Environmental Management

, Volume 50, Issue 6, pp 1204–1218

A Decision Support Framework for Science-Based, Multi-Stakeholder Deliberation: A Coral Reef Example

  • Amanda P. Rehr
  • Mitchell J. Small
  • Patricia Bradley
  • William S. Fisher
  • Ann Vega
  • Kelly Black
  • Tom Stockton
Article

Abstract

We present a decision support framework for science-based assessment and multi-stakeholder deliberation. The framework consists of two parts: a DPSIR (Drivers–Pressures–States–Impacts–Responses) analysis to identify the important causal relationships among anthropogenic environmental stressors, processes, and outcomes; and a Decision Landscape analysis to depict the legal, social, and institutional dimensions of environmental decisions. The Decision Landscape incorporates interactions among government agencies, regulated businesses, non-government organizations, and other stakeholders. It also identifies where scientific information regarding environmental processes is collected and transmitted to improve knowledge about elements of the DPSIR and to improve the scientific basis for decisions. Our application of the decision support framework to coral reef protection and restoration in the Florida Keys focusing on anthropogenic stressors, such as wastewater, proved to be successful and offered several insights. Using information from a management plan, it was possible to capture the current state of the science with a DPSIR analysis as well as important decision options, decision makers and applicable laws with a the Decision Landscape analysis. A structured elicitation of values and beliefs conducted at a coral reef management workshop held in Key West, Florida provided a diversity of opinion and also indicated a prioritization of several environmental stressors affecting coral reef health. The integrated DPSIR/Decision landscape framework for the Florida Keys developed based on the elicited opinion and the DPSIR analysis can be used to inform management decisions, to reveal the role that further scientific information and research might play to populate the framework, and to facilitate better-informed agreement among participants.

Keywords

Decision support framework Environmental decision making Environmental management Multiple stakeholders Elicitation Scientific input Valuation Ecosystem services DPSIR 

References

  1. Ault JS, Bohnsack JA, Smith SG, Jiangang L (2005) Towards sustainable multispecies fisheries in the Florida, USA, coral reef ecosystem. Bull Marine Sci 76(2):595–622Google Scholar
  2. Becken S, Hay JE (2007) Tourism and climate change: risks and opportunities. Channel View Publications, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Belton V, Stewart TJ (2001) Multiple criteria decision analysis. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bockstael NE, Freeman AM III, Kopp RJ, Portney PR, Smith VK (2000) On Measuring Economic Values for Nature. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1384–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borsuk M, Clemen R, Maguire L, Reckhow K (2001) Stakeholder values and scientific modeling in the Neuse River watershed. Group Decis Negot 10:355–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyd J, Banzhaf S (2007) What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol Econ 63(2–3):616–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradley P, Fore L, Fisher W, Davis W (2010). Coral Reef Biological Criteria: Using the Clean Water Act to Protect a National Treasure. Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Narragansett, RI. EPA/600/R-10/054.Google Scholar
  8. Brouwer R, Georgiou S, Turner RK (2003) Integrated assessment and sustainable water and wetland management. A review of concepts and methods. Integr Assess 4(3):172–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Causey B, Delaney J, Diaz E, Dodge D, Garcia J, Higgins J, Keller B, Kelty R, Jaap W, Matos C, Schmahl G, Rogers C, Miller M, Turgeon D (2002) Status of coral reefs in the US Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico. In: Wilkinson C (ed) Status of Coral Reefs of the World: 2001. e. T. A. I. o. M. S. Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, pp 251–276Google Scholar
  10. Cesar H, Burke L, Pet-Soede L (2003) The economics of worldwide coral reef degradation. Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting, ArnhemGoogle Scholar
  11. Clemen RT (1996) An introduction to decision analysis 2nd edition. Duxbury press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen SJ (1997) Scientist–stakeholder collaboration in integrated assessment of climate change: lessons from a case study of Northwest Canada. Environ Model Assess 2(4):281–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohon JL (2004) Multiobjective programming and planning. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanza R, Andrade F, Autunes P, Van den Belt M, Boesch D, Boersma D, Catarino F, Hanna S, Limburg K, Low B, Molitor M, Pereira JG, Rayner S, Santos R, Wilson J, Young M (1999) Ecological economics and sustainable governance of the oceans. Ecol Econ 31(2):171–187Google Scholar
  15. Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Pauelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, Van den Belt M (2002) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecolo Econ 25(1):3–15Google Scholar
  16. Cowling RM, Egoh B, Knight AT, O’Farrell PJ, Reyers B, Rouget M, Roux DJ, Welz A, Wilhelm-Rechman A (2008) An operational model for mainstreaming ecosystem services for implementation. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science of USA 105:9438–9488Google Scholar
  17. Cullen AC, Small MJ (2004) Uncertain risk. In: McDaniels T, Small MJ (eds) Risk analysis and society: an interdisciplinary characterization of the field. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Cullen AC, Frey HC (1999) Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. DeKay ML, Small MJ, Fischbeck PS, Farrow RS, Cullen AC, Kadane JB, Lave L, Morgan MG, Takemura K (2002) Risk-based decision analysis in support of precautionary policies. J Risk Res 5(4):391–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Doney S, Fabry V, Feely R, Kleypas J (2009) Ocean acidification: the other CO2 problem. Ann Rev Marine Sci 1:169–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dowlatabadi H, Morgan MG (1993) Integrated assessment of climate change. Science 259:5103Google Scholar
  22. Eakin CM, Morgan JA, Heron SF, Smith TB, Liu G (2010) Caribbean corals in crisis: record thermal stress, bleaching, and mortality in 2005. PLoS ONE 5(11):e13969. doi:13910.11371/journal.pone.0013969 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. EPA (2012) Florida keys national marine sanctuary water quality protection program (WQPP). Accessed from http://ocean.floridamarine.org/FKNMS_WQPP/pages/wqpp.html
  24. European environment agency (2001). The DPSIR Framework global international waters assessment (GIWA). CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  25. Farrow RS, Goldburg CB, Small MJ (2000) Economic valuation and the environment: A special issue. Environ Sci Technol 34(8):1381–1383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fisher W (2009) Illustration of DPSIR. Environmental Protection Agency, Gulf BreezeGoogle Scholar
  27. Gregory R, McDaniels T, Fields D (2001) Decision aiding, not dispute resolution: creating insights through structured environmental decisions. J Policy Anal Manag 20(3):415–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hanley N, Shogren JF, White B (2007) Environmental economics in theory and practice. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment. In: Ecosystems and human well being: current state and trends, Island Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  30. Hein L, Koppen KV, de Groot RS, Van Lerland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57(2):209–228Google Scholar
  31. Hoegh-Guldberg H (2010) Climate change and the Florida Keys. FKNMS/NOAA Socioeconomic Research and Monitoring Program, Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, NOAAGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Mumby PJ, Hooten AJ, Steneck RS, Greenfield P, Gomez E, Harvell CD, Sale PF, Edwards AJ, Caldeira K, Knowlton N, Eakin CM, Igiesias-Prieto R, Muthiga N, Bradbury RH, Dubi A, Hatziolos ME (2007) Coral reefs under rapid climate change and ocean acidification. Science 318(5857):1737–1742Google Scholar
  33. Jaap WC (2000) Coral reef restoration. Ecol Eng 15(3–4):345–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jaynes ET (2003) Probability theory: the logic of science. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller BD, Gleason DF, McLeod E, Woodley CM, Airame S, Causey BD, Friedlander AM, Grober-Dunsmore R, Johnson JE, Miller SL, Steneck RS (2009) Climate change, coral reef ecosystems, and management options for marine protected areas. J Environ Manag 44:1069–1088Google Scholar
  36. Keeney R (1992) Value-focused thinking: a path to creative decision making. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  37. Kiker GA, Bridges TS, Varghese A, Seager TP, Linkov I (2005) Application of multicriteria decision analysis in environmental decision making. Integr Environ Assess Manag 1(2):95–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knowlton N, Jackson JBC (2008) Shifting baselines, local impacts, and global change on coral reefs. PLoS Biol 6(2):e54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kruczynski WL, McManus F (2002) Water quality concerns in the Florida Keys: sources, effects, and solutions. In: Porter JW, Porter KG (eds) The everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  40. Lapointe BE, Barile PJ, Matzie WR (2004) Anthropogenic nutrient enrichment of seagrass and coral reef communities in the Lower Florida Keys: discrimination of local versus regional nitrogen sources. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 308:23–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Leeworthy VR, Bowker JM (1997) Non-market economic user values of the Florida Keys/Key West. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Strategic Environmental Assessments Division, Silver Spring, p 41Google Scholar
  42. Leeworthy VR, Loomis D (2010a) Visitor study: some selected results comparing visitors in 1995–96 and 2007–08, Florida Keys/Key West. N. O. S. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  43. Leeworthy VR, Loomis D, Paterson S (2010b). Visitor profiles: Florida Keys/Key West 2007–08. N. O. S. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  44. Lynam T, de Jong W, Sheil D, Kusumanto T, Evans K (2007) A review of tools for incorporating community knowledge, preferences and values into decision making in natural resources management. Ecol Soc 12(1):5–19Google Scholar
  45. Makowski M, Somlyody L, Watkins D (1996) Multiple criteria analysis for water quality management in the Nitra basin. J Am Water Res Assoc 32(5):937–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Manzello DP, Berkelmans R, Hendee JC (2007) Coral bleaching indices and thresholds for the Florida Reef Tract, Bahamas, and St. Croix, US Virgin Islands. Marine Pollut Bull 54(12):1923–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Matthies M, Giupponi C, Ostendorf B (2007) Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools. Environ Model Softw 22(2):123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McClenachan L (2009) Documenting loss of large trophy fish from the Florida Keys with historical photographs. Conserv Biol 23(3):636–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McDaniels T, Gregory R, Fields D (1999) Democratizing risk management: successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Anal 19(3):497–510Google Scholar
  50. McNie E (2007) Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ Sci Policy 10:17–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Messner F, Zwirner O, Karkuschke M (2006) Participation in multi-criteria decision support for the resolution of a water allocation problem in the Spree River basin. Land Use Policy 1:63–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Morgan MG, Henrion M, Small MJ (1990) Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, DsCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. National Academy of Sciences National Research Council (1996). Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society. WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  54. NOAA (1997). Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary Management Plan, 1997Google Scholar
  55. NOAA (2005). Florida Keys National marine sanctuary draft revised management plan. Federal RegisterGoogle Scholar
  56. NOAA (2007). Florida Keys national marine sanctuary revised management plan. Key WestGoogle Scholar
  57. NOAA (2010) Florida Keys national marine sanctuary: visitor information. http://floridakeys.noaa.gov/visitor_information/welcome.html. Accessed March 17, 2010
  58. NOAA (2012) NOAA coastal and marine spatial planning: comprehensive planning for the Florida Keys national marine sanctuary. http://cmsp.noaa.gov/examples/flordiakeys.html
  59. Office of National Marine Sanctuaries (2011). Florida Keys national marine sanctuary condition report 2011. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Office of National Marine Sanctuaries, Silver Spring, p 105Google Scholar
  60. Orr JC, Fabry VJ, Aumont O, Bopp L, Doney SC, Feely RA, Gnanadesikan A, Gruber N, Ishida A, Joos F, Key RM, Lindsay K, Maier-Reimer E, Matear R, Monfray P, Mouchet A, Najjar RG, Gian-Kasper P, Rodgers KB, Sabine CL, Sarmiento JL, Schlitzer R, Slater RD, Totterdell IJ, Marie-France W, Yamanaka Y, Yool A (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681–686Google Scholar
  61. Porter JW, Porter KG (2002) The everglades, Florida Bay, and coral reefs of the Florida Keys: an ecosystem sourcebook. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  62. Precht WF (2006) Coral reef restoration handbook. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Precht WF, Miller SL (2007) Ecological shifts along the Florida reef tract: the past is key to the future. In: Geological approaches to coral reef ecology. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  64. Pyke CR, Bierwagen BG, Furlow J, Gamble J, Johnson T, Julius S, West J (2007) A decision inventory approach for improving decision support for climate change impact assessment and adaptation. Environ Sci Policy 10(7–8):610–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141(10):2417–2431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Renn O (2006) Participatory processes for designing environmental policies. Land Use Policy 23(1):34–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rouphael AB, Inglis GJ (2002) Increased spatial and temporal variability in coral damage caused by recreational scuba diving. Ecol Appl 12(2):427–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Rubin ES, Small MJ, Bloyd CN, Henrion M (1992) An integrated assessment of acid deposition effects on Lake Acidification. J Environ Eng 118:120–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shivlani M, Suman D (2000) Dive operator use patterns in the designated no-take zones of the Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary. Environ Manag 25(6):647–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spalding M (2001) World atlas of coral reefs. University of California Press and UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Center, Berkeley, p 150Google Scholar
  71. Stiber NA, Pantazidou M, Small MJ (1999) Expert system methodology for evaluating reductive dechlorination at TCE Sites. Environ Sci Technol 33(17):3012–3020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tonn B, English M, Travis C (2000) A framework for understanding and improving environmental decision making. J Environ Plan Manag 43(2):163–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Turner RK, Georgiou S, Brouwer R, Batemen IJ, Langford IJ (2003) Towards an integrated environmental assessment for wetland and catchment management. Geogr J 169(2):99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Turner RK, Morse-Jones S, Fisher B (2010) Ecosystem valuation: a sequential decision support system and quality assessment issues. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1185(1):79–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. UNEP (2006) In the front line: shoreline protection and other ecosystem services from mangroves and coral reefs. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, p 33Google Scholar
  76. UNEP (2007) Global environment outlook GEO4. Nairobi & Valletta, p 540Google Scholar
  77. Wheaton J, Jaap WC, Porter JW, Kosminyn V, Hackett K, Lybolt M, Callahan MK, Kidney J, Kupfner S, Tsokos C, Yanev G (2001) EPA/FKNMS coral reef monitoring project executive summary 2001. FKNMS symposium: an ecosystem report card. WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amanda P. Rehr
    • 1
  • Mitchell J. Small
    • 2
  • Patricia Bradley
    • 3
  • William S. Fisher
    • 4
  • Ann Vega
    • 5
  • Kelly Black
    • 6
  • Tom Stockton
    • 7
  1. 1.Northwest Fisheries Science Center, U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Departments of Civil & Environmental; Engineering and Engineering & Public PolicyCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Atlantic Ecology DivisionOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, c/o Florida Keys National Marine SanctuaryKey WestUSA
  4. 4.National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Gulf Ecology DivisionOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyGulf BreezeUSA
  5. 5.National Risk Management Research Laboratory, LRPCD/RRBOffice of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA
  6. 6.Neptune and Company, IncLakewoodUSA
  7. 7.Neptune and Company, IncLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations