Environmental Management

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 1103–1114 | Cite as

Integrating Climate Change into Habitat Conservation Plans Under the U.S. Endangered Species Act

  • Paola Bernazzani
  • Bethany A. Bradley
  • Jeffrey J. Opperman
Article

Abstract

Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) are an important mechanism for the acquisition of land and the management of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. HCPs have become a vital means of protecting endangered and threatened species and their habitats throughout the United States, particularly on private land. The scientific consensus that climate is changing and that these changes will impact the viability of species has not been incorporated into the conservation strategies of recent HCPs, rendering plans vulnerable biologically. In this paper we review the regulatory context for incorporating climate change into HCPs and analyze the extent to which climate change is linked to management actions in a subset of large HCPs. We conclude that most current plans do not incorporate climate change into conservation actions, and so we provide recommendations for integrating climate change into the process of HCP development and implementation. These recommendations are distilled from the published literature as well as the practice of conservation planning and are structured to the specific needs of HCP development and implementation. We offer nine recommendations for integrating climate change into the HCP process: (1) identify species at-risk from climate change, (2) explore new strategies for reserve design, (3) increase emphasis on corridors, linkages, and connectivity, (4) develop anticipatory adaptation measures, (5) manage for diversity, (6) consider assisted migration, (7) include climate change in scenarios of water management, (8) develop future-oriented management actions, and (9) increase linkages between the conservation strategy and adaptive management/monitoring programs.

Keywords

Biological conservation Climate change Habitat conservation plans Ecosystem management Endangered species act Reserve design Adaptation strategy Conservation planning 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We wish to acknowledge the help of Dr. David Wilcove who provided initial guidance for this effort. Dr. David Zippin, Dr. Erica Fleishman and Dr. Scott Fleury provided input on early versions of the manuscript. Tim Messick gave valuable graphical support, and two anonymous reviewers provided important insights that improved the final version of the manuscript.

References

  1. Ackerly DD, Loarie SR, Cornwell WK, Weiss SB, Hamilton H, Branciforte R, Kraft NJB (2010) The geography of climate change: Implications for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions 16:476–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson MG, Ferree CE (2010) Conserving the stage: climate change and the geophysical underpinnings of species diversity. PLos ONE 5(7):e11554. doi: 10.1371/journal.phone.0011554
  3. Bagne KE, Friggens MM, Finch DM (2011) A system for assessing vulnerability of species (SAVS) to climate change. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-257. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, COGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron JS, Allen CD, Fleishman E, Gunderson L, McKenzie D, Meyerson L, Oropeza J, Stephenson N (2008a) National parks. In: Julius SH, West JM (Eds), Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate sensitive ecosystems and resources. A report by the U.S. Climate change science program and the subcommittee on global change research. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, pp 4-1–4-68Google Scholar
  5. Baron JS, Julius SH, West JM, Joyce LA, Blate G, Peterson CH, Palmer M, Keller BD, Kareiva P, Scott JM, Griffith B (2008b) Some guidelines for helping natural resources adapt to climate change. IHDP Update 46–52Google Scholar
  6. Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu SH, Palutikof JP (2008) Climate change and water: Technical paper of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Bates BC, Kundzewicz ZW, Wu SH, Palutikof JP (eds) IPCC Secretariat. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. Beier P, Brost B (2010) Use of land facets to plan for climate change: conserving the arenas, not the actors. Conservation Biology 24:701–710Google Scholar
  8. Bradley BA, Blumenthal DM, Wilcove DS, Ziska LH (2010) Predicting plant invasions in an era of global change. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 25:310–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CEQ (White House Council on Environmental Quality), DOI (U.S. Department of the Interior) (2012) National Fish, Wildlife and Plants Climate Adaptation Strategy. Public Review Draft. http://www.wildlifeadaptationstrategy.gov/
  10. Choi YD (2007) Restoration ecology to the future: a call for new paradigm. Restoration Ecology 15:351–353Google Scholar
  11. Cylinder P, Bogdan K, Zippin D (2004) Understanding the habitat conservation planning process in California. Institute for Local Government, Sacramento, p 57Google Scholar
  12. Dormann CF (2007) Promising the future? Global change projections of species distributions. Basic and Applied Ecology 8:387–397Google Scholar
  13. Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. EasterPilcher A (1996) Implementing the endangered species act. Bioscience 46:355–363Google Scholar
  15. Evans A, Perschel R (2009) A review of forestry mitigation and adaptation strategies in the northeast U.S. Climatic Change 96:167–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gilbert-Norton L, Wilson R, Stevens JR, Beard KH (2010b) A meta-analytic review of corridor effectiveness. Conservation Biology 24:660–668CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guisan A, Zimmermann NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135:147–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hannah L, Midgley G, Andelman S, Araujo M, Hughes G, Martinez-Meyer E, Pearson R, Williams P (2007) Protected area needs in a changing climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller NE, Zavaleta ES (2009) Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: a review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation 142:14–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hoegh-Guldberg O, Hughes L, McIntyre S, Lindenmayer DB, Parmesan C, Possingham HP, Thomas CD (2008) Assisted colonization and rapid climate change. Science 321:345–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. Kareiva P et al (1999) Using science in habitat conservation plans. Santa Barbara: national center for ecological analysis and synthesis. University of California, Santa BarbaraGoogle Scholar
  23. Kostyack J (1997) Reshaping habitat conservation plans for species recovery: an introduction of a series of articles on habitat conservation plans. Environmental Law 27:755–766Google Scholar
  24. Lawler JJ, Tear TH, Pyke C, Shaw MR, Gonzalez P, Kareiva P, Hansen L, Hannah L, Klausmeyer K, Aldous A, Bienz C, Pearsall S (2010) Resource management in a changing and uncertain climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8:35–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lestelle L, Mobrand L, McConnaha W (2004) Information structure of ecosystem diagnosis and treatment (EDT) and Habitat rating rules for Chinook Salmon, Coho Salmon and Steelhead Trout. Mobrand Biometrics, Inc., Vashon Island, WA. http://www.jonesandstokes.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=488&Itemid=784
  26. Loarie SR, Carter BE, Hayhoe K, McMahon S, Moe R, Knight CA, Ackerly DD (2008) Climate change and the future of California’s endemic flora. PLoS ONE 3:e2502Google Scholar
  27. Luers A, Cayan D, Franco G, Hanemann M, Croes B (2006) Our changing climate: assessing the risks to California. A summary report from the California climate change center. CEC-500-2006-077Google Scholar
  28. Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency (2007) 549 U.S. 497Google Scholar
  29. Maurer EP, Adam JC, Wood AW (2009) Climate model based consensus on the hydrologic impacts of climate change to the Rio Lempa basin of Central America. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 13:183–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McLachlan JS, Hellmann JJ, Schwartz MW (2007) A framework for debate of assisted migration in an era of climate change. Conservation Biology 21:297–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millar CI, Stephenson NL, Stephens SL (2007) Climate change and forests of the future: managing in the face of uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17:2145–2151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Morin X, Lechowicz MJ (2008) Contemporary perspectives on the niche that can improve models of species range shifts under climate change. Biology Letters 4:573–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Myers JH, Simberloff D, Kuris AM, Carey JR (2000) Eradication revisited: dealing with exotic species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 15:316–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. National Science and Technology Council (2008) Scientific assessment of the effects of global climate change on the united states: a report of the committee on environment and natural resourcesGoogle Scholar
  35. Natural Resources Defense Council v. Kempthorne (2007) No. 1:05-cv-1207 OWW GSA, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91968Google Scholar
  36. NatureServe (2010) Climate change vulnerability index. http://www.natureserve.org/prodServices/climatechange/ccvi.jsp
  37. NatureServe (2011) Mojave Basin and range rapid ecoregional assessments final memorandum I-3-C: prepared for the Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Rapid Ecoregional Assessments, pp 1–224Google Scholar
  38. Palmer MA, Lettenmaier DP, Poff NL, Postel SL, Richter B, Warner R (2009) Climate change and river ecosystems: protection and adaptation options. Environmental Management 44:1053–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. PRBO Conservation Science (2011) Projected effects of climate change in California ecoregional summaries emphasizing consequences for wildlife. Version 1.0Google Scholar
  41. Ricciardi A, Rasmussen JB (1999) Extinction rates of North American freshwater fauna. Conservation Biology 13:1220–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Richardson DM, Hellmann JJ, McLachlan JS, Sax DF, Schwartz MW, Gonzalez P, Brennan EJ, Camacho A, Root TL, Sala OE, Schneider SH, Ashe DM, Clark JR, Early R, Etterson JR, Fielder ED, Gill JL, Minteer BA, Polasky S, Safford HD, Thompson AR, Vellend M (2009) Multidimensional evaluation of managed relocation. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:9721–9724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Richter BD, Warner AT, Meyer JL, Lutz K (2006) A collaborative and adaptive process for developing environmental flow recommendations. River Research and Applications 22:297–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, Schneider SH, Rosenzweig C, Pounds JA (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ruhl JB (2008) Climate change and the endangered species act: building bridges to the no-analog future. Boston University Law Review 88:1–62Google Scholar
  46. Scholze M, Knorr W, Arnell NW, Prentice IC (2006) A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:13116–13120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz MD (1999) Advancing to full bloom: planning phenological research for the 21st century. International Journal of Biometeorology 42:113–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sponseller RA, Grimm NB, Boulton AJ, Sabo JL (2010) Responses of macroinvertebrate communities to long-term flow variability in a Sonoran desert stream. Global Change Biology 16:2891–2900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Research and Applications 19:397–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas CD, Cameron A, Rhys EG, Bakkenes M, Beaumont LJ, Collingham YC, Erasmus BFN, Ferreira de Siqueira M, Grainger A, Hannah L, Hughes L, Huntley B, van Jaarsveld AS, Midgley GF, Miles L, Ortega-Huerta MA, Peterson AT, Phillips OL, Williams SE (2004) Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427:145–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tilman D, Downing JA (1994) Biodiversity and stability in grasslands. Nature 367:363–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (2009) A framework for categorizing the relative vulnerability of threatened and endangered species to climate change. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Washington, D.C.: EPA/600/R-09/011. Available from the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA, http://www.epa.gov/ncea
  53. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2011) Rising to the urgent challenge: strategic plan for responding to accelerating climate change, pp 1–32Google Scholar
  54. Weaver WE, Hadans DK (1994) Handbook for forest and ranch roads. A guide for planning, designing, constructing, reconstructing, maintaining and closing wildland roads, Ukiah. Mendocino County Resource Conservation District, CA, p 161Google Scholar
  55. Wenger SJ, Isaak DJ, Luce CH, Neville HM, Fausch KD, Dunham JB, Dauwalter DC, Young MK, Marketa ME, Rieman BE, Hamlet AF, William JE (2011) Flow regime, temperature, and biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 108(34):14175–14180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. West JM, Julius SH, Kareiva P, Enquist C, Lawler JJ, Petersen B, Johnson AE, Shaw MR (2009) U.S. Natural resources and climate change: concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environmental Management 44:1001–1021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW (2006) Warming and earlier spring increase western us forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wiens JA, Stralberg D, Jongsomjit D, Howell CA, Snyder MA (2009) Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106:19729–19736CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48:607–615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Willis CG, Ruhfel B, Primack RB, Miller-Rushing AJ, Davis CC (2008) Phylogenetic patterns of species loss in Thoreau’s woods are driven by climate change. Proceedings of the National academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:17029–17033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Winchell CS, Doherty PF (2008) Using California gnatcatcher to test underlying models in habitat conservation plans. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:1322–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. WWF (2010) Flowing forward: freshwater ecosystem adaptation to climate change in water resources management and biodiversity conservation. Prepared for the World BankGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Bernazzani
    • 1
  • Bethany A. Bradley
    • 2
  • Jeffrey J. Opperman
    • 3
  1. 1.ICF InternationalChagrin FallsUSA
  2. 2.Department of Environmental ConservationUniversity of MassachusettsAmherstUSA
  3. 3.The Nature ConservancyChagrin FallsUSA

Personalised recommendations