Advertisement

Environmental Management

, Volume 49, Issue 4, pp 802–815 | Cite as

Using a Down-Scaled Bioclimate Envelope Model to Determine Long-Term Temporal Connectivity of Garry oak (Quercus garryana) Habitat in Western North America: Implications for Protected Area Planning

  • Marlow G. Pellatt
  • Simon J. Goring
  • Karin M. Bodtker
  • Alex J. Cannon
Article

Abstract

Under the Canadian Species at Risk Act (SARA), Garry oak (Quercus garryana) ecosystems are listed as “at-risk” and act as an umbrella for over one hundred species that are endangered to some degree. Understanding Garry oak responses to future climate scenarios at scales relevant to protected area managers is essential to effectively manage existing protected area networks and to guide the selection of temporally connected migration corridors, additional protected areas, and to maintain Garry oak populations over the next century. We present Garry oak distribution scenarios using two random forest models calibrated with down-scaled bioclimatic data for British Columbia, Washington, and Oregon based on 1961–1990 climate normals. The suitability models are calibrated using either both precipitation and temperature variables or using only temperature variables. We compare suitability predictions from four General Circulation Models (GCMs) and present CGCM2 model results under two emissions scenarios. For each GCM and emissions scenario we apply the two Garry oak suitability models and use the suitability models to determine the extent and temporal connectivity of climatically suitable Garry oak habitat within protected areas from 2010 to 2099. The suitability models indicate that while 164 km2 of the total protected area network in the region (47,990 km2) contains recorded Garry oak presence, 1635 and 1680 km2 of climatically suitable Garry oak habitat is currently under some form of protection. Of this suitable protected area, only between 6.6 and 7.3% will be “temporally connected” between 2010 and 2099 based on the CGCM2 model. These results highlight the need for public and private protected area organizations to work cooperatively in the development of corridors to maintain temporal connectivity in climatically suitable areas for the future of Garry oak ecosystems.

Keywords

Climate change Downscaling Bioclimate envelope modeling British Columbia Garry oak (Quercus garryanaProtected area Western North America Temporal connectivity Pacific Northwest Washington Oregon 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The Climate Change Action Fund (Project A718), Interdepartmental Recovery Fund (Project 733), Parks Canada—Western and Northern Service Centre, and the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) provided financial support for the project to M.G. Pellatt. S. Goring is supported by a NSERC RC PGS-D3 scholarship. We would like to thank D. Peter and C. Harrington of the US. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, C. Chappell of the Washington Department of Natural Resources, Ted Lea, the British Columbia Ministry of the Environment, VegBank (NatureServe), E-Flora (UBC), and D.Hrynyk (Parks Canada) for data contributions. We would also like to extend our appreciation to three anonymous reviewers whose positive comments helped improve the manuscript.

References

  1. Araújo MB (2009) Climate change and spatial conservation planning. In: Moilenen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Araújo MB, Rahbek C (2006) How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313:1396–1397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry PM, Dawson TP, Harrison PA, Pearson RG (2002) Modelling potential impacts of climate change on the bioclimatic envelope of species in Britain and Ireland. Global Ecology & Biogeography 11:453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodtker KM, Pellatt MG, Cannon AJ (2009) A bioclimatic model to assess the impact of climate change on ecosystems at risk and inform land management decisions. Report for the Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Directorate, CCAF Project A718. Western and Northern Service Centre, VancouverGoogle Scholar
  5. Breiman L (2001) Random Forests. Machine Learning 45:5–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns RM, Honkala BH (1990) Silvics of North America: 1. Conifers; 2. Hardwoods Agriculture Handbook 654, vol 2. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Chappell CB, Gee MS, Stephens B (2003) A geographic information system map of existing grasslands and oak woodlands in the Puget lowland and Willamette valley ecoregions, Washington. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia (http://www.dnr.wa.gov/nhp/refdesk/gis/oakgrsld.html)
  8. Daly C, Neilson RP, Phillips DL (1994) A statistical-topographic model for mapping climatological precipitation over mountainous terrain. Journal of Applied Meteorology 33:140–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Daly C, Taylor G, Gibson W (1997) The PRISM approach to mapping precipitation and temperature, 10th Conference on Applied Climatology. American Meteorological Society, Reno NV, pp 10–12Google Scholar
  10. Davis MB (1981) Quaternary history and the stability of forest communities. In:West DC, Shugart HH, Botkin DB (eds) Forest succession concepts and application. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 132–153Google Scholar
  11. Dockerty T, Lovett A (2003) A location-centred, GIS-based methodology for estimating the potential impacts of climate change on nature reserves. Transactions in GIS 7:345–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eastman JR (2006) IDRISI Andes. Clark University, WorcesterGoogle Scholar
  13. Ecological Society of America (2006) VegBank on-line database. http://vegbank.org/cite/VB.Ob.17196.INW28670, VB.Ob.18019.INW29518, VB.Ob.18020.INW29519, VB.Ob.18021.INW29520, VB.Ob.18023.INW29522, VB.Ob.18032.INW29531, VB.Ob.18033.INW29532, VB.Ob.18034.INW29533, VB.Ob.18037.INW29536, VB.Ob.18040.INW29539, VB.Ob.18046.INW29545, VB.Ob.18052.INW29551, VB.Ob.18053.INW29552, VB.Ob.18055.INW29554, VB.Ob.18056.INW29555, VB.Ob.18059.INW29558, VB.Ob.18061.INW29560, VB.Ob.18062.INW29561, VB.Ob.18067.INW29566, VB.Ob.18069.INW29568, VB.Ob.18081.INW29580, VB.Ob.18093.INW29592, VB.Ob.18101.INW29600, VB.Ob.18112.INW29611, VB.Ob.18136.INW29635, VB.Ob.18266.INW29767, VB.Ob.21620.INW32492, VB.Ob.21621.INW32493, VB.Ob.21688.INW32567, VB.Ob.21689.INW32568, VB.Ob.21690.INW32569, VB.Ob.21691.INW32570, VB.Ob.21696.INW32575, VB.Ob.21703.INW32582, VB.Ob.23237.INW33646, VB.Ob.23386.INW33800, VB.Ob.23387.INW33801
  14. Froyd CA, Willis KJ (2008) Emerging issues in biodiversity & conservation management: the need for a palaeoecological perspective. Quaternary Science Reviews 27:1723–1732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fuchs MA (2001) Towards a Recovery Strategy for Garry Oak and Associated Ecosystems in Canada: Ecological Assessment and Literature Review. Technical Report GBEI/EC-00-030. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Pacific and Yukon RegionGoogle Scholar
  16. Graham CH, VanDerWal J, Phillips SJ, Moritz C, Williams SE (2010) Dynamic refugia and species persistence: tracking spatial shifts in habitat through time. Ecography 33:1062–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamann A, Wang T (2006) Potential effects of climate change on ecosystem and tree species distribution in British Columbia. Ecology 87:2773–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hannah L, Midgley G, Hughes G, Bomhard B (2005) The view from the Cape: extinction risk, protected areas, and climate change. Bioscience 55:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington CA (2003) The 1930s survey of forest resources in Washington and Oregon. General Technical Report, PNW-GTR-584. Portland, OR. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 123 p. [plus CD-ROM]Google Scholar
  20. Heikkinen RK, Luoto M, Araújo MB, Virkkala R, Thuiller W, Sykes MT (2006) Methods and uncertainties in bioclimatic envelope modelling under climate change. Progress in Physical Geography 30:751–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Klinkenberg B (2004) E-Flora BC: Electronic Atlas of the plants of British Columbia [www.eflora.bc.ca]. Lab for Advanced Spatial Analysis, Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver
  22. Lawler JJ, White D, Neilson RP, Blaustein AR (2006) Predicting climate-induced range shifts: model differences and model reliability. Global Change Biology 12:1568–1584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lea T (2007) Historical Garry oak ecosystems of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, pre-European contact to the present. Davidsonia 17:34–50Google Scholar
  24. Liaw A, Wiener M (2002) Classification and regression by random forest. Rnews 2:18–22Google Scholar
  25. MacDougall AS, Duwyn A, Jones NT (2010) Consumer-based limitations drive oak recruitment failure. Ecology 9:2092–2099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Midgley GF, Hannah L, Millar D, Rutherford MC, Powrie LW (2002) Assessing the vulnerability of species richness to anthropogenic climate change in a biodiversity hotspot. Global Ecology & Biogeography 11:445–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Midgley GF, Hannah L, Millar D, Thuiller W, Booth A (2003) Developing regional and species-level assessments of climate change impacts on biodiversity in the Cape Floristic Region. Biological Conservation 112:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pellatt MG (2002) The role of paleoecology in understanding ecological integrity: an example from a highly fragmented landscape in the Strait of Georgia Lowlands. In: Bondrop-Nielson S, Munro N, Nelson G, Willison JHM, Herman T, Eagles P (eds) Managing protected areas in a changing world, Proceedings of the fourth international conference on science and management of protected areas. SAMPAA, Wolfville, pp 384–397Google Scholar
  29. Pellatt MG, Hebda RJ, Mathewes RW (2001) High-resolution Holocene vegetation history and climate from Hole 1034B, ODP leg 169S, Saanich Inlet, Canada. Marine Geology 174:211–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pellatt MG, Gedalof Z, McCoy M, Bodtker K, Canon A, Smith S, Beckwith B, Mathewes RW, Smith D (2007) Fire History and Ecology of Garry Oak and Associated Ecosystems in British Columbia. Final Report for the Interdepartmental Recovery Fund Project 733. WNSC Publication. Vancouver, BCGoogle Scholar
  31. R Development Core Team (2011) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, http://www.R-project.org
  32. Rehfeldt GE, Ferguson DE, Crookston NL (2009) Aspen, climate, and sudden decline in western USA. Forest Ecology and Management 258:2353–2364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rose NA, Burton PJ (2009) Using bioclimate envelopes to identify temporal corridors in support of conservation planning in a changing climate. Forest Ecology and Management 258S:S64–S74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Salathé EP Jr, Motea PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest. International Journal of Climatology 27:1611–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shafer SL, Bartlein PJ, Thompson RS (2001) Potential changes in the distributions of western North America tree and shrub taxa under future climate scenarios. Ecosystems 4:200–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strobl C, Boulesteix A, Zeileis A, Hothorn T (2007) Bias in random forest variable importance measures: illustrations, sources and a solution. BMC Bioinformatics 8:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Vellend M, Bjorkman AD, McConchie A (2008) Environmentally biased fragmentation of oak savanna habitat on southeastern Vancouver Island, Canada. Biological Conservation 141:2576–2584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang T, Hamann A, Spittlehouse DL, Aitken SN (2006) Development of scale-free climate data for Western Canada for use in resource management. International Journal of Climatology 26:383–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Williams JW, Jackson ST, Kutzbach JE (2007) Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104:5738–5742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Willmott CJ, Robeson SM (1995) Climatologically aided interpolation (CAI) of terrestrial air temperature. International Journal of Climatology 15:221–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marlow G. Pellatt
    • 1
    • 2
  • Simon J. Goring
    • 3
  • Karin M. Bodtker
    • 1
  • Alex J. Cannon
    • 4
  1. 1.Parks Canada, Western and Northern Service CentreVancouverCanada
  2. 2.School of Resource and Environmental ManagementSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  3. 3.Department of Biological SciencesSimon Fraser UniversityBurnabyCanada
  4. 4.Meteorological Service of Canada, Environment CanadaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations