Environmental Management

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 55–66 | Cite as

Economic Linkages to Changing Landscapes

  • Jeffrey M. Peterson
  • Marcellus M. Caldas
  • Jason S. Bergtold
  • Belinda S. Sturm
  • Russell W. Graves
  • Dietrich Earnhart
  • Eric A. Hanley
  • J. Christopher Brown


Many economic processes are intertwined with landscape change. A large number of individual economic decisions shape the landscape, and in turn the changes in the landscape shape economic decisions. This article describes key research questions about the economics of landscape change and reviews the state of research knowledge. The rich and varied economic–landscape interactions are an active area of research by economists, geographers, and others. Because the interactions are numerous and complex, disentangling the causal relationships in any given landscape system is a formidable research challenge. Limited data with mismatched temporal and spatial scales present further obstacles. Nevertheless, the growing body of economic research on these topics is advancing and shares fundamental challenges, as well as data and methods, with work in other disciplines.


Land use Thresholds Spatial scale Great Plains Climate Ogallala aquifer 



This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Award No. EPS-0903806 and matching support from the State of Kansas through the Kansas Board of Regents.


  1. Anand M, Archer DW, Bergtold JS, Canales E (2011) Balancing feedstock economics and ecosystem services. In: Braun R, Karlen D, Johnson D (eds) Sustainable feedstocks for advanced biofuels: Sustainable alternative fuel feedstock opportunities challenges and roadmaps for six US regions. Soil and Water Conservation Society, Ankeny, pp 193–216Google Scholar
  2. Andersen L (1996) The causes of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. J Environ Dev 5:309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin L (1988) Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Series: studies in operational regional science, vol 4. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, p 304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin L (2002) Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agric Econ 27:247–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anselin L, Florax RJ (1995) New directions in spatial econometrics. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anselin L, Griffith D (1988) Do spatial effects really matter in regression analysis? Reg Sci Assoc 65:11–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anselin L, Florax RJGM, Rey SJ (2004) Advances in spatial econometrics: methodology, tools and applications. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antle JM, Capalbo SM, Elliott ET, Paustian KH (2004) Adaptation, spatial heterogeneity, and the vulnerability of agricultural systems to climate change and CO2 fertilization: an integrated assessment approach. Clim Chang 64:289–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bailey KW, Womack AW (1985) Wheat acreage response: a regional econometric investigation. South J Agric Econ 17:171–180Google Scholar
  10. Bandiera O, Barankay I, Rasul I (2010) Social incentives in the workplace. Rev Econ Stud 77:417–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barbier EB (1997) The economic determinants of land degradation in developing countries. Philos Trans R Soc B 352:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bazilian M, Rogner H, Howells M, Hermann S, Arent D, Gielen D, Steduto P, Mueller A, Komor P, Tol RSJ, Yumkella KK (2011) Considering the energy, water and food nexus: towards an integrated modelling approach. Energy Policy 39:7896–7906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beach RH, McCarl BA (2010) U.S. agricultural and forestry impacts of the energy independence and security act: FASOM results and model description, final report. Prepared for the US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Res Triangle Institute, Res Triangle Park, NC RTI Project Number 0210826.003Google Scholar
  14. Bishop RC (1978) Endangered species and uncertainty: the economics of a safe minimum standard. Am J Agric Econ 60:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blanco-Canqui H, Lal R (2009) Crop residue removal impacts on soil productivity and environmental quality. Crit Rev Plant Sci 28:139–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bodin Ö, Norberg J (2005) Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management. Environ Manage 35:175–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brady M, Irwin E (2011) Accounting for spatial effects in economic models of land use: recent developments and challenges ahead. Environ Resour Econ 48:487–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bridges D, Tenkorang F (2009) Agricultural commodities acreage value elasticity over time—implications for the 2008 farm bill. In: Proceedings of ASBBS 16, 2009Google Scholar
  19. Brozović N, Schlenker W (2011) Optimal management of an ecosystem with an unknown threshold. Ecol Econ 70:627–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buchanan RC, Buddemeier RR, Wilson BB (2009) Public information circular 18—The High Plains Aquifer. Kansas Geological Survey, LawrenceGoogle Scholar
  21. Bulatewicz T, Allen A, Peterson JM, Steward DR, Staggenborg S, Welch SM (2013) The simple script wrapper for OpenMI: enabling interdisciplinary water studies. Environ Model Softw 39:283–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Burnham BO (1973) Markov intertemporal land use simulation model. South J Agric Econ 5:253–258Google Scholar
  23. Calvó-Armengol A, Ptacchini E, Zenou Y (2009) Peer effects and social networks in education. Rev Econ Stud 76:1239–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chembezi DM, Womack AW (1992) Regional acreage response for U.S. corn and wheat: the effects of government programs. South J Agric Econ 24:187–198Google Scholar
  25. Chomitz KM, Gray DA (1996) Roads, land-use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to belize. World Bank Econ Rev 10:487–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Claasen R, Hansen L, Peters M, Breneman V, Weinberg M, Cattaneo A, Feather, P Gadsby D, Hellerstein D, Hopkins J, Johnston P, Morehart M, Smith M (2001) Agri-environmental policy at the crossroads: guideposts on a changing landscape. Agricultural Economic Report No. 794, Economic Research Service, USDA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  27. Clarke KC, Hoppen S, Gaydos L (1997) A self-modifying cellular automaton model of historical urbanization in the San Francisco Bay area. Environ Plan B 24:247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Cliff A, Ord J (1973) Spatial autocorrelation. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Cliff A, Ord J (1981) Spatial processes, models and applications. Pion, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Cressie NAC (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Dacey M (1968) A review of measures of contiguity for two and K-Color Maps. In: Berry B, Marble D (eds) Spatial analysis: a reader in statistical geography. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 479–495Google Scholar
  32. Dagel KC (1997) Defining drought in marginal areas: the role of perception. Prof Geogr 49:192–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. De La Torre Ugarte DG, English BC, Jensen K (2007) Sixty billion gallons by 2030: economic and agricultural impacts of ethanol and biodiesel expansion. Am J Agric Econ 89:1290–1295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dennehy KF, USGS (2000). High Plains regional ground-water study, US Department of the Interior. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
  35. Dennehy K, Litke D, McMahon PB (2002) The High Plains Aquifer, USA: groundwater development and sustainability. Special Publications. vol 193. Geological Society, London, pp 99–119Google Scholar
  36. Deschenes O, Greenstone M (2007) The economic impacts of climate change: evidence from agricultural output and random fluctuations in weather. Am Econ Rev 97:354–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dicks MR, Campiche JL, Ugarte DGDLT, Hellwinckel CM, Bryant HL, Richardson JW (2009) Land use implications of expanding biofuel demand. J Agric Appl Econ 41:435–453Google Scholar
  38. Diggs DM (1991) Drought experience and perception of climate change among Great Plains farmers. Great Plains Res 1:114–132Google Scholar
  39. Eichner T, Pethig R (2009) Pricing the ecosystem and taxing ecosystem services: a general equilibrium approach. J Econ Theory 144:1589–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Elhorst JP (2003) Specification and estimation of spatial panel data models. Int Reg Sci Rev 26:244–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Elhorst JP (2004) Serial and spatial error dependence in space time models. In: Getis A, Mur J, Zoller HG (eds) Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave MacMillan, New York, pp 176–193Google Scholar
  42. Elhorst JP (2010) Spatial panel data models. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 377–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Feng H, Kling CL, Kurkalova LA, Secchi S, Gassman PW (2005) The conservation reserve program in the presence of a working land alternative: implications for environmental quality, program participation, and income transfer. Am J Agric Econ 87:1231–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Finnoff D, Tschirhart J (2008) Linking dynamic economic and ecological general equilibrium models. Resour Energy Econ 30:91–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Flores D (1991) Bison ecology and bison diplomacy: the Southern Plains from 1800–1850. J Am Hist 78:465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Flores D (1994) Place: an argument for bioregional history. Environ Hist Rev 18:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fujita M (1989) Urban economics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Gates DM (1993) Climate change and its biological consequences. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Getis A, Mur J, Zoller HG (2004) Spatial econometrics and spatial statistics. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Gibson CC, Ostrom E, Ahn TK (2000) The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global chance: a survey. Ecol Econ 32:217–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Gutentag ED, Heimes FJ et al (1984) Geohydrology of the High Plains Aquifer in parts of Colorado, Kansas, Nebraska, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming. US Dept of the Interior. US Gov Printing Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Guttorp P (1995) Stochastic modeling of scientific data. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hansen CV (1991) Estimates of freshwater storage and potential natural recharge for principal aquifers in Kansas. Available from Books and Open File Report Section, USGS, Box 25425, Denver CO 80225. USGS Water-Resource Investigations Report 87-4230, 1991. 100 p 19 fig 4 tab 66 ref. USGS ProjectGoogle Scholar
  54. Hendricks NP (2011) The dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of crop acreage response to price: problems of aggregation and pooling. Dissertation, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar
  55. Harden CP, Chin A, English MR, Fu R, Galvin KA, Gerlak AK, McDowell PF, McNamara DE, Peterson JM, Poff NL, Rosa EA, Solecki WD, Wohl EE (2013) Understanding human–landscape interactions in the “Anthropocene”. Environ Manage. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0082-0
  56. Houck JP, Abel ME, Ryan ME, Gallagher PW, Hoffman RG, Penn JB (1976) Analyzing the impact of government programs on crop acreage. USDA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  57. Ives AR, Turner MG, Pearson SM (1998) Local explanations of landscape patterns: can analytical approaches approximate simulation models of spatial processes? Ecosystems 1:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jacquez GM (2010) Space-time intelligence system software for the analysis of complex systems. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 113–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jahan S (1986) The determination of stability and similarity of markovian land use change processes: a theoretical and empirical analysis. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 20:243–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Keller K, Bolker BM, Bradford DF (2004) Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. J Environ Econ Manage 48:723–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kline JD (2003) Characterizing land use change in multidisciplinary landscape-level analyses. Agric Resour Econ Rev 32(1):103–115Google Scholar
  62. Krause MA, Lee JH, Koo WW (1995) Program and nonprogram wheat acreage responses to prices and risk. J Agric Resour Econ 20:96–107Google Scholar
  63. Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:438–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lambim EF, Turner BL II, Geist HJ, Agbola SB, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fisher G, Folke C, George PS, Home-Wodd K, Imberson J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran EF, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan PS, Richards JF, Skanes H, Steffen W, Stone DG, Svedin U, Veldkamp TA, Vogel C, Xu J (2001) The causes of land use and land cover change: moving beyond myths. Glob Environ Chang 11:261–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Landis JD (1994) The California urban futures model: a new generation of metropolitan simulation models. Environ Plan B 21:399–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lee DR, Helmberger PG (1985) Estimating supply response in the presence of farm programs. Am J Agric Econ 67:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. LeSage JP (1997) Regression analysis of spatial data. J Reg Anal Policy 27:83–94Google Scholar
  68. LeSage J, Pace RK (2009) Introduction to spatial econometrics. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Letort E, Carpentier A (2009) On modelling acreage decisions within the multinomial logit framework. Contributed paper presented at the International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, 16–22 Aug 2008. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
  70. Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ (2007) Policies for habitat fragmentation: combining econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Econ 83:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Lichtenberg E (2004) Cost-responsiveness of conservation practice adoption: a revealed preference approach. J Agric Resour Econ 29:420–435Google Scholar
  73. Limburg KE, O’Neill RV, Costanza R, Farber S (2002) Complex systems and valuation. Ecol Econ 41:409–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lubowski RN, Bucholtz S, Claassen R, Roberts MJ, Cooper JC, Gueorguieva A, Johansson R (2006a) Environmental effects of agricultural land-use change. Economic Research Report No. 25. Econ Res Serv, USDA, Washington DC. Accessed 19 Dec 2011
  75. Lubowski RN, Plantinga AJ, Stavins RN (2006b) Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function. J Environ Econ Manage 51:135–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Ludeke AK, Maggio RC, Reid LM (1990) An analysis of anthropogenic deforestation using logistic regression and GIS. J Environ Manage 32:247–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Ludwig D, Carpenter SR, Brock WA (2003) Optimal phosphorus loading for a potentially eutrophic lake. Ecol Appl 13:1135–1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Mäler KG, Xepapadeas A, de Zeeuw A (2003) The economics of shallow lakes. Environ Resour Econ 26:603–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. McGuire VL (2007) Water-level changes in the High Plains Aquifer, predevelopment to 2005 and 2003 to 2005. USGS. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
  80. McGuire VL (2009) Water-level changes in the High Plains Aquifer, predevelopment to 2007, 2005–06, and 2006–07. US Department of the Interior USGS, Reston, Virginia. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
  81. McIntosh CS, Shideed KH (1989) The effect of government programs on acreage response over time: the case of corn production in Iowa. West J Agric Econ 14:38–44Google Scholar
  82. Mendelsohn R (2000) Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang 45:583–600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Mertens B, Lambin E (1997) Spatial modeling of deforestation in southern Cameroon. Appl Geogr 17:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Miller DJ, Plantinga AJ (1999) Modeling land-use decisions with aggregate data. Am J Agric Econ 81:180–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Mumby PJ, Hastings A, Edwards HJ (2007) Thresholds and the resilience of Caribbean coral reefs. Nature 450:98–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Nævdal E (2001) Optimal regulation of eutrophying lakes, fjords, and rivers in the presence of threshold effects. Am J Agric Econ 83:972–984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Nævdal E (2006) Dynamic optimisation in the presence of threshold effects when the location of the threshold is uncertain—with an application to a possible disintegration of the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet. J Econ Dyn Control 30:1131–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Nordhaus WD (2008) A question of balance: weighing the options on global warming policies. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  89. North GR (2008) Future climate of the continental United States. Choices 23:6–8Google Scholar
  90. Pfaff ASP (1999) What drives deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon? J Environ Econ Manage 37:26–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Powell LM, Tauras JA, Ross H (2005) The importance of peer effects, cigarette prices and tobacco control policies for youth smoking behavior. J Health Econ 24:950–968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Reilly J, Tubiello F, McCarl B, Abler D, Darwin R, Fuglie K, Hollinger S, Izaurradle C, Jagtap S, Jones J, Mearns L, Ojima D, Paul E, Paustian K, Riha S, Rosenberg N, Rosenzweiy C (2003) U.S. agriculture and climate change: new results. Clim Chang 57:43–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Roberts MJ, Bucholtz S (2005) Slippage in the conservation reserve program or spurious correlation? A comment. Am J Agric Econ 87:244–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Rose SK, McCarl BA (2008) Greenhouse gas emissions, stabilization and the inevitability of adaptation: challenges for US agriculture. Choices 23:15–18Google Scholar
  95. Sandler T (1997) Global challenges: an approach to environmental, political, and economic challenges. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Scheffer M, Carpenter SR (2003) Catastrophic regime shifts in ecosystems: linking theory to observation. Trends Ecol Evol 18(12):648–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Schlenker W, Haneman WM, Fisher AC (2007) Water availability, degree days, and the potential impact of climate change on irrigated agriculture in California. Clim Chang 81:19–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Simpson TW, Sharpley AN, Howarth RW, Paerl HW, Mankin KR (2008) The new gold rush: fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality. J Environ Qual 37:318–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Sophocleous M, Schloss JA (2000) Estimated annual groundwater recharge. An Atlas of the Kansas High Plains Aquifer. Accessed 31 Jan 2012
  101. Spiertz JHJ, Ewert F (2009) Crop production and resource use to meet the growing demand for food, feed and fuel: opportunities and constraints. NJAS-Wash J Life Sci 56:281–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Stonestrom DA, Scanlon BR, Zhang L (2009) Introduction to special section on impacts of land use change and water resources. Water Resour Res 45:1–3Google Scholar
  103. Subramanian SV (2010) Mutlilevel modeling. In: Fischer MM, Getis A (eds) Handbook of applied spatial analysis. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 507–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Trogdon JG, Nonnemaker J, Pais J (2008) Peer effects in adolescent overweight. J Health Econ 27:1388–1399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Tschirhart J (2000) General equilibrium of an ecosystem. J Theor Biol 203:13–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Tsur Y, Zemel A (2004) Endangered aquifers: groundwater management under threats of catastrophic events. Water Resour Res 40:W06S20. doi: 10.1029/2003WR002168 Google Scholar
  107. Turner BL II, Cortina-Villar S, Foster D, Geoghegan J, Keys E, Kepleis P, Lawrence P, Mendoza PM, Manson S, Ogneva-Himmelberger A, Plotkin B, Pérez-Salicrup D, Chowdhury RR, Savitsky BB, Schneider B, Schmook B, Vance C (2001) Deforestation in the southern Yucatán peninsular region: an integrative approach. For Ecol Manage 154:353–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2010) EPA finalizes regulations for the national renewable fuel standard program for 2010 and beyond. EPA-420-F-10-007. US EPA Washington DC. Accessed 30 Jan 2011
  109. USGS (2010) Physical/cultural setting. High Plains water-level monitoring study. Accessed 25 May 2011
  110. van Vuuren DP, Lowe J, Stehfest E, Gohar L, Hof AF, Hope C, Warren R, Meinshausen M, Plattner GK (2011) How well do integrated assessment models simulate climate change? Clim Chang 104:255–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Vaughn G (1995) Precursors of Ely’s land economics in American universities. Land Econ 71:531–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Veldkamp A, Lambin E (2001) Predicting land-use change. Agric Ecosyst Environ 85(1–3):1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Walker RT (2003) Mapping process to pattern in the landscape change of the Amazonian Frontier. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 93:376–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Walker RT, Drzyzga SA, Li Y, Qi J, Caldas M, Vergara D (2004) Behavioral model of landscape change in the Amazon Basin: the colonist case. Ecol Appl 14(4):S299–S312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. White R, Engelen G, Uljee I (1997) The use of constrained cellular automata for high-resolution modelling of urban land-use dynamics. Environ Plan B 24:323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Worster D (1979) Dust bowl: the Southern Plains in the 1930s. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  117. Wu JJ (2000) Slippage effects of the conservation reserve program. Am J Agric Econ 82:979–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Wu JJ, Adams RM (2002) Micro versus macro acreage response models: does site-specific information matter? J Agric Resour Econ 27:40–60Google Scholar
  119. Wu JJ, Babcock BA (1998) The choice of tillage, rotation and soil testing practices: economics and environmental implications. Am J Agric Econ 80:494–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Wu F, Webster CJ (1998) Simulation of land development through the integration of cellular automata and multicriteria evaluation. Environ Plan B 25:103–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. Ziker JP (2003) Assigned territories, family/clan/communal holdings, and common-pool resources in the Taimyr autonomous region, northern Russia. Human Ecol 31:331–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey M. Peterson
    • 1
  • Marcellus M. Caldas
    • 2
  • Jason S. Bergtold
    • 3
  • Belinda S. Sturm
    • 4
  • Russell W. Graves
    • 3
  • Dietrich Earnhart
    • 5
  • Eric A. Hanley
    • 6
  • J. Christopher Brown
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Agricultural EconomicsKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural EconomicsKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  4. 4.Department of Civil, Environmental, and Architectural EngineeringUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  5. 5.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  6. 6.Department of SociologyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA
  7. 7.Department of GeographyUniversity of KansasLawrenceUSA

Personalised recommendations