Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 50, Issue 4, pp 566–580 | Cite as

The Influence of Place Attachment and Experience Use History on Perceived Depreciative Visitor Behavior and Crowding in an Urban National Park

  • Renate Eder
  • Arne ArnbergerEmail author
Article

Abstract

Research on recreational place attachment suggests that place identity, or the emotional/symbolic ties people have to places, and place dependence, which describes a functional attachment to a specific place, influence the perception of social and environmental site conditions. Recent research, however, has found that place attachment is not always a predictor of such perceptions. This study investigated the influence of place attachment and experience use history on the perception of depreciative visitor behavior, recreation impacts and crowding in an urban national park. In 2006, 605 on-site visitors to the heavily-used Viennese part of the Danube Floodplains National Park were asked about past experience, place attachment, perceptions of depreciative visitor behavior, crowding, changes in visitor numbers during the past ten years, and recreation impacts on wildlife. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two dimensions of place attachment. Linear regression analyses found that place identity and place dependence were related to some perceived depreciative visitor behaviors and visitor number changes but not to crowding, while experience use history additionally related to perceived crowding. Visitors with higher place attachment and past experience were more sensitive to social and environmental site conditions. Management implications of the findings are discussed.

Keywords

Danube Floodplains National Park Place attachment Protected area management Recreation use Recreation perceptions Vienna 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The study was co-financed by the Austrian Man and Biosphere Program (UNESCO), administered by the Austrian Academy of Sciences (ÖAW). Project partners were the Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management of the University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna, the Vienna Forest Department and the Danube Floodplains National Park Administration. The authors wish to thank four anonymous reviewers for their comments.

References

  1. Altman I, Low SM (1992) Place attachment, human behavior, and environment: advances in theory and research. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony RG, Steidl RJ, McGarigal K (1995) Recreation and bald eagles in the Pacific Northwest. In: Knight RL, Gutzwiller KJ (eds) Wildlife and recreationists—coexistence through management and research. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 223–241Google Scholar
  3. Arnberger A (2006) Recreation use of urban forests: an inter-area comparison. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 4:135–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnberger A, Brandenburg C (2007) Past on-site experience, crowding perceptions and use displacement of visitor groups to a peri-urban national park. Environmental Management 40:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnberger A, Haider W (2007) A comparison of global and actual measures of perceived crowding of urban forest visitors. Journal of Leisure Research 39:668–685Google Scholar
  6. Bouton SN, Frederick PC (2003) Stakeholders’ perceptions of a wading bird colony as a community resource in the Brazilian Pantanal. Conservation Biology 17:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bricker KS, Kerstetter DL (2000) Level of specialization and place attachment: an explorative study of whitewater recreationists. Leisure Sciences 22:233–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budruk M, Wilhem Stanis SA, Schneider IE, Heisey JJ (2008) Crowding and experience-use history: a study of the moderating effect of place attachment among water-based recreationists. Environmental Management 41(4):528–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Budruk M, Thomas H, Tyrrell T (2009) Urban green spaces: place attachment and environmental attitudes in India. Society and Natural Resources 22(9):824–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Byrne BB (2010) Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Carver S, Evans A, Kingston R, Turton I (2001) Public participation, GIS, and cyberdemocracy: evaluating on-line spatial decision support systems. Environment and Planning B 28:907–921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen JW (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New yorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Cortina JM (1993) What is coefficient alpa? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology 78(1):98–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ditton RB, Fedler AJ, Graefe AR (1983) Factors contributing to perceptions of recreational crowding. Leisure Sciences 5(4):273–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ewert AW (1998) A comparison of urban-proximate and urban-distant wilderness users on selected variables. Environmental Management 22(6):927–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Graefe AR, Vaske JJ, Kuss FR (1984) Social carrying capacity. An integration and synthesis of twenty years of research. Leisure Sciences 6(4):395–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Halpenny EA (2010) Pro-environmental behaviours and park visitors: the effect of place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30:409–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hammitt WE, McDonald C (1983) Past on-site experience and its relationship to managing river recreation resources. Forest Science 29(2):262–266Google Scholar
  19. Hammitt WE, Backlund EA, Bixler RD (2004) Experience use history, place bonding and resource substitution of trout anglers during recreation engagements. Journal of Leisure Research 36(3):356–378Google Scholar
  20. Hammitt WE, Kyle GT, Oh CO (2009) Comparison of place bonding models in recreation resource management. Journal of Leisure Research 41(1):55–70Google Scholar
  21. Ibitayo OO, Virden RJ (1996) Visitor and manager perceptions of depreciative behaviors in urban park settings. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 14:36–51Google Scholar
  22. Jorgensen BS, Stedman RC (2001) Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21:233–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaltenborn BP, Williams DR (2002) The meaning of place: attachments to Femundsmarka National Park, Norway, among tourists and locals. Norwegian Journal of Geography 56(3):189–198Google Scholar
  24. Kuentzel WF, McDonald CD (1992) Differential effects of past experience, commitment, and lifestyle dimensions on river use specialisation. Journal of Leisure Research 24(3):269–287Google Scholar
  25. Kyle G, Chick G (2002) The social nature of leisure involvement. Journal of Leisure Research 34(4):426–448Google Scholar
  26. Kyle G, Mowen AJ, Tarrant M (2004a) Linking place preferences with place meaning: an examination of the relationship between place motivation and place attachment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:439–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R, Bacon J (2004b) Effects of place attachment on users’ perceptions of social and environmental conditions in a natural setting. Journal of Environmental Psychology 24:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R, Bacon J (2004c) Effect of activity involvement and place attachment on recreationists’ perceptions of setting density. Journal of Leisure Research 36(2):209–231Google Scholar
  29. Kyle G, Graefe A, Manning R (2004d) Attached recreationists… Who are they? Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 22(2):65–84Google Scholar
  30. Moore RL, Graefe AR (1994) Attachment to recreation settings: the case of railtrail users. Leisure Sciences 16:17–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore RL, Scott D (2003) Place attachment and context: comparing a park and a trail within. Forest Science 49(6):877–884Google Scholar
  32. Schreyer R, Lime D, Williams DR (1984) Characterizing the influence of past experience on recreation behavior. Journal of Leisure Research 16:31–50Google Scholar
  33. Smaldone D, Harris CC, Sanyal N, Lind D (2005) Place attachment and management of critical park issues in Grand Teton National Park. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 23(1):90–114Google Scholar
  34. Sterl P, Brandenburg C, Arnberger A (2008) Visitors’ awareness and assessment of recreational disturbance of wildlife in the Donau-Auen National Park. Journal for Nature Conservation 16:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Takano T, Nakamura K, Watanabe M (2002) Urban residential environments and senior citizens’ longevity in megacity areas: the importance of walkable green spaces. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health 56:913–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vaske JJ, Kobrin KC (2001) Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education 32(4):16–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wakefield SEL, Elliott SJ, Cole DC, Eyles JD (2001) Environmental risk and (re)action: air quality, health, and civic involvement in an urban industrial neighbourhood. Health & Place 7(3):163–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Walker GJ, Chapman R (2003) Thinking like a park: the effects of sense of place, perspective-taking, and empathy on pro-environmental intentions. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 21(4):71–86Google Scholar
  39. Warzecha C, Lime D (2001) Place attachment in Canyonlands National Park: visitors’ assessments of setting attributes on the Colorado and Green Rivers. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 19(1):59–78Google Scholar
  40. Watson AE, Roggenbuck JW, Williams DR (1991) The influence of past experience on wilderness choice. Journal of Leisure Research 23(1):21–36Google Scholar
  41. Westover TN, Collins JR (1987) Perceived crowding in recreation settings: an urban case study. Leisure Sciences 9:87–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. White DD, Virden RJ, van Riper C (2008) Effects of place identity, place dependence, and experience-use history on perceptions of recreation impacts in a natural setting. Environmental Management 42(4):647–657CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Williams DR, Roggenbuck JR (1989) Measuring place attachment: some preliminary results. Paper presented at the session on outdoor planning and management NRPA symposium on leisure research. San Antonio, 20–22 October 1989Google Scholar
  44. Williams DR, Vaske JJ (2003) The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science 49(6):830–840Google Scholar
  45. Williams DR, Patterson ME, Roggenbuck JW, Watson A (1992) Beyond the commodity metaphor: examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences 14:29–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Landscape Development, Recreation and Conservation PlanningUniversity of Natural Resources and Life Sciences ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations