Environmental Management

, Volume 50, Issue 1, pp 123–139 | Cite as

River Restoration in Spain: Theoretical and Practical Approach in the Context of the European Water Framework Directive

  • Marta González del Tánago
  • Diego García de Jalón
  • Mercedes Román


River restoration is becoming a priority in many countries because of increasing the awareness of environmental degradation. In Europe, the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) has significantly reinforced river restoration, encouraging the improvement of ecological status for water bodies. To fulfill the WFD requirements, the Spanish Ministry of the Environment developed in 2006 a National Strategy for River Restoration whose design and implementation are described in this paper. At the same time many restoration projects have been conducted, and sixty of them have been evaluated in terms of stated objectives and pressures and implemented restoration measures. Riparian vegetation enhancement, weir removal and fish passes were the most frequently implemented restoration measures, although the greatest pressures came from hydrologic alteration caused by flow regulation for irrigation purposes. Water deficits in quantity and quality associated with uncontrolled water demands seriously affect Mediterranean rivers and represent the main constraint to achieving good ecological status of Spanish rivers, most of them intensively regulated. Proper environmental allocation of in-stream flows would need deep restrictions in agricultural water use which seem to be of very difficult social acceptance. This situation highlights the need to integrate land-use and rural development policies with water resources and river management, and identifies additional difficulties in achieving the WFD objectives and good ecological status of rivers in Mediterranean countries.


River restoration Spain Water framework directive Water resources management Forecaster National strategy 



The National Strategy was formulated under two administrative contracts between the Polytechnic University of Madrid and the Ministry of the Environment in 2006 and 2007. The review of restoration projects corresponds to FORECASTER project results (IWRM-NET CGL2008-03082-E/BTE). The authors express their recognition to Cristina Narbona, Jaime Palop, Jesús Yague, Ricardo Segura, Luis Babiano and Javier Sánchez from the Ministry of the Environment for their political and administrative support. M. Aldaguer, I. Doadrio, R. Garilleti, D. Gómez Orea, M. Gutiérrez, F. Lara, I. Lastra, M. Múgica, A. Ollero, I. Rodríguez, R. Romeo, R. Sánchez-Navarro and J. Serrano coordinated the working groups with remarkable effort and positive results.


  1. Alonso C, Baeza D, Gortázar J (2009) Liberando Ríos. Propuestas de WWF para el desmantelamiento de presas en España. WWF España, Madrid, p 48Google Scholar
  2. Arenillas L (2008) The Manzanares river restoration (Northern Madrid, Spain): demolition of an obsolete dam and rehabilitation of a riverine ecosystem. In: Gumiero B, Rinaldi M, Fokkens B (eds) Procceedings 4th ECRR Conference on River Restoration, Venice, pp 975–980Google Scholar
  3. Arthington AH, Bunn SE, Poff NL, Naiman RJ (2006) The challenge of providing environmental flow rules to sustain river ecosystems. Ecological Applications 16:1311–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barreira A, Brufao P, Colman A (2009) Aspectos jurídicos en la restauración de ríos. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y del Medio Rural y Marino, Madrid, p 231Google Scholar
  5. Batalla RJ, Gómez CM, Kondolf GM (2004) Reservoir-induced hydrological changes in the Ebro river basin (NE Spain). Journal of Hydrology 290:117–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonada N, Statzner Dolédec S, Statzner B (2007) Taxonomic and biological trait differences of stream macroinvertebrate communities between mediterranean and temperate regions: implications for future climatic scenarios. Global Change Biology 13:1658–1671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boulton A, Piégay H, Sanders MD (2008) Turbulence and train wrecks: using knowledge strategies to enhance the application of integrative river science to effective river management. In: Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (eds) River futures: an integrative scientific approach to River Repair. Society of Ecological Restoration International, Island Press, Washington DC, pp 28–39Google Scholar
  8. Brufao P (2006) La demolición de presas en España: un repaso por comunidades autónomas. Quercus 241:34–41Google Scholar
  9. Brufao P (2008) La reforma ambiental de concesiones y autorizaciones de agua. Bakeaz-Fundación Nueva Cultura del Agua, Bilbao, p 88Google Scholar
  10. Bunn SE, Arthington AH (2002) Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30:492–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Camargo JA, Alonso A, Puente M (2005) Eutrophication downstream from small reservoirs in Mountain Rivers of Central Spain. Water Research 39:3376–3384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Claver A, Ormad P, Rodríguez L, Ovelleiro JL (2006) Study of the presence of pesticides in surface waters in the Ebro river basin (Spain). Chemosphere 64:1437–1443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clewell AF, Aronson J (2006) Motivations for the restoration of ecosystems. Conservation Biology 20:420–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corenblit D, Tabacchi E, Steiger J, Gurnell AM (2007) Reciprocal interactions and adjustments between fluvial landforms and vegetation dynamics in river corridors: a review of complementary approaches. Earth-Science Reviews 84:56–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Downs PW, Kondolf GM (2002) Post-project appraisals in adaptive management for river channel restoration. Environmental Management 29:477–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dufour S, Piégay H (2009) From the myth of a lost paradise to targeted river restoration: forget natural references and focus on human benefits. River Research and Applications 25(5):568–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elvira B (1995) Conservation status of endemic freshwater fish in Spain. Biological Conservation 72:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elvira B, Almodóvar A (2005) Freshwater fish introductions in Spain: facts and figures at the beginning of the 21st century. Journal of Fish Biology 59:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. European Environmental Agency (EEA) (2007) Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010: proposal for a first set of indicators to monitor progress in Europe. EEA Technical Report 11/2007, Luxembourg, p 38Google Scholar
  20. Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group (FISRWG) (1998) Stream corridor restoration. Principles, processes, and practices, 10/98. U.S. National Engineering Handbook, Part 653, Washington, DC, USDA, Natural Resources Conservation ServiceGoogle Scholar
  21. Feld CK, Birk S, Bradley DC, Hering D, Kail J, Marzin A, Melcher A, Nemitz D, Pedersen ML, Pletterbauer F, Pont D, Verdonschot PFM, Friberg N (2011) From natural to degraded rivers and back again: a test of restoration ecology theory and practice. Advances in Ecological Research 44:119–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferreira T, Oliveira J, Caiola et al. (2007) Ecological traits of fish assemblages from Mediterranean Europe and their responses to human disturbance. Fisheries Management and Ecology 14:473–481Google Scholar
  23. García de Jalón D (2003) The Spanish experience in determining minimum flow regimes in regulated streams. Canadian Water Resources Journal 28(2):1–14Google Scholar
  24. García de Jalón D, González del Tánago M, Casado C (1992) Ecology of regulated rivers in Spain: an overview. Limnetica 8:161–166Google Scholar
  25. García Ruiz JM (2010) The effects of land uses on soil erosion in Spain: a review. Catena 81:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giller PS (2005) River restoration: seeking ecological standards. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. González del Tánago M, García de Jalón D (2007) Restauración de Ríos. Guía metodológica para la elaboración de proyectos. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, p 318Google Scholar
  28. Grantham TE, Merenlender AM, Resh VE (2010) Climatic influences and anthropogenic stressors: An integrated framework for streamflow management in Mediterranean-climate California, USA. Freshwater Biology 55(Suppl.1):188–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grindlay AL, Zamorano M, Rodríguez MI, Molero E, Urrea MA (2011) Implementation of the European Framework Directive: integration of hydrological and regional planning at the Segura River Basin, southeast Spain. Land Use Policy 28:242–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hooke JM (2006) Human impacts on fluvial systems in the Mediterranean region. Geomorphology 79:311–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vadermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75(1):3–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes FMR, Rood SB (2003) The allocation of river flows for the restoration of woody riparian and floodplain forest ecosystems: a review of approaches and their application in Europe. Environmental Management 32:12–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) Climatic change 2007 synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report, IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  34. King EG, Hobbs RJ (2006) Identifying linkages among conceptual models of ecosystem degradation and restoration: towards and integrative framework. Restoration Ecology 14(3):369–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Klimo E, Hager H (eds.) (2008) The Floodplain Forests in Europe: current situation and perspectives. Leiden and European Forest Institute Research Report No. 10, Koninklijke Brill, p 267Google Scholar
  36. Kondolf GM, Boulton A, O’ Daniel S, Poole G, Rahel F, Stanley E, Wohl E, Bang A, Carlstrom J, Cristoni C, Huber H, Koljonen S, Louhi P, Nakamura K (2006) Process-based ecological river restoration: visualising three-dimensional connectivity and dynamic vectors to recover lost linkages. Ecology & Society 11:5 (
  37. Land and Water Australia (2002) Planning for river restoration. River Landscapes, fact sheet 9. Australia Government, Canberra.
  38. Land and Water Australia (2006) River and Riparian lands management newsletter vol 31, pp 44–46Google Scholar
  39. Lara F, Garillety R, Calleja JA (2004) La vegetación de ribera de la mitad norte española Monografías M-81, CEDEX. Ministerio de Fomento-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, p 536Google Scholar
  40. Lara F, Garilleti R, Calleja JA (2008) Síntesis ecológica y sectorización de la vegetación de ribera de la mitad Sur de España. Technical Report CEDEX- Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, p 571Google Scholar
  41. Laub BG, Palmer MA (2009) Restoration ecology of rivers. In: Encyclopedia of inland waters, pp 332–341Google Scholar
  42. Magdaleno F (2005) Caudales ecológicos: conceptos, métodos e interpretaciones. Monografías CEDEX, M-82, Madrid, p 194Google Scholar
  43. Martínez C, Fernández-Yuste JA (2006) Índices de alteración hidrológica en ecosistemas fluviales. Monografías CEDEX, M-85, Madrid, p 178Google Scholar
  44. Menció A, Mas-Pla J (2010) Influence of groundwater exploitation on the ecological status of streams in a Mediterranean system (Selva Basin, NE Spain). Ecological Indicators 10:915–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Meybeck M (2003) Global analysis of river systems: from Earth system controls to Anthropocene syndromes. Philosophical Transactions the Royal Society of London B 358:1935–1955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC, p 137Google Scholar
  47. Ministerio Medio de Ambiente (MMA) (2006) Inventario de presas españolas. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, p 494Google Scholar
  48. Ministerio Medio de Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (MMAMRM) (2010) Restauración de ríos. Bases de la estrategia nacional de restauración de ríos, Madrid, p 102Google Scholar
  49. MMAMRM (Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino) (2008) Instrucción de Planificación Hidrológica, Orden ARM/2656/2008 de 10 de septiembreGoogle Scholar
  50. Mooney H, Larigauderie A, Cesario M, Elmquist T, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Lavorel S, Mace GM, Palmer MA, Scholes R, Yahara T (2009) Biodiversity, climate change, and ecosystem services. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 1:46–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Morán-Tejeda E, Ceballos A, Llorente-Pinto JM (2010) Hydrological response of Mediterranean headwaters to climate oscillations and land-cover changes: the mountains of Duero River Basin (Central Spain). Global and Planetary Change 72:39–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreno JL, Navarro C, Heras J (2006) Abiotic ecotypes in south-central Spanish rivers: reference conditions and pollution. Environmental Pollution 143:388–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naiman RJ, Bunn SE, Nilsson C, Petts GE, Pinay G, Thompson LC (2002) Legitimizing fluvial ecosystems as users of water: an overview. Environmental Management 30(4):455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. National Research Council (NRC) (1992) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 552Google Scholar
  55. Navarro-Llácer C, Baeza D, Heras J (2010) Assessment of regulated rivers with indices based on macroinvertebrates, fish and riparian forest in the southeast of Spain. Ecological Indicators 10:935–942CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Nilsson C, Berggren K (2000) Alterations of riparian ecosystems caused by river regulation. BioScience 50:783–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Observatorio de la Sostenibilidad en España (OSE) (2006) Cambios de ocupación del suelo en España. Ministerio de Fomento, Instituto Geográfico Nacional, Madrid, p 485Google Scholar
  58. Ollero A (2010) Channel changes and floodplain management in the meandering middle Ebro River, Spain. Geomorphology 117:247–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ollero A, Ballarín D, Mora D (2006) Cambios en el cauce y el llano de inundación del río Ebro (Aragón) en los últimos 80 años. Geographicalia 50:87–109Google Scholar
  60. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Follstad Shah J, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O′Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. Journal of Applied Ecology 42:208–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Palmer MA, Menninger HL, Bernhardt E (2010) River restoration, habitat heterogeneity and biodiversity: A failure of theory or practice? Freshwater Biology 55(Suppl.1):205–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Paredes J, Andreu J, Solera A (2010) A decision support system for water quality in the Manzanares River (Madrid, Spain). Science of the Total Environment 408:2576–2589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pedersen ML, Andersena JM, Nielsena K, Linnemannb M (2007a) Restoration of Skjern River and its valley: project description and general ecological changes in the project area. Ecological Engineering 30:131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pedersen ML, Friberg N, Skriver J, Baattrup-Pedersen A, Larsen SE (2007b) Restoration of Skjern River and its valley—short-term effects on river habitats, macrophytes and macroinvertebrates. Ecological Engineering 30:145–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Poff NL, Zimmerman JKH (2010) Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshwater Biology 55(1):194–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Prat N, Munné A (2000) Water use and quality and stream flow in a Mediterranean stream. Water Research 34(15):3876–3881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Reichert P, Borsuk M, Hostmann M, Schweizer S, Spörri C, Tockner K, Truffer B (2007) Concepts of decision support for river rehabilitation. Environmental Modelling and Software 22:188–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Resh VH, Brown AV, Covich AP, Gurtz ME, Li HW, Minshall GW, Reice SR, Sheldon AL, Wallace JB, Wissmar RC (1988) The role of disturbance in stream ecology. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7:433–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rodríguez I, Herrero JM, Gutiérrez F (2008) Project for ecological improvement of river Negro and tributaries (Zamora-Spain). In: Gumiero B, Rinaldi M, Fokkens B (eds) Procceedings 4th ECRR conference on river restoration, Venice, pp 223–230Google Scholar
  70. Rutherfurd I, Jerie K, Walker M, Marsh N (2000) A rehabilitation manual for Australian streams. Land and Water Resources Research and Development Corporation, vol 1 (p 192), vol 2 (p 382), CanberraGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryder D, Brierley GJ, Hobbs R, Kyle G, Leishman M (2008) Vision generation: What do we seek to achieve in river rehabilitation? In: Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (eds) River futures: an integrative scientific approach to river repair. Society of Ecological Restoration International/Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 16–27Google Scholar
  72. Sabater S, Feio MJ, Graça MAS, Muñoz I, Romaní AM (2009) The Iberian rivers. In: Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT (eds) Rivers of Europe. Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, pp 113–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sánchez Martínez FJ (2008) Voluntary river work programme organised by the Water Department of the Ministry of Environment and rural and marine areas. In: Gumiero B, Rinaldi M, Fokkens B (eds) 4th ECRR conference on river restoration. CIRF Publication, Venice, pp 661–668Google Scholar
  74. Tena A, Batalla RJ, Vericat D, López-Tarazón JA (2011) Suspended sediment dynamics in a large regulated river over a 10-year period (the lower Ebro, NE Iberian Peninsula). Geomorphology 125:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomson D, Pepperdine S (2003) Assessing community capacity for riparian restoration. National Riparian Lands R&D Programme/Land and Water Australia, Canberra, p 53Google Scholar
  76. Tippett J, Sarle B, Pahl-Wostl C, Rees Y (2005) Social learning in public participation in river basin management-early findings from HarmoniCOP European studies. Environmental Science & Policy 8:287–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine flood plains: present state and future trends. Environmental Conservation 29(3):308–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tockner K, Uehlinger U, Robinson CT (eds) (2009) Rivers of Europe. Elsevier/Academic Press, San Diego, p 700Google Scholar
  79. Torrecilla NJ, Galve JP, Zaera LG, Retamar JF, Alvarez ANA (2005) Nutrient sources and dynamics in a mediterranean fluvial regime (Ebro River, NE Spain) and their implications for water management. Journal of Hydrology 304:166–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. van Ast JA, Boot SP (2003) Participation in European water policy. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28:555–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Woolsey S, Capelli F, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Hostmann M, Junker B, Paetzold A, Roulier C, Schweizer S, Tiegs SD, Tockner K, Weber C, Peter A (2007) A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwater Biology 52:752–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. World Wife Foundation-Ministerio de Medio Ambiente (WWF-MMA) (2007) Voluntariado ambiental en ríos y riberas. Guía para el diseño y ejecución de programas. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Madrid, p 55Google Scholar
  83. Yague J, González del Tánago M, Sánchez FJ (2008) The Spanish National strategy for river restoration. In: Gumiero B, Rinaldi M, Fokkens B (eds) Proceedings 4th ECRR conference on river restoration, Venice, pp 281–290Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta González del Tánago
    • 1
  • Diego García de Jalón
    • 1
  • Mercedes Román
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de Ingeniería Forestal ETSI Montes, Ciudad UniversitariaUniversidad Politécnica de MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations