Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 702–714 | Cite as

Effects of Coal Mining, Forestry, and Road Construction on Southern Appalachian Stream Invertebrates and Habitats

  • Michael M. Gangloff
  • Michael Perkins
  • Peter W. Blum
  • Craig Walker
Article

Abstract

Coal has been extracted via surface and sub-surface mining for decades throughout the Appalachian Mountains. New interest in ridge-top mining has raised concerns about possible waterway impacts. We examined effects of forestry, mining, and road construction-based disturbance on physico-chemistry and macroinvertebrate communities in east-central Tennessee headwater streams. Although 11 of 30 sites failed Tennessee’s biocriteria scoring system, invertebrate richness was moderately high and we did not find significant differences in any water chemistry or habitat parameters between sites with passing and failing scores. However, conductivity and dissolved solid concentrations appeared elevated in the majority of study streams. Principal components (PCs) analysis indicated that six PCs accounted for ~77 % of among-site habitat variability. One PC associated with dissolved oxygen and specific conductance explained the second highest proportion of among-site variability after catchment area. Specific conductance was not correlated with catchment area but was strongly correlated with mining activity. Composition and success of multivariate models using habitat PCs to predict macroinvertebrate metrics was highly variable. PC scores associated with water chemistry and substrate composition were most frequently included in significant models. These results suggest that impacts of historical and current coal mining remain a source of water quality and macroinvertebrate community impairment in this region, but effects are subtle. Our results suggest that surface mining may have chronic and system-wide effects on habitat conditions and invertebrate communities in Cumberland Plateau streams.

Keywords

Surface mine Conductivity Benthos pH Fine sediment Coal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the following former students or technicians for field assistance: E. Abernethy, D. Hamilton, R. Hoch, J. Holcomb, and D. Walker. Jordan Holcomb constructed the study site map. Ken Fritz (USEPA) reviewed an earlier draft of this manuscript and we are grateful for his helpful comments. The research presented in this paper was conducted in part by employees of the US Office of Surface Mining, Appalachian Region and was funded by OSM. However, the views expressed in this article are those of the coauthors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of OSM or the US government. Mention of trade names does not reflect endorsement by OSM or the US government.

References

  1. Ahern M, Hendryx M (2012) Cancer mortality rates in Appalachian mountaintop coal mining areas. J Environ Occup Sci 1(2):63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahlstedt SA, Bakaletz S, Fagg MT, Hubbs D, Treece MW, Butler RS (2005) Current status of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area of the Cumberland River, Tennessee and Kentucky (1999-2002). Evidence of faunal recovery. Walkerana 14(31):33–77Google Scholar
  3. Bakaletz S (1991) Mussel survey of the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Master’s Thesis, Tennessee Technological University, Cookeville, Tennessee. 62ppGoogle Scholar
  4. Benz GW, Collins DE (1997) Aquatic fauna in peril: the southeastern perspective. Lenz Design and Communications, DecaturGoogle Scholar
  5. Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA (2011) The environmental costs of mountaintop mining valley fill operations for aquatic ecosystems of the Central Appalachians. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1223(2011):39–57. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.05986.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black TR, Detar JE, Mattingly HT (2013) Population densities of the threatened blackside dace, Chrosomus cumberlandensis, in Kentucky and Tennessee. Southeast Nat 12:6–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cormier SM, Suter GW II, Zheng L, Pond GJ (2013) Assessing causation of the extirpation of stream macroinvertebrates by a mixture of ions. Environ Tox Chem 32:277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Diamond JM, Serveiss VB (2001) Identifying sources of stress to native aquatic fauna using a watershed ecological risk assessment framework. Environ Sci Tech 35(24):4711–4718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Diamond JM, Bressler DW, Serveiss VB (2002) Assessing relationships between human land uses and the decline of native mussels, fish and macroinvertebrates in the Clinch and Powell River watershed, USA. Environ Tox Chem 21(6):1147–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gore JA (1996) Discharge measurements and streamflow analysis. In: Hauer FR, Lamberti GA (eds) Methods in stream ecology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffith MB (2014) Natural variation and current reference for specific conductivity and major ions in wadeable streams of the conterminous USA. Freshw Sci 33:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffith MB, Norton SB, Alexander LC, Pollard AI, LeDuc SD (2012) The effects of mountaintop mines and valley fills on the physicochemical quality of stream ecosystems in the central Appalachians: a review. Sci Total Environ 417–418(2012):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Guyot JA (2005) Restoration of the endangered Cumberland elktoe (Alasmidonta atropurpurea) and Cumberland bean (Villosa trabalis) (Bivalvia: Unionidae) in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, Tennessee and Kentucky. MS Thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 160 pGoogle Scholar
  14. Hitt NP, Hendryx M (2010) Ecological integrity of streams related to human cancer mortality rates. EcoHealth 7(1):91–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hobbs HH, Shoup CS (1942) On the crayfishes collected from the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River in Tennessee during the summer of 1938. Am Mid Nat 28(3):634–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindberg TT, Bernhardt ES, Bier R, Helton AM, Merola RB, Vengosh A, DiGiulio RT (2011) Cumulative impacts of mountaintop mining on an Appalachian watershed. Proc Nat Acad Sci 108(52):20929–20934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McAbee K, Albeke S, Nibbelkink NP (2008) Improving imperiled species management through spatially-explicit decision tools. In: Bettinger P, Merry K, Fei S, Drake J, Nibbelink N, Hepinstall J (eds) Proceedings of the 6th Southern Forestry and Natural Resources GIS Conference (2008). Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, AthensGoogle Scholar
  18. Minear RA, Tschantz BA (1976) The effect of coal surface mining on the water quality of mountain drainage basin streams. J Water Pollut Control Fed 48(11):2549–2569Google Scholar
  19. Murphy JC, Hornberger GM, Liddle RG (2012) Concentration-discharge relationships in the coal mined region of the New River basin and Indian Fork sub-basin, Tennessee, USA. Hydrol Process. doi: 10.1002/hyp.9603 Google Scholar
  20. National Park Service (2003) Recovery of freshwater mussels in the free flowing reach of the Big South Fork of the Cumberland River. Environmental assessment revised draft. Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area, OneidaGoogle Scholar
  21. Neel JK, Allen WR (1964) The mussel fauna of the upper Cumberland Basin before its impoundment. Malacologia 1(3):427–459Google Scholar
  22. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Schlesinger WH, Eshleman KN, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Hendryx MS, Lemly AD, Likens GE, Loucks OL, Power ME, White PS, Wilcock PR (2010) Mountaintop mining consequences. Science 327(5962):148–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Petty JT, Fulton JB, Strager MP, Merovich GT, Stiles JM, Ziemkiewicz PF (2010) Landscape indicators and thresholds of stream ecological impairment in an intensively mined Appalachian watershed. J N Am Benthol Soc 29(4):1292–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pond GJ (2010) Patterns of Ephemeroptera taxa loss in Appalachian headwater streams (Kentucky, USA). Hydrobiologia 641(1):185–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pond GJ, Passmore ME, Borsuk FA, Reynolds L, Rose CJ (2008) Downstream effects of mountaintop coal mining: comparing biological conditions using family- and genus-level macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools. J N Am Benthol Soc 27(3):717–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Pond GJ, Passmore ME, Pointon ND, Felbinger JK, Walker CA, Krock KJG, Fulton JB, Nash WL (2014) Long-term impacts on macroinvertebrates downstream of reclaimed mountaintop mining valley fills in Central Appalachia. Environ Manag. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0319-6 Google Scholar
  27. Sams JI, Beer KM (2000) Effects of coal-mine drainage on stream water quality in the Allegheny and Monongahela River Basins- sulfate transport and trends. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4208. http://pa.water.usgs.gov/reports/wrir_99-4208.pdf
  28. Soucek DJ, Kennedy AJ (2005) Effects of hardness, chloride, and acclimation on the acute toxicity of sulfate to freshwater invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 24(5):1204–1210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stair DM, Tolbert VR, Vaughn GL (1984) Comparison of growth, population structure, and food of the creek chub Semotilus atromaculatus in undisturbed and surface-mining-disturbed streams in Tennessee. Environ Pollut 35(1984):331–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Starnes WC, Starnes LB (1978) A new cyprinid of the genus Phoxinus endemic to the upper Cumberland River drainage. Copeia 3(1978):508–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suter GW II, Cormier SM (2013) A method for assessing the potential for confounding applied to ionic strength in Central Appalachian streams. Environ Tox Chem 32:288–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (2001) Development of regionally-based numeric interpretations of Tennessee’s narrative biological integrity criterion. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  33. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation (2011) Quality system standard operating procedure for macroinvertebrate stream surveys. Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, TennesseeGoogle Scholar
  34. Tolbert VR, Vaughn GL (1979) Stripmining as it relates to benthic insect communities. Proc WV Acad Sci 51(3):168–181Google Scholar
  35. US Fish and Wildlife Service (1990) Determination of threatened status for Spiraea virginiana (Virginia spiraea). Fed Reg 55(116):24241–24247Google Scholar
  36. Vaughn GL (1979) Effects of strip-mining on fish and diatoms in streams of the New River Drainage Basin. J TN Acad Sci 54(3):110–115Google Scholar
  37. Verb RG, Vis ML (2000) Comparison of benthic diatom assemblages from streams draining abandoned and reclaimed coal mines and nonimpacted sites. J N Am Benthol Soc 19(2):274–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Warren ML Jr, Haag WR (2005) Spatio-temporal patterns of the decline of freshwater mussels in the Little South Fork Cumberland River,USA. Biodivers Conserv 14(6):1383–1400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zipper CE, Burger JA, Skousen JG, Angel PN, Barton CD, Davis V, Franklin JA (2011) Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on Appalachian coal surface mines. Environ Manag 47(5):751–765CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael M. Gangloff
    • 1
  • Michael Perkins
    • 1
  • Peter W. Blum
    • 1
    • 3
  • Craig Walker
    • 2
  1. 1.Biology DepartmentAppalachian State UniversityBooneUSA
  2. 2.Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and EnforcementKnoxvilleUSA
  3. 3.Biology DepartmentUniversity of North Carolina- GreensboroGreensboroUSA

Personalised recommendations