Environmental Management

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 1175–1189 | Cite as

Informal Institutional Responses to Government Interventions: Lessons from Madhupur National Park, Bangladesh

  • H. M. Tuihedur Rahman
  • Swapan Kumar Sarker
  • Gordon M. Hickey
  • M. Mohasinul Haque
  • Niamjit Das
Article

Abstract

Madhupur National Park is renowned for severe resource ownership conflicts between ethnic communities and government authorities in Bangladesh. In this study, we applied the Institutional Analysis and Development framework to identify: (i) past and present informal institutional structures within the ethnic Garo community for land resource management; (ii) the origin of the land ownership dispute; (iii) interaction mechanisms between formal and informal institutions; and (iv) change in land management authority and informal governance structures. We identify that the informal institutions of the traditional community have undergone radical change due to government interventions with implications for the regulation of land use, informal institutional functions, and joint-decision-making. Importantly, the government’s persistent denial of the role of existing informal institutions is widening the gap between government and community actors, and driving land ownership conflicts in a cyclic way with associated natural resource degradation.

Keywords

Sustainable natural resource management Land rights Forest conservation Social capital Garo people 

References

  1. Agrawal A (2001) Common property institution and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29(10):1649–1672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal A, Ostrom E (2001) Collective action, property rights and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Polit Sci 29:485–514Google Scholar
  3. Akama JS, Lant CL, Wesley G (1996) A political-ecology approach to wildlife conservation in Kenya. Environ Values 5:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alam M, Furukawa Y, Sarker SK, Ahmed R (2008) Sustainability of Sal (Shorearobusta) forest in Bangladesh: past, present and future actions. Int For Rev 10(1):29–37Google Scholar
  5. Ballet J, Sirven N, Requiers-Desjardins M (2007) Social capital and natural resource management: a critical perspective. J Environ Dev 16:355–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker CD, Ostrom E (1995) Human ecology and resource sustainability: the importance of institutional diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 26:113–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswas SR, Choudhury JK (2007) Forests and forest management practices in Bangladesh: the question of sustainability. Int For Rev 9:627–640Google Scholar
  8. Boeije H (2002) A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant 36:391–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cham SJ (2006) Original religion of Garo people and religious transformation. In: Majid (ed) The Garo aboriginals. Mowla Brothers, Dhaka, pp 103–104Google Scholar
  10. Chowdhury ME, Ahmed SU (2008). Poverty-environment nexus: an investigation of linkage and policy implications. A report submitted to UNDP/Centre for Policy Dialogue, January 28Google Scholar
  11. De Soto H (2001) The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the west and falls everywhere else. Basic Books, London, p 288Google Scholar
  12. Drong S (2009) Indigenous people of forest: life of Garo women in the Madhupur forest. In: Kamal et al. (eds) Endangered offspring of soil: indigenous people’s existence at stake, reflections on Bangladesh and Eastern India. Adorn Publication, Dhaka, pp 173–182.Google Scholar
  13. Farooque M (1997) Law and custom on forest of Bangladesh: issues and remedies. Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association, DhakaGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer A, Petersen L, Huppert W (2007) Sustainable governance of natural resource and institutional change—an analytical framework. Public Admin Dev 27:123–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forest Department (FD) (2012) Conservation sites: protected areas of Bangladesh. Ministry of Environment and Forest Bangladesh. http://www.bforesty-gov.bd/conservation.php. Accessed 1 April 2012
  16. Gain P (2007) Madhupur walls to protect wilderness or marauders! Earth Touch No. 10 April. SEHD. http://www.sehd.org/publications/magazines. Accessed 9 Jan 2009
  17. Heltberg R (2002) Property rights and natural resource management in developing countries. J Econ Surv 16(2):189–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hodgson GM (2006) What are institutions? J Econ Issues 40(1):1–25Google Scholar
  19. Iftekhar MS, Hoque AKF (2005) Causes of forest encroachment: an analysis of Bangladesh. Geoj 62:95–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Imperial MT (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environ Manage 24(4):449–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Islam S (2007) Economic history in perspectives. In: Islam S (ed) History of Bangladesh. Asiatic Society of Bangladesh, Dhaka, pp 1704–1971Google Scholar
  22. IUCN (2011) Category V-protected area with sustainable use of natural resources http://www.iucn.org/about/work/programs/pa_products. Accessed 10 April 2012
  23. Khaleque K (1986) The position of male and female in matrilineal Garo society. Janira Res J 7:45–65Google Scholar
  24. Krishna A (2011) Gaining access to public service and the democratic state in India: institutions in the middle. St Comp Int Dev 46:98–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lijphart A (1971) Comparative politics and comparative method. Am Political Sci Rev 65(3):682–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu FE (2001) The common property regime of the Huaorani Indians of Ecuador: implication and challenge to conservation. Hum Ecol 29:425–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marak M (2006) Garo tradition, education and culture. In: Majid M (ed) The Garo aboriginals. Mowla Brothers, Dhaka, pp 85–92Google Scholar
  28. Moore DS (1993) Contesting terrain in Zimbabwe’s Eastern highlands: political ecology, ethnography, and peasant resource struggles. Econ Geogr 69:380–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nawaz A (1985) Garo aborigines and their cultural evolution (in Bangla). Memorandum, read in ‘Ethnic culture and literature’ seminar, April 16, 1985. Ethnic cultural academy: Birishiri, Durgapur, Netrokona, BangladeshGoogle Scholar
  30. Niroula GS, Thapa GB (2005) Impact and causes of land fragmentation, and lesson learned from land consolidation in South Asia. Land Use Policy 22:358–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ostrom E (1986) An agenda for the study of institutions. Public Choice 48:3–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom E, Gardner R, Walker J (1994) Rules, games and common pool resources. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  35. Prasad R, Kant S (2003) Institutions, forest management and sustainable human development experience from India. Environ Dev Sustain 5:353–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rahman HMT, Hickey GM, Sarker SK (2012) A framework for evaluating collective action and informal institutional dynamics under a resource management policy of decentralization. Ecol Econ 83:32–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rashid M, Satter F (2006) Indigenous people’s land right: Bangladesh perspective. Presented in international conference on Land, Poverty, Social Justice and Development, 9–14 Jan 2006, Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  38. Rastogi A, Hickey GM, Badola R, Hussain SA (2012) Saving the Superstar: a review of tiger conservation approaches in India. J Environ Manage 113:328–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rastogi A, Hickey GM, Badola R, Hussain SA (2014) Understanding the local socio-political processes affecting conservation management outcomes in Corbett Tiger Reserve, India. Environ Manage 53:913–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Robson C (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers. Blackwell Publishing, Cornwall, pp 455–473Google Scholar
  41. Roy RD (2004) Salient feature of the Chittagong Hill Tracts Peace Accord of 1997. In: Tauli-Corpuz V, Cariño J (eds) Reclaiming balance: indigenous peoples, conflict resolution and sustainable development. Tebtebba Foundation, Baguio City, pp 293–304Google Scholar
  42. Rudd MA (2004) An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem based fisheries management policy experiment. Ecol Econ 48:109–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sandberg A (2007) Property rights and ecosystem properties. Land Use Policy 24(4):613–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sarker SK, Deb JC, Halim MA (2011) A diagnosis of existing logging bans in Bangladesh. Int For Rev 13:461–475Google Scholar
  45. Sokile CS, Kashaigili JJ, Kadigi RMJ (2003) Towards an integrated water resource management in Tanzania: the role of appropriate institutional framework in Rufiji Basin. Phys Chem Earth 28:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stavenhagen R (2007) General considerations on the situation of human rights and fundamental freedoms of indigenous peoples in Asia. Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues, Sixth session, New York, 14–25 May 2007, Item 6 of the provisional agenda, Half day discussion on AsiaGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W (1997) Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Org Sci 8(2):109–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yin RK (2003) Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publication, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. M. Tuihedur Rahman
    • 1
  • Swapan Kumar Sarker
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gordon M. Hickey
    • 1
  • M. Mohasinul Haque
    • 4
  • Niamjit Das
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental SciencesMcGill UniversitySte-Anne-de-BellevueCanada
  2. 2.Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health & Comparative Medicine, College of Medical, Veterinary & Life SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
  3. 3.Department of Forestry and Environmental ScienceShahjalal University of Science & TechnologySylhetBangladesh
  4. 4.Department of Biological SciencesMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations