Environmental Management

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 223–239 | Cite as

Factors Influencing Phosphorus Levels Delivered to Everglades National Park, Florida, USA

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Everglades restoration is dependent on constructed wetlands to treat agricultural phosphorus (P)-enriched runoff prior to delivery to the Everglades. Over the last 5 years, P concentrations delivered to the northern boundary of Everglades National Park (Park) have remained higher than the 8 μg L−1-target identified to be protective of flora and fauna. Historically, Everglades hydrology was driven by rainfall that would then sheetflow through the system. The system is now divided into a number of large impoundments. We use sodium-to-calcium ratios as a water source discriminator to assess the influence of management and environmental conditions to understand why P concentrations in Park inflows remain higher than that of the target. Runoff from Water Conservation Area 3A (Area 3A) and canal water from areas north of Area 3A are two major sources of water to the Park, and both have distinct Na:Ca ratios. The P concentrations of Park inflows have decreased since the 1980s, and from June 1994 through May 2000, concentrations were the lowest when Area 3A water depths were the deepest. Area 3A depths declined following this period and P concentrations subsequently increased. Further, some water sources for the Park are not treated and are impeding concentration reductions. Promoting sheetflow over channelized flow and treating untreated water sources can work in conjunction with constructed wetlands to further reduce nutrient loading to the sensitive Everglades ecosystem.

Keywords

Nutrient enrichment Everglades National Park Indicator Water quality Point source Water depth 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Roy Sonenshein for hydrologic consultation, Kyle Douglas-Mankin for hydrologic and phosphorus transport consultation, and Alicia LoGalbo for ecological consultation. We also thank Dilip Shinde and William W. Walker for extensive reviews of manuscript concepts and analyses. Finally, we would like to thank the National Park Service for financial support.

References

  1. Abtew W, Trimble P (2010) El Nino-Southern oscillation link to South Florida hydrology and water management applications. Water Resour Manag 24:4255–4271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abtew W, Cadavid L, Ciuca V (2012) Chapter 2: South Florida hydrology and water management. 2013 South Florida environmental report, South Florida water management district, West Palm Beach. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/pg_grp_sfwmd_sfer/portlet_prevreport/2012_sfer/v1/vol1_table_of_contents.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2013
  3. Addinsoft (2012) XLSTAT, nonparametric test in microsoft excel. http://www.xlstat.com/en/learning-center/tutorials/running-a-mann-whitney-test-on-two-independent-samples-with-xlstat.html. Accessed 4 Apr 2013
  4. Armentano TV, Sah JP, Ross MS, Jones MS, Jones DT, Cooley HC, Smith CS (2006) Rapid responses of vegetation to hydrological changes in Taylor Slough Everglades National Park, Florida, USA. Hydrobiologia 569:293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Azzalini A, Menardi G, Rosolin T (2012) R package ‘pdfCluster’: cluster analysis via nonparametric density estimation (version 1.0-0). http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pdfCluster/index.html. Accessed 4 Apr 2013
  6. Baker W, Madden J, Wade P (2013) Chapter 4: Nutrient source control programs. In: 2013 South Florida environmental report, South Florida water management district, West Palm Beach. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/pg_grp_sfwmd_sfer/portlet_prevreport/2013_sfer/v1/chapters/v1_ch4.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2013
  7. Bazante J, Jacobi G, Solo-Gabriele HM, Reed D, Mitchell-Bruker S, Childers DL, Leonard L, Ross M (2006) Hydrologic measurements and implications for tree island formation within Everglades National Park. J Hydrol 329:606–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boers AM, Zedler JB (2008) Stabilized water levels and Typha invasiveness. Wetlands 28:676–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Broward County Florida (2006) Broward county C-11 West Basin pollution reduction action plan. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/xrepository/sfwmd_repository_pdf/c-11april_06_v2_wappendix.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2013
  10. Bruland GL, Osborne TZ, Reddy KR, Grunwald S, Newman S, DeBusk WF (2007) Recent changes in soil total phosphorus in the Everglades: water Conservation Area 3. Environ Monit Assess 129:379–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chambers RM, Pederson KA (2006) Variation in soil phosphorus, sulfur, and iron pools among south Florida wetlands. Hydrobiologia 569:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen M, Daroub SH, Lang TA, Diaz OA (2006) Specific conductance and ionic characteristics of farm canals in the Everglades Agricultural Area. J Environ Qual 35:141–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Childers DL, Doren RF, Jones R, Noe GB, Rugge M, Scinto LJ (2003) Decadal change in vegetation and soil phosphorus pattern across the Everglades landscape. J Environ Qual 32:344–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis S, Ogden JC (1994) Everglades: The ecosystem and it restoration. Delray Beach, FLGoogle Scholar
  15. Detenbeck NE, Taylor DL, Lima A, Hagley C (1995) Temporal and spatial variability in water quality of wetlands in the Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN metropolitan area: implications for monitoring strategies and designs. Environ Monit Assess 40:11–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edyvane KS (1999) Coastal and marine wetlands in Gulf St. Vincent, South Australia: understanding their loss and degradation. Wetlands Ecol Manag 7:83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fennessy S, Craft C (2011) Agricultural conservation practices increase wetland ecosystem services in the Glaciated Interior Plains. Ecol Appl 21:S49–S64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fitz CH, Kiker GA, Kim JB (2011) Integrated ecological modeling and decision analysis within the Everglades landscape. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 41(S1):517–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1981a) Specific conductance and ionic characteristics of the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida. South Florida natural resources center, Everglades National Park, Homestead, FL, Report T-615Google Scholar
  20. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1981b) The response of specific conductance to environmental conditions in the Everglades National Park, Florida. Water Air Soil Pollut 17:51–59Google Scholar
  21. Flora MD, Rosendahl PC (1982) Historical changes in the conductivity and ionic characteristics of the source water for the Shark River Slough, Everglades National Park, Florida, U.S.A. Hydrobiologia 97:249–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Florida Administrative Code (2013) Surface water quality criteria, Chapter 62-302, Florida Adminstrative Code. https://www.flrules.org/gateway/ChapterHome.asp?Chapter=62-302. Accessed 02 Dec 2013
  23. Gaiser E (2009) Periphyton as an indicator of restoration in the Florida Everglades. Ecol Indic 9:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagerthey SE, Newman S, Rutchey K, Smith EP, Godin J (2008) Multiple regime shifts in a subtropical peatland: community-specific thresholds to eutrophication. Ecol Monogr 78:547–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ivanoff D, Pietro K, Chen H, Gerry L (2013) Chapter 5: performance and optimization of the Everglades stormwater treatment areas. In: 2013 South Florida environmental report, South Florida water management district, West Palm Beach. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/pg_grp_sfwmd_sfer/portlet_prevreport/2013_sfer/v1/chapters/v1_ch5.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2013
  26. Johannesson KM, Andersson JL, Tonderski KS (2011) Efficiency of a constructed wetland for retention of sediment-associated phosphorus. Hydrobiologia 674:179–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Juston J, DeBusk TA (2006) Phosphorus mass load and outflow concentration relationship in stormwater treatment areas for Everglades restoration. Ecol Eng 26:206–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplan D, Bachelin M, Munoz-Carpena R, Chacon WR (2011) Hydrological importance and water quality treatment potential of a small freshwater wetland in the humid tropics of Costa Rica. Wetlands 31:1117–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lang TA, Oladeji O, Josan M, Daroub S (2010) Environmental and management factors that influence drainage water P loads from Everglades Agricultural Area farms of South Florida. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:170–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLeod AI (2011) Kendall: Kendall rank correlation and Mann-Kendall trend test. R package version 2.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Kendall
  31. Meiers D (2002) Water quality improvement strategies for the Everglades alternative combinations for the C-11 West Basin–Final draft. South Florida water management district, West Palm Beach. http://www.sfwmd.gov/portal/page/portal/pg_grp_sfwmd_watershed/subtabs_stamanagement_longtermplan/tab1834097/bsfs/c11w_basin.pdf. Accessed 12 Dec 2012
  32. Misra V, DiNapoli SM (2012) Understanding the wet season variations over Florida. Climate dynamics, published on-line: http://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1056&context=coaps_pubs. doi: 10.1007/s00382-012-1382-4
  33. Naja GM, Rivero R, Davis SE, van Lent T (2010) Hydrochemical impacts of limestone rock mining. Water Air Soil Pollut 217:95–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Newman S, Grace JB, Koebel JW (1996) Effects of nutrients and hydroperiod on Typha, Cladium, and Eleocharis: implications for Everglades restoration. Ecol Appl 6:774–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Olde Venterink H, Vermaat JE, Pronk M, Wiegman F, van der Lee GEM, van den Hoorn MW, Higler LWG, Verhoeven JTA (2006) Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodplain wetlands. Appl Veg Sci 9:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Owen CR (1999) Hydrology and history: land use changes and ecological responses in an urban wetland. Wetl Ecol Manag 6:209–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Qian SS, Pan Y, King RS (2004) Soil total phosphorus threshold in the Everglades: a Bayesian changepoint analysis for multinomial response data. Ecol Ind 4:p29–p37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. R Development Core Team (2012) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. www.R-project.org. Accessed 1 January 2012
  39. Rice RW, Izuno FT, Garcia RM (2002) Phosphorus load reductions under best management practices for sugarcan cropping systems in the Everglades Agricultural Area. Agric Water Manag 56:17–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sãnchez-Carrillo S, Ãlvarez-Cobelas M (2000) Nutrient dynamics and eutrophication patterns in a semi-arid wetland: the effects of fluctuating hydrology. Water Air Soil Pollut 131:97–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheidt DJ, Kalla PI (2007) Everglades ecosystem assessment: water management and quality, eutrophication, mercury contamination, soils and habitat: monitoring for adaptive management: a R-EMAP status report. USEPA Region 4, Athens, GO. EPA 904-R-07-001, pp98. http://www.epa.gov/region4/sesd/reports/epa904r07001.html. Accessed 1 Feb 2013
  42. Serrano L, Burgos MD, Diaz-Espejo A, Toja J (1999) Phosphorus inputs to wetlands following storm events after drought. Wetland 19:318–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shih G, Wang X, Grimshaw HJ, VanArman J (1998) Variance of load estimates derived by Piece-Wise Interpolation. J Environ Eng 124:1114–1120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. South Florida Natural Resources Center–SFNRC (2005) An assessment of the Interim Operational Plan. South Florida natural resources center, Everglades National Park, Homestead. Project evaluation report. SFNRC Technical Series 2005:2, pp47Google Scholar
  45. Steven DD, Lowrance R (2011) Agricultrual conservation practices and wetland ecosystem services in the wetland-rich Piedmont-Coastal Plain region. Ecol Appl 21:S3–S17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Surratt D, Shinde D, Aumen N (2012) Recent cattail expansion and possible relationships to water management: changes in Upper Taylor Slough (Everglades National Park, Florida, USA). Environ Manag 49:720–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Taylor WA (2001) Change-point analysis: A powerful new tool for detecting changes. http://www.variation.com/cpa/. Accessed 10 Jan 2012
  48. United States v. SFWMD, et al (1988) Case No. 88-1886-CIV-MORENO—settlement agreement. United States district court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, MiamiGoogle Scholar
  49. United States Army Corps of Engineers–USACE (1998) Central and Southern Florida project comprehensive review study. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
  50. United States Army Corps of Engineers–USACE (2010) Endangered species act biological assessment–Everglades restoration transition plan. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Jacksonville District, JacksonvilleGoogle Scholar
  51. United States Army Corps of Engineers–USACE (2014) Development of the central and South Florida (C&SF) Project. http://www.evergladesplan.org/about/restudy_csf_devel.aspx. Accessed 01 Apr 2014
  52. Van Lent T, Johnson R, Fennema R (1993) Water management in taylor slough and effects on Florida Bay. Report SFRC 93-03, South Florida research center, Everglades National Park, Homestead. http://www.nps.gov/ever/naturescience/technicalreports.htm. Accessed 10 Dec 2012
  53. Van Lent T, Snow RW, James FE (1999) An examination of the modified water deliveries project, the C-111 project, and the experimental water deliveries project: hydrologic analyses and effects on endangered species. South Florida Research Center, Everglades National Park, Homestead. http://www.nps.gov/ever/naturescience/technicalreports.htm. Accessed 21 December 2012
  54. Venterink HO, Vermaat JE, Pronk M, Wiegman F, van der Lee GEM, van den Hoorn MW, Higler WBG, Verhoeven JTA (2006) Importance of sediment deposition and denitrification for nutrient retention in floodpland wetlands. Appl Veg Sci 9:163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wagner JI, Rosendahl PC (1982) Structures S-12 water distribution to Everglades National Park. Report T-650, South Florida research center, Everglades National Park, National Park Service. http://digitalcollections.fiu.edu/sfrc/pdfs/FI05050402.pdf. Accessed 1 Jan 2013
  56. Walker WW (1991) Water quality trends at inflows to Everglades National Park. Water Resour Bulletin J Am Water Resour Assoc 27:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walker WW (1999) Analysis of Everglades Round Robin Results: Rounds 2–8. http://www.wwwalker.net/doi/err_1099.pdf. Accessed 01 Apr 2014
  58. Wang N, Mitsch WJ (1998) Estimating phosphorus retention of existing and restored coastal wetland in a tributary watershed of the Laurentian Great Lakes in Michigan, USA. Wetl Ecol Manag 6:69–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang Z, Song K, Ma W, Ren C, Zhang B, Liu D, Chen JM, Song C (2011) Loss and fragmentation of marshes in the Sanjiang Plain, northeast China, 1954-2005. Wetlands 31:945–954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Weisner SEB, Miao SL (2004) Use of morphological variability in Cladium jamaicense and Typha domingensis to understand vegetation changes in an Everglades marsh. Aquat Bot 78:319–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York (outside the USA) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Everglades National Park, National Park ServiceBoynton BeachUSA
  2. 2.U.S. Geological SurveyDavieUSA

Personalised recommendations