Environmental Management

, Volume 53, Issue 1, pp 4–13

Understanding Human–Landscape Interactions in the “Anthropocene”

  • Carol P. Harden
  • Anne Chin
  • Mary R. English
  • Rong Fu
  • Kathleen A. Galvin
  • Andrea K. Gerlak
  • Patricia F. McDowell
  • Dylan E. McNamara
  • Jeffrey M. Peterson
  • N. LeRoy Poff
  • Eugene A. Rosa
  • William D. Solecki
  • Ellen E. Wohl
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00267-013-0082-0

Cite this article as:
Harden, C.P., Chin, A., English, M.R. et al. Environmental Management (2014) 53: 4. doi:10.1007/s00267-013-0082-0

Abstract

This article summarizes the primary outcomes of an interdisciplinary workshop in 2010, sponsored by the U.S. National Science Foundation, focused on developing key questions and integrative themes for advancing the science of human–landscape systems. The workshop was a response to a grand challenge identified recently by the U.S. National Research Council (2010a)—“How will Earth’s surface evolve in the “Anthropocene?”—suggesting that new theories and methodological approaches are needed to tackle increasingly complex human–landscape interactions in the new era. A new science of human–landscape systems recognizes the interdependence of hydro-geomorphological, ecological, and human processes and functions. Advances within a range of disciplines spanning the physical, biological, and social sciences are therefore needed to contribute toward interdisciplinary research that lies at the heart of the science. Four integrative research themes were identified—thresholds/tipping points, time scales and time lags, spatial scales and boundaries, and feedback loops—serving as potential focal points around which theory can be built for human–landscape systems. Implementing the integrative themes requires that the research communities: (1) establish common metrics to describe and quantify human, biological, and geomorphological systems; (2) develop new ways to integrate diverse data and methods; and (3) focus on synthesis, generalization, and meta-analyses, as individual case studies continue to accumulate. Challenges to meeting these needs center on effective communication and collaboration across diverse disciplines spanning the natural and social scientific divide. Creating venues and mechanisms for sustained focused interdisciplinary collaborations, such as synthesis centers, becomes extraordinarily important for advancing the science.

Keywords

Human impacts Human–landscape interactions Human adaptation Landscape change Interdisciplinary research Anthropocene 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol P. Harden
    • 1
  • Anne Chin
    • 2
  • Mary R. English
    • 3
  • Rong Fu
    • 4
  • Kathleen A. Galvin
    • 5
  • Andrea K. Gerlak
    • 6
  • Patricia F. McDowell
    • 7
  • Dylan E. McNamara
    • 8
  • Jeffrey M. Peterson
    • 9
  • N. LeRoy Poff
    • 10
  • Eugene A. Rosa
    • 11
  • William D. Solecki
    • 12
  • Ellen E. Wohl
    • 13
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geography and Environmental SciencesUniversity of ColoradoDenverUSA
  3. 3.University of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA
  4. 4.Department of Geological SciencesThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  5. 5.Department of AnthropologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  6. 6.International Studies Association and Udall Center for Studies in Public PolicyUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA
  7. 7.Department of GeographyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA
  8. 8.Department of Physics and Physical OceanographyUniversity of North Carolina at WilmingtonWilmingtonUSA
  9. 9.Department of Agricultural EconomicsKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  10. 10.Department of BiologyColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA
  11. 11.Department of SociologyWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA
  12. 12.Department of Geography, Hunter College of the City University of New YorkNew YorkUSA
  13. 13.GeosciencesColorado State UniversityFort CollinsUSA

Personalised recommendations