Environmental Management

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 1131–1138 | Cite as

Effects of Livestock Grazing and Well Construction on Prairie Vegetation Structure Surrounding Shallow Natural Gas Wells

  • N. KoperEmail author
  • K. Molloy
  • L. Leston
  • J. Yoo


Short and sparse vegetation near shallow gas wells has generally been attributed to residual effects from well construction, but other mechanisms might also explain these trends. We evaluated effects of distance to shallow gas wells on vegetation and bare ground in mixed-grass prairies in southern Alberta, Canada, from 2010 to 2011. We then tested three hypotheses to explain why we found shorter vegetation and more bare ground near wells, using cattle fecal pat transects from 2012, and our vegetation quadrats. We evaluated whether empirical evidence suggested that observed patterns were driven by (1) higher abundance of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) near wells, (2) residual effects of well construction, or (3) attraction of livestock to wells. Crested wheatgrass occurrence was higher near wells, but this did not explain effects of wells on vegetation structure. Correlations between distance to wells and litter depth were the highest near newer wells, providing support for the construction hypothesis. However, effects of distance to wells on other vegetation metrics did not decline as time since well construction increased, suggesting that other mechanisms explained observed edge effects. Cattle abundance was substantially higher near wells, and this effect corresponded with changes in habitat structure. Our results suggest that both residual effects of well construction and cattle behavior may explain effects of shallow gas wells on habitat structure in mixed-grass prairies, and thus, to be effective, mitigation strategies must address both mechanisms.


Edge effects Grasslands Habitat structure Livestock grazing Natural gas 



We thank three anonymous reviewers and Drs. Efroymson and Collins for their helpful reviews of the manuscript. J. Heese, of Cenovus Energy, provided helpful information on changes in well construction and restoration methods over time. We thank the Eastern Irrigation District and Cenovus Energy for allowing us access to their rangelands and lease sites for our research. Numerous research assistants and graduate students contributed to data collection. This research was supported by Cenovus Energy, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canadian Foundation for Innovation, the Manitoba Research and Innovations Fund, and the Clayton H. Riddell Faculty of Environment, Earth and Resources Endowment Fund.


  1. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board (2002a) Petroleum industry activity in native prairie and parkland areas: guidelines for minimizing surface disturbance. Alberta Energy and Utilities BoardGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberta Environment (2003a) Problem introduced forages on prairie and parkland reclamation sites: guidance for non-cultivated land R&R/03-5. Alberta EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberta Environment (2003b) Wellsite construction: guidelines for no-strip and reduced disturbance R&R/03-07. Alberta EnvironmentGoogle Scholar
  4. Aldridge CL, Boyce MS (2007) Linking occurrence and fitness to persistence: habitat-based approach for endangered greater sage-grouse. Ecol Appl 17:508–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aldridge CL, Brigham RM (2002) Sage-grouse nesting and brood habitat use in southern Canada. J Wildl Manag 66:433–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber JR, Crooks KR, Kristup KM (2009) The costs of chronic noise exposure for terrestrial organisms. Trends Ecol Evol 25:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckmann JP, Murray K, Seidler RG, Berger J (2012) Human-mediated shifts in animal habitat use: sequential changes in pronghorn use of a natural gas field in greater yellowstone. Biol Conserv 147:222–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berquist E, Evangelista P, Stohlgren TJ (2007) Invasive species and coal bed methane development in the powder River Basin, Wyoming. Environ Monit Assess 128:381–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter J, Aldridge C, Boyce MS (2010) Sage-grouse habitat selection during winter in Alberta. J Wildl Manag 74:1806–1814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman RN, Engle DM, Masters RE, Leslie DM (2004) Grassland vegetation and bird communities in the southern Great Plains of North America. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:577–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collinge SK, Prudic KL, Oliver JC (2003) Effects of local habitat characteristics and landscape context on grassland butterfly diversity. Conserv Biol 17:178–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CSA Group (2011) CSA Z662-11 Oil and gas pipeline systems, 6th edn. CSA Group, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  13. Derner JD, Lauenroth WK, Stapp P, Augustine DJ (2009) Livestock as ecosystem engineers for grassland bird habitat in the western great plains of North America. Rangel Ecol Manag 62:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Desserud PA (2011) Rough fescue (Festuca hallii) ecology and restoration in Central Alberta. Dissertation, University of AlbertaGoogle Scholar
  15. Fisher RJ, Davis SK (2009) From Wiens to Robel: a review of grassland-bird habitat selection. J Wildl Manag 74:265–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleischner TL (1994) Ecological costs of livestock grazing in in western North America. Conserv Biol 8:629–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fontaine AL, Kennedy PL, Johnson DH (2004) Effects of distance from cattle water developments on grassland birds. J Range Manag 57:238–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritcher SC, Rumble MA, Flake LD (2004) Grassland bird densities in seral stages of mixed-grass prairie. J Range Manag 57:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert MM, Chalfoun AD (2011) Energy development affects population of sagebrush songbirds in Wyoming. J Wildl Manag 75:816–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton LE, Dale BC, Paszkowski CA (2011) Effects of disturbance associated with natural gas extraction on the occurrence of three grassland songbirds. Avian Conserv Ecol. doi: 10.5751/ACE-00458-060107 Google Scholar
  21. Hardin JW, Hilbe JM (2003) Generalized estimating equations. Chapman and Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Ingelfinger F, Anderson S (2004) Passerine response to roads associated with natural gas extraction in a sagebrush steppe. West North Am Nat 64:385–395Google Scholar
  23. Klug PE, Jackrel SL, With KA (2010) Linking snake habitat use to nest predation risk in grassland birds: the dangers of shrub cover. Oecologia 162:803–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knick ST, Dobkin DS, Rotenberry JT, Schroeder MA, Hagen WMV, Van Riper CIII (2003) Teetering on the edge or too late? Conservation and research issues for avifauna of sagebrush habitats. Condor 105:611–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohler F, Gillet F, Reust S, Wagner HH, Gadallah F, Gobat J, Buttler A (2006) Spatial and seasonal patterns of cattle habitat use in a mountain wooded pasture. Landsc Ecol 21:281–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koper N, Schmiegelow FKA (2006) A multi-scaled analysis of avian response to habitat amount and fragmentation in the Canadian dry mixed-grass prairie. Landsc Ecol 21:1045–1059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ksiksi T, Laca EA (2000) Can social interactions affect food searching efficiency of cattle? Rangel J 22:235–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Larson DL, Anderson PK, Newton W (2001) Alien plant invasion in mixed-grass prairie: effects of vegetation type and anthropogenic disturbance. Ecol Appl 11:128–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McDonald RI, Fargione J, Kiesecker J, Miller WM, Powell J (2009) Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: climate policy impacts on natural habitat for the United States of America. PLoS One 4:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Milchunas DG, Lauenroth WK, Chapman PL, Kazempour MK (1989) Effects of grazing, topography, and precipitation on the structure of a semiarid grassland. Vegetatio 80:11–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mundry R (2011) Issues in information theory-based statistical inference-a commentary from a frequentist’s perspective. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:57–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nasen LC, Noble BF, Johnstone JF (2011) Environmental effects of oil and gas lease sites in a grassland ecosystem. J Environ Manag 92:195–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Onsager JA (2000) Suppression of grasshoppers in the Great Plains through grazing management. J Range Manag 53:592–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Owens MK, Launchbaugh KL, Holloway JW (1991) Pasture characteristics affecting spatial distribution of utilization by cattle in mixed brush communities. J Range Manag 44:118–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pan W (2001) Akaike’s information criterion in generalized estimating equations. Biometrics 57:120–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Putfarken D, Dengler J, Lehmann S, Hardtle W (2008) Site use of grazing cattle and sheep in a large scale pasture landscape: a GPS/GIS assessment. Appl Animal Behav Sci 111:54–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Quinn GGP, Keough MJ (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reeves MC, Mitchell JE (2011) Extent of conterminous US rangelands: quantifying implications from different agency perspectives. Rangel Ecol Manag 64:585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Riley TZ, Bayne EM, Boyce MS, Dale BC, Naugle D, Rodgers JA, Torbit SC (2012) Impacts of crude oil and natural gas developments on wildlife and wildlife habitat in the rocky mountain region. Wildlife Society Technical Review, The Wildlife Society, BethesdaGoogle Scholar
  40. Rowell MJ, Florence LZ (1993) Characteristics associated with differences between undisturbed and industrially-disturbed soils. Soil Biol Biochem 25:1499–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanderson MA, Feldmann C, Schmidt J, Hermann A, Taube F (2010) Spatial distribution of livestock concentration areas and soil nutrients in pastures. J Soil Water Conserv 65:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sawyer H, Nielson RM, Lindzey F, McDonald LL (2006) Winter habitat selection of mule deer before and during development of a natural gas field. J Wildl Manag 70:396–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sawyer H, Kauffman MJ, Nielson RM (2009) Influence of well pad activity on winter habitat selection patterns of mule deer. J Wildl Manag 73:1052–1061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simmers SM, Galatowitsch SM (2010) Factors affecting revegetation of oil field access roads in semiarid grassland. Restor Ecol 18:27–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith PW, Depuit EJ, Richardson BZ (1988) Plant community development on petroleum drill sites in northwestern Wyoming. J Range Manag 41:372–377Google Scholar
  46. Sutter GC, Davis SK, Duncan DC (2000) Grassland songbird abundance along roads and trails in southern Saskatchewan. J Field Ornithol 71:110–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Swengel AB, Swengel SR (2001) Effects of prairie and barrens management on butterfly faunal composition. Biodivers Conserv 10:1757–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tastad AC (2013) The relative effects of grazing by bison and cattle on plant community heterogeneity in northern mixed prairie. University of Manitoba, ThesisGoogle Scholar
  49. Tate KW, Atwill ER, McDougald NK, George MR (2003) Spatial and temporal patterns of cattle feces deposition on rangelands. J Range Manag 56:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Taylor BL, Gerrodette T (1993) The uses of statistical power in ecology: the vaquita and the northern spotted owl. Conserv Biol 7:489–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vaness BM, Wilson SD (2007) Impact and management of crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum) in the northern Great Plains. Can J Plant Sci 87:1023–1028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Walker BL, Naugle DE, Doherty KE (2007) Greater sage-grouse population response to energy development and habitat loss. J Wildl Manag 71:2644–2654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White SL, Sheffield RE, Washburn SP, King LD, Green JT Jr (2001) Spatial and time distribution of dairy cattle excreta in an intensive pasture system. J Environ Qual 30:2180–2187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wiens JA (1969) An approach to the study of ecological relationships among grassland birds. Ornithol Monogr 8:1–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources InstituteUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations