Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 51, Issue 5, pp 1012–1024 | Cite as

Different Shades of Green: A Case Study of Support for Wind Farms in the Rural Midwest

  • Kate K. Mulvaney
  • Patrick Woodson
  • Linda Stalker Prokopy
Article

Abstract

Benton County, in north-central Indiana, USA has successfully sited more than 500 turbines. To understand Benton County’s acceptance of wind farms, a holistic case study was conducted that included a document review, a survey of local residents and interviews with key stakeholders. Survey questionnaires were sent to 750 residents asking questions about attitudes toward the wind farms, perceived benefits and impacts from the wind farms, environmental attitudes, and demographic information. Key stakeholders were also interviewed for a deeper understanding of the historical timeline and community acceptance of the wind farm development. While there is limited opposition to the turbines, on the whole the community presents a front of acceptance. Financial, rather than environmental, benefits are the main reason for the acceptance. Although significant in other case studies, transparency and participation do not play a large role in Benton County’s acceptance. Most residents are not concerned with either visual impacts or noise from the wind turbines. More concrete benefits to the community, such as reduced energy bills for county residents, could help to extend acceptance even further within the community. Although there are concerns about the acceptance of wind farms and the impacts of those farms on local residents in both peer-reviewed literature and popular media, we found little evidence of those concerns in Benton County. Instead, we found Benton County to be a community largely accepting of wind farms.

Keywords

Wind farm Social impact Renewable energy Midwestern landscape 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Chad Martin, John Lee, and the four key informants for their advice and insights on wind energy development in Benton County. We would also like to thank Purdue University’s Natural Resources Social Science Lab for their methodological assistance and guidance. Finally, we would like to thank Purdue University’s College of Agriculture for funding this research.

References

  1. Abbott JA (2010) The localized and scaled discourse of conservation for wind power in Kittitas County, Washington. Soc Nat Resour 23:969–985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agterbosch S, Meertens RM, Vermuelen WJV (2009) The relative importance of social and institutional conditions in the planning of wind power projects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:393–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aitken M (2010) Why we still don’t understand the social aspects of wind power: a critique of key assumptions within the literature. Energy Policy 38:1834–1841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. AWEA (American Wind Energy Association) (2011) Wind energy facts: Indiana. http://www.awea.org/learnabout/publications/upload/1Q-11-Indiana.pdf. Accessed: 5 July 2011
  5. Bell D, Gray T, Haggett C (2005) The ‘social gap’ in wind farm citing decisions: explanations and policy responses. Environ Pollut 14:460–477Google Scholar
  6. Benton County (2011a) Benton County website: “Wind farms.” http://www.bentoncounty.in.gov/bentoncountywindfarm.php. Accessed: 6 January 2011
  7. Benton County (2011b) Benton County website: “Wind Farms Facts.” http://www.bentoncounty.in.gov/windfacts.php. Accessed: 5 July 2011
  8. Breukers S, Wolsink M (2007) Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: an international comparison. Energ Policy 35:2737–2750CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brittan GG Jr (2001) Wind, energy, landscape: reconciling nature and technology. Philos Geogr 4:169–184Google Scholar
  10. Dalili N, Edrisy A, Carriveau R (2009) A review of surface engineering issues critical to wind turbine performance. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:428–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devine-Wright P (2005) Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications. Local Environ 10:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2008) Internet, mail and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  13. DSIRE database of state incentives for renewables & efficiency 2012. Indiana incentives/policies for renewables & efficiency. Available online: http://www.dsireusa.org/incentives/incentive.cfm?Incentive_Code=IN12R&re=1&ee=1. Accessed: April 20, 2012
  14. Firestone J, Kempton W (2007) Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors. Energ Policy 35:1584–1598CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. GEC (Global Energy Concepts) (2005) Indiana energy group tall towers wind study final project report. October 2005. Prepared for Indiana energy group http://www.in.gov/oed/files/Indiana_Final_Project_Report.pdf. Accessed: 5 July 2011
  16. Halliday JA (1993) Wind energy: an option for the UK? IEE Proceedings A 140:53–62Google Scholar
  17. Hinshelwood E (2001) Power to the people: community-led wind energy-obstacles and opportunities in a South Wales Valley. Comm Dev J 36:95–110Google Scholar
  18. Hoen B, Wiser R, Cappers P, Thayer M, Sethi G (2011) Wind energy facilities and residential properties: the effect of proximity and view on sales prices. J Real Estate Res 33:279–316Google Scholar
  19. Kempton W, Firestone J, Lilley J, Rouleau T, Whitaker P (2005) The offshore wind power debate: views from cape cod. Coast Manag 33:119–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krohn S, Damborg S (1999) On public attitudes towards wind power. Renew Energy 16:954–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leininger K (2010) Whitley wind-farm idea stirs up worry. The news-sentinel http://www.news-sentinel.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/SE/20101111/NEWS/11110336. Accessed: 23 July 2011
  22. Loring JM (2007) Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: factors influencing project success. Energy Policy 35:2648–2660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin, CL (2010) Your guide to wind turbine syndrome… a roadmap to this complicated subject. http://docs.wind-watch.org/WTSguide.pdf. Accessed: 3 November 2011
  24. Martin C, Ileleji K, Bricker J (2010) The wind energy ordinance process for local government. Purdue University Extension Publication. http://www.extension.purdue.edu/extmedia/ABE/RE-1-W.pdf. Accessed: 7 July 2011
  25. Mulvaney KK, Woodson P, Prokopy L (in press) A tale of three counties: understanding wind development in the rural midwestern United States. Energy PolicyGoogle Scholar
  26. Munday M, Bristow G, Cowell R (2011) Wind farms in rural areas: how far do community benefits from wind farms represent a local economic development opportunity? J Rural Stud 27:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Osten M (2008) WindConnect® selected as balance-of-plant general contractor for the Fowler Ridge Wind Farm. WindConnect® press release February 25, 2008. Available online: http://www.rmtinc.com/pdf/News_FowlerRidge_FINAL.pdf. Accessed: April 25, 2012
  28. Pasqualetti MJ (2001) Wind energy landscape: society and technology in the California desert. Soc Nat Resour 14:689–699Google Scholar
  29. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative interviewing. In: Patton MQ (ed) Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 339–418Google Scholar
  30. Phadke R (2010) Steel forests or smoke stacks: the politics of visualisation in the Cape Wind controversy. Environ Polit 19:11–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Purdue University Extension (2011) Wind Energy Ordinance Library. Purdue University Extension Website. http://www.extension.purdue.edu/renewable-energy/wind-energy-library.shtml. Accessed: 7 July 2011
  32. Robertson T (2009) County leaders take close look at wind power. Times-Union March 5, 2009. http://www.timesuniononline.com/main.asp?SectionID=2&SubSectionID=224&ArticleID=38817&TM=46224.88. Accessed: 3 November 2011
  33. Swiatek J (2009) 2 wind projects targeting Boone County kick up debate. Indianapolis Star July 15, 2009Google Scholar
  34. Thayer RL, Freeman CM (1987) Altamont: public perceptions of a wind energy landscape. Landsc Urban Plan 14:379–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. U.S. Census (2011) Benton County, Indiana State & County Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18/18007.html. Accessed: 5 July 2011
  36. U.S. Census (2012) Indiana State & County QuickFacts. http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/18000.html. Accessed: 23 April 2012
  37. U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2008) 20% Wind Energy by 2030: Increasing Wind Energy’s Contribution to U.S. Electricity Supply. DOE/GO-102008-2567 http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/41869.pdf. Accessed: 11 October 2011
  38. U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2011a) States with renewable portfolio standards. http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/states/maps/renewable_portfolio_states.cfm. Accessed: 5 July 5 2011
  39. U.S. DOE (United States Department of Energy) (2011b) U.S. Department of Energy, energy efficiency & renewable energy “wind & water program.” http://www1.eere.energy.gov/windandhydro/wind_ad.html. Accessed: 20 July 2011
  40. USDA (United State Department of Agriculture) (2010) County estimates, statistics by state-Indiana http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Indiana/Publications/County_Estimates/. Accessed: 20 December 2011
  41. Warren CR, Lumsden C, O’Dowd S, Birnie RV (2005) ‘Green on green’: public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. J Environ Plann Man 48:853–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wolsink M (2000) Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renew Energ 21:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wolsink M (2006) Invalid theory impedes our understanding: a critique on the persistence of the language of NIMBY. T I Brit Geogr 31:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wolsink M (2007) Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energ Policy 35:2692–2704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Woods M (2003) Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: windfarm development in Mid Wales. Sociol Ruralis 43:271–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energ Policy 35:2683–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods, 4th edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kate K. Mulvaney
    • 1
  • Patrick Woodson
    • 2
  • Linda Stalker Prokopy
    • 1
  1. 1.Forestry and Natural ResourcesPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA
  2. 2.Ecological Sciences and EngineeringPurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations