Environmental Management

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 517–522 | Cite as

Airports Offer Unrealized Potential for Alternative Energy Production

  • Travis L. DeVault
  • Jerrold L. Belant
  • Bradley F. Blackwell
  • James A. Martin
  • Jason A. Schmidt
  • L. Wes BurgerJr
  • James W. PattersonJr
Article

Abstract

Scaling up for alternative energy such as solar, wind, and biofuel raises a number of environmental issues, notably changes in land use and adverse effects on wildlife. Airports offer one of the few land uses where reductions in wildlife abundance and habitat quality are necessary and socially acceptable, due to risk of wildlife collisions with aircraft. There are several uncertainties and limitations to establishing alternative energy production at airports, such as ensuring these facilities do not create wildlife attractants or other hazards. However, with careful planning, locating alternative energy projects at airports could help mitigate many of the challenges currently facing policy makers, developers, and conservationists.

Keywords

Airport Biofuel Energy GIS Grassland Solar Wildlife Wind 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The United States Department of Agriculture, Mississippi State University, and the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration support our research. We thank P. M. Schmidt, R. King, and L. Clark for providing comments on the manuscript, and E. Poggiali for administrative support.

References

  1. Allan JR (2002) The costs of bird strikes and bird strike prevention. In: Clark L (ed) Proceedings of the National Wildlife Research Center Symposium, Human Conflicts with Wildlife: Economic Considerations. Department of Agriculture, National Wildlife Research Center, Fort Collins, pp 147–155Google Scholar
  2. Baskas H (2009) Solar-powered airports? It could happen. USA Today, 28 Apr 2009Google Scholar
  3. Blackwell BF, DeVault TL, Fernandez-Juricic E, Dolbeer RA (2009) Wildlife collisions with aircraft: a missing component of land-use planning for airports. Landscape and Urban Planning 93:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campbell JE, Lobell DB, Genova RC, Field CB (2008) The global potential of bioenergy on abandoned agricultural lands. Environmental Science and Technology 42:5791–5794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Casler MD (2005) Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the northern USA. Crop Science 45:388–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Central Intelligence Agency [CIA] (2010) The world factbook. Accessed online September 8, 2010. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/us.html
  7. Cerkal R, Vejražka K, Kamler J, Dvořák J (2009) Game browse and its impact on selected grain crops. Plant, Soil and Environment 55:181–186Google Scholar
  8. Cho A (2010) Energy’s tricky tradeofffs. Science 329:786–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curry A (2009) Deadly flights. Science 325:386–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DeVault TL, Kubel JE, Rhodes OE Jr, Dolbeer RA (2009) Habitat and bird communities at small airports in the midwestern USA. Proceedings of the Wildlife Damage Management Conference 13:137–145Google Scholar
  11. DeVault TL, Belant JL, Blackwell BF, Seamans TW (2011) Interspecific variation in wildlife hazards to aircraft: implications for airport management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 35(4):394–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dolbeer RA (2006) Height distribution of birds recorded by collisions with civil aircraft. Journal of Wildlife Management 70:1345–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolbeer RA, Wright SE, Cleary EC (2000) Ranking the hazard level of wildlife species to aviation. Wildlife Society Bulletin 28:372–378Google Scholar
  14. Dolbeer RA, Begier MJ, Wright SE (2008) Animal ambush: the challenge of managing wildlife hazards at general aviation airports. Proceedings of the Corporate Aviation Safety Seminar 53:1–17Google Scholar
  15. Dolbeer RA, Wright SE, Weller J, Begier MJ (2009) Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States 1990–2009. Federal Aviation Administration Serial Report No. 15Google Scholar
  16. Fargione J, Hill J, Tilman D, Polasky S, Hawthorne P (2008) Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319:1235–1238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fargione JE, Cooper TR, Flaspohler DJ, Hill J, Lehman C, McCoy T, McLeod S, Nelson EJ, Oberhauser KS, Tilman D (2009) Bioenergy and wildlife: threats and opportunities for grassland conservation. BioScience 59:767–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fargione JE, Plevin RJ, Hill JD (2010) The ecological impact of biofuels. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 41:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Federal Aviation Administration (1989) Airport design. Advisory Circular 150/5300-13, Appendix 17, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Federal Aviation Administration (2000) Proposed construction or alteration of objects that could affect navigable airspace. Advisory Circular 70/7460, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  21. Federal Aviation Administration (2007) Hazardous wildlife attractants on or near airports. Advisory Circular 150/5200-33B, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  22. Federal Aviation Administration (2010a) Technical guidance for evaluating selected solar technologies on airports. Federal Aviation Administration Report FAA-ARP-TR-10-1, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  23. Federal Aviation Administration (2010b) Airport Data & Contact Information. Accessed online September 8, 2010. http://www.faa.gov/airports/airport_safety/airportdata_5010/
  24. Groom MJ, Gray EM, Townsend PA (2008) Biofuels and biodiversity: principles for creating better policies for biofuel production. Conservation Biology 22:602–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Infanger JF (2010) The pros, cons of solar, wind. Airport Business 24(9):18–19Google Scholar
  26. International Civil Aviation Organization (2002) Land use and environmental control. Airport Planning Manual 9184 AN/902, Part 2, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Jain AK, Khanna M, Erickson M, Huang H (2010) An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States. GCB Bioenergy 2:217–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kintisch E (2010) Out of site. Science 329:788–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kocoloski K, Griffin WM, Matthews HC (2011) Impacts of facility size and location decisions on ethanol production cost. Energy Policy 39:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Marra PP, Dove CJ, Dolbeer RA, Dahlan NF, Heacker M, Whatton JF, Diggs NE, France C, Henkes GA (2009) Migratory Canada geese cause crash of US airways flight 1549. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7:297–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin JA, Belant JL, DeVault TL, Burger LW Jr, Blackwell BF, Riffell SK, Wang G (2011) Wildlife risk to aviation: a multi-scale issue requires a multi-scale solution. Human-Wildlife Interactions 5:198–203Google Scholar
  33. McAllister B (2009) The greener, the better. Airport Business 23(8):13–15Google Scholar
  34. Meehan TD, Hurlbert AH, Gratton C (2010) Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 107:18745–18746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Omernik JM (1987) Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Map (scale 1:7,500,0000). Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson BA, Doran PJ, Loomis LR, Robertson JR, Schemske DW (2010) Perennial biomass feedstocks enhance avian diversity. GCB Bioenergy 3:235–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sarath G, Mitchell RB, Sattler SE, Funnell D, Pedersen JF, Graybosch RA, Vogel KP (2008) Opportunities and roadblocks in utilizing forages and small grains for liquid fuels. Journal of Industrial Microbiology Biotechnology 35:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sinha S (2010) Leh airport ACs to run on solar power. The Times of India, 4 JuneGoogle Scholar
  39. Somerville C, Youngs H, Taylor C, Davis SC, Long SP (2010) Feedstocks for lignocellulosic biofuels. Science 329:790–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Statistix (2008) Statistix 9 User’s Manual. Analytical Software. Tallahassee, p 454Google Scholar
  41. Thorpe J (2010) Update on fatalities and destroyed civil aircraft due to bird strikes with appendix for 2008 & 2009. Proceedings of the 29th International Bird Strike Committee Meeting, Cairns, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  42. Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C (2006) Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science 314:1598–1600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tilman D, Socolow R, Foley JA, Hill J, Larson E, Lynd L, Pacala S, Reilly J, Searchinger T, Somerville C, Williams R (2009) Beneficial biofuels—the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 325:270–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Turner JA (1999) A realizable renewable energy future. Science 285:687–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Department of Agriculture (2009) Census of agriculture. National Agricultural Statistics Service, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  46. Washburn BE, Seamans TW (2007) Wildlife responses to vegetation height management in cool-season grasslands. Rangeland Ecology and Management 60:319–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wullschleger SD, Davis EB, Borsuk ME, Gunderson CA, Lynd LR (2010) Biomass production in switchgrass across the United States: database description and determinants of yield. Agronomy Journal 102:1158–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC (outside the USA) 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis L. DeVault
    • 1
  • Jerrold L. Belant
    • 2
  • Bradley F. Blackwell
    • 1
  • James A. Martin
    • 2
  • Jason A. Schmidt
    • 1
  • L. Wes BurgerJr
    • 2
  • James W. PattersonJr
    • 3
  1. 1.United States Department of Agriculture, Wildlife ServicesNational Wildlife Research CenterSanduskyUSA
  2. 2.Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and AquacultureMississippi State UniversityMississippiUSA
  3. 3.United States Federal Aviation AdministrationWilliam J. Hughes Technical CenterAtlantic CityUSA

Personalised recommendations