Environmental Management

, Volume 55, Issue 2, pp 279–295 | Cite as

Cave Conservation Priority Index to Adopt a Rapid Protection Strategy: A Case Study in Brazilian Atlantic Rain Forest

  • Marconi Souza Silva
  • Rogério Parentoni Martins
  • Rodrigo Lopes Ferreira
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Cave environments are characterized by possessing specialized fauna living in high environmental stability with limited food conditions. These fauna are highly vulnerable to impacts, because this condition can frequently be easily altered. Moreover, environmental determinants of the biodiversity patterns of caves remain poorly understood and protected. Therefore, the main goal of this work is to propose a cave conservation priority index (CCPi) for a rapid assessment for troglobiotic and troglophile protection. Furthermore, the troglobiotic diversity, distribution and threats have been mapped in the Brazilian Atlantic forest. To propose the CCPi, the human impacts and richness of troglobiotic and troglophile species of 100 caves were associated. Data related to troglomorphic/troglobiotic fauna from another 200 caves were used to map the troglobiotic diversity and distribution. The CCPi reveals extremely high conservation priority for 15 % of the caves, high for 36 % and average for 46 % of the caves. Fourteen caves with extremely high priorities should have urgent conservation and management actions. The geographical distribution of the 221 known troglobiotic/troglomorphic species allowed us to select 19 karst areas that need conservation actions. Seven areas were considered to have urgent priority for conservation actions. The two richest areas correspond to the “iron quadrangle” with iron ore caves (67 spp.) and the “Açungui limestone group” (56 spp.). Both areas have several caves and are important aquifers. The use of the CCPi can prevent future losses because it helps assessors to select caves with priorities for conservation which should receive emergency attention in relation to protection, management and conservation actions.

Keywords

Biodiversity Conservation priority Cave fauna Cave vulnerability Cave conservation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

National Research Council (CNPq), Foundation that funds research in State of Minas Gerais state (Fapemig), Critical Ecosystem Partnership Fund (CEPF), Aliança para a conservação da Mata Atlântica, Conservação Internacional (CI) for financial support. Funding was provided by the Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa (CNPq) to R.L.F. (CNPq Grant number 301061/2011–4).

References

  1. Abrantes EA, Bellini BC, Bernardo AN, Fernandes LH, Mendonça MC, Oliveira EP, Queiroz GC, Sautter KD, Silveira TC, Zeppelini D (2010) Synthesis of Brazilian Collembola: an update to the species list. Zootaxa 2388:1–22Google Scholar
  2. Auler A, Rubbioli E, Brandi R (2001) As grandes cavernas do Brasil. Grupo Bambuí de Pesquisas Espeleológicas, Belo Horizonte, p 228Google Scholar
  3. Ázara LN, Ferreira RL (2013) The first troglobitic Cryptops (Trigonocryptops) Chilopoda: Scolopendromorpha. from South America and the description of a non-troglobitic species from Brazil. Zootaxa 3709(5):432–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ázara LN, Da Silva MB, Ferreira RL (2013) Description of Mitogoniella mucuri sp. nov. (Opiliones: Gonyleptidae) and considerations on polymorphic traits in the genus and Gonyleptidae. Zootaxa 3736(1):069–081CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baillie J, Groombridge B (1996) IUCN red list of threatened animals.IUCN and Washington, DC, Gland, Switzerland: Conservation International; http://www.redlist.org/
  6. Barton HA (2006) Introduction to cave microbiology: a review for the non-specialist. J Caves Karst Stud 2(68):43–54Google Scholar
  7. BirdLife/FFI/IUCN/WWF (2014) “Extraction and biodiversity in limestone areas”. Joint briefing paperGoogle Scholar
  8. Biswas J (2009) The biodiversity of Krem Mawkhyrdop of Meghalaya, India, on the verge of extinction. Curr Sci 7(96):904–910Google Scholar
  9. Borges PAV, Cardoso P, Amorim IR, Pereira F, Constância JP, Nunes JC, Barcelos P, Costa P, Gabriel R, Dapkevicius ML (2012) Volcanic caves: priorities for conserving the Azorean endemic troglobiont species. Int J Speleol 41(1):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brescovit AD, Ferreira RL, Souza-Silva M, Rheims CA (2012) Brasilomma gen. nov., a new prodidomid genus from Brazil (Araneae, Prodidomidae). Zootaxa 3572:23–32Google Scholar
  11. Calo F, Parise M (2006) Evaluating the human disturbance to karst environments in southern Italy. Acta Carsologica 35(2):47–56Google Scholar
  12. Cardoso GM, Bueno AA, Ferreira RL (2011a) A new troglobiotic species of Hyalella (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Dogielinotidae) from Southeastern Brazil. Nauplius 19(1):17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cardoso P, Borges PAV, Triantis KA, Ferrández MA, Martín JL (2011b) Adapting the IUCN red list criteria for invertebrates. Biol Conserv 144:2432–2440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardoso P, Erwin TL, Borges PAV, New TR (2011c) The seven impediments in invertebrate conservation and how to overcome them. Biol Conserv 144:2647–2655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cardoso GM, Araujo PB, Bueno AA, Ferreira RL (2014) Two new subterranean species of Hyalella Smith, 1874 (Crustacea: amphipoda: Hyalellidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 3814(3):353–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. CEBS-UFLA (2014) Center of studies on subterranean biology from Federal University of Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil, ( www.biologiasubterranea.com.br)
  17. Cigna AA (2005) Show Caves. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves. Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, pp 495–500Google Scholar
  18. Cigna AA, Forti P (2013) Caves: the most important geotouristic feature in the world. Tour Karst Areas 6(1):9–26Google Scholar
  19. CONAMA (2004) Conselho Nacional de Meio Ambiente. http://www.mma.gov.br/port/conama
  20. Culver DC, Pipan T (2009) The biology of caves and other subterranean habitats. Library of congress 412 cataloging in publication data. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Culver DC, Lawrence LM, Christman MC, Hobbs HH (2000) Obligate cave fauna of the 48 contiguous United States. Conserv Biol 14:386–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Day M (1996) Conservation of Karst in Belize. J Cave Karst Stud 58(2):139–144Google Scholar
  23. Deharveng L, Bedos A (2012) Diversity patterns in the tropics. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, pp 238–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Donato CR, Ribeiro AS, Souto LS (2014) A conservation status index, as an auxiliary tool for the management of cave environments. Int J Speleol 43(3):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elliott WR (2000) Conservation of the American cave and Karst biota. In Wilkens, Culver DC, Humphreys (eds) Subterranean ecosystems. Elsevier, Oxford, pp. 671–695Google Scholar
  26. Ferraz G (2012) Twelve guidelines for biological sampling in environmental licensing studies. Natureza Conserv, Braz J Nat Conserv 10(1):20–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ferreira RL (2004) A medida da complexidade ecológica e suas aplicações na conservação e manejo de ecossistemas subterrâneos. Tese apresentada ao programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. http://www.ufmg.br/pos/ecologia/index.php/teses/63-2001-2010
  28. Ferreira RL (2005) A vida subterrânea nos campos ferruginosos. O Carste 3:106–115Google Scholar
  29. Ferreira D, Malard F, Dole-Olivier MJ, Gibert J (2007) Obligate groundwater fauna of France: diversity patterns and conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 16:567–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fleury S (2009) Land use policy and practice on Karst Terrains. doi:  10.1007/978-1-4020-9670-92, Springer Science
  31. Ford D (2005) Proposed criteria for groundwater protection zoning in karst regions. In Milanović PT (ed) Water resources engineering in karst, Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data, ISBN 1-56670-671-8Google Scholar
  32. Gabriel R, Pereira F, Borges PAV, Constância JP (2008) Indicators of conservation value of Azorean caves based on its bryophyte flora at cave entrances. Proceedings of the X, XI and XII International Symposia on Vulcanospeleology. pp. 114–118Google Scholar
  33. Gillieson D (1986) Cave sedimentation in the New Guinea highlands. Earth Surf Proc Landf 11:533–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gillieson D (1996) Caves: processes, development, and management, British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data. p 324Google Scholar
  35. Gillieson DS (2011) Management of caves. In: Van Beynen PE (ed) Karst Management. Springer, Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, Library of CongressGoogle Scholar
  36. Goerck JM (1997) Patterns of rarity in the birds of the Atlantic Forest of Brazil. Conserv Biol 11:112–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gunn J, Hardwick P, Wood PJ (2000) The invertebrate community of the Peak—Speedwell cave system, Derbyshire, England—pressures and considerations for conservation management. Aquat Conserv 10:353–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. GUPE (2013) Grupo Universitário de Pesquisas Espeleológicas (GUPE), http://www.gupe.org.br. Accessed Mar 2013
  39. Hamilton-Smith E (2004) Tourist caves. In: Gunn J (ed) Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. Taylor and Francis Group, New York, pp 1554–1561Google Scholar
  40. Hamilton-Smith E (2006) Spatial planning and protection measures for karst areas. Acta Carsologica 2(35):5–11Google Scholar
  41. Hoch H, Ferreira RL (2012) Ferricixius davidi gen. n., sp. n.—the first cavernicolous planthopper from Brazil (Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha, Cixiidae). Dtsch Entomol Z 59(2):201–206Google Scholar
  42. Hoch H, Ferreira RL (2013) Potiguara troglobia gen. n., sp. n.—first record of a troglobitic Kinnaridae from Brazil (Hemiptera: Fulgoromorpha). Dtsch Entomol Z 60(1):33–40Google Scholar
  43. Hoffmann M, Brooks TM, da Fonseca GAB, Gascon C, Hawkins AFA, James RE, Langhammer P, Mittermeier RA, Pilgrim JD, Rodrigues ASL, Silva JMC (2008) Conservation planning and the IUCN red list. Endanger Species Res 6:113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Howarth FG (2004) Hawaiian Islands: biospeleology. In: Gunn J (ed) Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data. pp 863–867Google Scholar
  45. Huppert GN (1995) Legal protection for caves in the United States. Environ Geol 26:121–123Google Scholar
  46. Juberthie C (1995) Underground habitats and their protection, Edições 18–72Google Scholar
  47. Kepa K (2001) Karst conservation in Slovenia. Acta Carsologica 30(10):143–164Google Scholar
  48. Lino F, Allievi J (1980) Cavernas Brasileiras. Editora melhoramentos LTDA, São Paulo, p 168Google Scholar
  49. Lobo HAS, Trajano E, Marinho MA, Bichuette ME, Scaleante JAB, Scaleante OAF, Rocha BN, Laterza FV (2013) Projection of tourist scenarios onto fragility maps: framework for determination of provisional tourist carrying capacity in a Brazilian show cave. Tour Manag 35:234–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Loyola RD, Kubota U, Lewinsohn TM (2007) Endemic vertebrates are the most effective surrogates for identifying conservation priorities among Brazilian ecoregions. Divers Distrib 13:389–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Machado SF, Ferreira RL, Martins RP (2003) Aspects of the population ecology of Goniosoma sp. (Arachnida Opiliones Gonyleptidae) in limestone caves in southeastern Brazil. Trop Zool 16:13–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Machado AMM, Drumond GM, Paglia A (2008) Livro vermelho da fauna brasileira ameaçada de extinção, vol I e II, 1st edn. Fundação Biodiversitas, Belo HorizonteGoogle Scholar
  53. Machado EO, Ferreira RL, Brescovit AD (2011) A new troglomorphic Metagonia Simon 1893 (Araneae, Pholcidae) from Brazil. Zootaxa 3135:59–62Google Scholar
  54. McFarlane DA (1988) Endangered cave species. Nat Speleol Soc News 46:36–37Google Scholar
  55. Metzger JP (2009) Conservation issues in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biol Conserv 142:1138–1140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mittermeier RA, Myers N, Robles GP, Mittermeier CC (1999) Hotspots Agrupación Sierra Madre. CEMEX, Mexico CityGoogle Scholar
  57. Morrelato LPC, Haddad CFB (2000) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biotropica 32(4b):786–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Orndorff DCR (2005) Protecting cave animals through the endangered species acts. Virginia Cave Owner’s Newsletter. Virginia Cave Board, Department of Conservation and Recreation No. 16, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  59. Parise M, Gunn J (eds) (2007) Natural and anthropogenic hazards in karst areas: recognition, analysis and mitigation. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 279Google Scholar
  60. Pellegrini TG, Ferreira RL (2012) Management in a neotropical show cave: planning for invertebrates conservation. Int J Speleol 41(2):359–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pfab MF, Victor JE, Armstrong AJ (2011) Application of the IUCN red listing system to setting species targets for conservation planning purposes. Biodivers Conserv 20:1001–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pinto-da-Rocha R, Machado G, Weygoldt P (2002) Two new species of Charinus Simon, 1892 from Brazil with biological notes (Arachnida; Amblypygi; Charinidae). J Nat Hist 36:107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pipan T, Culver DC (2012) Wetlands in cave and karst regions. In: Culver DC, White WB (eds) Encyclopedia of caves, 2nd edition British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data, pp 897–904Google Scholar
  64. Prous X, Ferreira RL, Martins RP (2004) Ecotone delimitation: epigean-hypogean transition in cave ecosystems. Austral Ecol 29:374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pulido-Bosch A, Rosales WM, Chicano ML, Navarro CMR, Vallejos A (1997) Human impact in a tourist karstic cave (Aracena, Spain). Environ Geol 31(3/4):142–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reboleira ASPS (2007) Coleópteros (Insecta, Coleoptera) cavernícolas do Maciço Calcário Estremenho: uma abordagem à sua biodiversidade. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ecologia, Biodiversidade e Gestão de Ecossistemas). Universidade de AveiroGoogle Scholar
  67. Reboleira ASPS, Borges PAV, Gonçalves F, Serrano ARM, Oromí P (2011) The subterranean fauna of a biodiversity hotspot region—Portugal: an overview and its conservation. Int J Speleol 40(1):23–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Restificar SD, Day FMJ, Urich PB (2006) Protection of karst in the Philippines. Acta Carsologica 35(1):121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodrigues SG, Bueno AA, Ferreira RL (2014) A new troglobiotic species of Hyalella (Crustacea, Amphipoda, Hyalellidae) with a taxonomic key for the Brazilian species. Zootaxa 3815:200–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Santos AJ, Ferreira RL, Buzatto BA (2013) Two new cave-dwelling species of the short-tailed whipscorpion genus Rowlandius (Arachnida: Schizomida: Hubbardiidae) from northeastern Brazil, with comments on male dimorphism. PLoS ONE 8(5):e63616. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063616 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sessegolo GC, Oliveira KL, Rocha LFS (2001) Conhecendo cavernas. GEEP- Acungui. Curitiba- PRGoogle Scholar
  72. Sharratt NJ, Picker M, Samways M (2000) The invertebrate fauna of the sandstone of the caves of the Cape Penisula (South Africa): patterns of endemism and conservation priorities. Biodivers Conserv 9:107–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2014) Cave invertebrates in northwestern Minas Gerais state, Brazil: endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Acta Carsologica 43(1):159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Simon KS, Buikema AL Jr (1997) Effects of organic pollution on an Appalachian cave: changes in macroinvertebrate populations and food supplies. Am Midl Nat 138:387–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sket B (2008) Can we agree on an ecological classification of subterranean animals? J Nat Hist 42(21):1549–1563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Souza MFVR, Ferreira RL (2011) A new troglobitic Eukoenenia (Palpigradi: Eukoeneniidae) from Brazil. J Arachnol 39(1):185–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Souza-Silva M (2008) Ecologia e conservação das comunidades de invertebrados cavernícolas na Mata Atlântica Brasileira. Tese apresentada ao programa de pós-graduação em Ecologia Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre do Instituto de Ciências Biológicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. http://www.ufmg.br/pos/ecologia/index.php/teses/63-2001-2010
  78. Souza-Silva M, Martins RP, Ferreira RL (2011a) Cave lithology determining the structure of the invertebrate communities in the Brazilian Atlantic Rain Forest. Biodivers Conserv 20:1713–1729CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Souza-Silva M, Martins RP, Ferreira RL (2011b) Trophic dynamics in a neotropical limestone cave. Subterr Biol 9:127–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Souza-Silva M, Bernardi LFO, Martins RP, Ferreira RL (2012) Transport and consumption of organic detritus in a neotropical limestone cave. Acta Carsologica 41(1):139–150Google Scholar
  81. Taylor SJ, Krejca JK, Denight ML (2005) Foraging range and habitat use of Ceuthophilus secretus (Orthoptera: Rhaphidophoridae), a key trogloxene in central Texas cave communities. Am Midl Nat 154:97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Taylor ELS, Resende-Stoianoff MAA, Ferreira RL (2013) Mycological study for a management plan of a neotropical show cave (Brazil). Int J Speleol 42(3):267–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Terborgh J (1992) Maintenance of the diversity in tropical forests. Biotropica 24:283–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Tercafs R (1992a) The Protection of the subterranean environment: conservation principles and management tools. In: Ana Camacho (ed) The Natural history of bioespeleology. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, Madrid, pp 485–522, p 680Google Scholar
  85. Tercafs R (1992b) Conservation: cave biota. In: Encyclopedia of caves and karst science. pp 500–503Google Scholar
  86. Trajano E (2000) Cave faunas in the Atlantic tropical rain forest: composition, ecology and conservation. Biotropica 32:882–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Trajano E, Bichuette ME (2006) Biologia Subterranea - Introducão. Redespeleo Brasil, Sao PauloGoogle Scholar
  88. Trajano E, Bichuette ME (2010a) Subterranean fishes of Brazil. In: Trajano E, Bichuette ME, Kapoor BG (eds) Biology of subterranean fishes, 1st edn. pp 331–356Google Scholar
  89. Trajano E, Bichuette ME (2010b) Diversity of Brazilian subterranean invertebrates, with a list of troglomorphic taxa. Subterr Biol 7:1–16Google Scholar
  90. Valladares-Padua C, Padua SM, Cullen L Jr (2002) Within and surrounding the Morro do Diabo State Park: biological value, conflicts, mitigation and sustainable development alternatives. Environ Sci Policy 5:69–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Valsegno C (2010) Public FSE meeting about the petition and the next steps in European politics, date: 9 October in Published at: http://www.cavedeclaration.eu
  92. Van-Beynen PE (ed) (2011) Karst management. doi:  10.1007/978-94-007-1207-2_1, 1 Springer Science+Business Media B.V
  93. Van-Beynen PV, Townsend K (2005) A disturbance index for karst environments. Environ Manag 1(36):101–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Van-Beynen P, Brinkmann R, Van-Beynen K (2012) A sustainability index for karst environments. J Cave Karst Stud 2(74):221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Zeppelini D, da Silva DD, Palacios-Vargas JG (2014) A new species of Troglobius (Collembola, Paronellidae, Cyphoderinae) from a Brazilian iron cave. Subterr Biol 14:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marconi Souza Silva
    • 1
  • Rogério Parentoni Martins
    • 2
  • Rodrigo Lopes Ferreira
    • 1
  1. 1.Setor de Zoologia Geral, Departamento de Biologia, Centro de Estudos em Biologia SubterrâneaUniversidade Federal de LavrasLavrasBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Biologia, Centro de CiênciasUniversidade Federal do CearáFortalezaBrazil

Personalised recommendations