeholder-based decicions. Risk Anal 22(4):739–749
Bergeå HL (2007) Negotiating fences: interaction in advisory encounters. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Bergeå HL, Ljung M (2007) Implementing nature conservation policy in the name of participation: field-level bureaucrats as a lubricant. In: Bergeå HL Negotiating fences: interaction in advisory encounters. Dissertation, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
Berglund B, Hallgren L, Aradóttir ÁL (2013) Cultivating communication: participatory approaches in land restoration in Iceland. Ecol Soc 18(2):35
Blumer H (1969) Symbolic interactionism: perspective and method. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Brynleifsdóttir SJ (2012) Bændur græða landið: ársskýrsla 2011. LR-2012/13. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/bgl-skyrsla.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014
Buchy M, Hoverman S (2000) Understanding public participation in forest planning: a review. For Policy Econ 1:15–25
Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B (2008) Analysing and presenting qualitative data. Br Dent J 204(8):429–432
Buzan T, Buzan B (2006) The mind map book. BBC Active, Harlowe
Campbell A (1994) Community first: landcare in Australia., Gatekeeper Series SA42International Institution for Environment and Development, London
Cast AD (2004) Role-taking and interaction. Soc Psychol Q 67(3):296–309
Charon J (2010) Symbolic interactionism: an introduction, an interpretation, an integration. Prentice Hall, Boston
Cooper E, Smith G (2012) Organizing deliberation: the perspectives of professional participation practitioners in Britain and Germany. J Public Delib 8(1):3
Crofts R (2011) Healing the land. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland, Gunnarsholt
Farmers association of Iceland (2010) Hagtölur landbúnaðarins 2010. http://www.sjavarutvegsraduneyti.is/media/Skyrslur/Hagtolur_landbunadarins_2010.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2013
Forester J (1999) The deliberative practitioner: encouraging participatory planning processes. MIT Press, Cambridge
Jónsson JB (2009) Bændur græða landið: framkvæmd verkefnisins árið 2009. LR-2009/18. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/Arsskyrsla_BGL_2009.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
Jónsson JB (2010) Bændur græða landið: framkvæmd verkefnisins árið 2010. LR-2010/20. Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. http://www.land.is/images/pdf-documents/arsskyrslur/bgl_skyrslur/Arsskyrsla_BGL_2010.pdf. Accessed 15 January 2014
Lowndes V, Pratchett L, Stoker G (2001) Trends in public participation: part 1–local government perspectives. Public Admin 79(1):205–222
Luz F (2000) Participatory landscape ecology: a basis for acceptance and implementation. Landsc Urban Plan 50:157–166
Mahon M, Farrell M, McDonagh J (2010) Power, positionality and the view from within: agricultural advisers’ role in implementing participatory extension programmes in the Republic of Ireland. Sociol Rural 50(2):104–120
Maru YT, Davies J (2011) Supporting cross-cultural brokers is essential for employment among Aboriginal people in remote Australia. Rangel J 33(4):327–338
Michener V (1998) The participatory approach: contradiction and co-option in Burkina Faso. World Dev 26(12):2105–2118
Moore SA, Jennings S, Tacey WH (2001) Achieving sustainable natural resource management outcomes the ground: the key elements of stakeholder involvement. Aust J Environ Manag 8(2):91–98
Petursdottir T, Arnalds O, Baker S, Montanarella L, Aradóttir ÁL (2013) A social–ecological system approach to analyze stakeholders’ interactions within a large-scale rangeland restoration program. Ecol Soc 18(2):29
Pretty JN (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Dev 23(8):1247–1263
Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Conserv Biol 141:2417–2431
Rowe G, Frewer LJ (2005) A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Sci Technol Hum Values 30(2):251–290
Schmidt G (2000) Bændur græða landið: viðhorf bænda. Ráðunautafundur 2000:93–98
Schneider F, Fry P, Ledermann T, Rist S (2009) Social learning in Swiss soil protection: the ‘From farmer to famer’ project. Hum Ecol 37:475–489
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Basic Books, New York
SCSI [Soil Conservation Service of Iceland] (2012) History of the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. URL:http://www.land.is/english/history-of-scsi. Accessed 15 Jan 2014
SCSI [Soil Conservation Service of Iceland] (2014) Main projects. http://www.land.is/english/main-projects. Accessed 2 Dec 2014
Senecah SL (2004) The trinity of voice: the role of practical theory in planning and evaluating the effectiveness of environmental participatory processes. Depoe SP, Delicath JW, Elsenbeer M-FA (edt) Communication and public participation in environmental decisionmaking. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 13–33
Stenseke M (2009) Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 26:214–223
Stringer LC, Dougill AJ, Fraser E, Hubacek K, Prell C, Reed MS (2006) Unpacking ‘participation’ in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: a critical review. Ecol Soc 11(2):39
Warburton D (1997) Participatory action in the countryside: a literature review. Countryside Commission, Cheltenham
Webler T, Tuler S, Krueger R (2001) What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environ Manag 27(3):435–450
Wenger E (2009) Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization 7:225–246
Westberg L, Hallgren L, Setterwall A (2010) Communicative skills development of administrators: a necessary step for implementing participatory policies in natural resource management. Environ Commun 4(2):225–236
Acknowledgments
Our warmest thanks to the interviewees and the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland. We are also grateful for the financial support provided by Landsvirkjun’s Energy Research Fund and for valuable comments from the reviewers of a previous draft of this manuscript.
Ethical Standard
The research in this study complies with Icelandic laws and was conducted with the permission of the Soil Conservation Service of Iceland.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berglund, B., Hallgren, L. & Aradóttir, Á.L. Stakeholder Interaction in Participatory Land Restoration in Iceland: Environmental Officers’ Challenges and Strategies. Environmental Management 56, 519–531 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0506-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0506-0